Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'

IndonesiaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Indonesia's general privacy law lets data leave if the destination protects it about as well as Indonesia does, or you use strong safeguards, or the person agrees. Money and health are walled off. Banks, payment firms, insurers and non-bank lenders must run their systems on Indonesian soil unless the financial regulator says otherwise, and medical records must sit with a local storage provider.
The catch: The relaxed headline is true only until you touch banking, payments, insurance and other non-bank finance, electronic medical records, or public-sector systems. In those areas the servers themselves must be in Indonesia, and moving them out needs a written permission that the banking regulator may take three months to grant. The general privacy watchdog looks quiet; the financial regulators are not.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law follows the data, not the office. It covers any organisation, inside or outside Indonesia, whose handling of personal data has legal effects in Indonesia or affects people in Indonesia. There is no size or revenue cut-off to fall below. An organisation with no presence in the country is expected to name a representative in Indonesia, and any online service used by Indonesians is also expected to register with the digital ministry, which can order internet providers to block services that do not.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general yes, with homework. You must be able to show the destination protects personal data at a level at least equal to Indonesia's, or put binding safeguards in place, or get the person's clear agreement. That general answer stops at the door of finance, health and government. Banks, payment providers, insurers and other non-bank financial firms must keep their systems in Indonesian data centres and back-up centres, and can only go offshore with written regulator permission. Electronic medical records must be stored with a provider that has storage facilities inside Indonesia.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no published list of approved countries and no official standard contract to sign. Under the general law you assess the destination yourself, write down why it is safe enough, and keep that evidence. In finance the model is completely different: you need a real permission from the regulator before the systems move, and the banking regulator allows itself up to three months to answer once your paperwork is complete.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: It depends which rule you break. The privacy law's own watchdog is the weak spot: the law says a supervisory body must be set up by the President, and we found no government source showing it is staffed and issuing decisions as of 18 August 2026. Day to day the digital ministry handles complaints, registration and blocking. The financial regulators are a different story — the Financial Services Authority and the central bank are plainly working, and the Authority issued new binding rules as recently as July 2026.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and a ceiling and they collide. The hardest floor is health: a hospital or clinic must keep an electronic medical record for at least 25 years after the patient's last visit. Company and tax paperwork must also be kept for years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law, which says personal data must be erased once the purpose is finished, the retention period ends, or the person withdraws consent. Where they clash, the specific keeping rule wins, so a patient asking for deletion does not defeat the 25-year rule.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least three clocks, and the privacy one is not the fastest. Under the privacy law you have 72 hours to tell the affected people and the regulator about a personal data breach. If you are a bank, you must send the financial regulator a first alert within 24 hours of learning about a serious technology incident, and a full incident report within five working days. Other financial firms, such as insurers and lenders, have five working days. Miss the 24-hour one and the fact that you met the 72-hour one will not help you.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that ruin weekends. (1) In finance the wall is a permission, not a contract — moving systems abroad needs a regulator licence and the banking regulator gives itself up to three months to decide, so cloud migrations must be planned around that. (2) In health your cloud provider must have storage facilities in Indonesia, and the Ministry of Health can demand access to the whole medical record. (3) The 25-year medical record rule beats a patient's deletion request. (4) The privacy law carries prison sentences, not just fines, so directors are personally exposed. (5) A foreign company with no office still needs a named representative in Indonesia, and a consumer service that is not registered with the digital ministry can be blocked at the internet level.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: One dated change is certain: from 1 September 2026 trading in digital financial assets, including crypto, runs under the financial regulator's new rulebook, so anyone in that business should re-check where its servers and records must sit. Two things are still pending as far as we could verify: the detailed implementing regulation under the privacy law, and the presidential decision setting up the privacy watchdog itself. Both could land without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Banking — Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 11/POJK.03/2022 tentang Penyelenggaraan Teknologi Informasi oleh Bank Umum
Payments — Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 23/6/PBI/2021 tentang Penyedia Jasa Pembayaran
Insurance — Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 4/POJK.05/2021 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko dalam Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi oleh Lembaga Jasa Keuangan Nonbank
Health and social care — Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis
Government — Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik
Mapping and location — Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 tentang Informasi Geospasial

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026	IndonesiaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Waking up
In one paragraph	Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.	Indonesia's general privacy law lets data leave if the destination protects it about as well as Indonesia does, or you use strong safeguards, or the person agrees. Money and health are walled off. Banks, payment firms, insurers and non-bank lenders must run their systems on Indonesian soil unless the financial regulator says otherwise, and medical records must sit with a local storage provider.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.	The relaxed headline is true only until you touch banking, payments, insurance and other non-bank finance, electronic medical records, or public-sector systems. In those areas the servers themselves must be in Indonesia, and moving them out needs a written permission that the banking regulator may take three months to grant. The general privacy watchdog looks quiet; the financial regulators are not.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence	Yes. The privacy law follows the data, not the office. It covers any organisation, inside or outside Indonesia, whose handling of personal data has legal effects in Indonesia or affects people in Indonesia. There is no size or revenue cut-off to fall below. An organisation with no presence in the country is expected to name a representative in Indonesia, and any online service used by Indonesians is also expected to register with the digital ministry, which can order internet providers to block services that do not.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence	In general yes, with homework. You must be able to show the destination protects personal data at a level at least equal to Indonesia's, or put binding safeguards in place, or get the person's clear agreement. That general answer stops at the door of finance, health and government. Banks, payment providers, insurers and other non-bank financial firms must keep their systems in Indonesian data centres and back-up centres, and can only go offshore with written regulator permission. Electronic medical records must be stored with a provider that has storage facilities inside Indonesia.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence	There is no published list of approved countries and no official standard contract to sign. Under the general law you assess the destination yourself, write down why it is safe enough, and keep that evidence. In finance the model is completely different: you need a real permission from the regulator before the systems move, and the banking regulator allows itself up to three months to answer once your paperwork is complete.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence	It depends which rule you break. The privacy law's own watchdog is the weak spot: the law says a supervisory body must be set up by the President, and we found no government source showing it is staffed and issuing decisions as of 18 August 2026. Day to day the digital ministry handles complaints, registration and blocking. The financial regulators are a different story — the Financial Services Authority and the central bank are plainly working, and the Authority issued new binding rules as recently as July 2026.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence	There is a floor and a ceiling and they collide. The hardest floor is health: a hospital or clinic must keep an electronic medical record for at least 25 years after the patient's last visit. Company and tax paperwork must also be kept for years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law, which says personal data must be erased once the purpose is finished, the retention period ends, or the person withdraws consent. Where they clash, the specific keeping rule wins, so a patient asking for deletion does not defeat the 25-year rule.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence	Count at least three clocks, and the privacy one is not the fastest. Under the privacy law you have 72 hours to tell the affected people and the regulator about a personal data breach. If you are a bank, you must send the financial regulator a first alert within 24 hours of learning about a serious technology incident, and a full incident report within five working days. Other financial firms, such as insurers and lenders, have five working days. Miss the 24-hour one and the fact that you met the 72-hour one will not help you.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence	Five things that ruin weekends. (1) In finance the wall is a permission, not a contract — moving systems abroad needs a regulator licence and the banking regulator gives itself up to three months to decide, so cloud migrations must be planned around that. (2) In health your cloud provider must have storage facilities in Indonesia, and the Ministry of Health can demand access to the whole medical record. (3) The 25-year medical record rule beats a patient's deletion request. (4) The privacy law carries prison sentences, not just fines, so directors are personally exposed. (5) A foreign company with no office still needs a named representative in Indonesia, and a consumer service that is not registered with the digital ministry can be blocked at the internet level.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence	One dated change is certain: from 1 September 2026 trading in digital financial assets, including crypto, runs under the financial regulator's new rulebook, so anyone in that business should re-check where its servers and records must sit. Two things are still pending as far as we could verify: the detailed implementing regulation under the privacy law, and the presidential decision setting up the privacy watchdog itself. Both could land without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV) Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'	Banking — Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 11/POJK.03/2022 tentang Penyelenggaraan Teknologi Informasi oleh Bank Umum Payments — Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 23/6/PBI/2021 tentang Penyedia Jasa Pembayaran Insurance — Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 4/POJK.05/2021 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko dalam Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi oleh Lembaga Jasa Keuangan Nonbank Health and social care — Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis Government — Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik Mapping and location — Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 tentang Informasi Geospasial