Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

RussiaChecked 18 August 2026

A copy must stayWork: Very highEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: If you collect personal data from people in Russia, the database you collect it into must sit inside Russia. You may then send a copy abroad, but only after you tell the regulator first and only to a country on its approved list. The United States is not on that list. Breaking the storage rule costs up to 6 million roubles, about $75,000, and leaking data can now put a person in prison.
The catch: The 'copy may go abroad' part disappears in several industries. Payments, electronic money, biometrics, telecoms, internet messaging services, government systems and detailed mapping are hard walls: the data must stay in Russia and no copy may leave. Since 1 September 2025 any company running 'significant' critical infrastructure — which includes most banks, telecoms operators and large energy and health providers — must also run Russian-registered software on those systems.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law reaches a foreign company with no office in Russia. It applies whenever you process the personal data of Russian citizens under a contract with them, under any other agreement with them, or on the basis of their consent. There is no size or revenue threshold. Almost every organisation must also file a notice with the regulator before it starts processing, and file a second, separate notice before any data leaves the country.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: A copy can leave, but the original must stay. When you collect personal data about Russian citizens, the database you record, store, update or retrieve it from has to be physically in Russia. Since 1 July 2025 the law says this as a flat ban on using databases outside Russia for those steps. After that, sending a copy abroad is a separate question with its own paperwork. Several industries are stricter still and allow no copy out at all.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Russia runs an approved-destinations list, so a transfer is banned unless the destination is on it. Before any data leaves you must send the regulator a separate written notice naming the countries, the data and the recipients, and you must first collect written assurances from the recipient about how it will protect the data. If the destination is on the approved list you may start as soon as the notice is sent. If it is not, you must wait, and in practice you will be refused. The United States is not on the list.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Roskomnadzor, the federal communications and media supervisor, is the data protection regulator. It is a long-established federal service, fully staffed, and it is still issuing binding orders — its most recent inspection check-list order was published on the state legal portal in December 2025. It is not the only enforcer. The security service runs the national cyber-attack reporting system, the technical regulator FSTEC sets security requirements for government and critical systems, and the Bank of Russia supervises banks and payment firms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they collide. Personal data must be destroyed within 30 days of the purpose being achieved, or within 30 days of consent being withdrawn, and within 10 working days if the processing was unlawful. Against that, staff records must be kept for 50 years, telecoms and messaging metadata for three years, and message content for up to six months. Where a statute sets a minimum, the minimum wins and you keep the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are at least three clocks and they run at once. You have 24 hours to tell the data regulator that personal data has leaked, and 72 hours to give it the results of your internal investigation. Separately, if the leak came from a computer attack you must report it to the security service's national attack-detection system. Banks and payment firms report to the Bank of Russia as well. Missing the 24-hour notice is itself a fine of up to 3 million roubles, about $37,000.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things catch people out. First, leaking data is now a crime, and doing it across a border carries up to eight years in prison. Second, repeat leaks are fined as a share of worldwide-style annual revenue, between 1 and 3 percent, with a floor of 20 million roubles, about $250,000. Third, staff files must be kept 50 years, which flatly conflicts with the 30-day deletion duty. Fourth, biometric data can only be handled by a Russian-controlled company using databases in Russia. Fifth, refusing to serve a customer because they will not give biometrics is itself a fine.High confidence
What's about to change?: One dated change is already fixed: from 1 September 2027, Moscow's public bodies move onto a single city technology platform, which will pull a large volume of citizen data into one place. Much more important are the switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The approved-country list can be cut by a single regulator order. Any transfer can be banned outright on security or economic grounds. And the rules for foreign use of Russian mapping technology have been written into the law but never issued.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 152-ФЗ «О персональных данных», статья 18 часть 5
All industries — Федеральный закон № 152-ФЗ, статья 21 часть 3.1 и статья 19 часть 12
All industries — Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации, статья 272.1
Payments — Федеральный закон от 27.06.2011 № 161-ФЗ «О национальной платежной системе», статьи 12 и 16
All industries — Федеральный закон от 29.12.2022 № 572-ФЗ об идентификации и аутентификации с использованием биометрических персональных данных
Telecoms — Федеральный закон от 07.07.2003 № 126-ФЗ «О связи», статья 64; Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 149-ФЗ, статья 10.1
Government — Приказ ФСТЭК России от 11.04.2025 № 117; Указ Президента РФ от 30.03.2022 № 166; Указ Президента РФ от 01.05.2022 № 250; Федеральный закон от 07.04.2025 № 58-ФЗ
Mapping and location — Федеральный закон от 30.12.2015 № 431-ФЗ «О геодезии, картографии и пространственных данных», статьи 23 и 24
Health and social care — Федеральный закон от 21.11.2011 № 323-ФЗ «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации», статья 13
Social media and online platforms — Федеральный закон от 01.07.2021 № 236-ФЗ «О деятельности иностранных лиц в информационно-телекоммуникационной сети «Интернет» на территории Российской Федерации»

PolandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch: True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	RussiaChecked 18 August 2026	PolandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	A copy must stay Work: Very high Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	If you collect personal data from people in Russia, the database you collect it into must sit inside Russia. You may then send a copy abroad, but only after you tell the regulator first and only to a country on its approved list. The United States is not on that list. Breaking the storage rule costs up to 6 million roubles, about $75,000, and leaking data can now put a person in prison.	Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch	The 'copy may go abroad' part disappears in several industries. Payments, electronic money, biometrics, telecoms, internet messaging services, government systems and detailed mapping are hard walls: the data must stay in Russia and no copy may leave. Since 1 September 2025 any company running 'significant' critical infrastructure — which includes most banks, telecoms operators and large energy and health providers — must also run Russian-registered software on those systems.	True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The law reaches a foreign company with no office in Russia. It applies whenever you process the personal data of Russian citizens under a contract with them, under any other agreement with them, or on the basis of their consent. There is no size or revenue threshold. Almost every organisation must also file a notice with the regulator before it starts processing, and file a second, separate notice before any data leaves the country.High confidence	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	A copy can leave, but the original must stay. When you collect personal data about Russian citizens, the database you record, store, update or retrieve it from has to be physically in Russia. Since 1 July 2025 the law says this as a flat ban on using databases outside Russia for those steps. After that, sending a copy abroad is a separate question with its own paperwork. Several industries are stricter still and allow no copy out at all.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Russia runs an approved-destinations list, so a transfer is banned unless the destination is on it. Before any data leaves you must send the regulator a separate written notice naming the countries, the data and the recipients, and you must first collect written assurances from the recipient about how it will protect the data. If the destination is on the approved list you may start as soon as the notice is sent. If it is not, you must wait, and in practice you will be refused. The United States is not on the list.High confidence	Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	Roskomnadzor, the federal communications and media supervisor, is the data protection regulator. It is a long-established federal service, fully staffed, and it is still issuing binding orders — its most recent inspection check-list order was published on the state legal portal in December 2025. It is not the only enforcer. The security service runs the national cyber-attack reporting system, the technical regulator FSTEC sets security requirements for government and critical systems, and the Bank of Russia supervises banks and payment firms.Medium confidence	The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply and they collide. Personal data must be destroyed within 30 days of the purpose being achieved, or within 30 days of consent being withdrawn, and within 10 working days if the processing was unlawful. Against that, staff records must be kept for 50 years, telecoms and messaging metadata for three years, and message content for up to six months. Where a statute sets a minimum, the minimum wins and you keep the data.High confidence	There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There are at least three clocks and they run at once. You have 24 hours to tell the data regulator that personal data has leaked, and 72 hours to give it the results of your internal investigation. Separately, if the leak came from a computer attack you must report it to the security service's national attack-detection system. Banks and payment firms report to the Bank of Russia as well. Missing the 24-hour notice is itself a fine of up to 3 million roubles, about $37,000.High confidence	Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?	Five things catch people out. First, leaking data is now a crime, and doing it across a border carries up to eight years in prison. Second, repeat leaks are fined as a share of worldwide-style annual revenue, between 1 and 3 percent, with a floor of 20 million roubles, about $250,000. Third, staff files must be kept 50 years, which flatly conflicts with the 30-day deletion duty. Fourth, biometric data can only be handled by a Russian-controlled company using databases in Russia. Fifth, refusing to serve a customer because they will not give biometrics is itself a fine.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?	One dated change is already fixed: from 1 September 2027, Moscow's public bodies move onto a single city technology platform, which will pull a large volume of citizen data into one place. Much more important are the switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The approved-country list can be cut by a single regulator order. Any transfer can be banned outright on security or economic grounds. And the rules for foreign use of Russian mapping technology have been written into the law but never issued.High confidence	Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	All industries — Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 152-ФЗ «О персональных данных», статья 18 часть 5 All industries — Федеральный закон № 152-ФЗ, статья 21 часть 3.1 и статья 19 часть 12 All industries — Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации, статья 272.1 Payments — Федеральный закон от 27.06.2011 № 161-ФЗ «О национальной платежной системе», статьи 12 и 16 All industries — Федеральный закон от 29.12.2022 № 572-ФЗ об идентификации и аутентификации с использованием биометрических персональных данных Telecoms — Федеральный закон от 07.07.2003 № 126-ФЗ «О связи», статья 64; Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 149-ФЗ, статья 10.1 Government — Приказ ФСТЭК России от 11.04.2025 № 117; Указ Президента РФ от 30.03.2022 № 166; Указ Президента РФ от 01.05.2022 № 250; Федеральный закон от 07.04.2025 № 58-ФЗ Mapping and location — Федеральный закон от 30.12.2015 № 431-ФЗ «О геодезии, картографии и пространственных данных», статьи 23 и 24 Health and social care — Федеральный закон от 21.11.2011 № 323-ФЗ «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации», статья 13 Social media and online platforms — Федеральный закон от 01.07.2021 № 236-ФЗ «О деятельности иностранных лиц в информационно-телекоммуникационной сети «Интернет» на территории Российской Федерации»	None found.