Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

PolandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch: True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

GeorgiaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Georgia copied the European model in 2023: data can leave the country, but only to a destination the supervisor has approved, or with a permit, or under a narrow exception. There is no general rule forcing data to stay. The big change is who is in charge — on 2 March 2026 the independent privacy watchdog was replaced by the State Audit Office, and we could not verify that it has issued a single decision since.
The catch: Two things break the calm headline. Telephone and internet connection records are copied into a state-held database inside Georgia, so telecoms cannot treat that data as ordinary business data. And the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law catches a company with no office in Georgia if it uses technical means located in Georgia to handle people's data. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under. Worse, a foreign company in that position must appoint a representative in Georgia and register that person with the supervisor BEFORE it starts processing — the only escape is being based in the European Union or in a country the European Union has already approved.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Data may go abroad if the destination country has been judged to give good enough protection, or if the supervisor grants a permit for the contract you have signed, or under a short list of narrow exceptions such as the person's written consent after being told the risks. Nothing in the general law forces data to stay in Georgia. The one place data really does stay is telecoms: a copy of who called whom, and when, sits in a state-run database inside the country.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, with a permit as the back-up. The supervisor decides which countries offer good enough protection and publishes that decision as a formal act; if your destination is not on it, you need a permit for your contract, or you fall back on a narrow exception such as written consent. We could not find the current published list, so we cannot tell you today which countries are on it — treat that as the single biggest open question in this record.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: This is where Georgia surprises people. Until 1 March 2026 the job belonged to the Personal Data Protection Service, an independent watchdog. From 2 March 2026 the law hands the same job to the State Audit Office — the body that audits government spending — and its head, the Auditor General, now signs the privacy rules. We can prove the handover happened, because the Auditor General reissued two of the privacy rulebooks at the end of March 2026. We could not find a single enforcement decision published since the handover.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The ceiling is clear: keep personal data only as long as you need it for the purpose you collected it for, then erase, destroy or strip out the identifying parts, unless another law tells you to keep it. The floors are scattered across tax, accounting and sector laws that we could not open on an official site today. In telecoms the direction is reversed — the content of a call or message must be destroyed at once, while the record of who contacted whom can be copied into a state database and kept for a period set by a separate law.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Two clocks. If personal data is lost, leaked or wrongly handled, you have 72 hours from spotting it to tell the supervisor, and you must keep your own record of the incident and what you did about it. If you run a system the government has listed as critical to the country, you must tell the national computer emergency response team immediately — no fixed number of hours, which in practice means the same day. If both apply to you, both run at once.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. First, the regulator changed identity on 2 March 2026, so a privacy notice or contract naming the Personal Data Protection Service now points at a body the law no longer mentions. Second, a foreign company must register a representative in Georgia before it starts, not after. Third, a child is anyone under 16, so a European sign-up flow tuned to 13 will be wrong here. Fourth, direct marketing always needs consent, even if you bought the list lawfully. Fifth, the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations, which must publish detailed information about themselves.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing new is scheduled to start in the privacy law itself — we checked the current text on 18 August 2026 and found no provisions waiting on a future date. The live story is the handover: the Auditor General is reissuing the four rulebooks inherited from the old watchdog, and two of the four were reissued in March 2026. The rest of the risk sits in switches the government can already flip without a new law.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Telecoms — საქართველოს კანონი ელექტრონული კომუნიკაციების შესახებ

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	PolandChecked 18 August 2026	GeorgiaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Waking up
In one paragraph	Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.	Georgia copied the European model in 2023: data can leave the country, but only to a destination the supervisor has approved, or with a permit, or under a narrow exception. There is no general rule forcing data to stay. The big change is who is in charge — on 2 March 2026 the independent privacy watchdog was replaced by the State Audit Office, and we could not verify that it has issued a single decision since.
The catch	True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.	Two things break the calm headline. Telephone and internet connection records are copied into a state-held database inside Georgia, so telecoms cannot treat that data as ordinary business data. And the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence	Yes. The law catches a company with no office in Georgia if it uses technical means located in Georgia to handle people's data. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under. Worse, a foreign company in that position must appoint a representative in Georgia and register that person with the supervisor BEFORE it starts processing — the only escape is being based in the European Union or in a country the European Union has already approved.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Data may go abroad if the destination country has been judged to give good enough protection, or if the supervisor grants a permit for the contract you have signed, or under a short list of narrow exceptions such as the person's written consent after being told the risks. Nothing in the general law forces data to stay in Georgia. The one place data really does stay is telecoms: a copy of who called whom, and when, sits in a state-run database inside the country.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence	The model is an approved-destinations list, with a permit as the back-up. The supervisor decides which countries offer good enough protection and publishes that decision as a formal act; if your destination is not on it, you need a permit for your contract, or you fall back on a narrow exception such as written consent. We could not find the current published list, so we cannot tell you today which countries are on it — treat that as the single biggest open question in this record.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence	This is where Georgia surprises people. Until 1 March 2026 the job belonged to the Personal Data Protection Service, an independent watchdog. From 2 March 2026 the law hands the same job to the State Audit Office — the body that audits government spending — and its head, the Auditor General, now signs the privacy rules. We can prove the handover happened, because the Auditor General reissued two of the privacy rulebooks at the end of March 2026. We could not find a single enforcement decision published since the handover.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence	The ceiling is clear: keep personal data only as long as you need it for the purpose you collected it for, then erase, destroy or strip out the identifying parts, unless another law tells you to keep it. The floors are scattered across tax, accounting and sector laws that we could not open on an official site today. In telecoms the direction is reversed — the content of a call or message must be destroyed at once, while the record of who contacted whom can be copied into a state database and kept for a period set by a separate law.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence	Two clocks. If personal data is lost, leaked or wrongly handled, you have 72 hours from spotting it to tell the supervisor, and you must keep your own record of the incident and what you did about it. If you run a system the government has listed as critical to the country, you must tell the national computer emergency response team immediately — no fixed number of hours, which in practice means the same day. If both apply to you, both run at once.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence	Five. First, the regulator changed identity on 2 March 2026, so a privacy notice or contract naming the Personal Data Protection Service now points at a body the law no longer mentions. Second, a foreign company must register a representative in Georgia before it starts, not after. Third, a child is anyone under 16, so a European sign-up flow tuned to 13 will be wrong here. Fourth, direct marketing always needs consent, even if you bought the list lawfully. Fifth, the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations, which must publish detailed information about themselves.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence	Nothing new is scheduled to start in the privacy law itself — we checked the current text on 18 August 2026 and found no provisions waiting on a future date. The live story is the handover: the Auditor General is reissuing the four rulebooks inherited from the old watchdog, and two of the four were reissued in March 2026. The rest of the risk sits in switches the government can already flip without a new law.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Telecoms — საქართველოს კანონი ელექტრონული კომუნიკაციების შესახებ