Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

SingaporeChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Singapore lets personal data leave the country, and we found no industry that is forced to keep data on Singaporean soil. What you must do instead is make the person receiving the data legally bound to protect it as well as Singapore law does. There is no government list of approved or banned countries and no permission to apply for. The privacy regulator is real, staffed, and publishes decisions.
The catch: The open headline is about location, not about paperwork or secrecy. Banks must follow a separate rulebook before customer information goes to any outside supplier, and that rulebook was completely replaced on 11 December 2024. Company accounting records held abroad must still have summaries sent back into Singapore. And a stricter rule in any other Singapore law beats the privacy law outright.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company that has never set foot in Singapore. It defines an organisation as any body of persons whether or not formed under Singapore law and whether or not it has an office here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, and no in-country agent to appoint. You must name at least one person responsible for compliance and publish their contact details, but that person may sit anywhere in the world.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, it can leave, and this is the unusual part: we searched banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government, education, gaming, mapping and defence and found no rule anywhere that forces personal data to stay in Singapore. What the law asks for is protection, not location. Before data goes abroad you must make sure the recipient is under a legal duty to protect it to a standard comparable to Singapore's.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no list of approved countries, no list of banned countries, and no form to file. You need one thing: the recipient must be under a legally enforceable duty to protect the data to a comparable standard. Most companies do this with a contract they draft themselves, because Singapore does not publish a template. Group companies can use internal group-wide rules instead, and since 2 March 2026 a recipient holding a Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules certificate also counts.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Commission, which is the same body as the media and telecoms regulator wearing a different hat. It is genuinely working: it publishes batches of decisions and settlements several times a year, with the most recent batches in 2026. Financial firms answer to the central bank as well, and anyone running critical national systems answers to the Cyber Security Agency. All three are staffed and issuing instruments.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply. The ceiling: you must stop keeping personal data once the purpose is finished and there is no legal or business reason to hold it, and there is no fixed number of days attached to that. The floor: company accounting records must be kept for at least five years, tax records for at least five years from the relevant year of assessment, and employment records for the latest two years, kept one year past the date an employee leaves.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are at least three separate clocks and they run at very different speeds. Privacy: once you have decided a breach is serious enough to report, you have three calendar days to tell the regulator. Finance: a bank or other supervised firm has ONE HOUR to tell the central bank about a severe incident, then fourteen days for a root cause report. Critical national systems: TWO HOURS by phone to the national cyber agency, then a fuller report within seventy-two hours.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: an individual employee can go to prison for two years for leaking personal data, and that is separate from any fine on the company. Two: any other Singapore law beats the privacy law, so banking secrecy and similar duties override it. Three: every organisation must stop using national identity card numbers as passwords by 31 December 2026. Four: the data portability right is printed in the Act but has never been switched on. Five: the banking outsourcing rulebook everyone cites was cancelled in December 2024.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three real things are in flight. A new health law has been passed but not started, and it will add its own breach reporting clocks for anyone handling health records. A draft law for big data centres and big cloud providers went out for public comment on 1 July 2026 and closed on 22 July 2026; it is not law yet. And every organisation must stop using national identity numbers as passwords by 31 December 2026. Separately, watch two switches the government can flip with no consultation at all.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — Companies Act 1967, section 199

SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	SingaporeChecked 18 August 2026	SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Singapore lets personal data leave the country, and we found no industry that is forced to keep data on Singaporean soil. What you must do instead is make the person receiving the data legally bound to protect it as well as Singapore law does. There is no government list of approved or banned countries and no permission to apply for. The privacy regulator is real, staffed, and publishes decisions.	Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch	The open headline is about location, not about paperwork or secrecy. Banks must follow a separate rulebook before customer information goes to any outside supplier, and that rulebook was completely replaced on 11 December 2024. Company accounting records held abroad must still have summaries sent back into Singapore. And a stricter rule in any other Singapore law beats the privacy law outright.	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company that has never set foot in Singapore. It defines an organisation as any body of persons whether or not formed under Singapore law and whether or not it has an office here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, and no in-country agent to appoint. You must name at least one person responsible for compliance and publish their contact details, but that person may sit anywhere in the world.High confidence	Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, it can leave, and this is the unusual part: we searched banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government, education, gaming, mapping and defence and found no rule anywhere that forces personal data to stay in Singapore. What the law asks for is protection, not location. Before data goes abroad you must make sure the recipient is under a legal duty to protect it to a standard comparable to Singapore's.High confidence	In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no list of approved countries, no list of banned countries, and no form to file. You need one thing: the recipient must be under a legally enforceable duty to protect the data to a comparable standard. Most companies do this with a contract they draft themselves, because Singapore does not publish a template. Group companies can use internal group-wide rules instead, and since 2 March 2026 a recipient holding a Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules certificate also counts.High confidence	The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Personal Data Protection Commission, which is the same body as the media and telecoms regulator wearing a different hat. It is genuinely working: it publishes batches of decisions and settlements several times a year, with the most recent batches in 2026. Financial firms answer to the central bank as well, and anyone running critical national systems answers to the Cyber Security Agency. All three are staffed and issuing instruments.High confidence	The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply. The ceiling: you must stop keeping personal data once the purpose is finished and there is no legal or business reason to hold it, and there is no fixed number of days attached to that. The floor: company accounting records must be kept for at least five years, tax records for at least five years from the relevant year of assessment, and employment records for the latest two years, kept one year past the date an employee leaves.High confidence	Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There are at least three separate clocks and they run at very different speeds. Privacy: once you have decided a breach is serious enough to report, you have three calendar days to tell the regulator. Finance: a bank or other supervised firm has ONE HOUR to tell the central bank about a severe incident, then fourteen days for a root cause report. Critical national systems: TWO HOURS by phone to the national cyber agency, then a fuller report within seventy-two hours.High confidence	Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: an individual employee can go to prison for two years for leaking personal data, and that is separate from any fine on the company. Two: any other Singapore law beats the privacy law, so banking secrecy and similar duties override it. Three: every organisation must stop using national identity card numbers as passwords by 31 December 2026. Four: the data portability right is printed in the Act but has never been switched on. Five: the banking outsourcing rulebook everyone cites was cancelled in December 2024.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?	Three real things are in flight. A new health law has been passed but not started, and it will add its own breach reporting clocks for anyone handling health records. A draft law for big data centres and big cloud providers went out for public comment on 1 July 2026 and closed on 22 July 2026; it is not law yet. And every organisation must stop using national identity numbers as passwords by 31 December 2026. Separately, watch two switches the government can flip with no consultation at all.High confidence	Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	All industries — Companies Act 1967, section 199	Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV) Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'