Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

NepalChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Dormant

In one paragraph: Nepal's privacy law says nothing about sending data abroad, so on paper data can leave freely. There is no privacy regulator at all: breaches are criminal matters taken to a local court, the maximum fine is about 215 US dollars, and no case has produced a public penalty. The real constraint is a 2025 rule on data centres and cloud services, which says customers may only buy hosting from providers on a government list.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops being true the moment you look at where the data physically sits. Since January 2025 anyone buying data centre or cloud services in Nepal is supposed to use only providers listed by the Department of Information Technology, and to get listed a provider must be a Nepal-registered company with a physical building in Nepal. Government security agencies must use the state's own data centre, other government bodies are being moved into it, and card payments made in Nepali rupees must be settled inside Nepal.
Does this apply to me?: It is unclear, and that is the honest answer. The Privacy Act covers public bodies and companies handling people's information, but it never says whether it reaches a company sitting outside Nepal, and it does not ask you to appoint anyone locally. Two other laws clearly do reach you from abroad: the computer-crime law applies to acts done outside Nepal that involve a computer located in Nepal, and the central bank's payment licensing policy expressly covers firms set up abroad that carry out payment business inside Nepal. There is no revenue or company-size threshold to fall below.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the privacy law, yes — it is silent on sending personal data out of Nepal, so there is nothing to comply with. But the country still has walls, and they are about where the machines are rather than where the data goes. Since January 2025 anyone buying data centre or cloud services is meant to use only providers on the government's published list, and listing requires a Nepal-registered company with a building in Nepal. Government security agencies must use the state's own data centre, and card payments made in Nepali rupees must be settled inside Nepal.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to get, no standard contract to sign and no list of approved countries, because Nepal's privacy law simply does not deal with sending data abroad. The control that does exist works the other way round: it is an approved-supplier list for hosting. The Department of Information Technology lists data centre and cloud providers, and customers are told to use only listed ones.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: For personal data, nobody. Nepal has no privacy regulator and no data protection authority. A person whose privacy is breached files a criminal complaint in their local district court within three months, and the court can also award compensation. The bodies that are genuinely active work on cyber security and on industry rules, not on privacy: the National Cyber Security Center published advisories as recently as April 2026, the telecoms authority collects security audit reports, the central bank issues payment directives, and the Department of Information Technology is running the data centre listing scheme.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax records must be kept for five years after the tax year ends. Telecom operators must keep security logs for at least six months and internet address-translation logs for at least three months. Data centres must keep camera footage for at least three months. Going the other way, the privacy law has no general delete-by date, so the only real deletion duty found is a telecom rule that says paper customer forms must be destroyed once they have been scanned.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is no general duty to report a personal data breach in Nepal — not to a regulator, and not to the people affected. No rule found sets a deadline in hours. Two narrower duties do exist. A data centre or cloud provider that finds someone has got into its systems must tell the regulator and the National Cyber Security Center immediately, by the fastest means available. A telecom operator hit by a security incident must work with a standing task force at the telecoms authority.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five. First, privacy breaches are criminal, not administrative — the exposure is up to three years in prison for an individual, not a corporate fine. Second, a victim has only three months from the act to complain, so most claims die of old age. Third, your cloud vendor must be on the government's list, which makes this a supplier problem rather than a policy problem. Fourth, anyone under 18 needs a guardian's consent — there is no lower digital age. Fifth, the online-content offence in the electronic transactions law carries up to five years in prison for material judged contrary to public morality, and it is written vaguely enough to catch ordinary posts.High confidence
What's about to change?: No data protection law is on the way that we could find, and no bill for one is before parliament. What is moving is telecoms and broadcasting: the ministry published discussion papers for a new Telecommunications Bill and a National Mass Communication Bill on 5 August 2026. The telecoms authority is consulting on amending its 2020 cyber security rules, on a framework for streaming and messaging services, and on a rule to force the move to newer internet addressing.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — डाटा सेन्टर तथा क्लाउड सेवा (सञ्चालन तथा व्यवस्थापन) निर्देशिका, २०८१ (Data Center and Cloud Service (Operation and Management) Directives, 2081)
Payments — भुक्तानी प्रणालीसम्बन्धी एकीकृत निर्देशन, २०८२ (Unified Directive on Payment Systems, 2082)

SerbiaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Serbia copied Europe's privacy law almost word for word, so the duties feel familiar. Data can leave the country, and for most of Europe and a long list of other countries it can leave with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy — over a thousand inspections in 2025 — but it hands out warnings, not fines. The biggest fine any Serbian court imposed for a privacy breach in 2025 was about $950.
The catch: Two industries break the general picture. Online gambling operators must keep a copy of their whole player and transaction database physically inside Serbia. Banks, insurers and other financial firms cannot move any IT work abroad without telling the central bank 30 days ahead, proving the foreign country would let Serbian supervisors inspect on site, and risking a veto that forces them to cancel the contract.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it offers goods or services to people in Serbia, or watches what they do in Serbia. There is no size or revenue threshold to hide behind. If you are caught this way you must appoint a written representative living or based in Serbia, unless your processing is occasional and low risk or you are a public body.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork — and often with none at all. Serbia treats a very long list of countries as automatically safe: every member of the Council of Europe's data protection treaty, which covers all of Europe plus Argentina, Mexico, Morocco, Mauritius, Senegal, Tunisia, Uruguay, Cape Verde and others, and separately every country the European Union has approved. Sending data there needs no permission and no contract. Everywhere else you sign the Commissioner's standard contract or use approved group rules. Only one industry has a hard wall: online gambling. Banking has a gate rather than a wall.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: First check the destination. If it is on the safe list, you need nothing — no contract, no filing, no approval. If it is not, you sign the standard contract the Serbian regulator published in January 2020, or you get approved group-wide rules. If you want to use your own wording instead of the standard contract, the regulator must approve it and has 60 days to answer. As a last resort there are narrow exceptions such as the person's explicit consent.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, and it is genuinely working. In 2025 it finished 1,169 inspections, received 5,310 cases and issued 102 corrective orders. But it almost never fines. Of those 102 orders, 101 were warnings and one was a ban on processing. It asked the courts to punish only three organisations all year. Banks answer to the National Bank of Serbia instead, and it is fully active. A brand-new Office for Information Security exists on paper since October 2025 but we could find no sign it is running yet.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is no single national rule. The privacy law says keep data only as long as you need it, and each sector sets its own clock. Online gambling operators must keep every transaction for at least ten years. Phone and internet companies must keep who-called-whom records for exactly 12 months and then destroy them. Anyone selling a phone line must keep the customer's identity check for 12 months after the service ends. Financial firms must keep a live register of every outsourced service, including which countries the data sits in.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. Privacy breach: tell the Commissioner without delay and at the latest within 72 hours, and if you miss that you must explain why. Cyber incident: if you run an information system the state has classed as important, you have only 24 hours to report it. Then a third clock starts — updates every 24 hours for a serious incident, every three days for a middling one, and a final report within 15 days of the incident ending. Banks report cyber incidents to the central bank instead, promptly, with no fixed hour count.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) A child can consent for themselves at 15, not 13 or 16 — plan your age gates around 15. (2) A foreign court order or foreign tax authority demand for data is recognised in Serbia only if a treaty backs it, so handing data to an overseas authority on request can itself be unlawful. (3) Individuals, not just companies, can be prosecuted; the regulator has filed 49 criminal complaints since 2010. (4) Dozens of older Serbian laws still contradict the privacy law and were never fixed. (5) The government's official list of safe destination countries has not been touched since 2019 and still names a United States framework that died in 2020.High confidence
What's about to change?: One dated change and several unscheduled ones. From 1 January 2027 the ministry formally takes over supervising the new Office for Information Security, which should mean the office is actually up and running by then. A rewrite of the privacy law is being drafted by a special working group covering video surveillance, biometrics, genetic data and artificial intelligence, and a separate group is drafting an artificial intelligence law. Neither has been published as a bill, so neither is binding.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Online gaming — Pravilnik o informaciono-komunikacionom sistemu za priređivanje posebnih igara na sreću preko sredstava elektronske komunikacije

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	NepalChecked 18 August 2026	SerbiaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Dormant	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Nepal's privacy law says nothing about sending data abroad, so on paper data can leave freely. There is no privacy regulator at all: breaches are criminal matters taken to a local court, the maximum fine is about 215 US dollars, and no case has produced a public penalty. The real constraint is a 2025 rule on data centres and cloud services, which says customers may only buy hosting from providers on a government list.	Serbia copied Europe's privacy law almost word for word, so the duties feel familiar. Data can leave the country, and for most of Europe and a long list of other countries it can leave with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy — over a thousand inspections in 2025 — but it hands out warnings, not fines. The biggest fine any Serbian court imposed for a privacy breach in 2025 was about $950.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops being true the moment you look at where the data physically sits. Since January 2025 anyone buying data centre or cloud services in Nepal is supposed to use only providers listed by the Department of Information Technology, and to get listed a provider must be a Nepal-registered company with a physical building in Nepal. Government security agencies must use the state's own data centre, other government bodies are being moved into it, and card payments made in Nepali rupees must be settled inside Nepal.	Two industries break the general picture. Online gambling operators must keep a copy of their whole player and transaction database physically inside Serbia. Banks, insurers and other financial firms cannot move any IT work abroad without telling the central bank 30 days ahead, proving the foreign country would let Serbian supervisors inspect on site, and risking a veto that forces them to cancel the contract.
Does this apply to me?	It is unclear, and that is the honest answer. The Privacy Act covers public bodies and companies handling people's information, but it never says whether it reaches a company sitting outside Nepal, and it does not ask you to appoint anyone locally. Two other laws clearly do reach you from abroad: the computer-crime law applies to acts done outside Nepal that involve a computer located in Nepal, and the central bank's payment licensing policy expressly covers firms set up abroad that carry out payment business inside Nepal. There is no revenue or company-size threshold to fall below.Medium confidence	Yes. The law reaches a company anywhere in the world if it offers goods or services to people in Serbia, or watches what they do in Serbia. There is no size or revenue threshold to hide behind. If you are caught this way you must appoint a written representative living or based in Serbia, unless your processing is occasional and low risk or you are a public body.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the privacy law, yes — it is silent on sending personal data out of Nepal, so there is nothing to comply with. But the country still has walls, and they are about where the machines are rather than where the data goes. Since January 2025 anyone buying data centre or cloud services is meant to use only providers on the government's published list, and listing requires a Nepal-registered company with a building in Nepal. Government security agencies must use the state's own data centre, and card payments made in Nepali rupees must be settled inside Nepal.Medium confidence	Yes, with paperwork — and often with none at all. Serbia treats a very long list of countries as automatically safe: every member of the Council of Europe's data protection treaty, which covers all of Europe plus Argentina, Mexico, Morocco, Mauritius, Senegal, Tunisia, Uruguay, Cape Verde and others, and separately every country the European Union has approved. Sending data there needs no permission and no contract. Everywhere else you sign the Commissioner's standard contract or use approved group rules. Only one industry has a hard wall: online gambling. Banking has a gate rather than a wall.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to get, no standard contract to sign and no list of approved countries, because Nepal's privacy law simply does not deal with sending data abroad. The control that does exist works the other way round: it is an approved-supplier list for hosting. The Department of Information Technology lists data centre and cloud providers, and customers are told to use only listed ones.Medium confidence	First check the destination. If it is on the safe list, you need nothing — no contract, no filing, no approval. If it is not, you sign the standard contract the Serbian regulator published in January 2020, or you get approved group-wide rules. If you want to use your own wording instead of the standard contract, the regulator must approve it and has 60 days to answer. As a last resort there are narrow exceptions such as the person's explicit consent.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	For personal data, nobody. Nepal has no privacy regulator and no data protection authority. A person whose privacy is breached files a criminal complaint in their local district court within three months, and the court can also award compensation. The bodies that are genuinely active work on cyber security and on industry rules, not on privacy: the National Cyber Security Center published advisories as recently as April 2026, the telecoms authority collects security audit reports, the central bank issues payment directives, and the Department of Information Technology is running the data centre listing scheme.Medium confidence	The Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, and it is genuinely working. In 2025 it finished 1,169 inspections, received 5,310 cases and issued 102 corrective orders. But it almost never fines. Of those 102 orders, 101 were warnings and one was a ban on processing. It asked the courts to punish only three organisations all year. Banks answer to the National Bank of Serbia instead, and it is fully active. A brand-new Office for Information Security exists on paper since October 2025 but we could find no sign it is running yet.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax records must be kept for five years after the tax year ends. Telecom operators must keep security logs for at least six months and internet address-translation logs for at least three months. Data centres must keep camera footage for at least three months. Going the other way, the privacy law has no general delete-by date, so the only real deletion duty found is a telecom rule that says paper customer forms must be destroyed once they have been scanned.Medium confidence	There is no single national rule. The privacy law says keep data only as long as you need it, and each sector sets its own clock. Online gambling operators must keep every transaction for at least ten years. Phone and internet companies must keep who-called-whom records for exactly 12 months and then destroy them. Anyone selling a phone line must keep the customer's identity check for 12 months after the service ends. Financial firms must keep a live register of every outsourced service, including which countries the data sits in.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is no general duty to report a personal data breach in Nepal — not to a regulator, and not to the people affected. No rule found sets a deadline in hours. Two narrower duties do exist. A data centre or cloud provider that finds someone has got into its systems must tell the regulator and the National Cyber Security Center immediately, by the fastest means available. A telecom operator hit by a security incident must work with a standing task force at the telecoms authority.Medium confidence	Count three clocks. Privacy breach: tell the Commissioner without delay and at the latest within 72 hours, and if you miss that you must explain why. Cyber incident: if you run an information system the state has classed as important, you have only 24 hours to report it. Then a third clock starts — updates every 24 hours for a serious incident, every three days for a middling one, and a final report within 15 days of the incident ending. Banks report cyber incidents to the central bank instead, promptly, with no fixed hour count.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five. First, privacy breaches are criminal, not administrative — the exposure is up to three years in prison for an individual, not a corporate fine. Second, a victim has only three months from the act to complain, so most claims die of old age. Third, your cloud vendor must be on the government's list, which makes this a supplier problem rather than a policy problem. Fourth, anyone under 18 needs a guardian's consent — there is no lower digital age. Fifth, the online-content offence in the electronic transactions law carries up to five years in prison for material judged contrary to public morality, and it is written vaguely enough to catch ordinary posts.High confidence	Five. (1) A child can consent for themselves at 15, not 13 or 16 — plan your age gates around 15. (2) A foreign court order or foreign tax authority demand for data is recognised in Serbia only if a treaty backs it, so handing data to an overseas authority on request can itself be unlawful. (3) Individuals, not just companies, can be prosecuted; the regulator has filed 49 criminal complaints since 2010. (4) Dozens of older Serbian laws still contradict the privacy law and were never fixed. (5) The government's official list of safe destination countries has not been touched since 2019 and still names a United States framework that died in 2020.High confidence
What's about to change?	No data protection law is on the way that we could find, and no bill for one is before parliament. What is moving is telecoms and broadcasting: the ministry published discussion papers for a new Telecommunications Bill and a National Mass Communication Bill on 5 August 2026. The telecoms authority is consulting on amending its 2020 cyber security rules, on a framework for streaming and messaging services, and on a rule to force the move to newer internet addressing.Medium confidence	One dated change and several unscheduled ones. From 1 January 2027 the ministry formally takes over supervising the new Office for Information Security, which should mean the office is actually up and running by then. A rewrite of the privacy law is being drafted by a special working group covering video surveillance, biometrics, genetic data and artificial intelligence, and a separate group is drafting an artificial intelligence law. Neither has been published as a bill, so neither is binding.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	All industries — डाटा सेन्टर तथा क्लाउड सेवा (सञ्चालन तथा व्यवस्थापन) निर्देशिका, २०८१ (Data Center and Cloud Service (Operation and Management) Directives, 2081) Payments — भुक्तानी प्रणालीसम्बन्धी एकीकृत निर्देशन, २०८२ (Unified Directive on Payment Systems, 2082)	Online gaming — Pravilnik o informaciono-komunikacionom sistemu za priređivanje posebnih igara na sreću preko sredstava elektronske komunikacije