Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

ItalyChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Aggressive

In one paragraph: Italy does not make ordinary business data stay in Italy. European rules decide when data may leave Europe, and Italy layers its own rules on top. But the moment you sell to the Italian state — a ministry, a town hall, a hospital, a school — the picture changes completely. The most sensitive government data has to sit on machines inside Italy, run from Italy.
The catch: "Italy has no data localisation" holds right up until your customer is a public body. Italian government data is sorted into ordinary, critical and strategic. Strategic data belongs on Italian soil under Italian operational control; critical data may not go on a public cloud outside Europe. On top of that, a cloud provider needs a licence from the national cyber agency before any public body is allowed to buy from it at all. Separately, telecoms companies must keep call and connection records for years, and the government can attach storage-location conditions to fifth-generation mobile and cloud contracts case by case.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Italy. European law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Italy, or that monitors what they do online. There is no size or revenue threshold to duck under. If you have no branch anywhere in Europe, you must appoint a written representative based in Europe, and people and regulators can go to that representative instead of chasing you abroad.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: For a normal private company, yes — with paperwork, exactly as anywhere else in Europe. Italy has no general law saying personal data must be stored in Italy. The real walls are in one place: anything sold to or run by the Italian public sector. Government data is graded ordinary, critical or strategic, and the top two grades cannot sit on a public cloud outside Europe, with strategic data confined to infrastructure inside Italy and operated from Italy.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Three routes, and they are European rather than Italian. Best case, the destination is on Europe's official approved list and you need nothing extra. Otherwise you sign Europe's standard contract with the recipient, or get group-wide internal rules approved by a regulator. With the last two you must also write down an assessment of whether the destination country's surveillance laws would undermine the protection. Italy adds no extra permission step, but it does add a criminal offence for getting it badly wrong.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Italian data protection authority, known as the Garante, and it is one of the busiest and boldest regulators in Europe. In 2025 alone it took 807 decisions, of which 506 were corrective or punitive, ran 130 inspections and collected more than 37 million euros (about 41 million dollars) in fines. It was the first regulator in the world to order a temporary halt to a major chatbot service, and it has since blocked or restricted several artificial intelligence products. Cybersecurity is enforced by a separate agency.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions, and they pull hard against each other. The floors: telephone records must be kept 24 months, internet connection records 12 months, unanswered calls 30 days, and a separate six-year rule applies for terrorism and serious crime. Health records in the national system are erased 30 years after the patient dies. The ceiling is much tighter than people expect: the regulator says the technical logs behind staff email may normally be kept for no more than 21 days.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least three clocks, and they run at the same time. A personal data breach goes to the Garante within 72 hours, and to the people affected without delay where the risk to them is high. If you are in scope of Italy's network security regime, a first warning goes to the national cyber agency within 24 hours, a fuller notification within 72 hours, and a final report within a month. Organisations inside the national cyber perimeter have a much shorter fuse, reported as six hours.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five. One: staff email logs may normally be kept only 21 days, and a regional government was punished in 2025 for keeping 90. Two: before you install any tool that could monitor employees, you need a union agreement or a labour inspectorate permit, and skipping it is a criminal matter, not a fine. Three: some data offences in Italy carry prison, not just penalties. Four: children can consent at 14 in Italy, not 16. Five: the widely reported rule forcing public-sector artificial intelligence onto Italian servers was deleted before the law passed, so citing it is wrong.High confidence
What's about to change?: Two firm dates and one open wound. By 31 October 2026 organisations in Italy's network security regime must have their basic security measures in place and evidenced. From 12 January 2027 every cloud provider must charge nothing for switching away or pulling data out. The open wound is the Italian regulator itself: one of four board seats has been empty since January 2026 and Parliament has not filled it.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Regolamento unico per le infrastrutture e i servizi cloud per la PA — Determinazione ACN n. 21007/24

JapanChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Japan lets personal data leave the country, but you need paperwork. Only Europe and the United Kingdom are pre-approved. For anywhere else you either sign a contract that binds the recipient to Japanese-standard protection, or you get the person's consent after telling them which country the data goes to. There is no general rule forcing data to stay in Japan.
The catch: Two things break the calm headline. If you sell to the Japanese government, the data must physically sit in Japanese data centres. And if you run a website, an app or any online service used from Japan, the telecoms law reaches you even with no office here, requires a representative in Japan, and makes leaking a communication a criminal offence rather than a fine.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Japan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Japan, as long as it handles the personal information of people in Japan while supplying them goods or services. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. Unlike Europe, the privacy law does not make you appoint a representative in Japan — but the telecoms law does, if your service counts as a telecommunications service.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Japan's general rating is conditional: personal data may go abroad once you have one of three things in place. There is no across-the-board law keeping data in Japan, and no financial, insurance, securities or health localisation rule of the kind India or China have — we searched for one and did not find it. The real wall is government work: anything running on the national Government Cloud must sit in data centres inside Japan.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an allowlist, and the list has exactly two entries: the European Union and the United Kingdom. Send data there and it is treated almost like a domestic transfer. For every other destination you need one of two things instead. Either the recipient is contractually bound to protect the data to Japanese standards and you keep checking that it does, or you get the person's consent after first telling them the destination country, what its privacy law is like, and what the recipient will do to protect the data.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Information Protection Commission, and it is genuinely working. It has a chair, eight commissioners and a staff ceiling of 231 people. In the year to March 2025 it handled just over 19,000 breach reports, gave 395 pieces of formal guidance and made one recommendation. In the first six months of the following year it sharpened up: two recommendations and its first emergency order, against a company misusing personal information. What it cannot do yet is fine you — Japan has no administrative money penalty for privacy breaches until the 2026 amendment starts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor is firm and the ceiling is soft. Tax law makes you keep books and records for seven years, stretching to ten if you carry a loss forward. Company accounting books run ten years. Against that, the privacy law only asks you to try to delete personal data once you no longer need it — it is a best-efforts duty, not a hard deadline. So when the two collide, the keep-it rule wins in practice.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. For a personal data breach you file a first report to the privacy regulator within three to five days of finding out, and a full report within 30 days — 60 days if someone did it on purpose. You must also tell the people affected. Critical infrastructure operators have a separate cyber incident duty with a report to the government within 30 days. Telecoms operators report leaks of communications to the communications ministry on their own timetable.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) Putting data on a foreign server is often not a 'transfer' at all — if the provider is contractually barred from touching it — but you then have to work out that country's privacy law and publish the country's name to your users. Most people miss this. (2) The privacy law has no fines: the sanctions are criminal, and a company can be fined about $650,000 for a staff member stealing a customer database. (3) Leaking a communication is a crime punishable with prison, and telecoms staff face a longer term than outsiders. (4) The telecoms rules catch ordinary websites and apps, not just phone companies, and reach foreign operators with no office in Japan. (5) Consent to send data 'overseas' is not valid — you have to name the country.High confidence
What's about to change?: The big one has already passed. On 17 July 2026 Japan published a large amendment to its privacy law. It introduces the country's first money penalty for privacy breaches, sets 16 as the age below which a guardian must be involved, adds rules for face and other biometric data, and raises the criminal penalties. It is not in force yet: the government has up to two years to switch it on by order, and no date has been announced. The other thing to watch is the new cyber defence law, which is being switched on in stages through 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — デジタル庁におけるガバメントクラウド等の整備のためのクラウドサービスの提供 — 令和８年度募集調達仕様書

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	ItalyChecked 18 August 2026	JapanChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Aggressive	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Italy does not make ordinary business data stay in Italy. European rules decide when data may leave Europe, and Italy layers its own rules on top. But the moment you sell to the Italian state — a ministry, a town hall, a hospital, a school — the picture changes completely. The most sensitive government data has to sit on machines inside Italy, run from Italy.	Japan lets personal data leave the country, but you need paperwork. Only Europe and the United Kingdom are pre-approved. For anywhere else you either sign a contract that binds the recipient to Japanese-standard protection, or you get the person's consent after telling them which country the data goes to. There is no general rule forcing data to stay in Japan.
The catch	"Italy has no data localisation" holds right up until your customer is a public body. Italian government data is sorted into ordinary, critical and strategic. Strategic data belongs on Italian soil under Italian operational control; critical data may not go on a public cloud outside Europe. On top of that, a cloud provider needs a licence from the national cyber agency before any public body is allowed to buy from it at all. Separately, telecoms companies must keep call and connection records for years, and the government can attach storage-location conditions to fifth-generation mobile and cloud contracts case by case.	Two things break the calm headline. If you sell to the Japanese government, the data must physically sit in Japanese data centres. And if you run a website, an app or any online service used from Japan, the telecoms law reaches you even with no office here, requires a representative in Japan, and makes leaking a communication a criminal offence rather than a fine.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Italy. European law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Italy, or that monitors what they do online. There is no size or revenue threshold to duck under. If you have no branch anywhere in Europe, you must appoint a written representative based in Europe, and people and regulators can go to that representative instead of chasing you abroad.High confidence	Yes. Japan's privacy law reaches a foreign company with no office and no staff in Japan, as long as it handles the personal information of people in Japan while supplying them goods or services. There is no size, revenue or headcount threshold to fall below. Unlike Europe, the privacy law does not make you appoint a representative in Japan — but the telecoms law does, if your service counts as a telecommunications service.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	For a normal private company, yes — with paperwork, exactly as anywhere else in Europe. Italy has no general law saying personal data must be stored in Italy. The real walls are in one place: anything sold to or run by the Italian public sector. Government data is graded ordinary, critical or strategic, and the top two grades cannot sit on a public cloud outside Europe, with strategic data confined to infrastructure inside Italy and operated from Italy.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Japan's general rating is conditional: personal data may go abroad once you have one of three things in place. There is no across-the-board law keeping data in Japan, and no financial, insurance, securities or health localisation rule of the kind India or China have — we searched for one and did not find it. The real wall is government work: anything running on the national Government Cloud must sit in data centres inside Japan.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Three routes, and they are European rather than Italian. Best case, the destination is on Europe's official approved list and you need nothing extra. Otherwise you sign Europe's standard contract with the recipient, or get group-wide internal rules approved by a regulator. With the last two you must also write down an assessment of whether the destination country's surveillance laws would undermine the protection. Italy adds no extra permission step, but it does add a criminal offence for getting it badly wrong.High confidence	The model is an allowlist, and the list has exactly two entries: the European Union and the United Kingdom. Send data there and it is treated almost like a domestic transfer. For every other destination you need one of two things instead. Either the recipient is contractually bound to protect the data to Japanese standards and you keep checking that it does, or you get the person's consent after first telling them the destination country, what its privacy law is like, and what the recipient will do to protect the data.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Italian data protection authority, known as the Garante, and it is one of the busiest and boldest regulators in Europe. In 2025 alone it took 807 decisions, of which 506 were corrective or punitive, ran 130 inspections and collected more than 37 million euros (about 41 million dollars) in fines. It was the first regulator in the world to order a temporary halt to a major chatbot service, and it has since blocked or restricted several artificial intelligence products. Cybersecurity is enforced by a separate agency.High confidence	The Personal Information Protection Commission, and it is genuinely working. It has a chair, eight commissioners and a staff ceiling of 231 people. In the year to March 2025 it handled just over 19,000 breach reports, gave 395 pieces of formal guidance and made one recommendation. In the first six months of the following year it sharpened up: two recommendations and its first emergency order, against a company misusing personal information. What it cannot do yet is fine you — Japan has no administrative money penalty for privacy breaches until the 2026 amendment starts.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions, and they pull hard against each other. The floors: telephone records must be kept 24 months, internet connection records 12 months, unanswered calls 30 days, and a separate six-year rule applies for terrorism and serious crime. Health records in the national system are erased 30 years after the patient dies. The ceiling is much tighter than people expect: the regulator says the technical logs behind staff email may normally be kept for no more than 21 days.High confidence	The floor is firm and the ceiling is soft. Tax law makes you keep books and records for seven years, stretching to ten if you carry a loss forward. Company accounting books run ten years. Against that, the privacy law only asks you to try to delete personal data once you no longer need it — it is a best-efforts duty, not a hard deadline. So when the two collide, the keep-it rule wins in practice.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count at least three clocks, and they run at the same time. A personal data breach goes to the Garante within 72 hours, and to the people affected without delay where the risk to them is high. If you are in scope of Italy's network security regime, a first warning goes to the national cyber agency within 24 hours, a fuller notification within 72 hours, and a final report within a month. Organisations inside the national cyber perimeter have a much shorter fuse, reported as six hours.Medium confidence	Count three clocks. For a personal data breach you file a first report to the privacy regulator within three to five days of finding out, and a full report within 30 days — 60 days if someone did it on purpose. You must also tell the people affected. Critical infrastructure operators have a separate cyber incident duty with a report to the government within 30 days. Telecoms operators report leaks of communications to the communications ministry on their own timetable.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five. One: staff email logs may normally be kept only 21 days, and a regional government was punished in 2025 for keeping 90. Two: before you install any tool that could monitor employees, you need a union agreement or a labour inspectorate permit, and skipping it is a criminal matter, not a fine. Three: some data offences in Italy carry prison, not just penalties. Four: children can consent at 14 in Italy, not 16. Five: the widely reported rule forcing public-sector artificial intelligence onto Italian servers was deleted before the law passed, so citing it is wrong.High confidence	Five. (1) Putting data on a foreign server is often not a 'transfer' at all — if the provider is contractually barred from touching it — but you then have to work out that country's privacy law and publish the country's name to your users. Most people miss this. (2) The privacy law has no fines: the sanctions are criminal, and a company can be fined about $650,000 for a staff member stealing a customer database. (3) Leaking a communication is a crime punishable with prison, and telecoms staff face a longer term than outsiders. (4) The telecoms rules catch ordinary websites and apps, not just phone companies, and reach foreign operators with no office in Japan. (5) Consent to send data 'overseas' is not valid — you have to name the country.High confidence
What's about to change?	Two firm dates and one open wound. By 31 October 2026 organisations in Italy's network security regime must have their basic security measures in place and evidenced. From 12 January 2027 every cloud provider must charge nothing for switching away or pulling data out. The open wound is the Italian regulator itself: one of four board seats has been empty since January 2026 and Parliament has not filled it.Medium confidence	The big one has already passed. On 17 July 2026 Japan published a large amendment to its privacy law. It introduces the country's first money penalty for privacy breaches, sets 16 as the age below which a guardian must be involved, adds rules for face and other biometric data, and raises the criminal penalties. It is not in force yet: the government has up to two years to switch it on by order, and no date has been announced. The other thing to watch is the new cyber defence law, which is being switched on in stages through 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Government — Regolamento unico per le infrastrutture e i servizi cloud per la PA — Determinazione ACN n. 21007/24	Government — デジタル庁におけるガバメントクラウド等の整備のためのクラウドサービスの提供 — 令和８年度募集調達仕様書