Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

United StatesChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: In general the United States lets data go anywhere. There is no national privacy law and no permit is needed to move data abroad. Two things bite hard. Six countries are effectively off limits for large amounts of sensitive data, with prison sentences attached. And anything connected to government work must physically stay on American soil.
The catch: The open headline stops the moment you touch one of six areas: government contracting, police records, federal tax records, defence technical data, telecom licences, and bulk sensitive data flowing to China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba or Venezuela. Also note that the rule that actually binds you is almost always a state law or an industry regulator's rule, not a national privacy act. There isn't one.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. American rules reach a foreign company with no office in the country. California's privacy law applies to any for-profit business that 'does business in California' and crosses one of three thresholds, and physical presence is not one of them. The children's rule covers foreign websites aimed at American children. No state and no federal law requires you to appoint a local representative — a real difference from Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: It depends entirely on your industry, so the single national answer is misleading. For ordinary consumer or employee data, yes — send it anywhere, no paperwork. But six sectors have hard walls. Government contracting, police data, federal tax data and defence work require the data to physically stay in the United States. Telecom licences restrict which foreign staff may even look at records. And for anyone, sending large volumes of sensitive data to six named countries is now a crime.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: For ordinary data, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no destination approval list. The model is a blocklist and it is now populated: six countries are named. Before you move large volumes of sensitive data, your only real job is to work out whether a country of concern, or a company or person they control, could end up with access — including through a vendor, an investor or an employee.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Nobody, and everybody. There is no national privacy regulator. Instead the consumer protection regulator, the health department, the securities regulator, the communications regulator, the Justice Department, all fifty state attorneys general and one dedicated state privacy agency each enforce a slice. Almost all of them are visibly working right now. The one exception is the new national data transfer programme: it is staffed and issuing guidance but has published no enforcement action yet.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a strong floor and a weak but growing ceiling. Investment firms must keep some books for six years and most others for three, with the first two years easy to reach. Health providers keep their paperwork for six years. In the other direction, state privacy laws now force you to publish how long you keep each type of data and to stop keeping it longer than you said, and since April 2026 children's data may no longer be kept indefinitely. Where a keep-it rule and a delete-it rule collide, the keep-it rule wins: every state law carves out data you are required by law to retain.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count the clocks — there are at least seven, and they disagree. New York financial firms: 72 hours to the state regulator, and only 24 hours to report paying a ransom. Telecom carriers: seven working days to the police agencies and the communications regulator, and you may not warn customers until seven working days after that. Investment and finance firms: 30 days to affected customers. Health organisations: 60 days. Texas and many other states: 30 days to the state attorney general. Listed companies: four working days to disclose a material incident. The overlap, not any single deadline, is what people fail.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five that cost people their weekend. One: the national data transfer programme carries prison — up to twenty years for a deliberate breach. Two: Illinois lets individuals sue over fingerprints and face scans with fixed damages per person, no proof of harm needed, and that is where the largest privacy payouts happen. Three: the children's rule uses under 13, but several state laws use under 18, so a single age gate will not do. Four: government work means American soil, and police data allows only the United States, its territories, tribal lands and Canada. Five: a rule can be printed in the law book and still be unenforceable, because a court has blocked it.High confidence
What's about to change?: Four things in the next twelve months. The national critical infrastructure reporting rule should be finalised in late 2026, which will switch on a 72-hour incident clock and a 24-hour ransom-payment clock for a very wide range of businesses. California's rules on automated decision-making bite on 1 January 2027. The open banking rule is being rewritten after a court blocked it. And a federal privacy bill is moving in Congress, but it is only a bill and binds nobody.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy
Government — Publication 1075, Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies
Defence — Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clause 252.239-7010, Cloud Computing Services
Telecoms — National security agreement / letter of assurance conditioning a section 214 authorisation, reviewed by the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector

SlovakiaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Slovakia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. It runs on the European rulebook: send data abroad once you have the right paperwork. Three areas break that rule. Online gambling servers must sit on Slovak soil. The most sensitive government data must stay in a Slovak data centre. And anyone who takes aerial survey pictures of Slovakia must hand a copy to a defence ministry archive.
The catch: The easy answer stops being true in three places. First, online gambling: the operator's server must be physically in Slovakia, with no European Economic Area alternative. Second, government cloud: a public body handling the top security category of data may only use a service that stores and processes it inside Slovakia, in a data centre within reach of the Slovak state. Third, mapping: primary aerial survey imagery and published maps must be deposited with Slovak state archives, including one run by the Ministry of Defence. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, health and telecoms have no storage-location rule that we could find.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. A company with no office in Slovakia is still caught if it offers goods or services to people in Slovakia, or watches what they do online. There is no minimum size, headcount or revenue below which you are safe. If you have no office anywhere in the European Union, you must name a written representative inside the Union, and you can put that person in any member state where your customers are — it does not have to be Slovakia.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes — with the standard European paperwork. Nothing in Slovak law says personal data must be kept in Slovakia, and the law says so almost in as many words: it applies to a Slovak company whether it processes data inside or outside the country. But three specific activities do force data to stay. Online gambling operators must put their server in Slovakia. The top security tier of government data must stay in a Slovak data centre. And aerial survey imagery of Slovakia must be handed to a state archive.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Slovakia uses the European model, and it is an allowlist. Data may go to a country the European Commission has approved, or to anywhere else if you sign the Commission's standard contract, use approved group-wide rules, or fit one of a few narrow exceptions. The approved list is real and populated — it includes the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, Canada for commercial bodies, and the United States only for companies signed up to the transatlantic framework. Slovakia adds nothing of its own on top.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office for Personal Data Protection of the Slovak Republic. It is real, staffed and busy. In 2025 it issued 542 final fines totalling about 468,000 euros (roughly $510,000) and actually collected about 411,000 euros of that — a very high number of fines but a very small average, about 860 euros each. It has around 60 staff and got 20 extra posts in 2025. Cybersecurity incidents go to a separate body, the National Security Authority.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is no single retention rule. The general privacy rule is to delete when you no longer need the data. Against that sit long minimum-keeping duties: ten years for accounts and financial statements, and up to one hundred years after death for entries in the national health registers. Telecom companies keep far less than most people assume — Slovakia scrapped blanket call-record retention after its Constitutional Court struck it down, so operators only retain what a court order covers.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are two clocks and they are different. A personal data breach goes to the privacy authority within 72 hours of you becoming aware of it, and to the affected people without undue delay if the risk to them is high. A cybersecurity incident at a regulated organisation goes to the National Security Authority twice: a first warning within 24 hours, then a fuller report within 72 hours. If you are both, you file both, to two different bodies.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. Public bodies can be fined the full amount, with no discount. Mishandling personal data you got through your job is a crime, not just a fine. The age of consent for online services is 16, not 13. The rule on dead people's data changed today. And the gambling server rule has no European workaround.High confidence
What's about to change?: The whole national privacy law is being replaced by two new laws — one general, one for police and courts — but they are still bills and have no legal effect. Act 18/2018 was amended today, 18 August 2026, mostly to remove dead people from its scope. Public bodies face a bigger data-registration duty from 1 January 2027, and all cloud switching and data export fees across Europe must drop to zero by 12 January 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Online gaming — Zákon č. 30/2019 Z. z. o hazardných hrách a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov, § 14 ods. 21 a 22
Government — Metodické usmernenie č. 020775/2025/oSBATA z 11. 4. 2025 pre proces zaradenia cloudovej služby do katalógu vládnych cloudových služieb, vydané podľa § 24a zákona č. 95/2019 Z. z.
Mapping and location — Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 215/1995 Z. z. o geodézii a kartografii

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	United StatesChecked 18 August 2026	SlovakiaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	In general the United States lets data go anywhere. There is no national privacy law and no permit is needed to move data abroad. Two things bite hard. Six countries are effectively off limits for large amounts of sensitive data, with prison sentences attached. And anything connected to government work must physically stay on American soil.	Slovakia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. It runs on the European rulebook: send data abroad once you have the right paperwork. Three areas break that rule. Online gambling servers must sit on Slovak soil. The most sensitive government data must stay in a Slovak data centre. And anyone who takes aerial survey pictures of Slovakia must hand a copy to a defence ministry archive.
The catch	The open headline stops the moment you touch one of six areas: government contracting, police records, federal tax records, defence technical data, telecom licences, and bulk sensitive data flowing to China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba or Venezuela. Also note that the rule that actually binds you is almost always a state law or an industry regulator's rule, not a national privacy act. There isn't one.	The easy answer stops being true in three places. First, online gambling: the operator's server must be physically in Slovakia, with no European Economic Area alternative. Second, government cloud: a public body handling the top security category of data may only use a service that stores and processes it inside Slovakia, in a data centre within reach of the Slovak state. Third, mapping: primary aerial survey imagery and published maps must be deposited with Slovak state archives, including one run by the Ministry of Defence. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, health and telecoms have no storage-location rule that we could find.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. American rules reach a foreign company with no office in the country. California's privacy law applies to any for-profit business that 'does business in California' and crosses one of three thresholds, and physical presence is not one of them. The children's rule covers foreign websites aimed at American children. No state and no federal law requires you to appoint a local representative — a real difference from Europe.High confidence	Yes. A company with no office in Slovakia is still caught if it offers goods or services to people in Slovakia, or watches what they do online. There is no minimum size, headcount or revenue below which you are safe. If you have no office anywhere in the European Union, you must name a written representative inside the Union, and you can put that person in any member state where your customers are — it does not have to be Slovakia.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	It depends entirely on your industry, so the single national answer is misleading. For ordinary consumer or employee data, yes — send it anywhere, no paperwork. But six sectors have hard walls. Government contracting, police data, federal tax data and defence work require the data to physically stay in the United States. Telecom licences restrict which foreign staff may even look at records. And for anyone, sending large volumes of sensitive data to six named countries is now a crime.High confidence	In general, yes — with the standard European paperwork. Nothing in Slovak law says personal data must be kept in Slovakia, and the law says so almost in as many words: it applies to a Slovak company whether it processes data inside or outside the country. But three specific activities do force data to stay. Online gambling operators must put their server in Slovakia. The top security tier of government data must stay in a Slovak data centre. And aerial survey imagery of Slovakia must be handed to a state archive.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	For ordinary data, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no destination approval list. The model is a blocklist and it is now populated: six countries are named. Before you move large volumes of sensitive data, your only real job is to work out whether a country of concern, or a company or person they control, could end up with access — including through a vendor, an investor or an employee.High confidence	Slovakia uses the European model, and it is an allowlist. Data may go to a country the European Commission has approved, or to anywhere else if you sign the Commission's standard contract, use approved group-wide rules, or fit one of a few narrow exceptions. The approved list is real and populated — it includes the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, Canada for commercial bodies, and the United States only for companies signed up to the transatlantic framework. Slovakia adds nothing of its own on top.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	Nobody, and everybody. There is no national privacy regulator. Instead the consumer protection regulator, the health department, the securities regulator, the communications regulator, the Justice Department, all fifty state attorneys general and one dedicated state privacy agency each enforce a slice. Almost all of them are visibly working right now. The one exception is the new national data transfer programme: it is staffed and issuing guidance but has published no enforcement action yet.High confidence	The Office for Personal Data Protection of the Slovak Republic. It is real, staffed and busy. In 2025 it issued 542 final fines totalling about 468,000 euros (roughly $510,000) and actually collected about 411,000 euros of that — a very high number of fines but a very small average, about 860 euros each. It has around 60 staff and got 20 extra posts in 2025. Cybersecurity incidents go to a separate body, the National Security Authority.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a strong floor and a weak but growing ceiling. Investment firms must keep some books for six years and most others for three, with the first two years easy to reach. Health providers keep their paperwork for six years. In the other direction, state privacy laws now force you to publish how long you keep each type of data and to stop keeping it longer than you said, and since April 2026 children's data may no longer be kept indefinitely. Where a keep-it rule and a delete-it rule collide, the keep-it rule wins: every state law carves out data you are required by law to retain.High confidence	There is no single retention rule. The general privacy rule is to delete when you no longer need the data. Against that sit long minimum-keeping duties: ten years for accounts and financial statements, and up to one hundred years after death for entries in the national health registers. Telecom companies keep far less than most people assume — Slovakia scrapped blanket call-record retention after its Constitutional Court struck it down, so operators only retain what a court order covers.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count the clocks — there are at least seven, and they disagree. New York financial firms: 72 hours to the state regulator, and only 24 hours to report paying a ransom. Telecom carriers: seven working days to the police agencies and the communications regulator, and you may not warn customers until seven working days after that. Investment and finance firms: 30 days to affected customers. Health organisations: 60 days. Texas and many other states: 30 days to the state attorney general. Listed companies: four working days to disclose a material incident. The overlap, not any single deadline, is what people fail.High confidence	There are two clocks and they are different. A personal data breach goes to the privacy authority within 72 hours of you becoming aware of it, and to the affected people without undue delay if the risk to them is high. A cybersecurity incident at a regulated organisation goes to the National Security Authority twice: a first warning within 24 hours, then a fuller report within 72 hours. If you are both, you file both, to two different bodies.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five that cost people their weekend. One: the national data transfer programme carries prison — up to twenty years for a deliberate breach. Two: Illinois lets individuals sue over fingerprints and face scans with fixed damages per person, no proof of harm needed, and that is where the largest privacy payouts happen. Three: the children's rule uses under 13, but several state laws use under 18, so a single age gate will not do. Four: government work means American soil, and police data allows only the United States, its territories, tribal lands and Canada. Five: a rule can be printed in the law book and still be unenforceable, because a court has blocked it.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. Public bodies can be fined the full amount, with no discount. Mishandling personal data you got through your job is a crime, not just a fine. The age of consent for online services is 16, not 13. The rule on dead people's data changed today. And the gambling server rule has no European workaround.High confidence
What's about to change?	Four things in the next twelve months. The national critical infrastructure reporting rule should be finalised in late 2026, which will switch on a 72-hour incident clock and a 24-hour ransom-payment clock for a very wide range of businesses. California's rules on automated decision-making bite on 1 January 2027. The open banking rule is being rewritten after a court blocked it. And a federal privacy bill is moving in Congress, but it is only a bill and binds nobody.High confidence	The whole national privacy law is being replaced by two new laws — one general, one for police and courts — but they are still bills and have no legal effect. Act 18/2018 was amended today, 18 August 2026, mostly to remove dead people from its scope. Public bodies face a bigger data-registration duty from 1 January 2027, and all cloud switching and data export fees across Europe must drop to zero by 12 January 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Government — Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy Government — Publication 1075, Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies Defence — Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clause 252.239-7010, Cloud Computing Services Telecoms — National security agreement / letter of assurance conditioning a section 214 authorisation, reviewed by the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector	Online gaming — Zákon č. 30/2019 Z. z. o hazardných hrách a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov, § 14 ods. 21 a 22 Government — Metodické usmernenie č. 020775/2025/oSBATA z 11. 4. 2025 pre proces zaradenia cloudovej služby do katalógu vládnych cloudových služieb, vydané podľa § 24a zákona č. 95/2019 Z. z. Mapping and location — Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 215/1995 Z. z. o geodézii a kartografii