Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

UkraineChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Ukraine still runs its 2010 privacy law, not a European-style one. Personal data may leave the country only to a country the law treats as safe — that means Europe and the 50-odd countries that signed a Council of Europe data treaty. The United States is not on that list. Fines are tiny, but the human rights Commissioner really does inspect, and misusing data can be a crime.
The catch: The general picture changes completely once government is involved. If a Ukrainian state body is the organisation deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may process that data for it — a private or foreign supplier cannot. State systems, defence data and critical infrastructure also carry hard location rules, and several of the current permissions exist only because the country is under martial law.
Does this apply to me?: Probably not, if you have nothing in Ukraine. The 2010 law simply says it covers the processing of personal data by automated means or in structured paper files. It contains no clause reaching foreign companies that only sell into Ukraine from abroad, and it does not make you appoint a local representative. There is no size or revenue threshold either — a corner shop and a bank are treated the same.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, but only to countries Ukraine already treats as safe. Those are the European Economic Area countries plus every country that has signed the Council of Europe's data protection treaty — roughly 55 states. The United States has signed neither, so routine transfers to American servers do not fit the safe-country route and need one of the narrow exceptions instead. Whole sectors then override this: government, defence and critical infrastructure are far tighter, and securities firms are unusually looser.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no form to file and no government permission to obtain. You either send the data to a country the law already treats as safe, or you rely on one of five narrow exceptions. Those are: the person's clear consent, necessity for a contract made for that person's benefit, protecting someone's life, an important public interest or a legal claim, and the sender giving guarantees that private and family life will not be interfered with. That last one is a catch-all that a lot of Ukrainian practice leans on.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights — the national ombudsman — is the data protection regulator, and it is genuinely working. It publishes a fresh inspection programme every three months; the one for July to September 2026 went up on 2 July 2026. It also publishes what it found, including a run of checks on the national electronic health system. The catch is the money: the regulator cannot fine anyone itself, it writes up a case and sends it to a court, and the maximum penalty is about $800.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor comes from tax law. Companies must keep primary accounting documents and financial statements for 1,825 days — five years. Papers needed for transfer pricing checks run to 2,555 days, which is seven years. Everything else the tax authority may ask for runs 1,095 days, three years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law: you must delete personal data when the agreed storage period runs out, or when your relationship with the person ends, unless another law tells you to keep it.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: This is the biggest surprise in Ukrainian law: if you lose personal data, there is no duty to tell the regulator and no duty to tell the people affected. The 2010 privacy law simply has no breach reporting clause. The only mandatory clocks sit in the cyber security regime, and they only bite if you run a state system or a piece of critical information infrastructure. Even there the law does not set the hours — it leaves the deadline to an order of the cyber agency.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) If a Ukrainian government body is the one deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may handle that data for it — a private or foreign supplier is not allowed at all. (2) Misusing personal data is a crime, not just a fine, and repeat offences carry up to five years in prison. (3) The fines are aimed at named individuals and sole traders, not at companies. (4) Posting anything that shows where Ukrainian troops are carries five to eight years in prison. (5) Martial law lets the government limit the constitutional right to privacy that the whole system rests on.High confidence
What's about to change?: The date to watch is not a new law — it is the end of the war. Martial law was extended again on 13 July 2026 and now runs from 2 August 2026 for 90 days, so to about 31 October 2026. Several of today's permissions exist only while it lasts, and they die six months after it ends. A European-style replacement privacy law has been discussed for years and has still not been passed, so nothing about the current regime should be planned around its arrival.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Закон України "Про захист персональних даних", частина третя статті 4
Government — Закон України "Про захист інформації в інформаційно-комунікаційних системах"
Defence — Закон України "Про хмарні послуги"
Mapping and location — Кримінальний кодекс України, стаття 114-2

SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	UkraineChecked 18 August 2026	SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Ukraine still runs its 2010 privacy law, not a European-style one. Personal data may leave the country only to a country the law treats as safe — that means Europe and the 50-odd countries that signed a Council of Europe data treaty. The United States is not on that list. Fines are tiny, but the human rights Commissioner really does inspect, and misusing data can be a crime.	Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch	The general picture changes completely once government is involved. If a Ukrainian state body is the organisation deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may process that data for it — a private or foreign supplier cannot. State systems, defence data and critical infrastructure also carry hard location rules, and several of the current permissions exist only because the country is under martial law.	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?	Probably not, if you have nothing in Ukraine. The 2010 law simply says it covers the processing of personal data by automated means or in structured paper files. It contains no clause reaching foreign companies that only sell into Ukraine from abroad, and it does not make you appoint a local representative. There is no size or revenue threshold either — a corner shop and a bank are treated the same.Medium confidence	Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, but only to countries Ukraine already treats as safe. Those are the European Economic Area countries plus every country that has signed the Council of Europe's data protection treaty — roughly 55 states. The United States has signed neither, so routine transfers to American servers do not fit the safe-country route and need one of the narrow exceptions instead. Whole sectors then override this: government, defence and critical infrastructure are far tighter, and securities firms are unusually looser.High confidence	In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no form to file and no government permission to obtain. You either send the data to a country the law already treats as safe, or you rely on one of five narrow exceptions. Those are: the person's clear consent, necessity for a contract made for that person's benefit, protecting someone's life, an important public interest or a legal claim, and the sender giving guarantees that private and family life will not be interfered with. That last one is a catch-all that a lot of Ukrainian practice leans on.High confidence	The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights — the national ombudsman — is the data protection regulator, and it is genuinely working. It publishes a fresh inspection programme every three months; the one for July to September 2026 went up on 2 July 2026. It also publishes what it found, including a run of checks on the national electronic health system. The catch is the money: the regulator cannot fine anyone itself, it writes up a case and sends it to a court, and the maximum penalty is about $800.High confidence	The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	The floor comes from tax law. Companies must keep primary accounting documents and financial statements for 1,825 days — five years. Papers needed for transfer pricing checks run to 2,555 days, which is seven years. Everything else the tax authority may ask for runs 1,095 days, three years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law: you must delete personal data when the agreed storage period runs out, or when your relationship with the person ends, unless another law tells you to keep it.High confidence	Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	This is the biggest surprise in Ukrainian law: if you lose personal data, there is no duty to tell the regulator and no duty to tell the people affected. The 2010 privacy law simply has no breach reporting clause. The only mandatory clocks sit in the cyber security regime, and they only bite if you run a state system or a piece of critical information infrastructure. Even there the law does not set the hours — it leaves the deadline to an order of the cyber agency.Medium confidence	Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five. (1) If a Ukrainian government body is the one deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may handle that data for it — a private or foreign supplier is not allowed at all. (2) Misusing personal data is a crime, not just a fine, and repeat offences carry up to five years in prison. (3) The fines are aimed at named individuals and sole traders, not at companies. (4) Posting anything that shows where Ukrainian troops are carries five to eight years in prison. (5) Martial law lets the government limit the constitutional right to privacy that the whole system rests on.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?	The date to watch is not a new law — it is the end of the war. Martial law was extended again on 13 July 2026 and now runs from 2 August 2026 for 90 days, so to about 31 October 2026. Several of today's permissions exist only while it lasts, and they die six months after it ends. A European-style replacement privacy law has been discussed for years and has still not been passed, so nothing about the current regime should be planned around its arrival.High confidence	Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Government — Закон України "Про захист персональних даних", частина третя статті 4 Government — Закон України "Про захист інформації в інформаційно-комунікаційних системах" Defence — Закон України "Про хмарні послуги" Mapping and location — Кримінальний кодекс України, стаття 114-2	Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV) Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'