Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

RussiaChecked 18 August 2026

A copy must stayWork: Very highEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: If you collect personal data from people in Russia, the database you collect it into must sit inside Russia. You may then send a copy abroad, but only after you tell the regulator first and only to a country on its approved list. The United States is not on that list. Breaking the storage rule costs up to 6 million roubles, about $75,000, and leaking data can now put a person in prison.
The catch: The 'copy may go abroad' part disappears in several industries. Payments, electronic money, biometrics, telecoms, internet messaging services, government systems and detailed mapping are hard walls: the data must stay in Russia and no copy may leave. Since 1 September 2025 any company running 'significant' critical infrastructure — which includes most banks, telecoms operators and large energy and health providers — must also run Russian-registered software on those systems.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law reaches a foreign company with no office in Russia. It applies whenever you process the personal data of Russian citizens under a contract with them, under any other agreement with them, or on the basis of their consent. There is no size or revenue threshold. Almost every organisation must also file a notice with the regulator before it starts processing, and file a second, separate notice before any data leaves the country.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: A copy can leave, but the original must stay. When you collect personal data about Russian citizens, the database you record, store, update or retrieve it from has to be physically in Russia. Since 1 July 2025 the law says this as a flat ban on using databases outside Russia for those steps. After that, sending a copy abroad is a separate question with its own paperwork. Several industries are stricter still and allow no copy out at all.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Russia runs an approved-destinations list, so a transfer is banned unless the destination is on it. Before any data leaves you must send the regulator a separate written notice naming the countries, the data and the recipients, and you must first collect written assurances from the recipient about how it will protect the data. If the destination is on the approved list you may start as soon as the notice is sent. If it is not, you must wait, and in practice you will be refused. The United States is not on the list.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Roskomnadzor, the federal communications and media supervisor, is the data protection regulator. It is a long-established federal service, fully staffed, and it is still issuing binding orders — its most recent inspection check-list order was published on the state legal portal in December 2025. It is not the only enforcer. The security service runs the national cyber-attack reporting system, the technical regulator FSTEC sets security requirements for government and critical systems, and the Bank of Russia supervises banks and payment firms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they collide. Personal data must be destroyed within 30 days of the purpose being achieved, or within 30 days of consent being withdrawn, and within 10 working days if the processing was unlawful. Against that, staff records must be kept for 50 years, telecoms and messaging metadata for three years, and message content for up to six months. Where a statute sets a minimum, the minimum wins and you keep the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are at least three clocks and they run at once. You have 24 hours to tell the data regulator that personal data has leaked, and 72 hours to give it the results of your internal investigation. Separately, if the leak came from a computer attack you must report it to the security service's national attack-detection system. Banks and payment firms report to the Bank of Russia as well. Missing the 24-hour notice is itself a fine of up to 3 million roubles, about $37,000.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things catch people out. First, leaking data is now a crime, and doing it across a border carries up to eight years in prison. Second, repeat leaks are fined as a share of worldwide-style annual revenue, between 1 and 3 percent, with a floor of 20 million roubles, about $250,000. Third, staff files must be kept 50 years, which flatly conflicts with the 30-day deletion duty. Fourth, biometric data can only be handled by a Russian-controlled company using databases in Russia. Fifth, refusing to serve a customer because they will not give biometrics is itself a fine.High confidence
What's about to change?: One dated change is already fixed: from 1 September 2027, Moscow's public bodies move onto a single city technology platform, which will pull a large volume of citizen data into one place. Much more important are the switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The approved-country list can be cut by a single regulator order. Any transfer can be banned outright on security or economic grounds. And the rules for foreign use of Russian mapping technology have been written into the law but never issued.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 152-ФЗ «О персональных данных», статья 18 часть 5
All industries — Федеральный закон № 152-ФЗ, статья 21 часть 3.1 и статья 19 часть 12
All industries — Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации, статья 272.1
Payments — Федеральный закон от 27.06.2011 № 161-ФЗ «О национальной платежной системе», статьи 12 и 16
All industries — Федеральный закон от 29.12.2022 № 572-ФЗ об идентификации и аутентификации с использованием биометрических персональных данных
Telecoms — Федеральный закон от 07.07.2003 № 126-ФЗ «О связи», статья 64; Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 149-ФЗ, статья 10.1
Government — Приказ ФСТЭК России от 11.04.2025 № 117; Указ Президента РФ от 30.03.2022 № 166; Указ Президента РФ от 01.05.2022 № 250; Федеральный закон от 07.04.2025 № 58-ФЗ
Mapping and location — Федеральный закон от 30.12.2015 № 431-ФЗ «О геодезии, картографии и пространственных данных», статьи 23 и 24
Health and social care — Федеральный закон от 21.11.2011 № 323-ФЗ «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации», статья 13
Social media and online platforms — Федеральный закон от 01.07.2021 № 236-ФЗ «О деятельности иностранных лиц в информационно-телекоммуникационной сети «Интернет» на территории Российской Федерации»

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	RussiaChecked 18 August 2026	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	A copy must stay Work: Very high Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	If you collect personal data from people in Russia, the database you collect it into must sit inside Russia. You may then send a copy abroad, but only after you tell the regulator first and only to a country on its approved list. The United States is not on that list. Breaking the storage rule costs up to 6 million roubles, about $75,000, and leaking data can now put a person in prison.	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch	The 'copy may go abroad' part disappears in several industries. Payments, electronic money, biometrics, telecoms, internet messaging services, government systems and detailed mapping are hard walls: the data must stay in Russia and no copy may leave. Since 1 September 2025 any company running 'significant' critical infrastructure — which includes most banks, telecoms operators and large energy and health providers — must also run Russian-registered software on those systems.	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The law reaches a foreign company with no office in Russia. It applies whenever you process the personal data of Russian citizens under a contract with them, under any other agreement with them, or on the basis of their consent. There is no size or revenue threshold. Almost every organisation must also file a notice with the regulator before it starts processing, and file a second, separate notice before any data leaves the country.High confidence	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	A copy can leave, but the original must stay. When you collect personal data about Russian citizens, the database you record, store, update or retrieve it from has to be physically in Russia. Since 1 July 2025 the law says this as a flat ban on using databases outside Russia for those steps. After that, sending a copy abroad is a separate question with its own paperwork. Several industries are stricter still and allow no copy out at all.High confidence	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Russia runs an approved-destinations list, so a transfer is banned unless the destination is on it. Before any data leaves you must send the regulator a separate written notice naming the countries, the data and the recipients, and you must first collect written assurances from the recipient about how it will protect the data. If the destination is on the approved list you may start as soon as the notice is sent. If it is not, you must wait, and in practice you will be refused. The United States is not on the list.High confidence	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	Roskomnadzor, the federal communications and media supervisor, is the data protection regulator. It is a long-established federal service, fully staffed, and it is still issuing binding orders — its most recent inspection check-list order was published on the state legal portal in December 2025. It is not the only enforcer. The security service runs the national cyber-attack reporting system, the technical regulator FSTEC sets security requirements for government and critical systems, and the Bank of Russia supervises banks and payment firms.Medium confidence	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply and they collide. Personal data must be destroyed within 30 days of the purpose being achieved, or within 30 days of consent being withdrawn, and within 10 working days if the processing was unlawful. Against that, staff records must be kept for 50 years, telecoms and messaging metadata for three years, and message content for up to six months. Where a statute sets a minimum, the minimum wins and you keep the data.High confidence	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There are at least three clocks and they run at once. You have 24 hours to tell the data regulator that personal data has leaked, and 72 hours to give it the results of your internal investigation. Separately, if the leak came from a computer attack you must report it to the security service's national attack-detection system. Banks and payment firms report to the Bank of Russia as well. Missing the 24-hour notice is itself a fine of up to 3 million roubles, about $37,000.High confidence	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things catch people out. First, leaking data is now a crime, and doing it across a border carries up to eight years in prison. Second, repeat leaks are fined as a share of worldwide-style annual revenue, between 1 and 3 percent, with a floor of 20 million roubles, about $250,000. Third, staff files must be kept 50 years, which flatly conflicts with the 30-day deletion duty. Fourth, biometric data can only be handled by a Russian-controlled company using databases in Russia. Fifth, refusing to serve a customer because they will not give biometrics is itself a fine.High confidence	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	One dated change is already fixed: from 1 September 2027, Moscow's public bodies move onto a single city technology platform, which will pull a large volume of citizen data into one place. Much more important are the switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation. The approved-country list can be cut by a single regulator order. Any transfer can be banned outright on security or economic grounds. And the rules for foreign use of Russian mapping technology have been written into the law but never issued.High confidence	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	All industries — Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 152-ФЗ «О персональных данных», статья 18 часть 5 All industries — Федеральный закон № 152-ФЗ, статья 21 часть 3.1 и статья 19 часть 12 All industries — Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации, статья 272.1 Payments — Федеральный закон от 27.06.2011 № 161-ФЗ «О национальной платежной системе», статьи 12 и 16 All industries — Федеральный закон от 29.12.2022 № 572-ФЗ об идентификации и аутентификации с использованием биометрических персональных данных Telecoms — Федеральный закон от 07.07.2003 № 126-ФЗ «О связи», статья 64; Федеральный закон от 27.07.2006 № 149-ФЗ, статья 10.1 Government — Приказ ФСТЭК России от 11.04.2025 № 117; Указ Президента РФ от 30.03.2022 № 166; Указ Президента РФ от 01.05.2022 № 250; Федеральный закон от 07.04.2025 № 58-ФЗ Mapping and location — Федеральный закон от 30.12.2015 № 431-ФЗ «О геодезии, картографии и пространственных данных», статьи 23 и 24 Health and social care — Федеральный закон от 21.11.2011 № 323-ФЗ «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации», статья 13 Social media and online platforms — Федеральный закон от 01.07.2021 № 236-ФЗ «О деятельности иностранных лиц в информационно-телекоммуникационной сети «Интернет» на территории Российской Федерации»	None found.