Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

NepalChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Dormant

In one paragraph: Nepal's privacy law says nothing about sending data abroad, so on paper data can leave freely. There is no privacy regulator at all: breaches are criminal matters taken to a local court, the maximum fine is about 215 US dollars, and no case has produced a public penalty. The real constraint is a 2025 rule on data centres and cloud services, which says customers may only buy hosting from providers on a government list.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops being true the moment you look at where the data physically sits. Since January 2025 anyone buying data centre or cloud services in Nepal is supposed to use only providers listed by the Department of Information Technology, and to get listed a provider must be a Nepal-registered company with a physical building in Nepal. Government security agencies must use the state's own data centre, other government bodies are being moved into it, and card payments made in Nepali rupees must be settled inside Nepal.
Does this apply to me?: It is unclear, and that is the honest answer. The Privacy Act covers public bodies and companies handling people's information, but it never says whether it reaches a company sitting outside Nepal, and it does not ask you to appoint anyone locally. Two other laws clearly do reach you from abroad: the computer-crime law applies to acts done outside Nepal that involve a computer located in Nepal, and the central bank's payment licensing policy expressly covers firms set up abroad that carry out payment business inside Nepal. There is no revenue or company-size threshold to fall below.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the privacy law, yes — it is silent on sending personal data out of Nepal, so there is nothing to comply with. But the country still has walls, and they are about where the machines are rather than where the data goes. Since January 2025 anyone buying data centre or cloud services is meant to use only providers on the government's published list, and listing requires a Nepal-registered company with a building in Nepal. Government security agencies must use the state's own data centre, and card payments made in Nepali rupees must be settled inside Nepal.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to get, no standard contract to sign and no list of approved countries, because Nepal's privacy law simply does not deal with sending data abroad. The control that does exist works the other way round: it is an approved-supplier list for hosting. The Department of Information Technology lists data centre and cloud providers, and customers are told to use only listed ones.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: For personal data, nobody. Nepal has no privacy regulator and no data protection authority. A person whose privacy is breached files a criminal complaint in their local district court within three months, and the court can also award compensation. The bodies that are genuinely active work on cyber security and on industry rules, not on privacy: the National Cyber Security Center published advisories as recently as April 2026, the telecoms authority collects security audit reports, the central bank issues payment directives, and the Department of Information Technology is running the data centre listing scheme.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax records must be kept for five years after the tax year ends. Telecom operators must keep security logs for at least six months and internet address-translation logs for at least three months. Data centres must keep camera footage for at least three months. Going the other way, the privacy law has no general delete-by date, so the only real deletion duty found is a telecom rule that says paper customer forms must be destroyed once they have been scanned.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is no general duty to report a personal data breach in Nepal — not to a regulator, and not to the people affected. No rule found sets a deadline in hours. Two narrower duties do exist. A data centre or cloud provider that finds someone has got into its systems must tell the regulator and the National Cyber Security Center immediately, by the fastest means available. A telecom operator hit by a security incident must work with a standing task force at the telecoms authority.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five. First, privacy breaches are criminal, not administrative — the exposure is up to three years in prison for an individual, not a corporate fine. Second, a victim has only three months from the act to complain, so most claims die of old age. Third, your cloud vendor must be on the government's list, which makes this a supplier problem rather than a policy problem. Fourth, anyone under 18 needs a guardian's consent — there is no lower digital age. Fifth, the online-content offence in the electronic transactions law carries up to five years in prison for material judged contrary to public morality, and it is written vaguely enough to catch ordinary posts.High confidence
What's about to change?: No data protection law is on the way that we could find, and no bill for one is before parliament. What is moving is telecoms and broadcasting: the ministry published discussion papers for a new Telecommunications Bill and a National Mass Communication Bill on 5 August 2026. The telecoms authority is consulting on amending its 2020 cyber security rules, on a framework for streaming and messaging services, and on a rule to force the move to newer internet addressing.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — डाटा सेन्टर तथा क्लाउड सेवा (सञ्चालन तथा व्यवस्थापन) निर्देशिका, २०८१ (Data Center and Cloud Service (Operation and Management) Directives, 2081)
Payments — भुक्तानी प्रणालीसम्बन्धी एकीकृत निर्देशन, २०८२ (Unified Directive on Payment Systems, 2082)

ArmeniaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Dormant

In one paragraph: Armenia lets personal data leave, but only to a country on an official approved list of 53 states, or with case-by-case permission from the privacy regulator. That regulator has had no boss since February 2026 and the largest fine it can impose is about 1,300 US dollars. The real constraints are elsewhere: government data sent to a foreign cloud must keep a backup copy inside Armenia, and banking and medical secrecy sit outside the privacy law entirely.
The catch: The approved-country list is worthless in three places. Government bodies must keep an in-country backup of anything they put in a cloud abroad. Bank, notarial, lawyer and insurance secrets are carved out of the privacy law and are governed by their own secrecy statutes, which list exhaustively who may see the data and do not mention foreign cloud providers. And leaking medical secrets is a crime that can put a named individual in prison, not just a fine on the company.
Does this apply to me?: Probably not, if you have nothing in Armenia. The privacy law describes who it covers by naming Armenian public bodies, companies and individuals who process personal data. It contains no clause saying it follows Armenians' data abroad, and no rule requiring a foreign company to appoint someone inside Armenia. There is no size or revenue threshold either, so a one-person Armenian business is caught exactly like a bank.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Armenia runs an approved-country list: if the destination is on it, you can send data with no permission from anyone. The list is real and populated — 53 countries, including all of the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Georgia and Russia. Sending data anywhere else needs written permission from the privacy regulator first, and that regulator currently has nobody in the chair. Three sectors override this entirely: government, banking-type secrets, and health.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved list, and the list is full. Fifty-three countries were approved on 8 July 2024 and that decision has never been changed. If your destination is on it you need nothing — no standard contract, no filing, no fee. If it is not on it, you must write to the regulator before you send anything, attach the contract you plan to sign, and wait up to 30 days for a yes or a no.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: On paper, the Personal Data Protection Agency inside the Ministry of Justice. In practice, nobody right now: its head resigned with effect from 24 February 2026 and no replacement appointment has been published. In more than eleven years the agency has published exactly one general decision — the approved-country list. Two other regulators are genuinely working: the Central Bank supervises banks, payment firms, insurers and securities, and a brand-new Information Systems Regulatory Commission was appointed in March and April 2026 to police cybersecurity and state computer systems.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor is five years for anything that proves your tax position. The ceiling is not a number — it is a principle: you must destroy or block personal data as soon as you no longer need it for the purpose you collected it for. Two hard clocks sit inside that principle. If someone withdraws consent you have ten working days to destroy their data, then three more working days to tell them you did. If you spot unlawful processing you have three working days to fix it or destroy the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. Under the privacy law, if data leaks out of your electronic systems you must immediately publish a public announcement about it and at the same time tell the Armenian police and the privacy regulator — there is no grace period and no threshold. If you run a system in a sector the state calls vital, you have 24 hours to tell the cybersecurity regulator, 72 hours to send an update, two days to warn the people affected, and one month to file a final report. Both sets of duties can bite at once.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that will ruin your week. One: a data leak must be announced publicly and reported to the police, not just to the regulator. Two: encryption is legally compulsory, not a best practice, and failing to use it is its own separate fine. Three: before you process biometric or sensitive data you must notify the regulator in advance and wait to be entered in its register. Four: to process a dead person's data you need the consent of all of their legal heirs. Five: a child is anyone under 16 here, not 13 and not 18.High confidence
What's about to change?: Armenia rewired its digital rulebook in December 2025 and the deadlines land through 2026, 2027 and 2028. Rules for cyber incidents and for state computer systems are already live. Detailed technical rules are due by January 2027, internal cybersecurity policies and risk assessments by July 2027, and security certificates for critical systems by January 2028. The change most likely to catch someone out is not a new law at all: the approved-country list can be rewritten by one official's signature.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — «Ամպայինն առաջինը» քաղաքականության մշակման և ներդրման մասին ՀՀ կառավարության որոշում

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	NepalChecked 18 August 2026	ArmeniaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Dormant	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Dormant
In one paragraph	Nepal's privacy law says nothing about sending data abroad, so on paper data can leave freely. There is no privacy regulator at all: breaches are criminal matters taken to a local court, the maximum fine is about 215 US dollars, and no case has produced a public penalty. The real constraint is a 2025 rule on data centres and cloud services, which says customers may only buy hosting from providers on a government list.	Armenia lets personal data leave, but only to a country on an official approved list of 53 states, or with case-by-case permission from the privacy regulator. That regulator has had no boss since February 2026 and the largest fine it can impose is about 1,300 US dollars. The real constraints are elsewhere: government data sent to a foreign cloud must keep a backup copy inside Armenia, and banking and medical secrecy sit outside the privacy law entirely.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops being true the moment you look at where the data physically sits. Since January 2025 anyone buying data centre or cloud services in Nepal is supposed to use only providers listed by the Department of Information Technology, and to get listed a provider must be a Nepal-registered company with a physical building in Nepal. Government security agencies must use the state's own data centre, other government bodies are being moved into it, and card payments made in Nepali rupees must be settled inside Nepal.	The approved-country list is worthless in three places. Government bodies must keep an in-country backup of anything they put in a cloud abroad. Bank, notarial, lawyer and insurance secrets are carved out of the privacy law and are governed by their own secrecy statutes, which list exhaustively who may see the data and do not mention foreign cloud providers. And leaking medical secrets is a crime that can put a named individual in prison, not just a fine on the company.
Does this apply to me?	It is unclear, and that is the honest answer. The Privacy Act covers public bodies and companies handling people's information, but it never says whether it reaches a company sitting outside Nepal, and it does not ask you to appoint anyone locally. Two other laws clearly do reach you from abroad: the computer-crime law applies to acts done outside Nepal that involve a computer located in Nepal, and the central bank's payment licensing policy expressly covers firms set up abroad that carry out payment business inside Nepal. There is no revenue or company-size threshold to fall below.Medium confidence	Probably not, if you have nothing in Armenia. The privacy law describes who it covers by naming Armenian public bodies, companies and individuals who process personal data. It contains no clause saying it follows Armenians' data abroad, and no rule requiring a foreign company to appoint someone inside Armenia. There is no size or revenue threshold either, so a one-person Armenian business is caught exactly like a bank.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the privacy law, yes — it is silent on sending personal data out of Nepal, so there is nothing to comply with. But the country still has walls, and they are about where the machines are rather than where the data goes. Since January 2025 anyone buying data centre or cloud services is meant to use only providers on the government's published list, and listing requires a Nepal-registered company with a building in Nepal. Government security agencies must use the state's own data centre, and card payments made in Nepali rupees must be settled inside Nepal.Medium confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Armenia runs an approved-country list: if the destination is on it, you can send data with no permission from anyone. The list is real and populated — 53 countries, including all of the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Georgia and Russia. Sending data anywhere else needs written permission from the privacy regulator first, and that regulator currently has nobody in the chair. Three sectors override this entirely: government, banking-type secrets, and health.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to get, no standard contract to sign and no list of approved countries, because Nepal's privacy law simply does not deal with sending data abroad. The control that does exist works the other way round: it is an approved-supplier list for hosting. The Department of Information Technology lists data centre and cloud providers, and customers are told to use only listed ones.Medium confidence	The model is an approved list, and the list is full. Fifty-three countries were approved on 8 July 2024 and that decision has never been changed. If your destination is on it you need nothing — no standard contract, no filing, no fee. If it is not on it, you must write to the regulator before you send anything, attach the contract you plan to sign, and wait up to 30 days for a yes or a no.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	For personal data, nobody. Nepal has no privacy regulator and no data protection authority. A person whose privacy is breached files a criminal complaint in their local district court within three months, and the court can also award compensation. The bodies that are genuinely active work on cyber security and on industry rules, not on privacy: the National Cyber Security Center published advisories as recently as April 2026, the telecoms authority collects security audit reports, the central bank issues payment directives, and the Department of Information Technology is running the data centre listing scheme.Medium confidence	On paper, the Personal Data Protection Agency inside the Ministry of Justice. In practice, nobody right now: its head resigned with effect from 24 February 2026 and no replacement appointment has been published. In more than eleven years the agency has published exactly one general decision — the approved-country list. Two other regulators are genuinely working: the Central Bank supervises banks, payment firms, insurers and securities, and a brand-new Information Systems Regulatory Commission was appointed in March and April 2026 to police cybersecurity and state computer systems.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax records must be kept for five years after the tax year ends. Telecom operators must keep security logs for at least six months and internet address-translation logs for at least three months. Data centres must keep camera footage for at least three months. Going the other way, the privacy law has no general delete-by date, so the only real deletion duty found is a telecom rule that says paper customer forms must be destroyed once they have been scanned.Medium confidence	The floor is five years for anything that proves your tax position. The ceiling is not a number — it is a principle: you must destroy or block personal data as soon as you no longer need it for the purpose you collected it for. Two hard clocks sit inside that principle. If someone withdraws consent you have ten working days to destroy their data, then three more working days to tell them you did. If you spot unlawful processing you have three working days to fix it or destroy the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is no general duty to report a personal data breach in Nepal — not to a regulator, and not to the people affected. No rule found sets a deadline in hours. Two narrower duties do exist. A data centre or cloud provider that finds someone has got into its systems must tell the regulator and the National Cyber Security Center immediately, by the fastest means available. A telecom operator hit by a security incident must work with a standing task force at the telecoms authority.Medium confidence	Count three clocks. Under the privacy law, if data leaks out of your electronic systems you must immediately publish a public announcement about it and at the same time tell the Armenian police and the privacy regulator — there is no grace period and no threshold. If you run a system in a sector the state calls vital, you have 24 hours to tell the cybersecurity regulator, 72 hours to send an update, two days to warn the people affected, and one month to file a final report. Both sets of duties can bite at once.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five. First, privacy breaches are criminal, not administrative — the exposure is up to three years in prison for an individual, not a corporate fine. Second, a victim has only three months from the act to complain, so most claims die of old age. Third, your cloud vendor must be on the government's list, which makes this a supplier problem rather than a policy problem. Fourth, anyone under 18 needs a guardian's consent — there is no lower digital age. Fifth, the online-content offence in the electronic transactions law carries up to five years in prison for material judged contrary to public morality, and it is written vaguely enough to catch ordinary posts.High confidence	Five things that will ruin your week. One: a data leak must be announced publicly and reported to the police, not just to the regulator. Two: encryption is legally compulsory, not a best practice, and failing to use it is its own separate fine. Three: before you process biometric or sensitive data you must notify the regulator in advance and wait to be entered in its register. Four: to process a dead person's data you need the consent of all of their legal heirs. Five: a child is anyone under 16 here, not 13 and not 18.High confidence
What's about to change?	No data protection law is on the way that we could find, and no bill for one is before parliament. What is moving is telecoms and broadcasting: the ministry published discussion papers for a new Telecommunications Bill and a National Mass Communication Bill on 5 August 2026. The telecoms authority is consulting on amending its 2020 cyber security rules, on a framework for streaming and messaging services, and on a rule to force the move to newer internet addressing.Medium confidence	Armenia rewired its digital rulebook in December 2025 and the deadlines land through 2026, 2027 and 2028. Rules for cyber incidents and for state computer systems are already live. Detailed technical rules are due by January 2027, internal cybersecurity policies and risk assessments by July 2027, and security certificates for critical systems by January 2028. The change most likely to catch someone out is not a new law at all: the approved-country list can be rewritten by one official's signature.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	All industries — डाटा सेन्टर तथा क्लाउड सेवा (सञ्चालन तथा व्यवस्थापन) निर्देशिका, २०८१ (Data Center and Cloud Service (Operation and Management) Directives, 2081) Payments — भुक्तानी प्रणालीसम्बन्धी एकीकृत निर्देशन, २०८२ (Unified Directive on Payment Systems, 2082)	Government — «Ամպայինն առաջինը» քաղաքականության մշակման և ներդրման մասին ՀՀ կառավարության որոշում