Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

SerbiaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Serbia copied Europe's privacy law almost word for word, so the duties feel familiar. Data can leave the country, and for most of Europe and a long list of other countries it can leave with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy — over a thousand inspections in 2025 — but it hands out warnings, not fines. The biggest fine any Serbian court imposed for a privacy breach in 2025 was about $950.
The catch: Two industries break the general picture. Online gambling operators must keep a copy of their whole player and transaction database physically inside Serbia. Banks, insurers and other financial firms cannot move any IT work abroad without telling the central bank 30 days ahead, proving the foreign country would let Serbian supervisors inspect on site, and risking a veto that forces them to cancel the contract.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it offers goods or services to people in Serbia, or watches what they do in Serbia. There is no size or revenue threshold to hide behind. If you are caught this way you must appoint a written representative living or based in Serbia, unless your processing is occasional and low risk or you are a public body.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork — and often with none at all. Serbia treats a very long list of countries as automatically safe: every member of the Council of Europe's data protection treaty, which covers all of Europe plus Argentina, Mexico, Morocco, Mauritius, Senegal, Tunisia, Uruguay, Cape Verde and others, and separately every country the European Union has approved. Sending data there needs no permission and no contract. Everywhere else you sign the Commissioner's standard contract or use approved group rules. Only one industry has a hard wall: online gambling. Banking has a gate rather than a wall.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: First check the destination. If it is on the safe list, you need nothing — no contract, no filing, no approval. If it is not, you sign the standard contract the Serbian regulator published in January 2020, or you get approved group-wide rules. If you want to use your own wording instead of the standard contract, the regulator must approve it and has 60 days to answer. As a last resort there are narrow exceptions such as the person's explicit consent.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, and it is genuinely working. In 2025 it finished 1,169 inspections, received 5,310 cases and issued 102 corrective orders. But it almost never fines. Of those 102 orders, 101 were warnings and one was a ban on processing. It asked the courts to punish only three organisations all year. Banks answer to the National Bank of Serbia instead, and it is fully active. A brand-new Office for Information Security exists on paper since October 2025 but we could find no sign it is running yet.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is no single national rule. The privacy law says keep data only as long as you need it, and each sector sets its own clock. Online gambling operators must keep every transaction for at least ten years. Phone and internet companies must keep who-called-whom records for exactly 12 months and then destroy them. Anyone selling a phone line must keep the customer's identity check for 12 months after the service ends. Financial firms must keep a live register of every outsourced service, including which countries the data sits in.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. Privacy breach: tell the Commissioner without delay and at the latest within 72 hours, and if you miss that you must explain why. Cyber incident: if you run an information system the state has classed as important, you have only 24 hours to report it. Then a third clock starts — updates every 24 hours for a serious incident, every three days for a middling one, and a final report within 15 days of the incident ending. Banks report cyber incidents to the central bank instead, promptly, with no fixed hour count.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) A child can consent for themselves at 15, not 13 or 16 — plan your age gates around 15. (2) A foreign court order or foreign tax authority demand for data is recognised in Serbia only if a treaty backs it, so handing data to an overseas authority on request can itself be unlawful. (3) Individuals, not just companies, can be prosecuted; the regulator has filed 49 criminal complaints since 2010. (4) Dozens of older Serbian laws still contradict the privacy law and were never fixed. (5) The government's official list of safe destination countries has not been touched since 2019 and still names a United States framework that died in 2020.High confidence
What's about to change?: One dated change and several unscheduled ones. From 1 January 2027 the ministry formally takes over supervising the new Office for Information Security, which should mean the office is actually up and running by then. A rewrite of the privacy law is being drafted by a special working group covering video surveillance, biometrics, genetic data and artificial intelligence, and a separate group is drafting an artificial intelligence law. Neither has been published as a bill, so neither is binding.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Online gaming — Pravilnik o informaciono-komunikacionom sistemu za priređivanje posebnih igara na sreću preko sredstava elektronske komunikacije

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	SerbiaChecked 18 August 2026	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Serbia copied Europe's privacy law almost word for word, so the duties feel familiar. Data can leave the country, and for most of Europe and a long list of other countries it can leave with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy — over a thousand inspections in 2025 — but it hands out warnings, not fines. The biggest fine any Serbian court imposed for a privacy breach in 2025 was about $950.	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch	Two industries break the general picture. Online gambling operators must keep a copy of their whole player and transaction database physically inside Serbia. Banks, insurers and other financial firms cannot move any IT work abroad without telling the central bank 30 days ahead, proving the foreign country would let Serbian supervisors inspect on site, and risking a veto that forces them to cancel the contract.	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it offers goods or services to people in Serbia, or watches what they do in Serbia. There is no size or revenue threshold to hide behind. If you are caught this way you must appoint a written representative living or based in Serbia, unless your processing is occasional and low risk or you are a public body.High confidence	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with paperwork — and often with none at all. Serbia treats a very long list of countries as automatically safe: every member of the Council of Europe's data protection treaty, which covers all of Europe plus Argentina, Mexico, Morocco, Mauritius, Senegal, Tunisia, Uruguay, Cape Verde and others, and separately every country the European Union has approved. Sending data there needs no permission and no contract. Everywhere else you sign the Commissioner's standard contract or use approved group rules. Only one industry has a hard wall: online gambling. Banking has a gate rather than a wall.High confidence	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	First check the destination. If it is on the safe list, you need nothing — no contract, no filing, no approval. If it is not, you sign the standard contract the Serbian regulator published in January 2020, or you get approved group-wide rules. If you want to use your own wording instead of the standard contract, the regulator must approve it and has 60 days to answer. As a last resort there are narrow exceptions such as the person's explicit consent.High confidence	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, and it is genuinely working. In 2025 it finished 1,169 inspections, received 5,310 cases and issued 102 corrective orders. But it almost never fines. Of those 102 orders, 101 were warnings and one was a ban on processing. It asked the courts to punish only three organisations all year. Banks answer to the National Bank of Serbia instead, and it is fully active. A brand-new Office for Information Security exists on paper since October 2025 but we could find no sign it is running yet.High confidence	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is no single national rule. The privacy law says keep data only as long as you need it, and each sector sets its own clock. Online gambling operators must keep every transaction for at least ten years. Phone and internet companies must keep who-called-whom records for exactly 12 months and then destroy them. Anyone selling a phone line must keep the customer's identity check for 12 months after the service ends. Financial firms must keep a live register of every outsourced service, including which countries the data sits in.High confidence	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count three clocks. Privacy breach: tell the Commissioner without delay and at the latest within 72 hours, and if you miss that you must explain why. Cyber incident: if you run an information system the state has classed as important, you have only 24 hours to report it. Then a third clock starts — updates every 24 hours for a serious incident, every three days for a middling one, and a final report within 15 days of the incident ending. Banks report cyber incidents to the central bank instead, promptly, with no fixed hour count.High confidence	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five. (1) A child can consent for themselves at 15, not 13 or 16 — plan your age gates around 15. (2) A foreign court order or foreign tax authority demand for data is recognised in Serbia only if a treaty backs it, so handing data to an overseas authority on request can itself be unlawful. (3) Individuals, not just companies, can be prosecuted; the regulator has filed 49 criminal complaints since 2010. (4) Dozens of older Serbian laws still contradict the privacy law and were never fixed. (5) The government's official list of safe destination countries has not been touched since 2019 and still names a United States framework that died in 2020.High confidence	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	One dated change and several unscheduled ones. From 1 January 2027 the ministry formally takes over supervising the new Office for Information Security, which should mean the office is actually up and running by then. A rewrite of the privacy law is being drafted by a special working group covering video surveillance, biometrics, genetic data and artificial intelligence, and a separate group is drafting an artificial intelligence law. Neither has been published as a bill, so neither is binding.High confidence	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Online gaming — Pravilnik o informaciono-komunikacionom sistemu za priređivanje posebnih igara na sreću preko sredstava elektronske komunikacije	None found.