Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

TurkeyChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Turkey lets personal data leave, but only after you build the paperwork yourself. The regulator has never declared a single country safe, so the approved-destination list is empty. Most companies use a government-published standard contract and must file it within five working days. The regulator is busy: it fined 876 organisations in 2025.
The catch: The general rule is 'paperwork, then you may send it'. That stops being true the moment you touch payments, banking, telecoms networks, public-sector systems or critical infrastructure. Payment and electronic money firms must keep their systems, their backups and their data inside Turkey, and may only use cloud providers the central bank has approved by name.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. A company with no office in Turkey is still caught, and it is caught harder than a local one. Any organisation based outside Turkey that decides why and how Turkish people's data is used must appoint a representative inside Turkey and sign up to the public register of data controllers before it starts processing. That representative has to be a company set up in Turkey or a Turkish citizen. Turkish small businesses can escape the register if they have fewer than 50 staff and a balance sheet under 100 million lira, but there is no such let-off for foreign companies.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: It depends entirely on your industry, which is why Turkey is rated 'sectoral'. Under the general privacy law data may leave, but only after you put an approved safeguard in place, because the regulator has not yet declared any country safe. In payments and banking the answer flips to no: systems, backups and data have to sit inside Turkey. Public bodies, critical infrastructure, telecoms networks and health records all carry their own extra restrictions on top.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destination list, and the list is empty. Nobody can rely on their country being blessed, so almost everyone uses one of the safeguards instead. The usual route is signing one of four standard contracts the regulator publishes, then telling the regulator within five working days of signing. Group companies can instead get binding corporate rules approved, and there is a permission route for bespoke undertakings, but that route almost always fails.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Authority, and it is fully up and running. In 2025 its board met 42 times, took 2,528 decisions, handled 12,512 complaints and fined 876 organisations a combined 352.5 million lira, which is roughly 8 million US dollars. It publishes named breach announcements most weeks. Financial, telecoms and insurance regulators enforce their own rules alongside it, and a new Cybersecurity Directorate has taken over the national cyber incident centre.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply, and the ceiling is unusual. Turkey does not give you a fixed number of months to delete by. Instead, once your reason for holding data runs out, you must erase it at your next scheduled clear-out, and any organisation on the public register has to publish a written retention and destruction policy setting those dates. The floor comes from ordinary commercial and tax law, which forces you to keep books and invoices for years.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are at least three clocks. The privacy one is 72 hours: from the moment you learn that data has been taken unlawfully, you have three days to tell the Personal Data Protection Board, and you must tell the affected people as soon as you reasonably can. If you miss the 72 hours you must still report and explain why you were late. Companies based abroad have to report too, if people in Turkey are affected.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things bite people. One: most fines are for paperwork, not privacy. Two thirds of the organisations fined in 2025 were punished for the public register, not for mishandling anyone's data. Two: the bespoke permission route for sending data abroad is close to a dead end, with 76 of 89 applications refused in 2025. Three: filing your standard contract invites inspection rather than closing the file. Four: your representative in Turkey must be Turkish. Five: no country is on the safe list, so there is no shortcut.High confidence
What's about to change?: Two dated items and one direction of travel. Retailers running loyalty cards have until 28 February 2027 to build a way of checking that the person at the till really owns the card, after the regulator extended the original deadline in July 2026. Public bodies are working to a July 2026 ruling on what they may publish online. And the government is pushing openly on data sovereignty, with the President chairing a cyber security meeting in May 2026 that treated data as a strategic asset.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Payments — Odeme ve Elektronik Para Kuruluslarinin Bilgi Sistemleri ile Odeme Hizmeti Saglayicilarinin Odeme Hizmetleri Alanindaki Veri Paylasim Servislerine Iliskin Teblig
Banking — Bankalarin Bilgi Sistemleri ve Elektronik Bankacilik Hizmetleri Hakkinda Yonetmelik
Government — 2019/12 sayili Bilgi ve Iletisim Guvenligi Tedbirleri Genelgesi ve Bilgi ve Iletisim Guvenligi Rehberi

SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	TurkeyChecked 18 August 2026	SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Turkey lets personal data leave, but only after you build the paperwork yourself. The regulator has never declared a single country safe, so the approved-destination list is empty. Most companies use a government-published standard contract and must file it within five working days. The regulator is busy: it fined 876 organisations in 2025.	Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch	The general rule is 'paperwork, then you may send it'. That stops being true the moment you touch payments, banking, telecoms networks, public-sector systems or critical infrastructure. Payment and electronic money firms must keep their systems, their backups and their data inside Turkey, and may only use cloud providers the central bank has approved by name.	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. A company with no office in Turkey is still caught, and it is caught harder than a local one. Any organisation based outside Turkey that decides why and how Turkish people's data is used must appoint a representative inside Turkey and sign up to the public register of data controllers before it starts processing. That representative has to be a company set up in Turkey or a Turkish citizen. Turkish small businesses can escape the register if they have fewer than 50 staff and a balance sheet under 100 million lira, but there is no such let-off for foreign companies.High confidence	Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	It depends entirely on your industry, which is why Turkey is rated 'sectoral'. Under the general privacy law data may leave, but only after you put an approved safeguard in place, because the regulator has not yet declared any country safe. In payments and banking the answer flips to no: systems, backups and data have to sit inside Turkey. Public bodies, critical infrastructure, telecoms networks and health records all carry their own extra restrictions on top.High confidence	In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is an approved-destination list, and the list is empty. Nobody can rely on their country being blessed, so almost everyone uses one of the safeguards instead. The usual route is signing one of four standard contracts the regulator publishes, then telling the regulator within five working days of signing. Group companies can instead get binding corporate rules approved, and there is a permission route for bespoke undertakings, but that route almost always fails.High confidence	The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Personal Data Protection Authority, and it is fully up and running. In 2025 its board met 42 times, took 2,528 decisions, handled 12,512 complaints and fined 876 organisations a combined 352.5 million lira, which is roughly 8 million US dollars. It publishes named breach announcements most weeks. Financial, telecoms and insurance regulators enforce their own rules alongside it, and a new Cybersecurity Directorate has taken over the national cyber incident centre.High confidence	The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply, and the ceiling is unusual. Turkey does not give you a fixed number of months to delete by. Instead, once your reason for holding data runs out, you must erase it at your next scheduled clear-out, and any organisation on the public register has to publish a written retention and destruction policy setting those dates. The floor comes from ordinary commercial and tax law, which forces you to keep books and invoices for years.Medium confidence	Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There are at least three clocks. The privacy one is 72 hours: from the moment you learn that data has been taken unlawfully, you have three days to tell the Personal Data Protection Board, and you must tell the affected people as soon as you reasonably can. If you miss the 72 hours you must still report and explain why you were late. Companies based abroad have to report too, if people in Turkey are affected.High confidence	Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things bite people. One: most fines are for paperwork, not privacy. Two thirds of the organisations fined in 2025 were punished for the public register, not for mishandling anyone's data. Two: the bespoke permission route for sending data abroad is close to a dead end, with 76 of 89 applications refused in 2025. Three: filing your standard contract invites inspection rather than closing the file. Four: your representative in Turkey must be Turkish. Five: no country is on the safe list, so there is no shortcut.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?	Two dated items and one direction of travel. Retailers running loyalty cards have until 28 February 2027 to build a way of checking that the person at the till really owns the card, after the regulator extended the original deadline in July 2026. Public bodies are working to a July 2026 ruling on what they may publish online. And the government is pushing openly on data sovereignty, with the President chairing a cyber security meeting in May 2026 that treated data as a strategic asset.High confidence	Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Payments — Odeme ve Elektronik Para Kuruluslarinin Bilgi Sistemleri ile Odeme Hizmeti Saglayicilarinin Odeme Hizmetleri Alanindaki Veri Paylasim Servislerine Iliskin Teblig Banking — Bankalarin Bilgi Sistemleri ve Elektronik Bankacilik Hizmetleri Hakkinda Yonetmelik Government — 2019/12 sayili Bilgi ve Iletisim Guvenligi Tedbirleri Genelgesi ve Bilgi ve Iletisim Guvenligi Rehberi	Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV) Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'