Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

PolandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch: True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

AustraliaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Australia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. You may send personal information anywhere, and no destination is banned. The catch is that you stay legally responsible for whatever your overseas supplier does with it. Small businesses under A$3 million turnover are exempt from the main privacy law. Specific industries are far stricter, and one of them carries a prison sentence.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch six areas. National electronic health records may not leave Australia at all, and taking them offshore is a crime punishable by five years in prison. Banks and insurers must tell the banking regulator before any offshore arrangement. Open banking data, critical infrastructure data, Australian Government hosting and Queensland state government data each have their own rules. Check your sector before you believe the headline.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you even with no office in Australia. The national privacy law applies to any organisation that carries on business in Australia, whether or not the data is collected or stored here. But Australia has something most countries do not: a real size threshold you can fall below. A business with annual turnover of A$3 million (about US$2 million) or less is generally exempt. That exemption has big holes: it does not apply if you provide a health service, if you buy or sell personal information, or if you supply services under a federal government contract. No local representative and no registration are required.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Australia has no national law saying personal data must be kept in the country, and no country is blacklisted. You can pick any cloud region you like. What you cannot do is hand off the risk: if your overseas supplier does something with the data that would break Australian rules, the law treats that as your own breach. The hard walls are industry by industry, and the health one is absolute.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Before data leaves, you must take reasonable steps to make sure the overseas recipient will handle it the Australian way. In practice that means a contract with the right promises in it. There is no government form to file, no approval to wait for, and no list of approved countries to check. A power to approve countries was switched on in December 2024, but as of today the government has not named a single one. The alternative routes are narrow: you can rely on the recipient already being covered by a substantially similar law, or on the person's informed consent after you warn them you will no longer be responsible.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. It is staffed, it has a sitting Privacy Commissioner, and it is issuing decisions. In October 2025 the Federal Court ordered a pathology company to pay A$5.8 million (about US$3.8 million), the first court penalty in the law's history. The regulator sued Optus in August 2025, settled with Meta for A$50 million in December 2024, and in June 2026 alone published formal findings against Optus, American Express and two health providers. Banking, cyber security, online safety and open banking each have their own separate regulator, and all of them are working.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and a ceiling and they pull in opposite directions. The clearest floor is telecoms: phone and internet providers must keep call and connection records for two years, and must encrypt them. The general ceiling has no number attached — you must destroy or de-identify personal information once you genuinely no longer need it. Two ceilings are sharp. A social media platform must destroy age-check information as soon as it has finished using it. A digital identity provider must destroy a face or fingerprint scan immediately after the identity check is complete.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, because they run at different speeds. If you pay a ransom and your Australian turnover is above A$3 million (about US$2 million), you have 72 hours to report the payment to the government. If you run critical infrastructure, you have 12 hours for an attack that seriously hits availability, and 72 hours for a lesser one. If you are a bank, insurer or superannuation fund, you have 72 hours for a security incident and only 24 hours if a critical service goes down beyond tolerance. For an ordinary personal data breach you get up to 30 days to assess whether it is serious, then you must tell the regulator and the affected people as soon as you practically can. There is no fixed hour count for that last one, which is the part people get wrong.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that will cost you a weekend. First, moving national electronic health record data offshore is a crime, not a fine: up to five years in prison. Second, you never stop owning your supplier's mistakes — a major bank had to get a special ruling from the Privacy Commissioner just to keep processing international money transfers. Third, since December 2025 social media platforms must keep under-16s off the service and then destroy the age-check data they collected. Fourth, Queensland's rule for state government data is stricter than the national one and is hidden in section 33 of the Act, not in the numbered principles — the principle numbered 8 says there is no equivalent. Fifth, the value of a penalty unit rose to A$364 (about US$240) on 1 July 2026, so every fine figure you looked up before then is now understated.High confidence
What's about to change?: One date dominates: 10 December 2026. On that day privacy policies must start explaining computer-made decisions that significantly affect people, and the new Children's Online Privacy Code must be finalised and registered. The draft of that code was out for public comment from 31 March to 5 June 2026. Further out, the tougher critical infrastructure duties made in June 2026 start biting from mid-2027 and mid-2028 as their grace periods run out. Watch three switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — My Health Records Act 2012, section 77

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	PolandChecked 18 August 2026	AustraliaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.	Australia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. You may send personal information anywhere, and no destination is banned. The catch is that you stay legally responsible for whatever your overseas supplier does with it. Small businesses under A$3 million turnover are exempt from the main privacy law. Specific industries are far stricter, and one of them carries a prison sentence.
The catch	True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch six areas. National electronic health records may not leave Australia at all, and taking them offshore is a crime punishable by five years in prison. Banks and insurers must tell the banking regulator before any offshore arrangement. Open banking data, critical infrastructure data, Australian Government hosting and Queensland state government data each have their own rules. Check your sector before you believe the headline.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence	Yes, it reaches you even with no office in Australia. The national privacy law applies to any organisation that carries on business in Australia, whether or not the data is collected or stored here. But Australia has something most countries do not: a real size threshold you can fall below. A business with annual turnover of A$3 million (about US$2 million) or less is generally exempt. That exemption has big holes: it does not apply if you provide a health service, if you buy or sell personal information, or if you supply services under a federal government contract. No local representative and no registration are required.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence	In general, yes. Australia has no national law saying personal data must be kept in the country, and no country is blacklisted. You can pick any cloud region you like. What you cannot do is hand off the risk: if your overseas supplier does something with the data that would break Australian rules, the law treats that as your own breach. The hard walls are industry by industry, and the health one is absolute.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence	Before data leaves, you must take reasonable steps to make sure the overseas recipient will handle it the Australian way. In practice that means a contract with the right promises in it. There is no government form to file, no approval to wait for, and no list of approved countries to check. A power to approve countries was switched on in December 2024, but as of today the government has not named a single one. The alternative routes are narrow: you can rely on the recipient already being covered by a substantially similar law, or on the person's informed consent after you warn them you will no longer be responsible.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence	The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. It is staffed, it has a sitting Privacy Commissioner, and it is issuing decisions. In October 2025 the Federal Court ordered a pathology company to pay A$5.8 million (about US$3.8 million), the first court penalty in the law's history. The regulator sued Optus in August 2025, settled with Meta for A$50 million in December 2024, and in June 2026 alone published formal findings against Optus, American Express and two health providers. Banking, cyber security, online safety and open banking each have their own separate regulator, and all of them are working.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence	There is a floor and a ceiling and they pull in opposite directions. The clearest floor is telecoms: phone and internet providers must keep call and connection records for two years, and must encrypt them. The general ceiling has no number attached — you must destroy or de-identify personal information once you genuinely no longer need it. Two ceilings are sharp. A social media platform must destroy age-check information as soon as it has finished using it. A digital identity provider must destroy a face or fingerprint scan immediately after the identity check is complete.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence	Count four clocks, because they run at different speeds. If you pay a ransom and your Australian turnover is above A$3 million (about US$2 million), you have 72 hours to report the payment to the government. If you run critical infrastructure, you have 12 hours for an attack that seriously hits availability, and 72 hours for a lesser one. If you are a bank, insurer or superannuation fund, you have 72 hours for a security incident and only 24 hours if a critical service goes down beyond tolerance. For an ordinary personal data breach you get up to 30 days to assess whether it is serious, then you must tell the regulator and the affected people as soon as you practically can. There is no fixed hour count for that last one, which is the part people get wrong.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence	Five things that will cost you a weekend. First, moving national electronic health record data offshore is a crime, not a fine: up to five years in prison. Second, you never stop owning your supplier's mistakes — a major bank had to get a special ruling from the Privacy Commissioner just to keep processing international money transfers. Third, since December 2025 social media platforms must keep under-16s off the service and then destroy the age-check data they collected. Fourth, Queensland's rule for state government data is stricter than the national one and is hidden in section 33 of the Act, not in the numbered principles — the principle numbered 8 says there is no equivalent. Fifth, the value of a penalty unit rose to A$364 (about US$240) on 1 July 2026, so every fine figure you looked up before then is now understated.High confidence
What's about to change?	Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence	One date dominates: 10 December 2026. On that day privacy policies must start explaining computer-made decisions that significantly affect people, and the new Children's Online Privacy Code must be finalised and registered. The draft of that code was out for public comment from 31 March to 5 June 2026. Further out, the tougher critical infrastructure duties made in June 2026 start biting from mid-2027 and mid-2028 as their grace periods run out. Watch three switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Health and social care — My Health Records Act 2012, section 77