Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

LuxembourgChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: For most businesses, data can leave Luxembourg on the same terms as anywhere else in the European Union: you need the right paperwork, not a local data centre. Finance is the exception, and finance is most of the economy here. Banks and insurers are bound by a secrecy duty that is a crime to break, and a bank that runs its accounts abroad must still keep a daily backup inside Europe.
The catch: The relaxed general answer stops the moment you touch banking, insurance or investment funds. There, three things bite: breaking client secrecy is a criminal offence, not a fine; you may only send client information to a supplier abroad if the client has accepted the outsourcing, the type of information and the country the supplier sits in; and if a bank's accounting system is hosted outside Luxembourg it must still hold a full end-of-day backup on premises inside the European Economic Area. Telecoms firms face a separate 6-month duty to keep call and location records.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. If you sell to people in Luxembourg or watch what they do online, the European privacy rules reach you even with no office here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to hide under. A company with no base anywhere in Europe must appoint a representative in Europe, though it does not have to be in Luxembourg. The extra Luxembourg-only duties in the national law mostly apply to organisations that are actually set up here.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes, with paperwork. Luxembourg has no national law telling ordinary companies to keep data in the country, and European law actually forbids member states from forcing non-personal data to stay put except on public-security grounds. But this is a banking and fund centre, and the finance rules change the answer. A bank or insurer may only hand client information to a supplier abroad if the client has been told and has accepted which country that supplier is in. And a bank whose accounting system sits outside Luxembourg must still keep a full daily backup somewhere inside the European Economic Area.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is a European approved-list. Sending personal data outside Europe is barred unless the destination is on the European Commission's approved list, or you put an approved safeguard in place first. The list is real and populated. Luxembourg adds no national permit and the regulator does not pre-approve ordinary transfers. In finance, though, you also need the client's acceptance of the destination country before their information moves.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Yes, the regulators here really work. The privacy regulator is the National Commission for Data Protection, known as the CNPD. It is staffed, it publishes decisions, and in 2025 it handled 846 complaints, 425 breach reports and 59 investigations. It issued the largest privacy fine ever recorded in Europe, against Amazon in 2021. The financial regulator and the insurance regulator are heavyweight supervisors in their own right, and since May 2026 the telecoms regulator also runs the national cybersecurity regime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and a ceiling, and they collide often. You must keep anti-money-laundering records for 5 years after the relationship ends, patient files for at least 10 years after care ends, and telephone and internet connection records for 6 months. In the other direction, European privacy law says delete personal data once you no longer need it, and the anti-money-laundering law says delete it when the 5 years are up unless another law makes you keep it longer. That last sentence is how Luxembourg resolves the clash: the longest specific legal duty wins, and after that you must actually erase.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, because they overlap and they start at different moments. Privacy breach: 72 hours to tell the privacy regulator. Telephone and internet providers: 24 hours to report a personal data breach. Cybersecurity incidents at important companies: an early warning in 24 hours, a fuller report in 72 hours, and a final report a month later. Banks and insurers have their own European reporting on top. The trap is that one incident can start all of them at once, on different teams, with different forms.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in any summary. (1) Breaking bank or insurance client secrecy is a crime, not a fine, and it survives the end of the job. (2) Your works council can freeze an employee-monitoring project: staff have 15 days to ask the privacy regulator for an opinion, and that request suspends the project for a month. (3) Research projects carry a fixed list of 12 extra safeguards you must apply or justify skipping. (4) Using genetic data for employment or insurance purposes is banned outright. (5) The privacy regulator cannot fine the State or a commune, so a public body has far less to lose than you do.High confidence
What's about to change?: Two dated changes and several switches already in someone's hand. The dated ones: from 12 January 2027 cloud providers must let customers move away with no exit or transfer fees at all, and Luxembourg's new cybersecurity law, in force since 10 May 2026, is still being filled in with guidance and templates. The switches to watch: the European approval of United States transfers is under formal challenge, and the 6-month duty on telecoms firms to keep call records sits uneasily with European court rulings and could be struck at any time.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Finance — Circulaire CSSF 22/806 relative aux arrangements d'externalisation, telle que modifiee par la circulaire CSSF 25/883

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	LuxembourgChecked 18 August 2026	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	For most businesses, data can leave Luxembourg on the same terms as anywhere else in the European Union: you need the right paperwork, not a local data centre. Finance is the exception, and finance is most of the economy here. Banks and insurers are bound by a secrecy duty that is a crime to break, and a bank that runs its accounts abroad must still keep a daily backup inside Europe.	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch	The relaxed general answer stops the moment you touch banking, insurance or investment funds. There, three things bite: breaking client secrecy is a criminal offence, not a fine; you may only send client information to a supplier abroad if the client has accepted the outsourcing, the type of information and the country the supplier sits in; and if a bank's accounting system is hosted outside Luxembourg it must still hold a full end-of-day backup on premises inside the European Economic Area. Telecoms firms face a separate 6-month duty to keep call and location records.	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. If you sell to people in Luxembourg or watch what they do online, the European privacy rules reach you even with no office here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to hide under. A company with no base anywhere in Europe must appoint a representative in Europe, though it does not have to be in Luxembourg. The extra Luxembourg-only duties in the national law mostly apply to organisations that are actually set up here.High confidence	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes, with paperwork. Luxembourg has no national law telling ordinary companies to keep data in the country, and European law actually forbids member states from forcing non-personal data to stay put except on public-security grounds. But this is a banking and fund centre, and the finance rules change the answer. A bank or insurer may only hand client information to a supplier abroad if the client has been told and has accepted which country that supplier is in. And a bank whose accounting system sits outside Luxembourg must still keep a full daily backup somewhere inside the European Economic Area.High confidence	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is a European approved-list. Sending personal data outside Europe is barred unless the destination is on the European Commission's approved list, or you put an approved safeguard in place first. The list is real and populated. Luxembourg adds no national permit and the regulator does not pre-approve ordinary transfers. In finance, though, you also need the client's acceptance of the destination country before their information moves.High confidence	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	Yes, the regulators here really work. The privacy regulator is the National Commission for Data Protection, known as the CNPD. It is staffed, it publishes decisions, and in 2025 it handled 846 complaints, 425 breach reports and 59 investigations. It issued the largest privacy fine ever recorded in Europe, against Amazon in 2021. The financial regulator and the insurance regulator are heavyweight supervisors in their own right, and since May 2026 the telecoms regulator also runs the national cybersecurity regime.High confidence	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a floor and a ceiling, and they collide often. You must keep anti-money-laundering records for 5 years after the relationship ends, patient files for at least 10 years after care ends, and telephone and internet connection records for 6 months. In the other direction, European privacy law says delete personal data once you no longer need it, and the anti-money-laundering law says delete it when the 5 years are up unless another law makes you keep it longer. That last sentence is how Luxembourg resolves the clash: the longest specific legal duty wins, and after that you must actually erase.High confidence	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count four clocks, because they overlap and they start at different moments. Privacy breach: 72 hours to tell the privacy regulator. Telephone and internet providers: 24 hours to report a personal data breach. Cybersecurity incidents at important companies: an early warning in 24 hours, a fuller report in 72 hours, and a final report a month later. Banks and insurers have their own European reporting on top. The trap is that one incident can start all of them at once, on different teams, with different forms.High confidence	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in any summary. (1) Breaking bank or insurance client secrecy is a crime, not a fine, and it survives the end of the job. (2) Your works council can freeze an employee-monitoring project: staff have 15 days to ask the privacy regulator for an opinion, and that request suspends the project for a month. (3) Research projects carry a fixed list of 12 extra safeguards you must apply or justify skipping. (4) Using genetic data for employment or insurance purposes is banned outright. (5) The privacy regulator cannot fine the State or a commune, so a public body has far less to lose than you do.High confidence	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	Two dated changes and several switches already in someone's hand. The dated ones: from 12 January 2027 cloud providers must let customers move away with no exit or transfer fees at all, and Luxembourg's new cybersecurity law, in force since 10 May 2026, is still being filled in with guidance and templates. The switches to watch: the European approval of United States transfers is under formal challenge, and the 6-month duty on telecoms firms to keep call records sits uneasily with European court rulings and could be struck at any time.Medium confidence	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Finance — Circulaire CSSF 22/806 relative aux arrangements d'externalisation, telle que modifiee par la circulaire CSSF 25/883	None found.