Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

CambodiaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: LowEnforcement: Dormant

In one paragraph: Cambodia has no general privacy law. A bill exists and went to a public review meeting in August 2026, but it is not law and there is no privacy regulator to complain to. For most businesses data can leave the country freely, with no paperwork. Banks and other lenders are the big exception: their main data centre must sit inside Cambodia.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops at the door of the financial sector. Any bank or lender supervised by Cambodia's central bank must keep at least one main data centre inside the country, and must get the central bank's permission in advance before customer personal data is moved to or hosted on servers abroad. Telecoms are also watched closely by an active regulator, and a suspended 2021 order that would push all internet traffic through a single government-controlled gateway can be switched back on at any time.
Does this apply to me?: There is no general data protection law in Cambodia, so there is nothing for a foreign company to be caught by. No size threshold, no revenue threshold, no registration, and no requirement to appoint someone in Cambodia to answer for your data. That changes the moment you need a local licence: banks, lenders and telecoms operators are licensed here and their licence conditions do reach their overseas systems. A draft privacy law was put to a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and will proceed through the formal law-making process, so this answer has a shelf life.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes, and with nothing to sign. Cambodia has no rule that stops ordinary personal data leaving the country. Finance is the one hard wall we could verify: a bank or lender supervised by the central bank must have at least one main data centre in Cambodia, may only use a foreign data centre as a backup, and needs the central bank's approval before customer personal data is hosted abroad. Telecoms is the sector to watch, because a 2021 order that would route all internet traffic through a single national gateway was never switched on but was never cancelled either.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: For most organisations, nothing at all. There is no approved-countries list, no banned-countries list, no standard contract to sign and no government form to file. The lists are not just empty, they do not exist, because there is no law that creates them. In finance the model is completely different: each move of customer personal data out of Cambodia needs its own approval from the central bank, decided case by case, and there is no published application process or timetable.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: For privacy, nobody. Cambodia has no data protection authority. The Ministry of Post and Telecommunications is writing the law and, in November 2025, ran a training workshop with Singapore's privacy regulator on how to build such an authority, which tells you plainly that one does not yet exist. Sector regulators are a different story and are genuinely working: the central bank supervises financial firms against its 2026 technology guidelines, and the telecoms regulator publicly named an operator in June 2026 for selling SIM cards without properly checking customers' identity documents.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax and accounting law forces businesses to keep books and supporting documents for years, and financial firms must keep system logs and agree retention periods with their cloud providers. In the other direction there is no general rule telling anyone to delete personal data, because there is no privacy law. The only deletion duty we could verify applies to banks and lenders, who must keep customer personal data only as long as it is needed.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is no breach reporting clock in Cambodia. No law requires you to tell a regulator or the affected people when personal data leaks, and there is no national cyber incident hotline with a deadline in hours. The nearest thing is in banking: the central bank tells supervised firms to report incidents as it requires, either on a regular cycle or one-off, with no fixed number of hours. Two draft laws would change this, so treat today's silence as temporary.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, the e-commerce law reportedly bans encryption that would stop evidence being used in a criminal case, which cuts across normal end-to-end encryption promises. Second, a cloud-only bank cannot operate here: the main data centre must physically be in Cambodia. Third, moving customer banking data abroad needs the central bank's permission in advance, and there is no published process or timetable, so it must be planned months ahead. Fourth, telecoms operators must check identity documents before activating a SIM card, and the regulator names offenders in public. Fifth, no privacy law does not mean no risk, because your foreign customers will impose their own rules by contract.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Four drafts are moving and none of them is law yet. The Personal Data Protection Law reached a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and now heads into the formal law-making process. The Cybersecurity Law was still being argued over with the Ministry of Justice in July 2026. A Data Governance Policy for 2026 to 2035 was in consultation in March 2026 and is expected to cover where data may be stored and how it may cross borders. A Digital Government Law went to consultation in July 2025. No commencement date has been announced for any of them.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Finance — Technology and Cyber Risk Management Guidelines (TCRMG)

GermanyChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Contrary to widespread belief, neither Europe nor Germany requires personal data to be stored in Europe. What the law requires is a valid legal instrument before data leaves — an official decision that the destination is safe enough, or a standard contract, plus a documented risk assessment. Germany then adds its own layer on top, and one genuine hard wall: health and social data may only be processed in the cloud within Europe, by a provider holding a specific German security certificate.
The catch: 'Germany doesn't require local storage' is true right up until you sell to a hospital, a health insurer, a doctor, a lawyer or a tax adviser. In health and social care it is simply false, and for the professional-secrecy trades a standard data processing agreement is not enough and getting it wrong is a criminal matter.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Germany. Europe's privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Europe or monitors their behaviour. If you have no European establishment you must also appoint a representative inside Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes — with paperwork. This is the single most misunderstood point in the field. European law does not say where data must sit; it says what you must have in place before it leaves Europe. Storage location is a risk factor in that assessment, never a prohibition. For non-personal data, Europe goes further and actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: One of three routes. Best case, the destination is on Europe's official 'adequate' list and you need nothing extra — currently 17 entries including the UK, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, Canada for commercial bodies, Brazil since January 2026, and the United States but only for companies self-certified under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. Otherwise you sign Europe's standard contract clauses, or get group-wide internal rules approved. In either of those two cases you must also document an assessment of whether the destination country's surveillance laws undermine the protection.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Eighteen separate authorities, and for a private company it is almost never the federal one. Each of the 16 states has its own regulator, and you answer to the one where your German office is. The federal regulator handles government bodies plus telecoms and postal operators. Bavaria splits it further, with different bodies for private and public sector. If you operate across Europe, a separate rule lets you deal mainly with the regulator where your main European establishment sits.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Business records have a floor: accounting vouchers must be kept 8 years (cut from 10 with effect from 2025, and from 2026 for banks and insurers), the annual accounts and trading books still 10 years, and business correspondence 6 years. Privacy law pushes the other way — don't keep personal data longer than you need it. Where the two collide, German law has an elegant answer: you restrict processing of the data instead of deleting it.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: 72 hours to tell your state regulator about a personal data breach, and without undue delay to tell affected people where the risk to them is high. Separately, since December 2025 Germany's cybersecurity law adds its own clocks for around 29,500 in-scope companies: a first warning within 24 hours, an update at 72 hours, and a full report within a month. Financial firms follow a separate European regime instead.High confidence
What's the trap?: Four. (1) Health and social data really does have to stay in Europe, with a specific German security certificate — the general 'no localisation' answer is wrong here. (2) For doctors, lawyers, tax advisers and notaries, a standard data processing agreement is NOT enough: you need explicit secrecy undertakings flowed down to every subcontractor, and breach is a criminal offence, not a fine. (3) Germany still requires a data protection officer at just 20 employees involved in data processing — far stricter than European law, and still in force despite a government promise to scrap it by the end of 2026. (4) The German rule people cite for employee data was effectively struck down by Europe's top court in 2023 but never removed from the statute book, so citing it as your legal basis is a mistake.High confidence
What's about to change?: Two hard dates and one live risk. From 12 January 2027 every cloud provider must drop switching and data egress fees to zero — renegotiate contracts now. By 31 December 2026 Germany's banking IT rulebook is fully withdrawn in favour of the European financial regime. The live risk is the US arrangement: Europe's data protection board formally asked the Commission on 31 July 2026 to review whether it is still valid, and a separate court appeal is pending. If it falls, thousands of transfers move to standard contracts overnight.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — § 393 SGB V — Cloud-Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen
Telecoms — §§ 175–181 TKG — Vorratsdatenspeicherung

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	CambodiaChecked 18 August 2026	GermanyChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Low Enforcement: Dormant	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Cambodia has no general privacy law. A bill exists and went to a public review meeting in August 2026, but it is not law and there is no privacy regulator to complain to. For most businesses data can leave the country freely, with no paperwork. Banks and other lenders are the big exception: their main data centre must sit inside Cambodia.	Contrary to widespread belief, neither Europe nor Germany requires personal data to be stored in Europe. What the law requires is a valid legal instrument before data leaves — an official decision that the destination is safe enough, or a standard contract, plus a documented risk assessment. Germany then adds its own layer on top, and one genuine hard wall: health and social data may only be processed in the cloud within Europe, by a provider holding a specific German security certificate.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops at the door of the financial sector. Any bank or lender supervised by Cambodia's central bank must keep at least one main data centre inside the country, and must get the central bank's permission in advance before customer personal data is moved to or hosted on servers abroad. Telecoms are also watched closely by an active regulator, and a suspended 2021 order that would push all internet traffic through a single government-controlled gateway can be switched back on at any time.	'Germany doesn't require local storage' is true right up until you sell to a hospital, a health insurer, a doctor, a lawyer or a tax adviser. In health and social care it is simply false, and for the professional-secrecy trades a standard data processing agreement is not enough and getting it wrong is a criminal matter.
Does this apply to me?	There is no general data protection law in Cambodia, so there is nothing for a foreign company to be caught by. No size threshold, no revenue threshold, no registration, and no requirement to appoint someone in Cambodia to answer for your data. That changes the moment you need a local licence: banks, lenders and telecoms operators are licensed here and their licence conditions do reach their overseas systems. A draft privacy law was put to a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and will proceed through the formal law-making process, so this answer has a shelf life.High confidence	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Germany. Europe's privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Europe or monitors their behaviour. If you have no European establishment you must also appoint a representative inside Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes, and with nothing to sign. Cambodia has no rule that stops ordinary personal data leaving the country. Finance is the one hard wall we could verify: a bank or lender supervised by the central bank must have at least one main data centre in Cambodia, may only use a foreign data centre as a backup, and needs the central bank's approval before customer personal data is hosted abroad. Telecoms is the sector to watch, because a 2021 order that would route all internet traffic through a single national gateway was never switched on but was never cancelled either.Medium confidence	Yes — with paperwork. This is the single most misunderstood point in the field. European law does not say where data must sit; it says what you must have in place before it leaves Europe. Storage location is a risk factor in that assessment, never a prohibition. For non-personal data, Europe goes further and actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	For most organisations, nothing at all. There is no approved-countries list, no banned-countries list, no standard contract to sign and no government form to file. The lists are not just empty, they do not exist, because there is no law that creates them. In finance the model is completely different: each move of customer personal data out of Cambodia needs its own approval from the central bank, decided case by case, and there is no published application process or timetable.Medium confidence	One of three routes. Best case, the destination is on Europe's official 'adequate' list and you need nothing extra — currently 17 entries including the UK, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, Canada for commercial bodies, Brazil since January 2026, and the United States but only for companies self-certified under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. Otherwise you sign Europe's standard contract clauses, or get group-wide internal rules approved. In either of those two cases you must also document an assessment of whether the destination country's surveillance laws undermine the protection.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	For privacy, nobody. Cambodia has no data protection authority. The Ministry of Post and Telecommunications is writing the law and, in November 2025, ran a training workshop with Singapore's privacy regulator on how to build such an authority, which tells you plainly that one does not yet exist. Sector regulators are a different story and are genuinely working: the central bank supervises financial firms against its 2026 technology guidelines, and the telecoms regulator publicly named an operator in June 2026 for selling SIM cards without properly checking customers' identity documents.High confidence	Eighteen separate authorities, and for a private company it is almost never the federal one. Each of the 16 states has its own regulator, and you answer to the one where your German office is. The federal regulator handles government bodies plus telecoms and postal operators. Bavaria splits it further, with different bodies for private and public sector. If you operate across Europe, a separate rule lets you deal mainly with the regulator where your main European establishment sits.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a floor and almost no ceiling. Tax and accounting law forces businesses to keep books and supporting documents for years, and financial firms must keep system logs and agree retention periods with their cloud providers. In the other direction there is no general rule telling anyone to delete personal data, because there is no privacy law. The only deletion duty we could verify applies to banks and lenders, who must keep customer personal data only as long as it is needed.Medium confidence	Business records have a floor: accounting vouchers must be kept 8 years (cut from 10 with effect from 2025, and from 2026 for banks and insurers), the annual accounts and trading books still 10 years, and business correspondence 6 years. Privacy law pushes the other way — don't keep personal data longer than you need it. Where the two collide, German law has an elegant answer: you restrict processing of the data instead of deleting it.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is no breach reporting clock in Cambodia. No law requires you to tell a regulator or the affected people when personal data leaks, and there is no national cyber incident hotline with a deadline in hours. The nearest thing is in banking: the central bank tells supervised firms to report incidents as it requires, either on a regular cycle or one-off, with no fixed number of hours. Two draft laws would change this, so treat today's silence as temporary.Medium confidence	72 hours to tell your state regulator about a personal data breach, and without undue delay to tell affected people where the risk to them is high. Separately, since December 2025 Germany's cybersecurity law adds its own clocks for around 29,500 in-scope companies: a first warning within 24 hours, an update at 72 hours, and a full report within a month. Financial firms follow a separate European regime instead.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. First, the e-commerce law reportedly bans encryption that would stop evidence being used in a criminal case, which cuts across normal end-to-end encryption promises. Second, a cloud-only bank cannot operate here: the main data centre must physically be in Cambodia. Third, moving customer banking data abroad needs the central bank's permission in advance, and there is no published process or timetable, so it must be planned months ahead. Fourth, telecoms operators must check identity documents before activating a SIM card, and the regulator names offenders in public. Fifth, no privacy law does not mean no risk, because your foreign customers will impose their own rules by contract.Medium confidence	Four. (1) Health and social data really does have to stay in Europe, with a specific German security certificate — the general 'no localisation' answer is wrong here. (2) For doctors, lawyers, tax advisers and notaries, a standard data processing agreement is NOT enough: you need explicit secrecy undertakings flowed down to every subcontractor, and breach is a criminal offence, not a fine. (3) Germany still requires a data protection officer at just 20 employees involved in data processing — far stricter than European law, and still in force despite a government promise to scrap it by the end of 2026. (4) The German rule people cite for employee data was effectively struck down by Europe's top court in 2023 but never removed from the statute book, so citing it as your legal basis is a mistake.High confidence
What's about to change?	Four drafts are moving and none of them is law yet. The Personal Data Protection Law reached a validation workshop on 5 August 2026 and now heads into the formal law-making process. The Cybersecurity Law was still being argued over with the Ministry of Justice in July 2026. A Data Governance Policy for 2026 to 2035 was in consultation in March 2026 and is expected to cover where data may be stored and how it may cross borders. A Digital Government Law went to consultation in July 2025. No commencement date has been announced for any of them.High confidence	Two hard dates and one live risk. From 12 January 2027 every cloud provider must drop switching and data egress fees to zero — renegotiate contracts now. By 31 December 2026 Germany's banking IT rulebook is fully withdrawn in favour of the European financial regime. The live risk is the US arrangement: Europe's data protection board formally asked the Commission on 31 July 2026 to review whether it is still valid, and a separate court appeal is pending. If it falls, thousands of transfers move to standard contracts overnight.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Finance — Technology and Cyber Risk Management Guidelines (TCRMG)	Health and social care — § 393 SGB V — Cloud-Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen Telecoms — §§ 175–181 TKG — Vorratsdatenspeicherung