Compare countries
Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.
UkraineChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active
- In one paragraph
- Ukraine still runs its 2010 privacy law, not a European-style one. Personal data may leave the country only to a country the law treats as safe — that means Europe and the 50-odd countries that signed a Council of Europe data treaty. The United States is not on that list. Fines are tiny, but the human rights Commissioner really does inspect, and misusing data can be a crime.
- The catch
- The general picture changes completely once government is involved. If a Ukrainian state body is the organisation deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may process that data for it — a private or foreign supplier cannot. State systems, defence data and critical infrastructure also carry hard location rules, and several of the current permissions exist only because the country is under martial law.
- Does this apply to me?
- Probably not, if you have nothing in Ukraine. The 2010 law simply says it covers the processing of personal data by automated means or in structured paper files. It contains no clause reaching foreign companies that only sell into Ukraine from abroad, and it does not make you appoint a local representative. There is no size or revenue threshold either — a corner shop and a bank are treated the same.Medium confidence
- Can the data leave the country?
- Yes, but only to countries Ukraine already treats as safe. Those are the European Economic Area countries plus every country that has signed the Council of Europe's data protection treaty — roughly 55 states. The United States has signed neither, so routine transfers to American servers do not fit the safe-country route and need one of the narrow exceptions instead. Whole sectors then override this: government, defence and critical infrastructure are far tighter, and securities firms are unusually looser.High confidence
- What do I have to do to send it abroad?
- There is no form to file and no government permission to obtain. You either send the data to a country the law already treats as safe, or you rely on one of five narrow exceptions. Those are: the person's clear consent, necessity for a contract made for that person's benefit, protecting someone's life, an important public interest or a legal claim, and the sender giving guarantees that private and family life will not be interfered with. That last one is a catch-all that a lot of Ukrainian practice leans on.High confidence
- Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
- The Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights — the national ombudsman — is the data protection regulator, and it is genuinely working. It publishes a fresh inspection programme every three months; the one for July to September 2026 went up on 2 July 2026. It also publishes what it found, including a run of checks on the national electronic health system. The catch is the money: the regulator cannot fine anyone itself, it writes up a case and sends it to a court, and the maximum penalty is about $800.High confidence
- How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
- The floor comes from tax law. Companies must keep primary accounting documents and financial statements for 1,825 days — five years. Papers needed for transfer pricing checks run to 2,555 days, which is seven years. Everything else the tax authority may ask for runs 1,095 days, three years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law: you must delete personal data when the agreed storage period runs out, or when your relationship with the person ends, unless another law tells you to keep it.High confidence
- What happens when something goes wrong?
- This is the biggest surprise in Ukrainian law: if you lose personal data, there is no duty to tell the regulator and no duty to tell the people affected. The 2010 privacy law simply has no breach reporting clause. The only mandatory clocks sit in the cyber security regime, and they only bite if you run a state system or a piece of critical information infrastructure. Even there the law does not set the hours — it leaves the deadline to an order of the cyber agency.Medium confidence
- What's the trap?
- Five. (1) If a Ukrainian government body is the one deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may handle that data for it — a private or foreign supplier is not allowed at all. (2) Misusing personal data is a crime, not just a fine, and repeat offences carry up to five years in prison. (3) The fines are aimed at named individuals and sole traders, not at companies. (4) Posting anything that shows where Ukrainian troops are carries five to eight years in prison. (5) Martial law lets the government limit the constitutional right to privacy that the whole system rests on.High confidence
- What's about to change?
- The date to watch is not a new law — it is the end of the war. Martial law was extended again on 13 July 2026 and now runs from 2 August 2026 for 90 days, so to about 31 October 2026. Several of today's permissions exist only while it lasts, and they die six months after it ends. A European-style replacement privacy law has been discussed for years and has still not been passed, so nothing about the current regime should be planned around its arrival.High confidence
- Hardest industry wall
- Government — Закон України "Про захист персональних даних", частина третя статті 4
- Government — Закон України "Про захист інформації в інформаційно-комунікаційних системах"
- Defence — Закон України "Про хмарні послуги"
- Mapping and location — Кримінальний кодекс України, стаття 114-2
SerbiaChecked 18 August 2026
Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active
- In one paragraph
- Serbia copied Europe's privacy law almost word for word, so the duties feel familiar. Data can leave the country, and for most of Europe and a long list of other countries it can leave with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy — over a thousand inspections in 2025 — but it hands out warnings, not fines. The biggest fine any Serbian court imposed for a privacy breach in 2025 was about $950.
- The catch
- Two industries break the general picture. Online gambling operators must keep a copy of their whole player and transaction database physically inside Serbia. Banks, insurers and other financial firms cannot move any IT work abroad without telling the central bank 30 days ahead, proving the foreign country would let Serbian supervisors inspect on site, and risking a veto that forces them to cancel the contract.
- Does this apply to me?
- Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it offers goods or services to people in Serbia, or watches what they do in Serbia. There is no size or revenue threshold to hide behind. If you are caught this way you must appoint a written representative living or based in Serbia, unless your processing is occasional and low risk or you are a public body.High confidence
- Can the data leave the country?
- Yes, with paperwork — and often with none at all. Serbia treats a very long list of countries as automatically safe: every member of the Council of Europe's data protection treaty, which covers all of Europe plus Argentina, Mexico, Morocco, Mauritius, Senegal, Tunisia, Uruguay, Cape Verde and others, and separately every country the European Union has approved. Sending data there needs no permission and no contract. Everywhere else you sign the Commissioner's standard contract or use approved group rules. Only one industry has a hard wall: online gambling. Banking has a gate rather than a wall.High confidence
- What do I have to do to send it abroad?
- First check the destination. If it is on the safe list, you need nothing — no contract, no filing, no approval. If it is not, you sign the standard contract the Serbian regulator published in January 2020, or you get approved group-wide rules. If you want to use your own wording instead of the standard contract, the regulator must approve it and has 60 days to answer. As a last resort there are narrow exceptions such as the person's explicit consent.High confidence
- Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
- The Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, and it is genuinely working. In 2025 it finished 1,169 inspections, received 5,310 cases and issued 102 corrective orders. But it almost never fines. Of those 102 orders, 101 were warnings and one was a ban on processing. It asked the courts to punish only three organisations all year. Banks answer to the National Bank of Serbia instead, and it is fully active. A brand-new Office for Information Security exists on paper since October 2025 but we could find no sign it is running yet.High confidence
- How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
- There is no single national rule. The privacy law says keep data only as long as you need it, and each sector sets its own clock. Online gambling operators must keep every transaction for at least ten years. Phone and internet companies must keep who-called-whom records for exactly 12 months and then destroy them. Anyone selling a phone line must keep the customer's identity check for 12 months after the service ends. Financial firms must keep a live register of every outsourced service, including which countries the data sits in.High confidence
- What happens when something goes wrong?
- Count three clocks. Privacy breach: tell the Commissioner without delay and at the latest within 72 hours, and if you miss that you must explain why. Cyber incident: if you run an information system the state has classed as important, you have only 24 hours to report it. Then a third clock starts — updates every 24 hours for a serious incident, every three days for a middling one, and a final report within 15 days of the incident ending. Banks report cyber incidents to the central bank instead, promptly, with no fixed hour count.High confidence
- What's the trap?
- Five. (1) A child can consent for themselves at 15, not 13 or 16 — plan your age gates around 15. (2) A foreign court order or foreign tax authority demand for data is recognised in Serbia only if a treaty backs it, so handing data to an overseas authority on request can itself be unlawful. (3) Individuals, not just companies, can be prosecuted; the regulator has filed 49 criminal complaints since 2010. (4) Dozens of older Serbian laws still contradict the privacy law and were never fixed. (5) The government's official list of safe destination countries has not been touched since 2019 and still names a United States framework that died in 2020.High confidence
- What's about to change?
- One dated change and several unscheduled ones. From 1 January 2027 the ministry formally takes over supervising the new Office for Information Security, which should mean the office is actually up and running by then. A rewrite of the privacy law is being drafted by a special working group covering video surveillance, biometrics, genetic data and artificial intelligence, and a separate group is drafting an artificial intelligence law. Neither has been published as a bill, so neither is binding.High confidence
- Hardest industry wall
- Online gaming — Pravilnik o informaciono-komunikacionom sistemu za priređivanje posebnih igara na sreću preko sredstava elektronske komunikacije