Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Sri LankaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Sri Lanka has a full privacy law on the books, but almost none of the parts that create duties for companies are switched on yet. The government has now fixed 1 January 2027 as the day the core duties start. Data may leave the country freely today. From 2027 you will need a written contract or similar promise from whoever receives it abroad. No fines have ever been issued.
The catch: The 'conditional' rating describes 1 January 2027, not today. As of 18 August 2026 the transfer rule is not in force, the individual-rights section has no start date at all, and the penalty section has no start date either. There are no industry data-storage walls: banking, payments, insurance, securities, health and telecom all lack a localisation rule. The only place data location is even mentioned is government, and there it is a preference, not a ban.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law reaches a company with no office in Sri Lanka if it offers goods or services to people in Sri Lanka, or watches how they behave online. It also catches anyone processing data inside the country. There is no size or revenue floor to fall below, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. But none of this bites until 1 January 2027, because the scope section itself has not started yet.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Today, yes, with nothing to sign — the transfer section is not in force. From 1 January 2027 data can still leave, but you must first get a binding promise from the receiver abroad that Sri Lankan protections will be honoured. There is no banned-country list and no approved-country list: Sri Lanka scrapped its country-approval system in October 2025. No industry has a rule forcing data to stay in Sri Lanka.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Right now, nothing. There is no approval to get, no list to check and no form to file, because the transfer section has not started. From 1 January 2027 you will need a written, binding commitment from the overseas receiver. The Authority is supposed to say exactly what form that takes, and it has not done so — only a draft from October 2024 exists, and that draft was written for a version of the law that no longer exists.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Data Protection Authority of Sri Lanka. It genuinely exists: it has a chairman, a seven-person board, a director-general, an office in Colombo and it publishes circulars and draft rules. But it has never issued a fine or a decision, and legally it cannot yet. The Authority itself says in writing that it will only investigate complaints once the relevant sections are switched on. The penalty section still has no start date.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor is clearer than the ceiling. Banks, finance companies and other reporting institutions must keep transaction records for six years, and identity records for six years after the account closes. The ceiling is a principle, not a number: from 1 January 2027 you must not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than the purpose needs. Where the two clash, the six-year legal duty wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is no deadline, because there is no duty yet. This is unusual and worth saying plainly: as of 18 August 2026 a company suffering a data breach in Sri Lanka has no legal obligation to tell anyone. Reporting to the national cyber team is voluntary. From 1 January 2027 you must notify the Authority, but the rules that set the form and the clock are still a draft. Banks are the exception and must report technology and cyber incidents to the Central Bank.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that will cost you a weekend. A child in Sri Lanka is anyone under sixteen, not eighteen, and a parent must consent for them. Fines are small but personal: directors can be made to pay unless they prove they did not know. The advertised start date of 18 March 2025 was cancelled four days before it arrived, so anything written before November 2025 is wrong. Company data is not protected the way you would expect, because the individual-rights section still has no start date. And the published transfer guidance describes a law that no longer exists.High confidence
What's about to change?: One hard date and four switches. On 1 January 2027 the scope, the processing duties and the controller duties all start, and the Central Bank's new outsourcing rules for banks start the same day. Before then the Authority is expected to finalise its rules on breach reporting, impact assessments, data protection officers and overseas transfers. Watch also for a second gazette bringing individual rights and the penalty section into force — without it, the law has duties but no teeth.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Personal Data Protection Act section 26(4) and 26(5), as substituted by Act No. 22 of 2025

JapanChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Japan lets personal data leave the country, but you need paperwork. Only Europe and the United Kingdom are pre-approved. For anywhere else you either sign a contract that binds the recipient to Japanese-standard protection, or you get the person's consent after telling them which country the data goes to. There is no general rule forcing data to stay in Japan.
The catch: Two things break the calm headline. If you sell to the Japanese government, the data must physically sit in Japanese data centres. And if you run a website, an app or any online service used from Japan, the telecoms law reaches you even with no office here, requires a representative in Japan, and makes leaking a communication a criminal offence rather than a fine.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Japan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Japan, as long as it handles the personal information of people in Japan while supplying them goods or services. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. Unlike Europe, the privacy law does not make you appoint a representative in Japan — but the telecoms law does, if your service counts as a telecommunications service.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Japan's general rating is conditional: personal data may go abroad once you have one of three things in place. There is no across-the-board law keeping data in Japan, and no financial, insurance, securities or health localisation rule of the kind India or China have — we searched for one and did not find it. The real wall is government work: anything running on the national Government Cloud must sit in data centres inside Japan.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an allowlist, and the list has exactly two entries: the European Union and the United Kingdom. Send data there and it is treated almost like a domestic transfer. For every other destination you need one of two things instead. Either the recipient is contractually bound to protect the data to Japanese standards and you keep checking that it does, or you get the person's consent after first telling them the destination country, what its privacy law is like, and what the recipient will do to protect the data.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Information Protection Commission, and it is genuinely working. It has a chair, eight commissioners and a staff ceiling of 231 people. In the year to March 2025 it handled just over 19,000 breach reports, gave 395 pieces of formal guidance and made one recommendation. In the first six months of the following year it sharpened up: two recommendations and its first emergency order, against a company misusing personal information. What it cannot do yet is fine you — Japan has no administrative money penalty for privacy breaches until the 2026 amendment starts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor is firm and the ceiling is soft. Tax law makes you keep books and records for seven years, stretching to ten if you carry a loss forward. Company accounting books run ten years. Against that, the privacy law only asks you to try to delete personal data once you no longer need it — it is a best-efforts duty, not a hard deadline. So when the two collide, the keep-it rule wins in practice.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. For a personal data breach you file a first report to the privacy regulator within three to five days of finding out, and a full report within 30 days — 60 days if someone did it on purpose. You must also tell the people affected. Critical infrastructure operators have a separate cyber incident duty with a report to the government within 30 days. Telecoms operators report leaks of communications to the communications ministry on their own timetable.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) Putting data on a foreign server is often not a 'transfer' at all — if the provider is contractually barred from touching it — but you then have to work out that country's privacy law and publish the country's name to your users. Most people miss this. (2) The privacy law has no fines: the sanctions are criminal, and a company can be fined about $650,000 for a staff member stealing a customer database. (3) Leaking a communication is a crime punishable with prison, and telecoms staff face a longer term than outsiders. (4) The telecoms rules catch ordinary websites and apps, not just phone companies, and reach foreign operators with no office in Japan. (5) Consent to send data 'overseas' is not valid — you have to name the country.High confidence
What's about to change?: The big one has already passed. On 17 July 2026 Japan published a large amendment to its privacy law. It introduces the country's first money penalty for privacy breaches, sets 16 as the age below which a guardian must be involved, adds rules for face and other biometric data, and raises the criminal penalties. It is not in force yet: the government has up to two years to switch it on by order, and no date has been announced. The other thing to watch is the new cyber defence law, which is being switched on in stages through 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — デジタル庁におけるガバメントクラウド等の整備のためのクラウドサービスの提供 — 令和８年度募集調達仕様書

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Sri LankaChecked 18 August 2026	JapanChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Waking up	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Sri Lanka has a full privacy law on the books, but almost none of the parts that create duties for companies are switched on yet. The government has now fixed 1 January 2027 as the day the core duties start. Data may leave the country freely today. From 2027 you will need a written contract or similar promise from whoever receives it abroad. No fines have ever been issued.	Japan lets personal data leave the country, but you need paperwork. Only Europe and the United Kingdom are pre-approved. For anywhere else you either sign a contract that binds the recipient to Japanese-standard protection, or you get the person's consent after telling them which country the data goes to. There is no general rule forcing data to stay in Japan.
The catch	The 'conditional' rating describes 1 January 2027, not today. As of 18 August 2026 the transfer rule is not in force, the individual-rights section has no start date at all, and the penalty section has no start date either. There are no industry data-storage walls: banking, payments, insurance, securities, health and telecom all lack a localisation rule. The only place data location is even mentioned is government, and there it is a preference, not a ban.	Two things break the calm headline. If you sell to the Japanese government, the data must physically sit in Japanese data centres. And if you run a website, an app or any online service used from Japan, the telecoms law reaches you even with no office here, requires a representative in Japan, and makes leaking a communication a criminal offence rather than a fine.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The law reaches a company with no office in Sri Lanka if it offers goods or services to people in Sri Lanka, or watches how they behave online. It also catches anyone processing data inside the country. There is no size or revenue floor to fall below, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. But none of this bites until 1 January 2027, because the scope section itself has not started yet.High confidence	Yes. Japan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Japan, as long as it handles the personal information of people in Japan while supplying them goods or services. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. Unlike Europe, the privacy law does not make you appoint a representative in Japan — but the telecoms law does, if your service counts as a telecommunications service.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Today, yes, with nothing to sign — the transfer section is not in force. From 1 January 2027 data can still leave, but you must first get a binding promise from the receiver abroad that Sri Lankan protections will be honoured. There is no banned-country list and no approved-country list: Sri Lanka scrapped its country-approval system in October 2025. No industry has a rule forcing data to stay in Sri Lanka.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Japan's general rating is conditional: personal data may go abroad once you have one of three things in place. There is no across-the-board law keeping data in Japan, and no financial, insurance, securities or health localisation rule of the kind India or China have — we searched for one and did not find it. The real wall is government work: anything running on the national Government Cloud must sit in data centres inside Japan.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Right now, nothing. There is no approval to get, no list to check and no form to file, because the transfer section has not started. From 1 January 2027 you will need a written, binding commitment from the overseas receiver. The Authority is supposed to say exactly what form that takes, and it has not done so — only a draft from October 2024 exists, and that draft was written for a version of the law that no longer exists.High confidence	The model is an allowlist, and the list has exactly two entries: the European Union and the United Kingdom. Send data there and it is treated almost like a domestic transfer. For every other destination you need one of two things instead. Either the recipient is contractually bound to protect the data to Japanese standards and you keep checking that it does, or you get the person's consent after first telling them the destination country, what its privacy law is like, and what the recipient will do to protect the data.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Data Protection Authority of Sri Lanka. It genuinely exists: it has a chairman, a seven-person board, a director-general, an office in Colombo and it publishes circulars and draft rules. But it has never issued a fine or a decision, and legally it cannot yet. The Authority itself says in writing that it will only investigate complaints once the relevant sections are switched on. The penalty section still has no start date.High confidence	The Personal Information Protection Commission, and it is genuinely working. It has a chair, eight commissioners and a staff ceiling of 231 people. In the year to March 2025 it handled just over 19,000 breach reports, gave 395 pieces of formal guidance and made one recommendation. In the first six months of the following year it sharpened up: two recommendations and its first emergency order, against a company misusing personal information. What it cannot do yet is fine you — Japan has no administrative money penalty for privacy breaches until the 2026 amendment starts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	The floor is clearer than the ceiling. Banks, finance companies and other reporting institutions must keep transaction records for six years, and identity records for six years after the account closes. The ceiling is a principle, not a number: from 1 January 2027 you must not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than the purpose needs. Where the two clash, the six-year legal duty wins.High confidence	The floor is firm and the ceiling is soft. Tax law makes you keep books and records for seven years, stretching to ten if you carry a loss forward. Company accounting books run ten years. Against that, the privacy law only asks you to try to delete personal data once you no longer need it — it is a best-efforts duty, not a hard deadline. So when the two collide, the keep-it rule wins in practice.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is no deadline, because there is no duty yet. This is unusual and worth saying plainly: as of 18 August 2026 a company suffering a data breach in Sri Lanka has no legal obligation to tell anyone. Reporting to the national cyber team is voluntary. From 1 January 2027 you must notify the Authority, but the rules that set the form and the clock are still a draft. Banks are the exception and must report technology and cyber incidents to the Central Bank.High confidence	Count three clocks. For a personal data breach you file a first report to the privacy regulator within three to five days of finding out, and a full report within 30 days — 60 days if someone did it on purpose. You must also tell the people affected. Critical infrastructure operators have a separate cyber incident duty with a report to the government within 30 days. Telecoms operators report leaks of communications to the communications ministry on their own timetable.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that will cost you a weekend. A child in Sri Lanka is anyone under sixteen, not eighteen, and a parent must consent for them. Fines are small but personal: directors can be made to pay unless they prove they did not know. The advertised start date of 18 March 2025 was cancelled four days before it arrived, so anything written before November 2025 is wrong. Company data is not protected the way you would expect, because the individual-rights section still has no start date. And the published transfer guidance describes a law that no longer exists.High confidence	Five. (1) Putting data on a foreign server is often not a 'transfer' at all — if the provider is contractually barred from touching it — but you then have to work out that country's privacy law and publish the country's name to your users. Most people miss this. (2) The privacy law has no fines: the sanctions are criminal, and a company can be fined about $650,000 for a staff member stealing a customer database. (3) Leaking a communication is a crime punishable with prison, and telecoms staff face a longer term than outsiders. (4) The telecoms rules catch ordinary websites and apps, not just phone companies, and reach foreign operators with no office in Japan. (5) Consent to send data 'overseas' is not valid — you have to name the country.High confidence
What's about to change?	One hard date and four switches. On 1 January 2027 the scope, the processing duties and the controller duties all start, and the Central Bank's new outsourcing rules for banks start the same day. Before then the Authority is expected to finalise its rules on breach reporting, impact assessments, data protection officers and overseas transfers. Watch also for a second gazette bringing individual rights and the penalty section into force — without it, the law has duties but no teeth.High confidence	The big one has already passed. On 17 July 2026 Japan published a large amendment to its privacy law. It introduces the country's first money penalty for privacy breaches, sets 16 as the age below which a guardian must be involved, adds rules for face and other biometric data, and raises the criminal penalties. It is not in force yet: the government has up to two years to switch it on by order, and no date has been announced. The other thing to watch is the new cyber defence law, which is being switched on in stages through 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Government — Personal Data Protection Act section 26(4) and 26(5), as substituted by Act No. 22 of 2025	Government — デジタル庁におけるガバメントクラウド等の整備のためのクラウドサービスの提供 — 令和８年度募集調達仕様書