Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

TaiwanChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Taiwan lets personal data leave the country freely unless the ministry that regulates your industry has issued an order stopping it. There is no single privacy regulator: each industry ministry polices its own sector, and each has written its own security and breach-reporting rules. A big reform that would create one national regulator was passed in November 2025 but has never been switched on.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops being true the moment you touch health records, national health insurance data, banking or telecoms. Hospital data held in the cloud must physically sit in Taiwan. National health insurance records cannot be released to any organisation set up outside Taiwan at all. Banks need the financial regulator's permission before major consumer-finance systems go offshore, and must keep a backup of important customer data in Taiwan if they do.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Taiwan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Taiwan. The law says plainly that it also applies to organisations outside Taiwan that collect, process or use the personal data of Taiwanese people. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, and the law does not require you to appoint a local representative.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Taiwan's privacy law does not ask you to sign anything or get anyone's permission before sending personal data abroad. Instead it gives each industry ministry the power to order that data in its sector may not go to a particular country. But four sectors have real walls, and in two of them the wall is absolute.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Under the general law, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no adequacy finding, no consent form. The model is a blocklist run sector by sector: you may send data anywhere unless the ministry that supervises your industry has issued an order stopping it. Your real job is to find out which ministry supervises you and check whether it has issued one.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: There is no national privacy regulator in Taiwan today. A Personal Data Protection Commission is named in the law as the authority in charge, but that provision has never been switched on, the law creating the Commission is still only a bill, and what exists is a preparatory office that writes draft rules and cannot fine anyone. Enforcement is done instead by whichever ministry regulates your industry, plus city and county governments, and those bodies are genuinely active.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply, and the floors are set by other laws, not the privacy law. Accounting vouchers must be kept at least five years and account books and financial statements at least ten years. Medical records must be kept at least seven years, and for children until seven years after they turn eighteen; records from human trials must be kept forever. Going the other way, you must delete personal data once the purpose you collected it for has gone or the period you set has run out.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least three clocks, and the fastest is one hour. Telecoms companies and larger internet providers must tell the communications regulator within one hour of learning about a major personal data incident, then file a full report within seventy-two hours. Government bodies and designated critical infrastructure operators also have one hour, under the separate cyber security law. Financial firms get seventy-two hours. And under the privacy law itself you must tell the affected people once you have established the facts, with no fixed deadline attached.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that will cost someone their weekend. First, the official English text of the privacy law on the government's own website includes provisions that are not law yet, including the one naming the national regulator. Second, breaking a cross-border transfer order is a crime, not a fine — up to five years in prison. Third, there is no single regulator to ask; your duties depend on which ministry supervises you. Fourth, a bank asked for Taiwanese customer data by a foreign financial regulator must get Taiwan's regulator's permission first. Fifth, if you are sued, you have to prove you were not at fault.High confidence
What's about to change?: One thing has already landed and one is waiting on a switch. The National Health Insurance Data Management Act came into force on 10 August 2026, and it gives people a short window to opt their health records out of research use before silence counts as agreement. Separately, the big privacy reform passed in November 2025 is sitting on the shelf: the Cabinet can bring it into force whenever it likes, by a single order, with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — 醫療機構電子病歷製作及管理辦法 (Regulations Governing the Production and Management of Electronic Medical Records by Medical Institutions)
Health and social care — 全民健康保險資料管理條例 (National Health Insurance Data Management Act)
Banking — 金融機構作業委託他人處理內部作業制度及程序辦法 (Regulations Governing Internal Operating Systems and Procedures for the Outsourcing of Financial Institution Operation)

United StatesChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: In general the United States lets data go anywhere. There is no national privacy law and no permit is needed to move data abroad. Two things bite hard. Six countries are effectively off limits for large amounts of sensitive data, with prison sentences attached. And anything connected to government work must physically stay on American soil.
The catch: The open headline stops the moment you touch one of six areas: government contracting, police records, federal tax records, defence technical data, telecom licences, and bulk sensitive data flowing to China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba or Venezuela. Also note that the rule that actually binds you is almost always a state law or an industry regulator's rule, not a national privacy act. There isn't one.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. American rules reach a foreign company with no office in the country. California's privacy law applies to any for-profit business that 'does business in California' and crosses one of three thresholds, and physical presence is not one of them. The children's rule covers foreign websites aimed at American children. No state and no federal law requires you to appoint a local representative — a real difference from Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: It depends entirely on your industry, so the single national answer is misleading. For ordinary consumer or employee data, yes — send it anywhere, no paperwork. But six sectors have hard walls. Government contracting, police data, federal tax data and defence work require the data to physically stay in the United States. Telecom licences restrict which foreign staff may even look at records. And for anyone, sending large volumes of sensitive data to six named countries is now a crime.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: For ordinary data, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no destination approval list. The model is a blocklist and it is now populated: six countries are named. Before you move large volumes of sensitive data, your only real job is to work out whether a country of concern, or a company or person they control, could end up with access — including through a vendor, an investor or an employee.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Nobody, and everybody. There is no national privacy regulator. Instead the consumer protection regulator, the health department, the securities regulator, the communications regulator, the Justice Department, all fifty state attorneys general and one dedicated state privacy agency each enforce a slice. Almost all of them are visibly working right now. The one exception is the new national data transfer programme: it is staffed and issuing guidance but has published no enforcement action yet.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a strong floor and a weak but growing ceiling. Investment firms must keep some books for six years and most others for three, with the first two years easy to reach. Health providers keep their paperwork for six years. In the other direction, state privacy laws now force you to publish how long you keep each type of data and to stop keeping it longer than you said, and since April 2026 children's data may no longer be kept indefinitely. Where a keep-it rule and a delete-it rule collide, the keep-it rule wins: every state law carves out data you are required by law to retain.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count the clocks — there are at least seven, and they disagree. New York financial firms: 72 hours to the state regulator, and only 24 hours to report paying a ransom. Telecom carriers: seven working days to the police agencies and the communications regulator, and you may not warn customers until seven working days after that. Investment and finance firms: 30 days to affected customers. Health organisations: 60 days. Texas and many other states: 30 days to the state attorney general. Listed companies: four working days to disclose a material incident. The overlap, not any single deadline, is what people fail.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five that cost people their weekend. One: the national data transfer programme carries prison — up to twenty years for a deliberate breach. Two: Illinois lets individuals sue over fingerprints and face scans with fixed damages per person, no proof of harm needed, and that is where the largest privacy payouts happen. Three: the children's rule uses under 13, but several state laws use under 18, so a single age gate will not do. Four: government work means American soil, and police data allows only the United States, its territories, tribal lands and Canada. Five: a rule can be printed in the law book and still be unenforceable, because a court has blocked it.High confidence
What's about to change?: Four things in the next twelve months. The national critical infrastructure reporting rule should be finalised in late 2026, which will switch on a 72-hour incident clock and a 24-hour ransom-payment clock for a very wide range of businesses. California's rules on automated decision-making bite on 1 January 2027. The open banking rule is being rewritten after a court blocked it. And a federal privacy bill is moving in Congress, but it is only a bill and binds nobody.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy
Government — Publication 1075, Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies
Defence — Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clause 252.239-7010, Cloud Computing Services
Telecoms — National security agreement / letter of assurance conditioning a section 214 authorisation, reviewed by the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	TaiwanChecked 18 August 2026	United StatesChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Taiwan lets personal data leave the country freely unless the ministry that regulates your industry has issued an order stopping it. There is no single privacy regulator: each industry ministry polices its own sector, and each has written its own security and breach-reporting rules. A big reform that would create one national regulator was passed in November 2025 but has never been switched on.	In general the United States lets data go anywhere. There is no national privacy law and no permit is needed to move data abroad. Two things bite hard. Six countries are effectively off limits for large amounts of sensitive data, with prison sentences attached. And anything connected to government work must physically stay on American soil.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops being true the moment you touch health records, national health insurance data, banking or telecoms. Hospital data held in the cloud must physically sit in Taiwan. National health insurance records cannot be released to any organisation set up outside Taiwan at all. Banks need the financial regulator's permission before major consumer-finance systems go offshore, and must keep a backup of important customer data in Taiwan if they do.	The open headline stops the moment you touch one of six areas: government contracting, police records, federal tax records, defence technical data, telecom licences, and bulk sensitive data flowing to China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba or Venezuela. Also note that the rule that actually binds you is almost always a state law or an industry regulator's rule, not a national privacy act. There isn't one.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. Taiwan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Taiwan. The law says plainly that it also applies to organisations outside Taiwan that collect, process or use the personal data of Taiwanese people. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, and the law does not require you to appoint a local representative.High confidence	Yes. American rules reach a foreign company with no office in the country. California's privacy law applies to any for-profit business that 'does business in California' and crosses one of three thresholds, and physical presence is not one of them. The children's rule covers foreign websites aimed at American children. No state and no federal law requires you to appoint a local representative — a real difference from Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes. Taiwan's privacy law does not ask you to sign anything or get anyone's permission before sending personal data abroad. Instead it gives each industry ministry the power to order that data in its sector may not go to a particular country. But four sectors have real walls, and in two of them the wall is absolute.High confidence	It depends entirely on your industry, so the single national answer is misleading. For ordinary consumer or employee data, yes — send it anywhere, no paperwork. But six sectors have hard walls. Government contracting, police data, federal tax data and defence work require the data to physically stay in the United States. Telecom licences restrict which foreign staff may even look at records. And for anyone, sending large volumes of sensitive data to six named countries is now a crime.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Under the general law, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no adequacy finding, no consent form. The model is a blocklist run sector by sector: you may send data anywhere unless the ministry that supervises your industry has issued an order stopping it. Your real job is to find out which ministry supervises you and check whether it has issued one.High confidence	For ordinary data, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no destination approval list. The model is a blocklist and it is now populated: six countries are named. Before you move large volumes of sensitive data, your only real job is to work out whether a country of concern, or a company or person they control, could end up with access — including through a vendor, an investor or an employee.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	There is no national privacy regulator in Taiwan today. A Personal Data Protection Commission is named in the law as the authority in charge, but that provision has never been switched on, the law creating the Commission is still only a bill, and what exists is a preparatory office that writes draft rules and cannot fine anyone. Enforcement is done instead by whichever ministry regulates your industry, plus city and county governments, and those bodies are genuinely active.High confidence	Nobody, and everybody. There is no national privacy regulator. Instead the consumer protection regulator, the health department, the securities regulator, the communications regulator, the Justice Department, all fifty state attorneys general and one dedicated state privacy agency each enforce a slice. Almost all of them are visibly working right now. The one exception is the new national data transfer programme: it is staffed and issuing guidance but has published no enforcement action yet.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply, and the floors are set by other laws, not the privacy law. Accounting vouchers must be kept at least five years and account books and financial statements at least ten years. Medical records must be kept at least seven years, and for children until seven years after they turn eighteen; records from human trials must be kept forever. Going the other way, you must delete personal data once the purpose you collected it for has gone or the period you set has run out.High confidence	There is a strong floor and a weak but growing ceiling. Investment firms must keep some books for six years and most others for three, with the first two years easy to reach. Health providers keep their paperwork for six years. In the other direction, state privacy laws now force you to publish how long you keep each type of data and to stop keeping it longer than you said, and since April 2026 children's data may no longer be kept indefinitely. Where a keep-it rule and a delete-it rule collide, the keep-it rule wins: every state law carves out data you are required by law to retain.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count at least three clocks, and the fastest is one hour. Telecoms companies and larger internet providers must tell the communications regulator within one hour of learning about a major personal data incident, then file a full report within seventy-two hours. Government bodies and designated critical infrastructure operators also have one hour, under the separate cyber security law. Financial firms get seventy-two hours. And under the privacy law itself you must tell the affected people once you have established the facts, with no fixed deadline attached.High confidence	Count the clocks — there are at least seven, and they disagree. New York financial firms: 72 hours to the state regulator, and only 24 hours to report paying a ransom. Telecom carriers: seven working days to the police agencies and the communications regulator, and you may not warn customers until seven working days after that. Investment and finance firms: 30 days to affected customers. Health organisations: 60 days. Texas and many other states: 30 days to the state attorney general. Listed companies: four working days to disclose a material incident. The overlap, not any single deadline, is what people fail.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that will cost someone their weekend. First, the official English text of the privacy law on the government's own website includes provisions that are not law yet, including the one naming the national regulator. Second, breaking a cross-border transfer order is a crime, not a fine — up to five years in prison. Third, there is no single regulator to ask; your duties depend on which ministry supervises you. Fourth, a bank asked for Taiwanese customer data by a foreign financial regulator must get Taiwan's regulator's permission first. Fifth, if you are sued, you have to prove you were not at fault.High confidence	Five that cost people their weekend. One: the national data transfer programme carries prison — up to twenty years for a deliberate breach. Two: Illinois lets individuals sue over fingerprints and face scans with fixed damages per person, no proof of harm needed, and that is where the largest privacy payouts happen. Three: the children's rule uses under 13, but several state laws use under 18, so a single age gate will not do. Four: government work means American soil, and police data allows only the United States, its territories, tribal lands and Canada. Five: a rule can be printed in the law book and still be unenforceable, because a court has blocked it.High confidence
What's about to change?	One thing has already landed and one is waiting on a switch. The National Health Insurance Data Management Act came into force on 10 August 2026, and it gives people a short window to opt their health records out of research use before silence counts as agreement. Separately, the big privacy reform passed in November 2025 is sitting on the shelf: the Cabinet can bring it into force whenever it likes, by a single order, with no consultation.High confidence	Four things in the next twelve months. The national critical infrastructure reporting rule should be finalised in late 2026, which will switch on a 72-hour incident clock and a 24-hour ransom-payment clock for a very wide range of businesses. California's rules on automated decision-making bite on 1 January 2027. The open banking rule is being rewritten after a court blocked it. And a federal privacy bill is moving in Congress, but it is only a bill and binds nobody.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Health and social care — 醫療機構電子病歷製作及管理辦法 (Regulations Governing the Production and Management of Electronic Medical Records by Medical Institutions) Health and social care — 全民健康保險資料管理條例 (National Health Insurance Data Management Act) Banking — 金融機構作業委託他人處理內部作業制度及程序辦法 (Regulations Governing Internal Operating Systems and Procedures for the Outsourcing of Financial Institution Operation)	Government — Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy Government — Publication 1075, Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies Defence — Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clause 252.239-7010, Cloud Computing Services Telecoms — National security agreement / letter of assurance conditioning a section 214 authorisation, reviewed by the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector