Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

CambodiaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: LowEnforcement: Dormant

In one paragraph: Cambodia has no general privacy law. A bill exists and went to a public review meeting in August 2026, but it is not law and there is no privacy regulator to complain to. For most businesses data can leave the country freely, with no paperwork. Banks and other lenders are the big exception: their main data centre must sit inside Cambodia.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops at the door of the financial sector. Any bank or lender supervised by Cambodia's central bank must keep at least one main data centre inside the country, and must get the central bank's permission in advance before customer personal data is moved to or hosted on servers abroad. Telecoms are also watched closely by an active regulator, and a suspended 2021 order that would push all internet traffic through a single government-controlled gateway can be switched back on at any time.
Does this apply to me?: There is no general data protection law in Cambodia, so there is nothing for a foreign company to be caught by. No size threshold, no revenue threshold, no registration, and no requirement to appoint someone in Cambodia to answer for your data. That changes the moment you need a local licence: banks, lenders and telecoms operators are licensed here and their licence conditions do reach their overseas systems. A draft privacy law was put to a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and will proceed through the formal law-making process, so this answer has a shelf life.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes, and with nothing to sign. Cambodia has no rule that stops ordinary personal data leaving the country. Finance is the one hard wall we could verify: a bank or lender supervised by the central bank must have at least one main data centre in Cambodia, may only use a foreign data centre as a backup, and needs the central bank's approval before customer personal data is hosted abroad. Telecoms is the sector to watch, because a 2021 order that would route all internet traffic through a single national gateway was never switched on but was never cancelled either.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: For most organisations, nothing at all. There is no approved-countries list, no banned-countries list, no standard contract to sign and no government form to file. The lists are not just empty, they do not exist, because there is no law that creates them. In finance the model is completely different: each move of customer personal data out of Cambodia needs its own approval from the central bank, decided case by case, and there is no published application process or timetable.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: For privacy, nobody. Cambodia has no data protection authority. The Ministry of Post and Telecommunications is writing the law and, in November 2025, ran a training workshop with Singapore's privacy regulator on how to build such an authority, which tells you plainly that one does not yet exist. Sector regulators are a different story and are genuinely working: the central bank supervises financial firms against its 2026 technology guidelines, and the telecoms regulator publicly named an operator in June 2026 for selling SIM cards without properly checking customers' identity documents.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax and accounting law forces businesses to keep books and supporting documents for years, and financial firms must keep system logs and agree retention periods with their cloud providers. In the other direction there is no general rule telling anyone to delete personal data, because there is no privacy law. The only deletion duty we could verify applies to banks and lenders, who must keep customer personal data only as long as it is needed.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is no breach reporting clock in Cambodia. No law requires you to tell a regulator or the affected people when personal data leaks, and there is no national cyber incident hotline with a deadline in hours. The nearest thing is in banking: the central bank tells supervised firms to report incidents as it requires, either on a regular cycle or one-off, with no fixed number of hours. Two draft laws would change this, so treat today's silence as temporary.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, the e-commerce law reportedly bans encryption that would stop evidence being used in a criminal case, which cuts across normal end-to-end encryption promises. Second, a cloud-only bank cannot operate here: the main data centre must physically be in Cambodia. Third, moving customer banking data abroad needs the central bank's permission in advance, and there is no published process or timetable, so it must be planned months ahead. Fourth, telecoms operators must check identity documents before activating a SIM card, and the regulator names offenders in public. Fifth, no privacy law does not mean no risk, because your foreign customers will impose their own rules by contract.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Four drafts are moving and none of them is law yet. The Personal Data Protection Law reached a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and now heads into the formal law-making process. The Cybersecurity Law was still being argued over with the Ministry of Justice in July 2026. A Data Governance Policy for 2026 to 2035 was in consultation in March 2026 and is expected to cover where data may be stored and how it may cross borders. A Digital Government Law went to consultation in July 2025. No commencement date has been announced for any of them.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Finance — Technology and Cyber Risk Management Guidelines (TCRMG)

United StatesChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: In general the United States lets data go anywhere. There is no national privacy law and no permit is needed to move data abroad. Two things bite hard. Six countries are effectively off limits for large amounts of sensitive data, with prison sentences attached. And anything connected to government work must physically stay on American soil.
The catch: The open headline stops the moment you touch one of six areas: government contracting, police records, federal tax records, defence technical data, telecom licences, and bulk sensitive data flowing to China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba or Venezuela. Also note that the rule that actually binds you is almost always a state law or an industry regulator's rule, not a national privacy act. There isn't one.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. American rules reach a foreign company with no office in the country. California's privacy law applies to any for-profit business that 'does business in California' and crosses one of three thresholds, and physical presence is not one of them. The children's rule covers foreign websites aimed at American children. No state and no federal law requires you to appoint a local representative — a real difference from Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: It depends entirely on your industry, so the single national answer is misleading. For ordinary consumer or employee data, yes — send it anywhere, no paperwork. But six sectors have hard walls. Government contracting, police data, federal tax data and defence work require the data to physically stay in the United States. Telecom licences restrict which foreign staff may even look at records. And for anyone, sending large volumes of sensitive data to six named countries is now a crime.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: For ordinary data, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no destination approval list. The model is a blocklist and it is now populated: six countries are named. Before you move large volumes of sensitive data, your only real job is to work out whether a country of concern, or a company or person they control, could end up with access — including through a vendor, an investor or an employee.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Nobody, and everybody. There is no national privacy regulator. Instead the consumer protection regulator, the health department, the securities regulator, the communications regulator, the Justice Department, all fifty state attorneys general and one dedicated state privacy agency each enforce a slice. Almost all of them are visibly working right now. The one exception is the new national data transfer programme: it is staffed and issuing guidance but has published no enforcement action yet.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a strong floor and a weak but growing ceiling. Investment firms must keep some books for six years and most others for three, with the first two years easy to reach. Health providers keep their paperwork for six years. In the other direction, state privacy laws now force you to publish how long you keep each type of data and to stop keeping it longer than you said, and since April 2026 children's data may no longer be kept indefinitely. Where a keep-it rule and a delete-it rule collide, the keep-it rule wins: every state law carves out data you are required by law to retain.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count the clocks — there are at least seven, and they disagree. New York financial firms: 72 hours to the state regulator, and only 24 hours to report paying a ransom. Telecom carriers: seven working days to the police agencies and the communications regulator, and you may not warn customers until seven working days after that. Investment and finance firms: 30 days to affected customers. Health organisations: 60 days. Texas and many other states: 30 days to the state attorney general. Listed companies: four working days to disclose a material incident. The overlap, not any single deadline, is what people fail.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five that cost people their weekend. One: the national data transfer programme carries prison — up to twenty years for a deliberate breach. Two: Illinois lets individuals sue over fingerprints and face scans with fixed damages per person, no proof of harm needed, and that is where the largest privacy payouts happen. Three: the children's rule uses under 13, but several state laws use under 18, so a single age gate will not do. Four: government work means American soil, and police data allows only the United States, its territories, tribal lands and Canada. Five: a rule can be printed in the law book and still be unenforceable, because a court has blocked it.High confidence
What's about to change?: Four things in the next twelve months. The national critical infrastructure reporting rule should be finalised in late 2026, which will switch on a 72-hour incident clock and a 24-hour ransom-payment clock for a very wide range of businesses. California's rules on automated decision-making bite on 1 January 2027. The open banking rule is being rewritten after a court blocked it. And a federal privacy bill is moving in Congress, but it is only a bill and binds nobody.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy
Government — Publication 1075, Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies
Defence — Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clause 252.239-7010, Cloud Computing Services
Telecoms — National security agreement / letter of assurance conditioning a section 214 authorisation, reviewed by the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	CambodiaChecked 18 August 2026	United StatesChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Low Enforcement: Dormant	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Cambodia has no general privacy law. A bill exists and went to a public review meeting in August 2026, but it is not law and there is no privacy regulator to complain to. For most businesses data can leave the country freely, with no paperwork. Banks and other lenders are the big exception: their main data centre must sit inside Cambodia.	In general the United States lets data go anywhere. There is no national privacy law and no permit is needed to move data abroad. Two things bite hard. Six countries are effectively off limits for large amounts of sensitive data, with prison sentences attached. And anything connected to government work must physically stay on American soil.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops at the door of the financial sector. Any bank or lender supervised by Cambodia's central bank must keep at least one main data centre inside the country, and must get the central bank's permission in advance before customer personal data is moved to or hosted on servers abroad. Telecoms are also watched closely by an active regulator, and a suspended 2021 order that would push all internet traffic through a single government-controlled gateway can be switched back on at any time.	The open headline stops the moment you touch one of six areas: government contracting, police records, federal tax records, defence technical data, telecom licences, and bulk sensitive data flowing to China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba or Venezuela. Also note that the rule that actually binds you is almost always a state law or an industry regulator's rule, not a national privacy act. There isn't one.
Does this apply to me?	There is no general data protection law in Cambodia, so there is nothing for a foreign company to be caught by. No size threshold, no revenue threshold, no registration, and no requirement to appoint someone in Cambodia to answer for your data. That changes the moment you need a local licence: banks, lenders and telecoms operators are licensed here and their licence conditions do reach their overseas systems. A draft privacy law was put to a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and will proceed through the formal law-making process, so this answer has a shelf life.High confidence	Yes. American rules reach a foreign company with no office in the country. California's privacy law applies to any for-profit business that 'does business in California' and crosses one of three thresholds, and physical presence is not one of them. The children's rule covers foreign websites aimed at American children. No state and no federal law requires you to appoint a local representative — a real difference from Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes, and with nothing to sign. Cambodia has no rule that stops ordinary personal data leaving the country. Finance is the one hard wall we could verify: a bank or lender supervised by the central bank must have at least one main data centre in Cambodia, may only use a foreign data centre as a backup, and needs the central bank's approval before customer personal data is hosted abroad. Telecoms is the sector to watch, because a 2021 order that would route all internet traffic through a single national gateway was never switched on but was never cancelled either.Medium confidence	It depends entirely on your industry, so the single national answer is misleading. For ordinary consumer or employee data, yes — send it anywhere, no paperwork. But six sectors have hard walls. Government contracting, police data, federal tax data and defence work require the data to physically stay in the United States. Telecom licences restrict which foreign staff may even look at records. And for anyone, sending large volumes of sensitive data to six named countries is now a crime.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	For most organisations, nothing at all. There is no approved-countries list, no banned-countries list, no standard contract to sign and no government form to file. The lists are not just empty, they do not exist, because there is no law that creates them. In finance the model is completely different: each move of customer personal data out of Cambodia needs its own approval from the central bank, decided case by case, and there is no published application process or timetable.Medium confidence	For ordinary data, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no destination approval list. The model is a blocklist and it is now populated: six countries are named. Before you move large volumes of sensitive data, your only real job is to work out whether a country of concern, or a company or person they control, could end up with access — including through a vendor, an investor or an employee.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	For privacy, nobody. Cambodia has no data protection authority. The Ministry of Post and Telecommunications is writing the law and, in November 2025, ran a training workshop with Singapore's privacy regulator on how to build such an authority, which tells you plainly that one does not yet exist. Sector regulators are a different story and are genuinely working: the central bank supervises financial firms against its 2026 technology guidelines, and the telecoms regulator publicly named an operator in June 2026 for selling SIM cards without properly checking customers' identity documents.High confidence	Nobody, and everybody. There is no national privacy regulator. Instead the consumer protection regulator, the health department, the securities regulator, the communications regulator, the Justice Department, all fifty state attorneys general and one dedicated state privacy agency each enforce a slice. Almost all of them are visibly working right now. The one exception is the new national data transfer programme: it is staffed and issuing guidance but has published no enforcement action yet.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax and accounting law forces businesses to keep books and supporting documents for years, and financial firms must keep system logs and agree retention periods with their cloud providers. In the other direction there is no general rule telling anyone to delete personal data, because there is no privacy law. The only deletion duty we could verify applies to banks and lenders, who must keep customer personal data only as long as it is needed.Medium confidence	There is a strong floor and a weak but growing ceiling. Investment firms must keep some books for six years and most others for three, with the first two years easy to reach. Health providers keep their paperwork for six years. In the other direction, state privacy laws now force you to publish how long you keep each type of data and to stop keeping it longer than you said, and since April 2026 children's data may no longer be kept indefinitely. Where a keep-it rule and a delete-it rule collide, the keep-it rule wins: every state law carves out data you are required by law to retain.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is no breach reporting clock in Cambodia. No law requires you to tell a regulator or the affected people when personal data leaks, and there is no national cyber incident hotline with a deadline in hours. The nearest thing is in banking: the central bank tells supervised firms to report incidents as it requires, either on a regular cycle or one-off, with no fixed number of hours. Two draft laws would change this, so treat today's silence as temporary.Medium confidence	Count the clocks — there are at least seven, and they disagree. New York financial firms: 72 hours to the state regulator, and only 24 hours to report paying a ransom. Telecom carriers: seven working days to the police agencies and the communications regulator, and you may not warn customers until seven working days after that. Investment and finance firms: 30 days to affected customers. Health organisations: 60 days. Texas and many other states: 30 days to the state attorney general. Listed companies: four working days to disclose a material incident. The overlap, not any single deadline, is what people fail.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. First, the e-commerce law reportedly bans encryption that would stop evidence being used in a criminal case, which cuts across normal end-to-end encryption promises. Second, a cloud-only bank cannot operate here: the main data centre must physically be in Cambodia. Third, moving customer banking data abroad needs the central bank's permission in advance, and there is no published process or timetable, so it must be planned months ahead. Fourth, telecoms operators must check identity documents before activating a SIM card, and the regulator names offenders in public. Fifth, no privacy law does not mean no risk, because your foreign customers will impose their own rules by contract.Medium confidence	Five that cost people their weekend. One: the national data transfer programme carries prison — up to twenty years for a deliberate breach. Two: Illinois lets individuals sue over fingerprints and face scans with fixed damages per person, no proof of harm needed, and that is where the largest privacy payouts happen. Three: the children's rule uses under 13, but several state laws use under 18, so a single age gate will not do. Four: government work means American soil, and police data allows only the United States, its territories, tribal lands and Canada. Five: a rule can be printed in the law book and still be unenforceable, because a court has blocked it.High confidence
What's about to change?	Four drafts are moving and none of them is law yet. The Personal Data Protection Law reached a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and now heads into the formal law-making process. The Cybersecurity Law was still being argued over with the Ministry of Justice in July 2026. A Data Governance Policy for 2026 to 2035 was in consultation in March 2026 and is expected to cover where data may be stored and how it may cross borders. A Digital Government Law went to consultation in July 2025. No commencement date has been announced for any of them.High confidence	Four things in the next twelve months. The national critical infrastructure reporting rule should be finalised in late 2026, which will switch on a 72-hour incident clock and a 24-hour ransom-payment clock for a very wide range of businesses. California's rules on automated decision-making bite on 1 January 2027. The open banking rule is being rewritten after a court blocked it. And a federal privacy bill is moving in Congress, but it is only a bill and binds nobody.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Finance — Technology and Cyber Risk Management Guidelines (TCRMG)	Government — Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy Government — Publication 1075, Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies Defence — Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clause 252.239-7010, Cloud Computing Services Telecoms — National security agreement / letter of assurance conditioning a section 214 authorisation, reviewed by the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector