Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

LatviaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Latvia follows European Union privacy rules, so personal data may leave the country once the right paperwork is in place. But Latvia adds its own walls. Accounting records may not be stored outside the European Union at all. Phone and internet companies must hold call records for eighteen months. Banks need the central bank's blessing before handing systems to an outside supplier.
The catch: The relaxed European headline stops being true the moment you touch four things. (1) Accounting records: paper must stay in Latvia and electronic copies must stay inside the European Union, so a United States accounting or resource-planning cloud is unlawful for a Latvian company. (2) Telecoms: eighteen months of call and connection records, plus a gag on telling the customer. (3) Banking: significant outsourcing needs a filing with the central bank and a thirty-working-day wait. (4) State critical computer systems: the supplier and its owners must be from a NATO, European Union, European Free Trade Association or NATO Indo-Pacific partner country, and audit information may only be handled inside that same group of countries.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. A company with no office in Latvia is still caught if it offers goods or services to people in Latvia or watches what they do online. That reach comes from the European Union privacy regulation, which applies directly in Latvia. There is no size or revenue threshold to duck under. A company based outside Europe normally has to name a contact person inside the European Union. Latvia's own privacy act adds national detail rather than a separate territorial test.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Personal data can leave Latvia, but the answer flips depending on what kind of data it is. For ordinary personal data the European rules apply: send it anywhere with the right legal instrument. For accounting records the door is shut at the edge of the European Union — paper stays in Latvia, electronic files stay inside the European Union. Phone and internet companies must keep eighteen months of call records. Banks must clear big outsourcing deals with the central bank first. State critical computer systems can only be supplied and audited from allied countries.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: For personal data the model is a permission list, not a ban list. You may send data to a country the European Commission has approved, or use the European Union's standard contract template, or use approved group-wide rules. The approved list is real and long — it includes the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland and, for self-certified companies only, the United States. For accounting records none of this helps: the wall is geographic, and no contract unlocks it.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The privacy regulator is the State Data Inspectorate, and it is genuinely working, not a name on a door. In 2025 it took 1,034 complaints, ran 1,396 checks, applied corrective measures 62 times and issued fines totalling 326,400 euros (about $355,000), the largest single fine being 300,000 euros (about $327,000). It has about 32 staff. In the first half of 2026 it received 832 complaints and opened 73 checks of its own motion. Separate regulators handle banking, telecoms and cyber security, and all are staffed.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Latvia has an unusually crowded set of minimum keeping periods and one surprising maximum. You must keep accounting registers ten years and supporting documents at least five. Phone and internet companies must keep call records eighteen months. Medical records run from one year to forty years depending on the form. In the other direction, security audit trails must normally be deleted after one year — shorter than many global logging policies allow.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least two clocks, and often three. If personal data is exposed you have 72 hours to tell the State Data Inspectorate, and you must tell affected people without delay if the risk to them is high. If you run an essential or important service you also have 24 hours to send an early warning to the cyber incident response body, then 72 hours for a first report — and trust service providers get only 24 hours for that first report too. Banks have a third set of reporting duties under European financial rules.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: a child can consent from age 13, not 16, so a Latvian teenager can sign up without a parent. Two: mishandling personal data can be a crime, not just a fine, and a company's responsible employee faces up to four years in prison. Three: your accounting system cannot sit outside the European Union, and its entries must be made in Latvian. Four: audit logs must usually be deleted after one year. Five: a bank cannot move systems to a new supplier until it has filed with the central bank and waited thirty working days.High confidence
What's about to change?: Two dated items and three switches. On 12 January 2027 the European Data Act bans cloud providers from charging customers to move their data out — a real change to cloud contracts used in Latvia. On 14 October 2026 Latvia holds its next data protection specialist qualification examination. The switches: the government may still write binding rules on where computer systems are hosted and has not done so; the European Union's approval of United States data transfers is under formal challenge; and the cyber security law is being amended piece by piece.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — Grāmatvedības likums
Government — Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 397 "Minimālās kiberdrošības prasības"

JapanChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Japan lets personal data leave the country, but you need paperwork. Only Europe and the United Kingdom are pre-approved. For anywhere else you either sign a contract that binds the recipient to Japanese-standard protection, or you get the person's consent after telling them which country the data goes to. There is no general rule forcing data to stay in Japan.
The catch: Two things break the calm headline. If you sell to the Japanese government, the data must physically sit in Japanese data centres. And if you run a website, an app or any online service used from Japan, the telecoms law reaches you even with no office here, requires a representative in Japan, and makes leaking a communication a criminal offence rather than a fine.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Japan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Japan, as long as it handles the personal information of people in Japan while supplying them goods or services. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. Unlike Europe, the privacy law does not make you appoint a representative in Japan — but the telecoms law does, if your service counts as a telecommunications service.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Japan's general rating is conditional: personal data may go abroad once you have one of three things in place. There is no across-the-board law keeping data in Japan, and no financial, insurance, securities or health localisation rule of the kind India or China have — we searched for one and did not find it. The real wall is government work: anything running on the national Government Cloud must sit in data centres inside Japan.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an allowlist, and the list has exactly two entries: the European Union and the United Kingdom. Send data there and it is treated almost like a domestic transfer. For every other destination you need one of two things instead. Either the recipient is contractually bound to protect the data to Japanese standards and you keep checking that it does, or you get the person's consent after first telling them the destination country, what its privacy law is like, and what the recipient will do to protect the data.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Information Protection Commission, and it is genuinely working. It has a chair, eight commissioners and a staff ceiling of 231 people. In the year to March 2025 it handled just over 19,000 breach reports, gave 395 pieces of formal guidance and made one recommendation. In the first six months of the following year it sharpened up: two recommendations and its first emergency order, against a company misusing personal information. What it cannot do yet is fine you — Japan has no administrative money penalty for privacy breaches until the 2026 amendment starts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor is firm and the ceiling is soft. Tax law makes you keep books and records for seven years, stretching to ten if you carry a loss forward. Company accounting books run ten years. Against that, the privacy law only asks you to try to delete personal data once you no longer need it — it is a best-efforts duty, not a hard deadline. So when the two collide, the keep-it rule wins in practice.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. For a personal data breach you file a first report to the privacy regulator within three to five days of finding out, and a full report within 30 days — 60 days if someone did it on purpose. You must also tell the people affected. Critical infrastructure operators have a separate cyber incident duty with a report to the government within 30 days. Telecoms operators report leaks of communications to the communications ministry on their own timetable.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) Putting data on a foreign server is often not a 'transfer' at all — if the provider is contractually barred from touching it — but you then have to work out that country's privacy law and publish the country's name to your users. Most people miss this. (2) The privacy law has no fines: the sanctions are criminal, and a company can be fined about $650,000 for a staff member stealing a customer database. (3) Leaking a communication is a crime punishable with prison, and telecoms staff face a longer term than outsiders. (4) The telecoms rules catch ordinary websites and apps, not just phone companies, and reach foreign operators with no office in Japan. (5) Consent to send data 'overseas' is not valid — you have to name the country.High confidence
What's about to change?: The big one has already passed. On 17 July 2026 Japan published a large amendment to its privacy law. It introduces the country's first money penalty for privacy breaches, sets 16 as the age below which a guardian must be involved, adds rules for face and other biometric data, and raises the criminal penalties. It is not in force yet: the government has up to two years to switch it on by order, and no date has been announced. The other thing to watch is the new cyber defence law, which is being switched on in stages through 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — デジタル庁におけるガバメントクラウド等の整備のためのクラウドサービスの提供 — 令和８年度募集調達仕様書

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	LatviaChecked 18 August 2026	JapanChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Latvia follows European Union privacy rules, so personal data may leave the country once the right paperwork is in place. But Latvia adds its own walls. Accounting records may not be stored outside the European Union at all. Phone and internet companies must hold call records for eighteen months. Banks need the central bank's blessing before handing systems to an outside supplier.	Japan lets personal data leave the country, but you need paperwork. Only Europe and the United Kingdom are pre-approved. For anywhere else you either sign a contract that binds the recipient to Japanese-standard protection, or you get the person's consent after telling them which country the data goes to. There is no general rule forcing data to stay in Japan.
The catch	The relaxed European headline stops being true the moment you touch four things. (1) Accounting records: paper must stay in Latvia and electronic copies must stay inside the European Union, so a United States accounting or resource-planning cloud is unlawful for a Latvian company. (2) Telecoms: eighteen months of call and connection records, plus a gag on telling the customer. (3) Banking: significant outsourcing needs a filing with the central bank and a thirty-working-day wait. (4) State critical computer systems: the supplier and its owners must be from a NATO, European Union, European Free Trade Association or NATO Indo-Pacific partner country, and audit information may only be handled inside that same group of countries.	Two things break the calm headline. If you sell to the Japanese government, the data must physically sit in Japanese data centres. And if you run a website, an app or any online service used from Japan, the telecoms law reaches you even with no office here, requires a representative in Japan, and makes leaking a communication a criminal offence rather than a fine.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. A company with no office in Latvia is still caught if it offers goods or services to people in Latvia or watches what they do online. That reach comes from the European Union privacy regulation, which applies directly in Latvia. There is no size or revenue threshold to duck under. A company based outside Europe normally has to name a contact person inside the European Union. Latvia's own privacy act adds national detail rather than a separate territorial test.High confidence	Yes. Japan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Japan, as long as it handles the personal information of people in Japan while supplying them goods or services. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. Unlike Europe, the privacy law does not make you appoint a representative in Japan — but the telecoms law does, if your service counts as a telecommunications service.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Personal data can leave Latvia, but the answer flips depending on what kind of data it is. For ordinary personal data the European rules apply: send it anywhere with the right legal instrument. For accounting records the door is shut at the edge of the European Union — paper stays in Latvia, electronic files stay inside the European Union. Phone and internet companies must keep eighteen months of call records. Banks must clear big outsourcing deals with the central bank first. State critical computer systems can only be supplied and audited from allied countries.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Japan's general rating is conditional: personal data may go abroad once you have one of three things in place. There is no across-the-board law keeping data in Japan, and no financial, insurance, securities or health localisation rule of the kind India or China have — we searched for one and did not find it. The real wall is government work: anything running on the national Government Cloud must sit in data centres inside Japan.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	For personal data the model is a permission list, not a ban list. You may send data to a country the European Commission has approved, or use the European Union's standard contract template, or use approved group-wide rules. The approved list is real and long — it includes the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland and, for self-certified companies only, the United States. For accounting records none of this helps: the wall is geographic, and no contract unlocks it.High confidence	The model is an allowlist, and the list has exactly two entries: the European Union and the United Kingdom. Send data there and it is treated almost like a domestic transfer. For every other destination you need one of two things instead. Either the recipient is contractually bound to protect the data to Japanese standards and you keep checking that it does, or you get the person's consent after first telling them the destination country, what its privacy law is like, and what the recipient will do to protect the data.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The privacy regulator is the State Data Inspectorate, and it is genuinely working, not a name on a door. In 2025 it took 1,034 complaints, ran 1,396 checks, applied corrective measures 62 times and issued fines totalling 326,400 euros (about $355,000), the largest single fine being 300,000 euros (about $327,000). It has about 32 staff. In the first half of 2026 it received 832 complaints and opened 73 checks of its own motion. Separate regulators handle banking, telecoms and cyber security, and all are staffed.High confidence	The Personal Information Protection Commission, and it is genuinely working. It has a chair, eight commissioners and a staff ceiling of 231 people. In the year to March 2025 it handled just over 19,000 breach reports, gave 395 pieces of formal guidance and made one recommendation. In the first six months of the following year it sharpened up: two recommendations and its first emergency order, against a company misusing personal information. What it cannot do yet is fine you — Japan has no administrative money penalty for privacy breaches until the 2026 amendment starts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Latvia has an unusually crowded set of minimum keeping periods and one surprising maximum. You must keep accounting registers ten years and supporting documents at least five. Phone and internet companies must keep call records eighteen months. Medical records run from one year to forty years depending on the form. In the other direction, security audit trails must normally be deleted after one year — shorter than many global logging policies allow.High confidence	The floor is firm and the ceiling is soft. Tax law makes you keep books and records for seven years, stretching to ten if you carry a loss forward. Company accounting books run ten years. Against that, the privacy law only asks you to try to delete personal data once you no longer need it — it is a best-efforts duty, not a hard deadline. So when the two collide, the keep-it rule wins in practice.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count at least two clocks, and often three. If personal data is exposed you have 72 hours to tell the State Data Inspectorate, and you must tell affected people without delay if the risk to them is high. If you run an essential or important service you also have 24 hours to send an early warning to the cyber incident response body, then 72 hours for a first report — and trust service providers get only 24 hours for that first report too. Banks have a third set of reporting duties under European financial rules.High confidence	Count three clocks. For a personal data breach you file a first report to the privacy regulator within three to five days of finding out, and a full report within 30 days — 60 days if someone did it on purpose. You must also tell the people affected. Critical infrastructure operators have a separate cyber incident duty with a report to the government within 30 days. Telecoms operators report leaks of communications to the communications ministry on their own timetable.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: a child can consent from age 13, not 16, so a Latvian teenager can sign up without a parent. Two: mishandling personal data can be a crime, not just a fine, and a company's responsible employee faces up to four years in prison. Three: your accounting system cannot sit outside the European Union, and its entries must be made in Latvian. Four: audit logs must usually be deleted after one year. Five: a bank cannot move systems to a new supplier until it has filed with the central bank and waited thirty working days.High confidence	Five. (1) Putting data on a foreign server is often not a 'transfer' at all — if the provider is contractually barred from touching it — but you then have to work out that country's privacy law and publish the country's name to your users. Most people miss this. (2) The privacy law has no fines: the sanctions are criminal, and a company can be fined about $650,000 for a staff member stealing a customer database. (3) Leaking a communication is a crime punishable with prison, and telecoms staff face a longer term than outsiders. (4) The telecoms rules catch ordinary websites and apps, not just phone companies, and reach foreign operators with no office in Japan. (5) Consent to send data 'overseas' is not valid — you have to name the country.High confidence
What's about to change?	Two dated items and three switches. On 12 January 2027 the European Data Act bans cloud providers from charging customers to move their data out — a real change to cloud contracts used in Latvia. On 14 October 2026 Latvia holds its next data protection specialist qualification examination. The switches: the government may still write binding rules on where computer systems are hosted and has not done so; the European Union's approval of United States data transfers is under formal challenge; and the cyber security law is being amended piece by piece.Medium confidence	The big one has already passed. On 17 July 2026 Japan published a large amendment to its privacy law. It introduces the country's first money penalty for privacy breaches, sets 16 as the age below which a guardian must be involved, adds rules for face and other biometric data, and raises the criminal penalties. It is not in force yet: the government has up to two years to switch it on by order, and no date has been announced. The other thing to watch is the new cyber defence law, which is being switched on in stages through 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	All industries — Grāmatvedības likums Government — Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 397 "Minimālās kiberdrošības prasības"	Government — デジタル庁におけるガバメントクラウド等の整備のためのクラウドサービスの提供 — 令和８年度募集調達仕様書