Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

CambodiaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: LowEnforcement: Dormant

In one paragraph: Cambodia has no general privacy law. A bill exists and went to a public review meeting in August 2026, but it is not law and there is no privacy regulator to complain to. For most businesses data can leave the country freely, with no paperwork. Banks and other lenders are the big exception: their main data centre must sit inside Cambodia.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops at the door of the financial sector. Any bank or lender supervised by Cambodia's central bank must keep at least one main data centre inside the country, and must get the central bank's permission in advance before customer personal data is moved to or hosted on servers abroad. Telecoms are also watched closely by an active regulator, and a suspended 2021 order that would push all internet traffic through a single government-controlled gateway can be switched back on at any time.
Does this apply to me?: There is no general data protection law in Cambodia, so there is nothing for a foreign company to be caught by. No size threshold, no revenue threshold, no registration, and no requirement to appoint someone in Cambodia to answer for your data. That changes the moment you need a local licence: banks, lenders and telecoms operators are licensed here and their licence conditions do reach their overseas systems. A draft privacy law was put to a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and will proceed through the formal law-making process, so this answer has a shelf life.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes, and with nothing to sign. Cambodia has no rule that stops ordinary personal data leaving the country. Finance is the one hard wall we could verify: a bank or lender supervised by the central bank must have at least one main data centre in Cambodia, may only use a foreign data centre as a backup, and needs the central bank's approval before customer personal data is hosted abroad. Telecoms is the sector to watch, because a 2021 order that would route all internet traffic through a single national gateway was never switched on but was never cancelled either.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: For most organisations, nothing at all. There is no approved-countries list, no banned-countries list, no standard contract to sign and no government form to file. The lists are not just empty, they do not exist, because there is no law that creates them. In finance the model is completely different: each move of customer personal data out of Cambodia needs its own approval from the central bank, decided case by case, and there is no published application process or timetable.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: For privacy, nobody. Cambodia has no data protection authority. The Ministry of Post and Telecommunications is writing the law and, in November 2025, ran a training workshop with Singapore's privacy regulator on how to build such an authority, which tells you plainly that one does not yet exist. Sector regulators are a different story and are genuinely working: the central bank supervises financial firms against its 2026 technology guidelines, and the telecoms regulator publicly named an operator in June 2026 for selling SIM cards without properly checking customers' identity documents.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax and accounting law forces businesses to keep books and supporting documents for years, and financial firms must keep system logs and agree retention periods with their cloud providers. In the other direction there is no general rule telling anyone to delete personal data, because there is no privacy law. The only deletion duty we could verify applies to banks and lenders, who must keep customer personal data only as long as it is needed.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is no breach reporting clock in Cambodia. No law requires you to tell a regulator or the affected people when personal data leaks, and there is no national cyber incident hotline with a deadline in hours. The nearest thing is in banking: the central bank tells supervised firms to report incidents as it requires, either on a regular cycle or one-off, with no fixed number of hours. Two draft laws would change this, so treat today's silence as temporary.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, the e-commerce law reportedly bans encryption that would stop evidence being used in a criminal case, which cuts across normal end-to-end encryption promises. Second, a cloud-only bank cannot operate here: the main data centre must physically be in Cambodia. Third, moving customer banking data abroad needs the central bank's permission in advance, and there is no published process or timetable, so it must be planned months ahead. Fourth, telecoms operators must check identity documents before activating a SIM card, and the regulator names offenders in public. Fifth, no privacy law does not mean no risk, because your foreign customers will impose their own rules by contract.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Four drafts are moving and none of them is law yet. The Personal Data Protection Law reached a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and now heads into the formal law-making process. The Cybersecurity Law was still being argued over with the Ministry of Justice in July 2026. A Data Governance Policy for 2026 to 2035 was in consultation in March 2026 and is expected to cover where data may be stored and how it may cross borders. A Digital Government Law went to consultation in July 2025. No commencement date has been announced for any of them.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Finance — Technology and Cyber Risk Management Guidelines (TCRMG)

ThailandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch: The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	CambodiaChecked 18 August 2026	ThailandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Low Enforcement: Dormant	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Cambodia has no general privacy law. A bill exists and went to a public review meeting in August 2026, but it is not law and there is no privacy regulator to complain to. For most businesses data can leave the country freely, with no paperwork. Banks and other lenders are the big exception: their main data centre must sit inside Cambodia.	Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops at the door of the financial sector. Any bank or lender supervised by Cambodia's central bank must keep at least one main data centre inside the country, and must get the central bank's permission in advance before customer personal data is moved to or hosted on servers abroad. Telecoms are also watched closely by an active regulator, and a suspended 2021 order that would push all internet traffic through a single government-controlled gateway can be switched back on at any time.	The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?	There is no general data protection law in Cambodia, so there is nothing for a foreign company to be caught by. No size threshold, no revenue threshold, no registration, and no requirement to appoint someone in Cambodia to answer for your data. That changes the moment you need a local licence: banks, lenders and telecoms operators are licensed here and their licence conditions do reach their overseas systems. A draft privacy law was put to a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and will proceed through the formal law-making process, so this answer has a shelf life.High confidence	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes, and with nothing to sign. Cambodia has no rule that stops ordinary personal data leaving the country. Finance is the one hard wall we could verify: a bank or lender supervised by the central bank must have at least one main data centre in Cambodia, may only use a foreign data centre as a backup, and needs the central bank's approval before customer personal data is hosted abroad. Telecoms is the sector to watch, because a 2021 order that would route all internet traffic through a single national gateway was never switched on but was never cancelled either.Medium confidence	Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	For most organisations, nothing at all. There is no approved-countries list, no banned-countries list, no standard contract to sign and no government form to file. The lists are not just empty, they do not exist, because there is no law that creates them. In finance the model is completely different: each move of customer personal data out of Cambodia needs its own approval from the central bank, decided case by case, and there is no published application process or timetable.Medium confidence	There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	For privacy, nobody. Cambodia has no data protection authority. The Ministry of Post and Telecommunications is writing the law and, in November 2025, ran a training workshop with Singapore's privacy regulator on how to build such an authority, which tells you plainly that one does not yet exist. Sector regulators are a different story and are genuinely working: the central bank supervises financial firms against its 2026 technology guidelines, and the telecoms regulator publicly named an operator in June 2026 for selling SIM cards without properly checking customers' identity documents.High confidence	The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax and accounting law forces businesses to keep books and supporting documents for years, and financial firms must keep system logs and agree retention periods with their cloud providers. In the other direction there is no general rule telling anyone to delete personal data, because there is no privacy law. The only deletion duty we could verify applies to banks and lenders, who must keep customer personal data only as long as it is needed.Medium confidence	Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is no breach reporting clock in Cambodia. No law requires you to tell a regulator or the affected people when personal data leaks, and there is no national cyber incident hotline with a deadline in hours. The nearest thing is in banking: the central bank tells supervised firms to report incidents as it requires, either on a regular cycle or one-off, with no fixed number of hours. Two draft laws would change this, so treat today's silence as temporary.Medium confidence	Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. First, the e-commerce law reportedly bans encryption that would stop evidence being used in a criminal case, which cuts across normal end-to-end encryption promises. Second, a cloud-only bank cannot operate here: the main data centre must physically be in Cambodia. Third, moving customer banking data abroad needs the central bank's permission in advance, and there is no published process or timetable, so it must be planned months ahead. Fourth, telecoms operators must check identity documents before activating a SIM card, and the regulator names offenders in public. Fifth, no privacy law does not mean no risk, because your foreign customers will impose their own rules by contract.Medium confidence	Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?	Four drafts are moving and none of them is law yet. The Personal Data Protection Law reached a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and now heads into the formal law-making process. The Cybersecurity Law was still being argued over with the Ministry of Justice in July 2026. A Data Governance Policy for 2026 to 2035 was in consultation in March 2026 and is expected to cover where data may be stored and how it may cross borders. A Digital Government Law went to consultation in July 2025. No commencement date has been announced for any of them.High confidence	Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Finance — Technology and Cyber Risk Management Guidelines (TCRMG)	None found.