Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

SingaporeChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Singapore lets personal data leave the country, and we found no industry that is forced to keep data on Singaporean soil. What you must do instead is make the person receiving the data legally bound to protect it as well as Singapore law does. There is no government list of approved or banned countries and no permission to apply for. The privacy regulator is real, staffed, and publishes decisions.
The catch: The open headline is about location, not about paperwork or secrecy. Banks must follow a separate rulebook before customer information goes to any outside supplier, and that rulebook was completely replaced on 11 December 2024. Company accounting records held abroad must still have summaries sent back into Singapore. And a stricter rule in any other Singapore law beats the privacy law outright.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company that has never set foot in Singapore. It defines an organisation as any body of persons whether or not formed under Singapore law and whether or not it has an office here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, and no in-country agent to appoint. You must name at least one person responsible for compliance and publish their contact details, but that person may sit anywhere in the world.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, it can leave, and this is the unusual part: we searched banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government, education, gaming, mapping and defence and found no rule anywhere that forces personal data to stay in Singapore. What the law asks for is protection, not location. Before data goes abroad you must make sure the recipient is under a legal duty to protect it to a standard comparable to Singapore's.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no list of approved countries, no list of banned countries, and no form to file. You need one thing: the recipient must be under a legally enforceable duty to protect the data to a comparable standard. Most companies do this with a contract they draft themselves, because Singapore does not publish a template. Group companies can use internal group-wide rules instead, and since 2 March 2026 a recipient holding a Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules certificate also counts.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Commission, which is the same body as the media and telecoms regulator wearing a different hat. It is genuinely working: it publishes batches of decisions and settlements several times a year, with the most recent batches in 2026. Financial firms answer to the central bank as well, and anyone running critical national systems answers to the Cyber Security Agency. All three are staffed and issuing instruments.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply. The ceiling: you must stop keeping personal data once the purpose is finished and there is no legal or business reason to hold it, and there is no fixed number of days attached to that. The floor: company accounting records must be kept for at least five years, tax records for at least five years from the relevant year of assessment, and employment records for the latest two years, kept one year past the date an employee leaves.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are at least three separate clocks and they run at very different speeds. Privacy: once you have decided a breach is serious enough to report, you have three calendar days to tell the regulator. Finance: a bank or other supervised firm has ONE HOUR to tell the central bank about a severe incident, then fourteen days for a root cause report. Critical national systems: TWO HOURS by phone to the national cyber agency, then a fuller report within seventy-two hours.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: an individual employee can go to prison for two years for leaking personal data, and that is separate from any fine on the company. Two: any other Singapore law beats the privacy law, so banking secrecy and similar duties override it. Three: every organisation must stop using national identity card numbers as passwords by 31 December 2026. Four: the data portability right is printed in the Act but has never been switched on. Five: the banking outsourcing rulebook everyone cites was cancelled in December 2024.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three real things are in flight. A new health law has been passed but not started, and it will add its own breach reporting clocks for anyone handling health records. A draft law for big data centres and big cloud providers went out for public comment on 1 July 2026 and closed on 22 July 2026; it is not law yet. And every organisation must stop using national identity numbers as passwords by 31 December 2026. Separately, watch two switches the government can flip with no consultation at all.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — Companies Act 1967, section 199

MexicoChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Mexico's general privacy law does not care where you store data. There is no approved-country list, no standard contract to sign and no permission to ask for. You need the right wording in your privacy notice and, usually, the person's consent. The rules that actually pin data to Mexico live in banking, money-laundering and tax law, not in the privacy law.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you are a bank, a stockbroker, a crowdfunding platform, an insurer or a phone company. Banks need written permission from the banking regulator before any processing happens abroad. Separately, anti-money-laundering law and tax law require many ordinary businesses to keep their records at a Mexican address for ten and five years. Those rules bind companies that have never read a privacy law.
Does this apply to me?: Probably yes, but Mexico is unusually vague about it. The privacy law says only that it applies across Mexican territory. It does not spell out when it reaches a company based abroad. The old rulebook did say the law caught a foreign company that used equipment or systems located in Mexico, and let that company appoint a local representative instead of opening an office. That old rulebook belonged to a law that was scrapped in March 2025, so its status today is genuinely unclear. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes, and with very little paperwork. Mexico has no list of approved countries and no list of banned ones. Sending data to a company abroad is treated exactly like sending it to a company down the road: say so in your privacy notice, get the person's consent unless one of seven exceptions applies, and pass the privacy notice on to whoever receives the data. Handing data to your own supplier who only follows your instructions is not even counted as a transfer. Five sectors override this, and in three of them the override is severe.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing needs approval and no list exists in either direction. The model is simply unrestricted: any destination is allowed. What you need is a privacy notice that names the transfer and carries a clause where the person accepts or refuses it, plus that person's consent unless one of seven legal exceptions covers you. Because there is no list to populate, the government cannot make this stricter by adding a country. It would take a new law or a new regulation.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Mexico abolished its independent privacy regulator. The National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information and Data Protection was wound up in March 2025 and its staff, files and cases were moved into a government ministry, the Anti-Corruption and Good Government Ministry. So the referee is now part of the government rather than independent of it. The ministry is staffed, but the law says the detailed procedure for complaints, inspections and fines will be set out in a regulation, and that regulation still has not been published. Financial regulators, by contrast, are visibly active and update their rulebooks almost monthly.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is no single retention period. The privacy law says delete data once it is no longer needed, after a blocking period equal to the time limit for suing over the relationship. One hard ceiling is written into the law: information about someone breaking a contract must be erased six years after the default. The floors are longer and come from other laws. Tax records must be kept five years and their supporting documents must be available at your Mexican tax address. Anti-money-laundering records must be kept ten years at an address you register with the Finance Ministry. Phone companies keep call and location records for two years. Where a floor and a ceiling clash, the floor wins, because the privacy law lets you keep data to meet a legal duty.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are at least three clocks and they do not agree. Under the general privacy law you must tell the affected people immediately if a breach significantly harms their money or their reputation, and there is no duty to tell the regulator at all. Banks face a much tighter set: tell the banking regulator immediately, tell affected customers within forty-eight hours, file a full report within five working days, and send a remediation plan within fifteen working days of the incident ending. Phone companies must hand requested records to the authorities within twenty-four hours and keep a team available every hour of every day. Mexico has no general cyber-incident reporting law that catches everyone.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things catch people out. Every private business in Mexico is now legally required to ask customers for their national population ID number. Anti-money-laundering rules force many ordinary businesses to keep ten years of records at a Mexican address, which quietly rules out a pure foreign cloud setup. Mishandling data can put a person in prison, not just cost a company money. Banks must get written permission before any processing happens abroad, and that includes routine cloud hosting. And the rulebook the privacy law keeps pointing at does not exist.High confidence
What's about to change?: The biggest thing coming is a regulation that is already overdue. The privacy law repeatedly says a rulebook will set the deadlines for complaints, inspections and fines, and the government missed its own June 2025 deadline to publish it. When it lands it could change how enforcement works overnight, with no consultation. Health law was changed in January 2026 to put telehealth on a statutory footing, and the biometric national ID is still being rolled out. The dangerous powers are the ones the government already holds rather than any bill in parliament.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Payments — Disposiciones de carácter general aplicables a las instituciones de tecnología financiera, artículos 85 a 87
Finance — Ley Federal para la Prevención e Identificación de Operaciones con Recursos de Procedencia Ilícita, artículos 15 y 18
All industries — Código Fiscal de la Federación, artículos 28 y 30
Telecoms — Ley en Materia de Telecomunicaciones y Radiodifusión, artículo 183

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	SingaporeChecked 18 August 2026	MexicoChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Waking up
In one paragraph	Singapore lets personal data leave the country, and we found no industry that is forced to keep data on Singaporean soil. What you must do instead is make the person receiving the data legally bound to protect it as well as Singapore law does. There is no government list of approved or banned countries and no permission to apply for. The privacy regulator is real, staffed, and publishes decisions.	Mexico's general privacy law does not care where you store data. There is no approved-country list, no standard contract to sign and no permission to ask for. You need the right wording in your privacy notice and, usually, the person's consent. The rules that actually pin data to Mexico live in banking, money-laundering and tax law, not in the privacy law.
The catch	The open headline is about location, not about paperwork or secrecy. Banks must follow a separate rulebook before customer information goes to any outside supplier, and that rulebook was completely replaced on 11 December 2024. Company accounting records held abroad must still have summaries sent back into Singapore. And a stricter rule in any other Singapore law beats the privacy law outright.	The relaxed headline stops the moment you are a bank, a stockbroker, a crowdfunding platform, an insurer or a phone company. Banks need written permission from the banking regulator before any processing happens abroad. Separately, anti-money-laundering law and tax law require many ordinary businesses to keep their records at a Mexican address for ten and five years. Those rules bind companies that have never read a privacy law.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company that has never set foot in Singapore. It defines an organisation as any body of persons whether or not formed under Singapore law and whether or not it has an office here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, and no in-country agent to appoint. You must name at least one person responsible for compliance and publish their contact details, but that person may sit anywhere in the world.High confidence	Probably yes, but Mexico is unusually vague about it. The privacy law says only that it applies across Mexican territory. It does not spell out when it reaches a company based abroad. The old rulebook did say the law caught a foreign company that used equipment or systems located in Mexico, and let that company appoint a local representative instead of opening an office. That old rulebook belonged to a law that was scrapped in March 2025, so its status today is genuinely unclear. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, it can leave, and this is the unusual part: we searched banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government, education, gaming, mapping and defence and found no rule anywhere that forces personal data to stay in Singapore. What the law asks for is protection, not location. Before data goes abroad you must make sure the recipient is under a legal duty to protect it to a standard comparable to Singapore's.High confidence	Under the general privacy law, yes, and with very little paperwork. Mexico has no list of approved countries and no list of banned ones. Sending data to a company abroad is treated exactly like sending it to a company down the road: say so in your privacy notice, get the person's consent unless one of seven exceptions applies, and pass the privacy notice on to whoever receives the data. Handing data to your own supplier who only follows your instructions is not even counted as a transfer. Five sectors override this, and in three of them the override is severe.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no list of approved countries, no list of banned countries, and no form to file. You need one thing: the recipient must be under a legally enforceable duty to protect the data to a comparable standard. Most companies do this with a contract they draft themselves, because Singapore does not publish a template. Group companies can use internal group-wide rules instead, and since 2 March 2026 a recipient holding a Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules certificate also counts.High confidence	Nothing needs approval and no list exists in either direction. The model is simply unrestricted: any destination is allowed. What you need is a privacy notice that names the transfer and carries a clause where the person accepts or refuses it, plus that person's consent unless one of seven legal exceptions covers you. Because there is no list to populate, the government cannot make this stricter by adding a country. It would take a new law or a new regulation.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Personal Data Protection Commission, which is the same body as the media and telecoms regulator wearing a different hat. It is genuinely working: it publishes batches of decisions and settlements several times a year, with the most recent batches in 2026. Financial firms answer to the central bank as well, and anyone running critical national systems answers to the Cyber Security Agency. All three are staffed and issuing instruments.High confidence	Mexico abolished its independent privacy regulator. The National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information and Data Protection was wound up in March 2025 and its staff, files and cases were moved into a government ministry, the Anti-Corruption and Good Government Ministry. So the referee is now part of the government rather than independent of it. The ministry is staffed, but the law says the detailed procedure for complaints, inspections and fines will be set out in a regulation, and that regulation still has not been published. Financial regulators, by contrast, are visibly active and update their rulebooks almost monthly.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply. The ceiling: you must stop keeping personal data once the purpose is finished and there is no legal or business reason to hold it, and there is no fixed number of days attached to that. The floor: company accounting records must be kept for at least five years, tax records for at least five years from the relevant year of assessment, and employment records for the latest two years, kept one year past the date an employee leaves.High confidence	There is no single retention period. The privacy law says delete data once it is no longer needed, after a blocking period equal to the time limit for suing over the relationship. One hard ceiling is written into the law: information about someone breaking a contract must be erased six years after the default. The floors are longer and come from other laws. Tax records must be kept five years and their supporting documents must be available at your Mexican tax address. Anti-money-laundering records must be kept ten years at an address you register with the Finance Ministry. Phone companies keep call and location records for two years. Where a floor and a ceiling clash, the floor wins, because the privacy law lets you keep data to meet a legal duty.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There are at least three separate clocks and they run at very different speeds. Privacy: once you have decided a breach is serious enough to report, you have three calendar days to tell the regulator. Finance: a bank or other supervised firm has ONE HOUR to tell the central bank about a severe incident, then fourteen days for a root cause report. Critical national systems: TWO HOURS by phone to the national cyber agency, then a fuller report within seventy-two hours.High confidence	There are at least three clocks and they do not agree. Under the general privacy law you must tell the affected people immediately if a breach significantly harms their money or their reputation, and there is no duty to tell the regulator at all. Banks face a much tighter set: tell the banking regulator immediately, tell affected customers within forty-eight hours, file a full report within five working days, and send a remediation plan within fifteen working days of the incident ending. Phone companies must hand requested records to the authorities within twenty-four hours and keep a team available every hour of every day. Mexico has no general cyber-incident reporting law that catches everyone.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: an individual employee can go to prison for two years for leaking personal data, and that is separate from any fine on the company. Two: any other Singapore law beats the privacy law, so banking secrecy and similar duties override it. Three: every organisation must stop using national identity card numbers as passwords by 31 December 2026. Four: the data portability right is printed in the Act but has never been switched on. Five: the banking outsourcing rulebook everyone cites was cancelled in December 2024.High confidence	Five things catch people out. Every private business in Mexico is now legally required to ask customers for their national population ID number. Anti-money-laundering rules force many ordinary businesses to keep ten years of records at a Mexican address, which quietly rules out a pure foreign cloud setup. Mishandling data can put a person in prison, not just cost a company money. Banks must get written permission before any processing happens abroad, and that includes routine cloud hosting. And the rulebook the privacy law keeps pointing at does not exist.High confidence
What's about to change?	Three real things are in flight. A new health law has been passed but not started, and it will add its own breach reporting clocks for anyone handling health records. A draft law for big data centres and big cloud providers went out for public comment on 1 July 2026 and closed on 22 July 2026; it is not law yet. And every organisation must stop using national identity numbers as passwords by 31 December 2026. Separately, watch two switches the government can flip with no consultation at all.High confidence	The biggest thing coming is a regulation that is already overdue. The privacy law repeatedly says a rulebook will set the deadlines for complaints, inspections and fines, and the government missed its own June 2025 deadline to publish it. When it lands it could change how enforcement works overnight, with no consultation. Health law was changed in January 2026 to put telehealth on a statutory footing, and the biometric national ID is still being rolled out. The dangerous powers are the ones the government already holds rather than any bill in parliament.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	All industries — Companies Act 1967, section 199	Payments — Disposiciones de carácter general aplicables a las instituciones de tecnología financiera, artículos 85 a 87 Finance — Ley Federal para la Prevención e Identificación de Operaciones con Recursos de Procedencia Ilícita, artículos 15 y 18 All industries — Código Fiscal de la Federación, artículos 28 y 30 Telecoms — Ley en Materia de Telecomunicaciones y Radiodifusión, artículo 183