Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Saudi ArabiaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Data can leave Saudi Arabia, but never for free. You need a purpose the law allows, a written safeguard such as the government's own standard contract, and a written risk assessment that asks whether the transfer could harm the Kingdom itself. Banks need the central bank's written permission before anything goes abroad. The privacy regulator is fully set up but publishes no fines.
The catch: The 'paperwork and you can send it' answer is true for an ordinary business. It is false for banks and finance companies, where the central bank must give written no-objection first and cloud is expected to sit inside the country. It is also unsettled for government bodies and critical national infrastructure: the old rule forcing them to host inside Saudi Arabia was deleted in 2024 and replaced by a duty to ask a government office for a decision, and that office has published no replacement rule.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world with no office in Saudi Arabia, as long as it handles the data of people living in the Kingdom. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. There is no general duty to appoint a local representative, but many organisations must register on the government's data platform and some must name a data protection officer.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with real paperwork. First the reason for sending it has to be on the government's short list of allowed purposes. Then you need a safeguard: the government's own standard contract, approved group-wide rules, or a certificate from a licensed body. Then you must write a risk assessment that includes whether the transfer could damage the Kingdom's vital interests. Two industries are much harder. Banks and finance companies must get the central bank's written no-objection before any data goes to an overseas supplier, and the central bank's rules say cloud services should sit inside Saudi Arabia unless it approves otherwise. For government bodies and critical national infrastructure the picture changed in 2024 and is now genuinely unclear.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destination list, and the list is empty. The law says data may go to a country the regulator has judged good enough, but no such list has been published, so in practice nobody uses that route. Instead almost everyone relies on the escape hatches: sign the government's word-for-word standard contract, or get approved group-wide rules for a multinational, or send to a body holding a certificate from a licensed Saudi accreditation body. On top of that you must run a written risk assessment before the data moves.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority is the privacy regulator, and it is genuinely up and running. Its National Data Governance Platform is live and takes registrations, self-assessments, breach reports and complaints, and it has published the rulebook for the panels that hear violations and issue fines. What we could not find is a single published fine or named decision, so how hard it bites is still unknown. The financial regulator and the cybersecurity authority, by contrast, have supervised their sectors for years.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply, and the floor wins when they clash. The ceiling: you must destroy personal data without undue delay once the reason you collected it has gone, and also when someone asks, when they withdraw the only consent you relied on, or when you learn you processed it unlawfully. Destruction must reach backups too. The floor: your written record of processing activities must be kept for five years after the activity ends. If another law sets a keeping period, the law says keep the data until whichever is longer.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: The main clock is 72 hours. If personal data is breached, lost or accessed unlawfully and that could harm the people involved, you must tell the privacy regulator within 72 hours of finding out, through the government's data platform — and you have to be registered on that platform before you can use the service. You must also tell the affected people without undue delay, in plain language. A second, separate clock runs for government bodies and critical national infrastructure, which owe cyber incident reports to the national cybersecurity authority under its own rules. Suppliers owe you notice without undue delay so you can meet your own deadline.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: sending data abroad is not only about protecting the individual — you must also assess whether the transfer could harm the Kingdom's own vital interests, and there is a government guide telling you how. Two: the standard contract must be copied word for word, and changing it is itself a breach of the law, while the overseas recipient has to accept Saudi courts. Three: leaking or publishing sensitive data to hurt someone or to profit can put a person in prison for up to two years — this is a criminal charge, not a fine. Four: your supplier contract must go beyond a normal data processing agreement and say whether the supplier is subject to foreign laws and how that affects its compliance. Five: the widely quoted rule that all government and critical infrastructure data must be hosted inside Saudi Arabia was deleted in 2024, and quoting it today is wrong.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to commence on a fixed date in the next twelve months — the law and all its main regulations are already fully in force. The risk is the opposite kind: several switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The biggest is the approved-country list, which the regulator is legally required to publish and has not; the day it appears, every transfer plan in the country needs rechecking. The second biggest is the missing localisation rule for government and critical infrastructure, which one office was handed in 2024 and has not yet written.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

United KingdomChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Data can leave the United Kingdom, but you need the right paperwork first. Sending it to Europe or to about fifteen other approved places needs nothing extra. Anywhere else needs a government-published contract and a risk check. No general law forces data to stay in Britain. The privacy regulator is busy and its fines are getting bigger.
The catch: The easy headline stops being true in three places. Telecoms operators must keep backup copies of key network information inside the United Kingdom. National Health Service patient records may only be sent to countries the United Kingdom has formally approved, which rules out the standard contract route. And government material classified SECRET or above cannot sit in public cloud at all. Everyone else can store data abroad with the right contract in place.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. British privacy law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it deliberately offers goods or services to people in the United Kingdom, or watches what they do online. There is no size or revenue floor to hide under. If you are caught and have no British office, you generally have to name a representative in the United Kingdom, unless you are a public body or your processing is rare and low risk.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. The United Kingdom has no general law forcing data to stay in the country. Send it to the European Economic Area or another approved country and you need nothing extra; send it anywhere else and you need an approved contract plus a written risk assessment. Three industries are stricter: telecoms, the health service and classified government work. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, education, online gambling and mapping have no location rule that we could find.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-list one. If the destination is on the government's approved list you may send data with no extra paperwork. If it is not, you must sign the government's own contract template and run a risk assessment first. The list is well populated: the whole European Economic Area plus Andorra, Argentina, the Faroe Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland and Uruguay, with partial cover for Canada, Japan and the United States.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Information Commissioner's Office, and it is very much working. It fined Capita fourteen million pounds (about $18 million) in October 2025, Reddit £14.47 million (about $18.5 million) in February 2026, and the owner of Imgur in the same month, and it issues smaller marketing fines almost monthly. Watch a quirk: a replacement body called the Information Commission legally exists but had no staff and did no work in its first financial year, so the old office is still the one that acts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is no single deletion deadline. The rule is that you keep personal data only as long as you actually need it, and you must be able to explain the period you chose. Pulling the other way are minimum keeping periods: company and tax records for six years, telecoms connection records for up to twelve months if the government serves a notice, and telecoms security data for thirteen months. Where a minimum and a maximum clash, the legal duty to keep wins and you keep the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least three clocks. Any organisation has 72 hours to tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach, and must tell the affected people if the risk to them is high. Telecoms and internet providers also have 72 hours under the electronic communications rules — that used to be 24 hours and quietly changed on 20 August 2025. Operators of essential services such as water, energy and transport have their own 72-hour clock to their own regulator.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) A child can consent at 13 here, not 16 — but the children's design code covers everyone under 18, and the regulator fined Reddit £14.47 million (about $18.5 million) for weak age checks. (2) Telecoms firms must keep some backup data physically in Britain. (3) Health service data can only go to approved countries, so the standard contract does not help you. (4) Misusing personal data can be a crime, not just a fine. (5) The government can secretly order a company to weaken its security, and Apple is fighting one of those orders right now.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Two things to watch in the next twelve months. A cyber security bill is going through Parliament and will widen incident reporting to data centres and managed service suppliers — it is not law yet, so do not plan as if it were. And the privacy regulator is due to be replaced by a new body called the Information Commission, but only once ministers lay the paperwork, which had not happened by mid-2026. The regulator is also writing a statutory code on artificial intelligence.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Telecoms — The Electronic Communications (Security Measures) Regulations 2022, with the Telecommunications Security Code of Practice 2026 (version 1.1)

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Saudi ArabiaChecked 18 August 2026	United KingdomChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Waking up	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Data can leave Saudi Arabia, but never for free. You need a purpose the law allows, a written safeguard such as the government's own standard contract, and a written risk assessment that asks whether the transfer could harm the Kingdom itself. Banks need the central bank's written permission before anything goes abroad. The privacy regulator is fully set up but publishes no fines.	Data can leave the United Kingdom, but you need the right paperwork first. Sending it to Europe or to about fifteen other approved places needs nothing extra. Anywhere else needs a government-published contract and a risk check. No general law forces data to stay in Britain. The privacy regulator is busy and its fines are getting bigger.
The catch	The 'paperwork and you can send it' answer is true for an ordinary business. It is false for banks and finance companies, where the central bank must give written no-objection first and cloud is expected to sit inside the country. It is also unsettled for government bodies and critical national infrastructure: the old rule forcing them to host inside Saudi Arabia was deleted in 2024 and replaced by a duty to ask a government office for a decision, and that office has published no replacement rule.	The easy headline stops being true in three places. Telecoms operators must keep backup copies of key network information inside the United Kingdom. National Health Service patient records may only be sent to countries the United Kingdom has formally approved, which rules out the standard contract route. And government material classified SECRET or above cannot sit in public cloud at all. Everyone else can store data abroad with the right contract in place.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world with no office in Saudi Arabia, as long as it handles the data of people living in the Kingdom. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. There is no general duty to appoint a local representative, but many organisations must register on the government's data platform and some must name a data protection officer.High confidence	Yes. British privacy law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it deliberately offers goods or services to people in the United Kingdom, or watches what they do online. There is no size or revenue floor to hide under. If you are caught and have no British office, you generally have to name a representative in the United Kingdom, unless you are a public body or your processing is rare and low risk.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with real paperwork. First the reason for sending it has to be on the government's short list of allowed purposes. Then you need a safeguard: the government's own standard contract, approved group-wide rules, or a certificate from a licensed body. Then you must write a risk assessment that includes whether the transfer could damage the Kingdom's vital interests. Two industries are much harder. Banks and finance companies must get the central bank's written no-objection before any data goes to an overseas supplier, and the central bank's rules say cloud services should sit inside Saudi Arabia unless it approves otherwise. For government bodies and critical national infrastructure the picture changed in 2024 and is now genuinely unclear.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. The United Kingdom has no general law forcing data to stay in the country. Send it to the European Economic Area or another approved country and you need nothing extra; send it anywhere else and you need an approved contract plus a written risk assessment. Three industries are stricter: telecoms, the health service and classified government work. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, education, online gambling and mapping have no location rule that we could find.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is an approved-destination list, and the list is empty. The law says data may go to a country the regulator has judged good enough, but no such list has been published, so in practice nobody uses that route. Instead almost everyone relies on the escape hatches: sign the government's word-for-word standard contract, or get approved group-wide rules for a multinational, or send to a body holding a certificate from a licensed Saudi accreditation body. On top of that you must run a written risk assessment before the data moves.High confidence	The model is an approved-list one. If the destination is on the government's approved list you may send data with no extra paperwork. If it is not, you must sign the government's own contract template and run a risk assessment first. The list is well populated: the whole European Economic Area plus Andorra, Argentina, the Faroe Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland and Uruguay, with partial cover for Canada, Japan and the United States.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority is the privacy regulator, and it is genuinely up and running. Its National Data Governance Platform is live and takes registrations, self-assessments, breach reports and complaints, and it has published the rulebook for the panels that hear violations and issue fines. What we could not find is a single published fine or named decision, so how hard it bites is still unknown. The financial regulator and the cybersecurity authority, by contrast, have supervised their sectors for years.Medium confidence	The Information Commissioner's Office, and it is very much working. It fined Capita fourteen million pounds (about $18 million) in October 2025, Reddit £14.47 million (about $18.5 million) in February 2026, and the owner of Imgur in the same month, and it issues smaller marketing fines almost monthly. Watch a quirk: a replacement body called the Information Commission legally exists but had no staff and did no work in its first financial year, so the old office is still the one that acts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply, and the floor wins when they clash. The ceiling: you must destroy personal data without undue delay once the reason you collected it has gone, and also when someone asks, when they withdraw the only consent you relied on, or when you learn you processed it unlawfully. Destruction must reach backups too. The floor: your written record of processing activities must be kept for five years after the activity ends. If another law sets a keeping period, the law says keep the data until whichever is longer.High confidence	There is no single deletion deadline. The rule is that you keep personal data only as long as you actually need it, and you must be able to explain the period you chose. Pulling the other way are minimum keeping periods: company and tax records for six years, telecoms connection records for up to twelve months if the government serves a notice, and telecoms security data for thirteen months. Where a minimum and a maximum clash, the legal duty to keep wins and you keep the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	The main clock is 72 hours. If personal data is breached, lost or accessed unlawfully and that could harm the people involved, you must tell the privacy regulator within 72 hours of finding out, through the government's data platform — and you have to be registered on that platform before you can use the service. You must also tell the affected people without undue delay, in plain language. A second, separate clock runs for government bodies and critical national infrastructure, which owe cyber incident reports to the national cybersecurity authority under its own rules. Suppliers owe you notice without undue delay so you can meet your own deadline.High confidence	Count at least three clocks. Any organisation has 72 hours to tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach, and must tell the affected people if the risk to them is high. Telecoms and internet providers also have 72 hours under the electronic communications rules — that used to be 24 hours and quietly changed on 20 August 2025. Operators of essential services such as water, energy and transport have their own 72-hour clock to their own regulator.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: sending data abroad is not only about protecting the individual — you must also assess whether the transfer could harm the Kingdom's own vital interests, and there is a government guide telling you how. Two: the standard contract must be copied word for word, and changing it is itself a breach of the law, while the overseas recipient has to accept Saudi courts. Three: leaking or publishing sensitive data to hurt someone or to profit can put a person in prison for up to two years — this is a criminal charge, not a fine. Four: your supplier contract must go beyond a normal data processing agreement and say whether the supplier is subject to foreign laws and how that affects its compliance. Five: the widely quoted rule that all government and critical infrastructure data must be hosted inside Saudi Arabia was deleted in 2024, and quoting it today is wrong.High confidence	Five. (1) A child can consent at 13 here, not 16 — but the children's design code covers everyone under 18, and the regulator fined Reddit £14.47 million (about $18.5 million) for weak age checks. (2) Telecoms firms must keep some backup data physically in Britain. (3) Health service data can only go to approved countries, so the standard contract does not help you. (4) Misusing personal data can be a crime, not just a fine. (5) The government can secretly order a company to weaken its security, and Apple is fighting one of those orders right now.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to commence on a fixed date in the next twelve months — the law and all its main regulations are already fully in force. The risk is the opposite kind: several switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The biggest is the approved-country list, which the regulator is legally required to publish and has not; the day it appears, every transfer plan in the country needs rechecking. The second biggest is the missing localisation rule for government and critical infrastructure, which one office was handed in 2024 and has not yet written.Medium confidence	Two things to watch in the next twelve months. A cyber security bill is going through Parliament and will widen incident reporting to data centres and managed service suppliers — it is not law yet, so do not plan as if it were. And the privacy regulator is due to be replaced by a new body called the Information Commission, but only once ministers lay the paperwork, which had not happened by mid-2026. The regulator is also writing a statutory code on artificial intelligence.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Telecoms — The Electronic Communications (Security Measures) Regulations 2022, with the Telecommunications Security Code of Practice 2026 (version 1.1)