Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Saudi ArabiaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Data can leave Saudi Arabia, but never for free. You need a purpose the law allows, a written safeguard such as the government's own standard contract, and a written risk assessment that asks whether the transfer could harm the Kingdom itself. Banks need the central bank's written permission before anything goes abroad. The privacy regulator is fully set up but publishes no fines.
The catch: The 'paperwork and you can send it' answer is true for an ordinary business. It is false for banks and finance companies, where the central bank must give written no-objection first and cloud is expected to sit inside the country. It is also unsettled for government bodies and critical national infrastructure: the old rule forcing them to host inside Saudi Arabia was deleted in 2024 and replaced by a duty to ask a government office for a decision, and that office has published no replacement rule.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world with no office in Saudi Arabia, as long as it handles the data of people living in the Kingdom. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. There is no general duty to appoint a local representative, but many organisations must register on the government's data platform and some must name a data protection officer.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with real paperwork. First the reason for sending it has to be on the government's short list of allowed purposes. Then you need a safeguard: the government's own standard contract, approved group-wide rules, or a certificate from a licensed body. Then you must write a risk assessment that includes whether the transfer could damage the Kingdom's vital interests. Two industries are much harder. Banks and finance companies must get the central bank's written no-objection before any data goes to an overseas supplier, and the central bank's rules say cloud services should sit inside Saudi Arabia unless it approves otherwise. For government bodies and critical national infrastructure the picture changed in 2024 and is now genuinely unclear.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destination list, and the list is empty. The law says data may go to a country the regulator has judged good enough, but no such list has been published, so in practice nobody uses that route. Instead almost everyone relies on the escape hatches: sign the government's word-for-word standard contract, or get approved group-wide rules for a multinational, or send to a body holding a certificate from a licensed Saudi accreditation body. On top of that you must run a written risk assessment before the data moves.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority is the privacy regulator, and it is genuinely up and running. Its National Data Governance Platform is live and takes registrations, self-assessments, breach reports and complaints, and it has published the rulebook for the panels that hear violations and issue fines. What we could not find is a single published fine or named decision, so how hard it bites is still unknown. The financial regulator and the cybersecurity authority, by contrast, have supervised their sectors for years.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply, and the floor wins when they clash. The ceiling: you must destroy personal data without undue delay once the reason you collected it has gone, and also when someone asks, when they withdraw the only consent you relied on, or when you learn you processed it unlawfully. Destruction must reach backups too. The floor: your written record of processing activities must be kept for five years after the activity ends. If another law sets a keeping period, the law says keep the data until whichever is longer.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: The main clock is 72 hours. If personal data is breached, lost or accessed unlawfully and that could harm the people involved, you must tell the privacy regulator within 72 hours of finding out, through the government's data platform — and you have to be registered on that platform before you can use the service. You must also tell the affected people without undue delay, in plain language. A second, separate clock runs for government bodies and critical national infrastructure, which owe cyber incident reports to the national cybersecurity authority under its own rules. Suppliers owe you notice without undue delay so you can meet your own deadline.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: sending data abroad is not only about protecting the individual — you must also assess whether the transfer could harm the Kingdom's own vital interests, and there is a government guide telling you how. Two: the standard contract must be copied word for word, and changing it is itself a breach of the law, while the overseas recipient has to accept Saudi courts. Three: leaking or publishing sensitive data to hurt someone or to profit can put a person in prison for up to two years — this is a criminal charge, not a fine. Four: your supplier contract must go beyond a normal data processing agreement and say whether the supplier is subject to foreign laws and how that affects its compliance. Five: the widely quoted rule that all government and critical infrastructure data must be hosted inside Saudi Arabia was deleted in 2024, and quoting it today is wrong.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to commence on a fixed date in the next twelve months — the law and all its main regulations are already fully in force. The risk is the opposite kind: several switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The biggest is the approved-country list, which the regulator is legally required to publish and has not; the day it appears, every transfer plan in the country needs rechecking. The second biggest is the missing localisation rule for government and critical infrastructure, which one office was handed in 2024 and has not yet written.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

JapanChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Japan lets personal data leave the country, but you need paperwork. Only Europe and the United Kingdom are pre-approved. For anywhere else you either sign a contract that binds the recipient to Japanese-standard protection, or you get the person's consent after telling them which country the data goes to. There is no general rule forcing data to stay in Japan.
The catch: Two things break the calm headline. If you sell to the Japanese government, the data must physically sit in Japanese data centres. And if you run a website, an app or any online service used from Japan, the telecoms law reaches you even with no office here, requires a representative in Japan, and makes leaking a communication a criminal offence rather than a fine.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Japan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Japan, as long as it handles the personal information of people in Japan while supplying them goods or services. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. Unlike Europe, the privacy law does not make you appoint a representative in Japan — but the telecoms law does, if your service counts as a telecommunications service.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Japan's general rating is conditional: personal data may go abroad once you have one of three things in place. There is no across-the-board law keeping data in Japan, and no financial, insurance, securities or health localisation rule of the kind India or China have — we searched for one and did not find it. The real wall is government work: anything running on the national Government Cloud must sit in data centres inside Japan.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an allowlist, and the list has exactly two entries: the European Union and the United Kingdom. Send data there and it is treated almost like a domestic transfer. For every other destination you need one of two things instead. Either the recipient is contractually bound to protect the data to Japanese standards and you keep checking that it does, or you get the person's consent after first telling them the destination country, what its privacy law is like, and what the recipient will do to protect the data.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Information Protection Commission, and it is genuinely working. It has a chair, eight commissioners and a staff ceiling of 231 people. In the year to March 2025 it handled just over 19,000 breach reports, gave 395 pieces of formal guidance and made one recommendation. In the first six months of the following year it sharpened up: two recommendations and its first emergency order, against a company misusing personal information. What it cannot do yet is fine you — Japan has no administrative money penalty for privacy breaches until the 2026 amendment starts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor is firm and the ceiling is soft. Tax law makes you keep books and records for seven years, stretching to ten if you carry a loss forward. Company accounting books run ten years. Against that, the privacy law only asks you to try to delete personal data once you no longer need it — it is a best-efforts duty, not a hard deadline. So when the two collide, the keep-it rule wins in practice.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. For a personal data breach you file a first report to the privacy regulator within three to five days of finding out, and a full report within 30 days — 60 days if someone did it on purpose. You must also tell the people affected. Critical infrastructure operators have a separate cyber incident duty with a report to the government within 30 days. Telecoms operators report leaks of communications to the communications ministry on their own timetable.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) Putting data on a foreign server is often not a 'transfer' at all — if the provider is contractually barred from touching it — but you then have to work out that country's privacy law and publish the country's name to your users. Most people miss this. (2) The privacy law has no fines: the sanctions are criminal, and a company can be fined about $650,000 for a staff member stealing a customer database. (3) Leaking a communication is a crime punishable with prison, and telecoms staff face a longer term than outsiders. (4) The telecoms rules catch ordinary websites and apps, not just phone companies, and reach foreign operators with no office in Japan. (5) Consent to send data 'overseas' is not valid — you have to name the country.High confidence
What's about to change?: The big one has already passed. On 17 July 2026 Japan published a large amendment to its privacy law. It introduces the country's first money penalty for privacy breaches, sets 16 as the age below which a guardian must be involved, adds rules for face and other biometric data, and raises the criminal penalties. It is not in force yet: the government has up to two years to switch it on by order, and no date has been announced. The other thing to watch is the new cyber defence law, which is being switched on in stages through 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — デジタル庁におけるガバメントクラウド等の整備のためのクラウドサービスの提供 — 令和８年度募集調達仕様書

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Saudi ArabiaChecked 18 August 2026	JapanChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Waking up	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Data can leave Saudi Arabia, but never for free. You need a purpose the law allows, a written safeguard such as the government's own standard contract, and a written risk assessment that asks whether the transfer could harm the Kingdom itself. Banks need the central bank's written permission before anything goes abroad. The privacy regulator is fully set up but publishes no fines.	Japan lets personal data leave the country, but you need paperwork. Only Europe and the United Kingdom are pre-approved. For anywhere else you either sign a contract that binds the recipient to Japanese-standard protection, or you get the person's consent after telling them which country the data goes to. There is no general rule forcing data to stay in Japan.
The catch	The 'paperwork and you can send it' answer is true for an ordinary business. It is false for banks and finance companies, where the central bank must give written no-objection first and cloud is expected to sit inside the country. It is also unsettled for government bodies and critical national infrastructure: the old rule forcing them to host inside Saudi Arabia was deleted in 2024 and replaced by a duty to ask a government office for a decision, and that office has published no replacement rule.	Two things break the calm headline. If you sell to the Japanese government, the data must physically sit in Japanese data centres. And if you run a website, an app or any online service used from Japan, the telecoms law reaches you even with no office here, requires a representative in Japan, and makes leaking a communication a criminal offence rather than a fine.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world with no office in Saudi Arabia, as long as it handles the data of people living in the Kingdom. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. There is no general duty to appoint a local representative, but many organisations must register on the government's data platform and some must name a data protection officer.High confidence	Yes. Japan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Japan, as long as it handles the personal information of people in Japan while supplying them goods or services. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. Unlike Europe, the privacy law does not make you appoint a representative in Japan — but the telecoms law does, if your service counts as a telecommunications service.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with real paperwork. First the reason for sending it has to be on the government's short list of allowed purposes. Then you need a safeguard: the government's own standard contract, approved group-wide rules, or a certificate from a licensed body. Then you must write a risk assessment that includes whether the transfer could damage the Kingdom's vital interests. Two industries are much harder. Banks and finance companies must get the central bank's written no-objection before any data goes to an overseas supplier, and the central bank's rules say cloud services should sit inside Saudi Arabia unless it approves otherwise. For government bodies and critical national infrastructure the picture changed in 2024 and is now genuinely unclear.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Japan's general rating is conditional: personal data may go abroad once you have one of three things in place. There is no across-the-board law keeping data in Japan, and no financial, insurance, securities or health localisation rule of the kind India or China have — we searched for one and did not find it. The real wall is government work: anything running on the national Government Cloud must sit in data centres inside Japan.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is an approved-destination list, and the list is empty. The law says data may go to a country the regulator has judged good enough, but no such list has been published, so in practice nobody uses that route. Instead almost everyone relies on the escape hatches: sign the government's word-for-word standard contract, or get approved group-wide rules for a multinational, or send to a body holding a certificate from a licensed Saudi accreditation body. On top of that you must run a written risk assessment before the data moves.High confidence	The model is an allowlist, and the list has exactly two entries: the European Union and the United Kingdom. Send data there and it is treated almost like a domestic transfer. For every other destination you need one of two things instead. Either the recipient is contractually bound to protect the data to Japanese standards and you keep checking that it does, or you get the person's consent after first telling them the destination country, what its privacy law is like, and what the recipient will do to protect the data.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority is the privacy regulator, and it is genuinely up and running. Its National Data Governance Platform is live and takes registrations, self-assessments, breach reports and complaints, and it has published the rulebook for the panels that hear violations and issue fines. What we could not find is a single published fine or named decision, so how hard it bites is still unknown. The financial regulator and the cybersecurity authority, by contrast, have supervised their sectors for years.Medium confidence	The Personal Information Protection Commission, and it is genuinely working. It has a chair, eight commissioners and a staff ceiling of 231 people. In the year to March 2025 it handled just over 19,000 breach reports, gave 395 pieces of formal guidance and made one recommendation. In the first six months of the following year it sharpened up: two recommendations and its first emergency order, against a company misusing personal information. What it cannot do yet is fine you — Japan has no administrative money penalty for privacy breaches until the 2026 amendment starts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply, and the floor wins when they clash. The ceiling: you must destroy personal data without undue delay once the reason you collected it has gone, and also when someone asks, when they withdraw the only consent you relied on, or when you learn you processed it unlawfully. Destruction must reach backups too. The floor: your written record of processing activities must be kept for five years after the activity ends. If another law sets a keeping period, the law says keep the data until whichever is longer.High confidence	The floor is firm and the ceiling is soft. Tax law makes you keep books and records for seven years, stretching to ten if you carry a loss forward. Company accounting books run ten years. Against that, the privacy law only asks you to try to delete personal data once you no longer need it — it is a best-efforts duty, not a hard deadline. So when the two collide, the keep-it rule wins in practice.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	The main clock is 72 hours. If personal data is breached, lost or accessed unlawfully and that could harm the people involved, you must tell the privacy regulator within 72 hours of finding out, through the government's data platform — and you have to be registered on that platform before you can use the service. You must also tell the affected people without undue delay, in plain language. A second, separate clock runs for government bodies and critical national infrastructure, which owe cyber incident reports to the national cybersecurity authority under its own rules. Suppliers owe you notice without undue delay so you can meet your own deadline.High confidence	Count three clocks. For a personal data breach you file a first report to the privacy regulator within three to five days of finding out, and a full report within 30 days — 60 days if someone did it on purpose. You must also tell the people affected. Critical infrastructure operators have a separate cyber incident duty with a report to the government within 30 days. Telecoms operators report leaks of communications to the communications ministry on their own timetable.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: sending data abroad is not only about protecting the individual — you must also assess whether the transfer could harm the Kingdom's own vital interests, and there is a government guide telling you how. Two: the standard contract must be copied word for word, and changing it is itself a breach of the law, while the overseas recipient has to accept Saudi courts. Three: leaking or publishing sensitive data to hurt someone or to profit can put a person in prison for up to two years — this is a criminal charge, not a fine. Four: your supplier contract must go beyond a normal data processing agreement and say whether the supplier is subject to foreign laws and how that affects its compliance. Five: the widely quoted rule that all government and critical infrastructure data must be hosted inside Saudi Arabia was deleted in 2024, and quoting it today is wrong.High confidence	Five. (1) Putting data on a foreign server is often not a 'transfer' at all — if the provider is contractually barred from touching it — but you then have to work out that country's privacy law and publish the country's name to your users. Most people miss this. (2) The privacy law has no fines: the sanctions are criminal, and a company can be fined about $650,000 for a staff member stealing a customer database. (3) Leaking a communication is a crime punishable with prison, and telecoms staff face a longer term than outsiders. (4) The telecoms rules catch ordinary websites and apps, not just phone companies, and reach foreign operators with no office in Japan. (5) Consent to send data 'overseas' is not valid — you have to name the country.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to commence on a fixed date in the next twelve months — the law and all its main regulations are already fully in force. The risk is the opposite kind: several switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The biggest is the approved-country list, which the regulator is legally required to publish and has not; the day it appears, every transfer plan in the country needs rechecking. The second biggest is the missing localisation rule for government and critical infrastructure, which one office was handed in 2024 and has not yet written.Medium confidence	The big one has already passed. On 17 July 2026 Japan published a large amendment to its privacy law. It introduces the country's first money penalty for privacy breaches, sets 16 as the age below which a guardian must be involved, adds rules for face and other biometric data, and raises the criminal penalties. It is not in force yet: the government has up to two years to switch it on by order, and no date has been announced. The other thing to watch is the new cyber defence law, which is being switched on in stages through 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Government — デジタル庁におけるガバメントクラウド等の整備のためのクラウドサービスの提供 — 令和８年度募集調達仕様書