Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

ThailandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch: The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

RussiaChecked 18 August 2026

A copy must stayWork: Very highEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: If you collect personal data from people in Russia, the database you collect it into must sit inside Russia. You may then send a copy abroad, but only after you tell the regulator first and only to a country on its approved list. The United States is not on that list. Breaking the storage rule costs up to 6 million roubles, about $75,000, and leaking data can now put a person in prison.
The catch: The 'copy may go abroad' part disappears in several industries. Payments, electronic money, biometrics, telecoms, internet messaging services, government systems and detailed mapping are hard walls: the data must stay in Russia and no copy may leave. Since 1 September 2025 any company running 'significant' critical infrastructure — which includes most banks, telecoms operators and large energy and health providers — must also run Russian-registered software on those systems.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law reaches a foreign company with no office in Russia. It applies whenever you process the personal data of Russian citizens under a contract with them, under any other agreement with them, or on the basis of their consent. There is no size or revenue threshold. Almost every organisation must also file a notice with the regulator before it starts processing, and file a second, separate notice before any data leaves the country.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: A copy can leave, but the original must stay. When you collect personal data about Russian citizens, the database you record, store, update or retrieve it from has to be physically in Russia. Since 1 July 2025 the law says this as a flat ban on using databases outside Russia for those steps. After that, sending a copy abroad is a separate question with its own paperwork. Several industries are stricter still and allow no copy out at all.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Russia runs an approved-destinations list, so a transfer is banned unless the destination is on it. Before any data leaves you must send the regulator a separate written notice naming the countries, the data and the recipients, and you must first collect written assurances from the recipient about how it will protect the data. If the destination is on the approved list you may start as soon as the notice is sent. If it is not, you must wait, and in practice you will be refused. The United States is not on the list.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Roskomnadzor, the federal communications and media supervisor, is the data protection regulator. It is a long-established federal service, fully staffed, and it is still issuing binding orders — its most recent inspection check-list order was published on the state legal portal in December 2025. It is not the only enforcer. The security service runs the national cyber-attack reporting system, the technical regulator FSTEC sets security requirements for government and critical systems, and the Bank of Russia supervises banks and payment firms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they collide. Personal data must be destroyed within 30 days of the purpose being achieved, or within 30 days of consent being withdrawn, and within 10 working days if the processing was unlawful. Against that, staff records must be kept for 50 years, telecoms and messaging metadata for three years, and message content for up to six months. Where a statute sets a minimum, the minimum wins and you keep the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are at least three clocks and they run at once. You have 24 hours to tell the data regulator that personal data has leaked, and 72 hours to give it the results of your internal investigation. Separately, if the leak came from a computer attack you must report it to the security service's national attack-detection system. Banks and payment firms report to the Bank of Russia as well. Missing the 24-hour notice is itself a fine of up to 3 million roubles, about $37,000.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things catch people out. First, leaking data is now a crime, and doing it across a border carries up to eight years in prison. Second, repeat leaks are fined as a share of worldwide-style annual revenue, between 1 and 3 percent, with a floor of 20 million roubles, about $250,000. Third, staff files must be kept 50 years, which flatly conflicts with the 30-day deletion duty. Fourth, biometric data can only be handled by a Russian-controlled company using databases in Russia. Fifth, refusing to serve a customer because they will not give biometrics is itself a fine.High confidence
What's about to change?: One dated change is already fixed: from 1 September 2027, Moscow's public bodies move onto a single city technology platform, which will pull a large volume of citizen data into one place. Much more important are the switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The approved-country list can be cut by a single regulator order. Any transfer can be banned outright on security or economic grounds. And the rules for foreign use of Russian mapping technology have been written into the law but never issued.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 152-ФЗ «О персональных данных», статья 18 часть 5
All industries — Федеральный закон № 152-ФЗ, статья 21 часть 3.1 и статья 19 часть 12
All industries — Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации, статья 272.1
Payments — Федеральный закон от 27.06.2011 № 161-ФЗ «О национальной платежной системе», статьи 12 и 16
All industries — Федеральный закон от 29.12.2022 № 572-ФЗ об идентификации и аутентификации с использованием биометрических персональных данных
Telecoms — Федеральный закон от 07.07.2003 № 126-ФЗ «О связи», статья 64; Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 149-ФЗ, статья 10.1
Government — Приказ ФСТЭК России от 11.04.2025 № 117; Указ Президента РФ от 30.03.2022 № 166; Указ Президента РФ от 01.05.2022 № 250; Федеральный закон от 07.04.2025 № 58-ФЗ
Mapping and location — Федеральный закон от 30.12.2015 № 431-ФЗ «О геодезии, картографии и пространственных данных», статьи 23 и 24
Health and social care — Федеральный закон от 21.11.2011 № 323-ФЗ «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации», статья 13
Social media and online platforms — Федеральный закон от 01.07.2021 № 236-ФЗ «О деятельности иностранных лиц в информационно-телекоммуникационной сети «Интернет» на территории Российской Федерации»

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	ThailandChecked 18 August 2026	RussiaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active	A copy must stay Work: Very high Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.	If you collect personal data from people in Russia, the database you collect it into must sit inside Russia. You may then send a copy abroad, but only after you tell the regulator first and only to a country on its approved list. The United States is not on that list. Breaking the storage rule costs up to 6 million roubles, about $75,000, and leaking data can now put a person in prison.
The catch	The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.	The 'copy may go abroad' part disappears in several industries. Payments, electronic money, biometrics, telecoms, internet messaging services, government systems and detailed mapping are hard walls: the data must stay in Russia and no copy may leave. Since 1 September 2025 any company running 'significant' critical infrastructure — which includes most banks, telecoms operators and large energy and health providers — must also run Russian-registered software on those systems.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence	Yes. The law reaches a foreign company with no office in Russia. It applies whenever you process the personal data of Russian citizens under a contract with them, under any other agreement with them, or on the basis of their consent. There is no size or revenue threshold. Almost every organisation must also file a notice with the regulator before it starts processing, and file a second, separate notice before any data leaves the country.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence	A copy can leave, but the original must stay. When you collect personal data about Russian citizens, the database you record, store, update or retrieve it from has to be physically in Russia. Since 1 July 2025 the law says this as a flat ban on using databases outside Russia for those steps. After that, sending a copy abroad is a separate question with its own paperwork. Several industries are stricter still and allow no copy out at all.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence	Russia runs an approved-destinations list, so a transfer is banned unless the destination is on it. Before any data leaves you must send the regulator a separate written notice naming the countries, the data and the recipients, and you must first collect written assurances from the recipient about how it will protect the data. If the destination is on the approved list you may start as soon as the notice is sent. If it is not, you must wait, and in practice you will be refused. The United States is not on the list.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence	Roskomnadzor, the federal communications and media supervisor, is the data protection regulator. It is a long-established federal service, fully staffed, and it is still issuing binding orders — its most recent inspection check-list order was published on the state legal portal in December 2025. It is not the only enforcer. The security service runs the national cyber-attack reporting system, the technical regulator FSTEC sets security requirements for government and critical systems, and the Bank of Russia supervises banks and payment firms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence	Both directions apply and they collide. Personal data must be destroyed within 30 days of the purpose being achieved, or within 30 days of consent being withdrawn, and within 10 working days if the processing was unlawful. Against that, staff records must be kept for 50 years, telecoms and messaging metadata for three years, and message content for up to six months. Where a statute sets a minimum, the minimum wins and you keep the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence	There are at least three clocks and they run at once. You have 24 hours to tell the data regulator that personal data has leaked, and 72 hours to give it the results of your internal investigation. Separately, if the leak came from a computer attack you must report it to the security service's national attack-detection system. Banks and payment firms report to the Bank of Russia as well. Missing the 24-hour notice is itself a fine of up to 3 million roubles, about $37,000.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence	Five things catch people out. First, leaking data is now a crime, and doing it across a border carries up to eight years in prison. Second, repeat leaks are fined as a share of worldwide-style annual revenue, between 1 and 3 percent, with a floor of 20 million roubles, about $250,000. Third, staff files must be kept 50 years, which flatly conflicts with the 30-day deletion duty. Fourth, biometric data can only be handled by a Russian-controlled company using databases in Russia. Fifth, refusing to serve a customer because they will not give biometrics is itself a fine.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence	One dated change is already fixed: from 1 September 2027, Moscow's public bodies move onto a single city technology platform, which will pull a large volume of citizen data into one place. Much more important are the switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The approved-country list can be cut by a single regulator order. Any transfer can be banned outright on security or economic grounds. And the rules for foreign use of Russian mapping technology have been written into the law but never issued.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	All industries — Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 152-ФЗ «О персональных данных», статья 18 часть 5 All industries — Федеральный закон № 152-ФЗ, статья 21 часть 3.1 и статья 19 часть 12 All industries — Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации, статья 272.1 Payments — Федеральный закон от 27.06.2011 № 161-ФЗ «О национальной платежной системе», статьи 12 и 16 All industries — Федеральный закон от 29.12.2022 № 572-ФЗ об идентификации и аутентификации с использованием биометрических персональных данных Telecoms — Федеральный закон от 07.07.2003 № 126-ФЗ «О связи», статья 64; Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 149-ФЗ, статья 10.1 Government — Приказ ФСТЭК России от 11.04.2025 № 117; Указ Президента РФ от 30.03.2022 № 166; Указ Президента РФ от 01.05.2022 № 250; Федеральный закон от 07.04.2025 № 58-ФЗ Mapping and location — Федеральный закон от 30.12.2015 № 431-ФЗ «О геодезии, картографии и пространственных данных», статьи 23 и 24 Health and social care — Федеральный закон от 21.11.2011 № 323-ФЗ «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации», статья 13 Social media and online platforms — Федеральный закон от 01.07.2021 № 236-ФЗ «О деятельности иностранных лиц в информационно-телекоммуникационной сети «Интернет» на территории Российской Федерации»