Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

ThailandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch: The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

PolandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch: True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	ThailandChecked 18 August 2026	PolandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.	Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch	The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.	True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence	Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence	The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence	There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence	Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence	Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	None found.