Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

ThailandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch: The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

CanadaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Canada lets data leave the country. There is no approved-country list and no banned-country list. You stay responsible for the data wherever it goes, and you must tell people it may be handled abroad. The catch is that Canada is really ten jurisdictions at once, and several of them add hard storage rules on top of the national one.
The catch: The relaxed national answer stops being true the moment you touch four things: personal information about people in Quebec, a Nova Scotia public body or its suppliers, federal government data rated Protected B or higher, or a federally regulated bank. Add to that a brand-new cyber security law that says records about critical systems in banking, telecoms, energy and transport must be kept in Canada. In those places Canada is genuinely restrictive.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Canada's national privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office here if it handles personal information about people in Canada as part of doing business. There is no revenue or headcount threshold that lets you out. You do not normally need a local representative, but payment companies are an exception: a payment firm based abroad that aims its service at people in Canada must register with the central bank and name an agent inside Canada to receive official notices.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes, and with no government permission. Canada's national law does not restrict where personal data is stored or processed. But the headline is wrong for at least six groups. Quebec makes you do a written risk assessment first — and that applies even to sending data to Ontario. Nova Scotia public bodies and their suppliers must keep the data in Canada. Federal government data rated Protected B or higher must sit in Canada. Banks must keep a full copy of their records on servers in Canada. And under the new cyber security law, records about critical systems must be kept in Canada.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: At the national level there is no list at all — no approved countries, no banned countries, no government form to file. What you must do instead is stay accountable: put a contract or similar protection in place with whoever handles the data for you, and tell people plainly that their information may be processed in another country and could be seen by foreign courts, police or security agencies. Quebec is different and stricter: there you must complete a written privacy risk assessment before the data moves, and sign a written agreement.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Canada has many regulators and they are all real, staffed and issuing decisions. The national one, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, published findings against OpenAI, X, Bell and WestJet in the first half of 2026 alone. But it cannot fine anyone — it makes findings and recommendations, and a case has to go to the Federal Court for money. Quebec's regulator can fine, and has blocked a national grocery chain from switching on a face-recognition system. Banking, payments and cyber security each have their own separate supervisor.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor and the ceiling pull in opposite directions. Tax law says keep your business records for six years after the tax year they relate to, and keep them at a place of business in Canada unless the tax authority agrees to somewhere else. Privacy law says the opposite: delete personal information once the reason you collected it has gone. Where the two clash, the duty to keep wins — but only for the specific records the law names, and only for as long as it names.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least four clocks and they do not agree. The national privacy law gives no fixed number of hours — you report 'as soon as feasible', which in practice means days, not weeks. Payment firms get 48 hours to tell the central bank about a serious incident. Critical infrastructure operators will get no more than 72 hours to tell the national cyber agency, then must tell their own regulator immediately after. Health and provincial rules add more. The overlap is where people get caught: one incident, several reports, several deadlines.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in any summary. Quebec's cross-border rule catches you sending data to Ontario, not just abroad. Quebec also makes you tell its regulator 60 days before you switch on any face or fingerprint system, and it has already blocked a big grocery chain from doing so. British Columbia repealed its keep-it-in-Canada rule in 2021, so trackers that still show it are wrong. Nova Scotia's Canada-only rule reaches private suppliers, with fines up to half a million dollars. And your tax records have to sit at a place of business in Canada.High confidence
What's about to change?: One big bill and one big law already passed. The bill is Canada's third attempt to replace its 25-year-old privacy law: it would force a written risk assessment before any personal data goes outside Canada, give people a right to have data deleted, treat everyone under 18 as sensitive, and set up a new commissioner. It was only introduced in June 2026 and is not law — do not plan around it as if it were. The law already passed is the cyber security act, which switches on in stages over the coming year.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Personal Information International Disclosure Protection Act
Government — Direction for Electronic Data Residency (ITPIN 2017-02), with the Policy on Service and Digital
Banking — Guideline B-10 Third-Party Risk Management, read with Bank Act section 245 and the equivalent provisions of the Insurance Companies Act and Trust and Loan Companies Act
All industries — Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act, enacted by the Cyber Security Act (Bill C-8)

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	ThailandChecked 18 August 2026	CanadaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.	Canada lets data leave the country. There is no approved-country list and no banned-country list. You stay responsible for the data wherever it goes, and you must tell people it may be handled abroad. The catch is that Canada is really ten jurisdictions at once, and several of them add hard storage rules on top of the national one.
The catch	The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.	The relaxed national answer stops being true the moment you touch four things: personal information about people in Quebec, a Nova Scotia public body or its suppliers, federal government data rated Protected B or higher, or a federally regulated bank. Add to that a brand-new cyber security law that says records about critical systems in banking, telecoms, energy and transport must be kept in Canada. In those places Canada is genuinely restrictive.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence	Yes. Canada's national privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office here if it handles personal information about people in Canada as part of doing business. There is no revenue or headcount threshold that lets you out. You do not normally need a local representative, but payment companies are an exception: a payment firm based abroad that aims its service at people in Canada must register with the central bank and name an agent inside Canada to receive official notices.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence	In general, yes, and with no government permission. Canada's national law does not restrict where personal data is stored or processed. But the headline is wrong for at least six groups. Quebec makes you do a written risk assessment first — and that applies even to sending data to Ontario. Nova Scotia public bodies and their suppliers must keep the data in Canada. Federal government data rated Protected B or higher must sit in Canada. Banks must keep a full copy of their records on servers in Canada. And under the new cyber security law, records about critical systems must be kept in Canada.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence	At the national level there is no list at all — no approved countries, no banned countries, no government form to file. What you must do instead is stay accountable: put a contract or similar protection in place with whoever handles the data for you, and tell people plainly that their information may be processed in another country and could be seen by foreign courts, police or security agencies. Quebec is different and stricter: there you must complete a written privacy risk assessment before the data moves, and sign a written agreement.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence	Canada has many regulators and they are all real, staffed and issuing decisions. The national one, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, published findings against OpenAI, X, Bell and WestJet in the first half of 2026 alone. But it cannot fine anyone — it makes findings and recommendations, and a case has to go to the Federal Court for money. Quebec's regulator can fine, and has blocked a national grocery chain from switching on a face-recognition system. Banking, payments and cyber security each have their own separate supervisor.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence	The floor and the ceiling pull in opposite directions. Tax law says keep your business records for six years after the tax year they relate to, and keep them at a place of business in Canada unless the tax authority agrees to somewhere else. Privacy law says the opposite: delete personal information once the reason you collected it has gone. Where the two clash, the duty to keep wins — but only for the specific records the law names, and only for as long as it names.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence	Count at least four clocks and they do not agree. The national privacy law gives no fixed number of hours — you report 'as soon as feasible', which in practice means days, not weeks. Payment firms get 48 hours to tell the central bank about a serious incident. Critical infrastructure operators will get no more than 72 hours to tell the national cyber agency, then must tell their own regulator immediately after. Health and provincial rules add more. The overlap is where people get caught: one incident, several reports, several deadlines.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence	Five things that are not in any summary. Quebec's cross-border rule catches you sending data to Ontario, not just abroad. Quebec also makes you tell its regulator 60 days before you switch on any face or fingerprint system, and it has already blocked a big grocery chain from doing so. British Columbia repealed its keep-it-in-Canada rule in 2021, so trackers that still show it are wrong. Nova Scotia's Canada-only rule reaches private suppliers, with fines up to half a million dollars. And your tax records have to sit at a place of business in Canada.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence	One big bill and one big law already passed. The bill is Canada's third attempt to replace its 25-year-old privacy law: it would force a written risk assessment before any personal data goes outside Canada, give people a right to have data deleted, treat everyone under 18 as sensitive, and set up a new commissioner. It was only introduced in June 2026 and is not law — do not plan around it as if it were. The law already passed is the cyber security act, which switches on in stages over the coming year.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Government — Personal Information International Disclosure Protection Act Government — Direction for Electronic Data Residency (ITPIN 2017-02), with the Policy on Service and Digital Banking — Guideline B-10 Third-Party Risk Management, read with Bank Act section 245 and the equivalent provisions of the Insurance Companies Act and Trust and Loan Companies Act All industries — Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act, enacted by the Cyber Security Act (Bill C-8)