Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

UkraineChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Ukraine still runs its 2010 privacy law, not a European-style one. Personal data may leave the country only to a country the law treats as safe — that means Europe and the 50-odd countries that signed a Council of Europe data treaty. The United States is not on that list. Fines are tiny, but the human rights Commissioner really does inspect, and misusing data can be a crime.
The catch: The general picture changes completely once government is involved. If a Ukrainian state body is the organisation deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may process that data for it — a private or foreign supplier cannot. State systems, defence data and critical infrastructure also carry hard location rules, and several of the current permissions exist only because the country is under martial law.
Does this apply to me?: Probably not, if you have nothing in Ukraine. The 2010 law simply says it covers the processing of personal data by automated means or in structured paper files. It contains no clause reaching foreign companies that only sell into Ukraine from abroad, and it does not make you appoint a local representative. There is no size or revenue threshold either — a corner shop and a bank are treated the same.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, but only to countries Ukraine already treats as safe. Those are the European Economic Area countries plus every country that has signed the Council of Europe's data protection treaty — roughly 55 states. The United States has signed neither, so routine transfers to American servers do not fit the safe-country route and need one of the narrow exceptions instead. Whole sectors then override this: government, defence and critical infrastructure are far tighter, and securities firms are unusually looser.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no form to file and no government permission to obtain. You either send the data to a country the law already treats as safe, or you rely on one of five narrow exceptions. Those are: the person's clear consent, necessity for a contract made for that person's benefit, protecting someone's life, an important public interest or a legal claim, and the sender giving guarantees that private and family life will not be interfered with. That last one is a catch-all that a lot of Ukrainian practice leans on.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights — the national ombudsman — is the data protection regulator, and it is genuinely working. It publishes a fresh inspection programme every three months; the one for July to September 2026 went up on 2 July 2026. It also publishes what it found, including a run of checks on the national electronic health system. The catch is the money: the regulator cannot fine anyone itself, it writes up a case and sends it to a court, and the maximum penalty is about $800.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor comes from tax law. Companies must keep primary accounting documents and financial statements for 1,825 days — five years. Papers needed for transfer pricing checks run to 2,555 days, which is seven years. Everything else the tax authority may ask for runs 1,095 days, three years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law: you must delete personal data when the agreed storage period runs out, or when your relationship with the person ends, unless another law tells you to keep it.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: This is the biggest surprise in Ukrainian law: if you lose personal data, there is no duty to tell the regulator and no duty to tell the people affected. The 2010 privacy law simply has no breach reporting clause. The only mandatory clocks sit in the cyber security regime, and they only bite if you run a state system or a piece of critical information infrastructure. Even there the law does not set the hours — it leaves the deadline to an order of the cyber agency.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) If a Ukrainian government body is the one deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may handle that data for it — a private or foreign supplier is not allowed at all. (2) Misusing personal data is a crime, not just a fine, and repeat offences carry up to five years in prison. (3) The fines are aimed at named individuals and sole traders, not at companies. (4) Posting anything that shows where Ukrainian troops are carries five to eight years in prison. (5) Martial law lets the government limit the constitutional right to privacy that the whole system rests on.High confidence
What's about to change?: The date to watch is not a new law — it is the end of the war. Martial law was extended again on 13 July 2026 and now runs from 2 August 2026 for 90 days, so to about 31 October 2026. Several of today's permissions exist only while it lasts, and they die six months after it ends. A European-style replacement privacy law has been discussed for years and has still not been passed, so nothing about the current regime should be planned around its arrival.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Закон України "Про захист персональних даних", частина третя статті 4
Government — Закон України "Про захист інформації в інформаційно-комунікаційних системах"
Defence — Закон України "Про хмарні послуги"
Mapping and location — Кримінальний кодекс України, стаття 114-2

United KingdomChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Data can leave the United Kingdom, but you need the right paperwork first. Sending it to Europe or to about fifteen other approved places needs nothing extra. Anywhere else needs a government-published contract and a risk check. No general law forces data to stay in Britain. The privacy regulator is busy and its fines are getting bigger.
The catch: The easy headline stops being true in three places. Telecoms operators must keep backup copies of key network information inside the United Kingdom. National Health Service patient records may only be sent to countries the United Kingdom has formally approved, which rules out the standard contract route. And government material classified SECRET or above cannot sit in public cloud at all. Everyone else can store data abroad with the right contract in place.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. British privacy law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it deliberately offers goods or services to people in the United Kingdom, or watches what they do online. There is no size or revenue floor to hide under. If you are caught and have no British office, you generally have to name a representative in the United Kingdom, unless you are a public body or your processing is rare and low risk.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. The United Kingdom has no general law forcing data to stay in the country. Send it to the European Economic Area or another approved country and you need nothing extra; send it anywhere else and you need an approved contract plus a written risk assessment. Three industries are stricter: telecoms, the health service and classified government work. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, education, online gambling and mapping have no location rule that we could find.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-list one. If the destination is on the government's approved list you may send data with no extra paperwork. If it is not, you must sign the government's own contract template and run a risk assessment first. The list is well populated: the whole European Economic Area plus Andorra, Argentina, the Faroe Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland and Uruguay, with partial cover for Canada, Japan and the United States.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Information Commissioner's Office, and it is very much working. It fined Capita fourteen million pounds (about $18 million) in October 2025, Reddit £14.47 million (about $18.5 million) in February 2026, and the owner of Imgur in the same month, and it issues smaller marketing fines almost monthly. Watch a quirk: a replacement body called the Information Commission legally exists but had no staff and did no work in its first financial year, so the old office is still the one that acts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is no single deletion deadline. The rule is that you keep personal data only as long as you actually need it, and you must be able to explain the period you chose. Pulling the other way are minimum keeping periods: company and tax records for six years, telecoms connection records for up to twelve months if the government serves a notice, and telecoms security data for thirteen months. Where a minimum and a maximum clash, the legal duty to keep wins and you keep the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least three clocks. Any organisation has 72 hours to tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach, and must tell the affected people if the risk to them is high. Telecoms and internet providers also have 72 hours under the electronic communications rules — that used to be 24 hours and quietly changed on 20 August 2025. Operators of essential services such as water, energy and transport have their own 72-hour clock to their own regulator.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) A child can consent at 13 here, not 16 — but the children's design code covers everyone under 18, and the regulator fined Reddit £14.47 million (about $18.5 million) for weak age checks. (2) Telecoms firms must keep some backup data physically in Britain. (3) Health service data can only go to approved countries, so the standard contract does not help you. (4) Misusing personal data can be a crime, not just a fine. (5) The government can secretly order a company to weaken its security, and Apple is fighting one of those orders right now.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Two things to watch in the next twelve months. A cyber security bill is going through Parliament and will widen incident reporting to data centres and managed service suppliers — it is not law yet, so do not plan as if it were. And the privacy regulator is due to be replaced by a new body called the Information Commission, but only once ministers lay the paperwork, which had not happened by mid-2026. The regulator is also writing a statutory code on artificial intelligence.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Telecoms — The Electronic Communications (Security Measures) Regulations 2022, with the Telecommunications Security Code of Practice 2026 (version 1.1)

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	UkraineChecked 18 August 2026	United KingdomChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Ukraine still runs its 2010 privacy law, not a European-style one. Personal data may leave the country only to a country the law treats as safe — that means Europe and the 50-odd countries that signed a Council of Europe data treaty. The United States is not on that list. Fines are tiny, but the human rights Commissioner really does inspect, and misusing data can be a crime.	Data can leave the United Kingdom, but you need the right paperwork first. Sending it to Europe or to about fifteen other approved places needs nothing extra. Anywhere else needs a government-published contract and a risk check. No general law forces data to stay in Britain. The privacy regulator is busy and its fines are getting bigger.
The catch	The general picture changes completely once government is involved. If a Ukrainian state body is the organisation deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may process that data for it — a private or foreign supplier cannot. State systems, defence data and critical infrastructure also carry hard location rules, and several of the current permissions exist only because the country is under martial law.	The easy headline stops being true in three places. Telecoms operators must keep backup copies of key network information inside the United Kingdom. National Health Service patient records may only be sent to countries the United Kingdom has formally approved, which rules out the standard contract route. And government material classified SECRET or above cannot sit in public cloud at all. Everyone else can store data abroad with the right contract in place.
Does this apply to me?	Probably not, if you have nothing in Ukraine. The 2010 law simply says it covers the processing of personal data by automated means or in structured paper files. It contains no clause reaching foreign companies that only sell into Ukraine from abroad, and it does not make you appoint a local representative. There is no size or revenue threshold either — a corner shop and a bank are treated the same.Medium confidence	Yes. British privacy law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it deliberately offers goods or services to people in the United Kingdom, or watches what they do online. There is no size or revenue floor to hide under. If you are caught and have no British office, you generally have to name a representative in the United Kingdom, unless you are a public body or your processing is rare and low risk.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, but only to countries Ukraine already treats as safe. Those are the European Economic Area countries plus every country that has signed the Council of Europe's data protection treaty — roughly 55 states. The United States has signed neither, so routine transfers to American servers do not fit the safe-country route and need one of the narrow exceptions instead. Whole sectors then override this: government, defence and critical infrastructure are far tighter, and securities firms are unusually looser.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. The United Kingdom has no general law forcing data to stay in the country. Send it to the European Economic Area or another approved country and you need nothing extra; send it anywhere else and you need an approved contract plus a written risk assessment. Three industries are stricter: telecoms, the health service and classified government work. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, education, online gambling and mapping have no location rule that we could find.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no form to file and no government permission to obtain. You either send the data to a country the law already treats as safe, or you rely on one of five narrow exceptions. Those are: the person's clear consent, necessity for a contract made for that person's benefit, protecting someone's life, an important public interest or a legal claim, and the sender giving guarantees that private and family life will not be interfered with. That last one is a catch-all that a lot of Ukrainian practice leans on.High confidence	The model is an approved-list one. If the destination is on the government's approved list you may send data with no extra paperwork. If it is not, you must sign the government's own contract template and run a risk assessment first. The list is well populated: the whole European Economic Area plus Andorra, Argentina, the Faroe Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland and Uruguay, with partial cover for Canada, Japan and the United States.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights — the national ombudsman — is the data protection regulator, and it is genuinely working. It publishes a fresh inspection programme every three months; the one for July to September 2026 went up on 2 July 2026. It also publishes what it found, including a run of checks on the national electronic health system. The catch is the money: the regulator cannot fine anyone itself, it writes up a case and sends it to a court, and the maximum penalty is about $800.High confidence	The Information Commissioner's Office, and it is very much working. It fined Capita fourteen million pounds (about $18 million) in October 2025, Reddit £14.47 million (about $18.5 million) in February 2026, and the owner of Imgur in the same month, and it issues smaller marketing fines almost monthly. Watch a quirk: a replacement body called the Information Commission legally exists but had no staff and did no work in its first financial year, so the old office is still the one that acts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	The floor comes from tax law. Companies must keep primary accounting documents and financial statements for 1,825 days — five years. Papers needed for transfer pricing checks run to 2,555 days, which is seven years. Everything else the tax authority may ask for runs 1,095 days, three years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law: you must delete personal data when the agreed storage period runs out, or when your relationship with the person ends, unless another law tells you to keep it.High confidence	There is no single deletion deadline. The rule is that you keep personal data only as long as you actually need it, and you must be able to explain the period you chose. Pulling the other way are minimum keeping periods: company and tax records for six years, telecoms connection records for up to twelve months if the government serves a notice, and telecoms security data for thirteen months. Where a minimum and a maximum clash, the legal duty to keep wins and you keep the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	This is the biggest surprise in Ukrainian law: if you lose personal data, there is no duty to tell the regulator and no duty to tell the people affected. The 2010 privacy law simply has no breach reporting clause. The only mandatory clocks sit in the cyber security regime, and they only bite if you run a state system or a piece of critical information infrastructure. Even there the law does not set the hours — it leaves the deadline to an order of the cyber agency.Medium confidence	Count at least three clocks. Any organisation has 72 hours to tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach, and must tell the affected people if the risk to them is high. Telecoms and internet providers also have 72 hours under the electronic communications rules — that used to be 24 hours and quietly changed on 20 August 2025. Operators of essential services such as water, energy and transport have their own 72-hour clock to their own regulator.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five. (1) If a Ukrainian government body is the one deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may handle that data for it — a private or foreign supplier is not allowed at all. (2) Misusing personal data is a crime, not just a fine, and repeat offences carry up to five years in prison. (3) The fines are aimed at named individuals and sole traders, not at companies. (4) Posting anything that shows where Ukrainian troops are carries five to eight years in prison. (5) Martial law lets the government limit the constitutional right to privacy that the whole system rests on.High confidence	Five. (1) A child can consent at 13 here, not 16 — but the children's design code covers everyone under 18, and the regulator fined Reddit £14.47 million (about $18.5 million) for weak age checks. (2) Telecoms firms must keep some backup data physically in Britain. (3) Health service data can only go to approved countries, so the standard contract does not help you. (4) Misusing personal data can be a crime, not just a fine. (5) The government can secretly order a company to weaken its security, and Apple is fighting one of those orders right now.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	The date to watch is not a new law — it is the end of the war. Martial law was extended again on 13 July 2026 and now runs from 2 August 2026 for 90 days, so to about 31 October 2026. Several of today's permissions exist only while it lasts, and they die six months after it ends. A European-style replacement privacy law has been discussed for years and has still not been passed, so nothing about the current regime should be planned around its arrival.High confidence	Two things to watch in the next twelve months. A cyber security bill is going through Parliament and will widen incident reporting to data centres and managed service suppliers — it is not law yet, so do not plan as if it were. And the privacy regulator is due to be replaced by a new body called the Information Commission, but only once ministers lay the paperwork, which had not happened by mid-2026. The regulator is also writing a statutory code on artificial intelligence.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Government — Закон України "Про захист персональних даних", частина третя статті 4 Government — Закон України "Про захист інформації в інформаційно-комунікаційних системах" Defence — Закон України "Про хмарні послуги" Mapping and location — Кримінальний кодекс України, стаття 114-2	Telecoms — The Electronic Communications (Security Measures) Regulations 2022, with the Telecommunications Security Code of Practice 2026 (version 1.1)