Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

IsraelChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Israeli data can go abroad, but never by default. Either the destination country protects data as well as Israel does, or you fit one of eight listed exceptions — usually a contract in which the receiver promises to follow Israeli rules. A big reform started on 14 August 2025 and the regulator now issues real fines. No industry bans exports outright, but several add heavy conditions.
The catch: The general answer is 'yes, with paperwork'. It stops being true in four places. Banks may not put sensitive customer data on a cloud outside Israel unless they have checked the provider meets European-level protection. Insurers and pension bodies must report every offshore outsourcing arrangement to their regulator each year. Identifiable patient data used for research must generally stay inside the hospital or health fund that holds it, not merely inside Israel. And central government has moved its own cloud into Israeli data-centre regions on purpose, so selling cloud to the state effectively requires an Israeli region.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach a foreign company with no office in Israel — but the law never says so in words. Israeli privacy law simply applies to anyone who collects, uses or processes personal data, with no size or revenue threshold to fall under. There is no general requirement to appoint a local representative. Some organisations must appoint a privacy officer, and that person is allowed to be an outside contractor rather than a staff member.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork — and you must be able to name the route you are using. The default rule is that data may only go to a country whose law protects it at least as well as Israeli law does. If the destination fails that test, you have to fit one of eight listed exceptions, and whichever route you take you also need a written promise from the receiver. No Israeli industry has a flat 'the data stays here' rule, but four sectors bolt extra conditions on top.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is closest to an allowlist: you may not send data out unless the destination qualifies, and the qualifying list is already populated. It counts if the country signed the Council of Europe data protection convention, or if it receives data from European Union countries on the same terms — so Europe's approved-country list does much of the work. If your destination does not qualify, the usual fallback is a contract in which the receiver promises to meet Israeli standards. Either way you also need a separate written promise from the receiver that it will protect the data and pass it to nobody else.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Protection Authority, part of the Ministry of Justice, and it is fully operational. It has a serving commissioner, an administrative enforcement department, and it publishes its decisions with names and amounts. In 2026 it fined a national health fund about 256,000 shekels (roughly $72,000) for taking two months to report a security incident, and a small leisure company about 12,000 shekels (roughly $3,400) for a defective privacy notice. Industry regulators — the Bank of Israel, the insurance regulator and the Ministry of Health — enforce their own rules separately.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a clear floor and a clear ceiling, and they sit close together. The floor: security and access-monitoring records must be kept for at least 24 months, and organisations with medium or high security databases must keep a restorable backup of them. The ceiling: if a database contains anything that came from Europe, you must run a mechanism that finds data you no longer need and delete it, and you must delete data on request. Where another law says you must keep something, that wins over the duty to delete.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is one main clock and it has no hours attached to it: a severe security incident must be reported to the Privacy Protection Authority immediately, along with what you did about it. 'Immediately' is taken literally — a health fund was fined for a two-month delay. Telling the affected people is not automatic; the Authority decides, after consulting the national cyber agency, and can order you to notify them. Israel has no general law forcing every company to report cyber incidents to the state, so your second clock, if you have one, comes from your industry regulator.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: a single record that arrived from Europe drags the whole database into the stricter European rules — since 1 January 2025 those rules apply to any other data sitting in the same database. Two: 'immediately' really means immediately, and there is no safe 72-hour habit to fall back on. Three: fines are calculated per person, not as a flat cap, so a large database turns a small breach into a very large bill. Four: privacy breaches are criminal offences, not just regulatory ones, with prison terms attached. Five: 'data security officer' and 'data protection officer' are two different Israeli roles with different triggers, and having one does not satisfy the other.High confidence
What's about to change?: The big change already happened on 14 August 2025. What is landing now is the detail underneath it. In April 2026 the regulator finalised its binding rules on the contract you must sign before sending data abroad, and separate regulations came into force giving a short grace period — a warning instead of a fine — for brand-new obligations. A guideline applying privacy law to artificial intelligence, including a requirement of consent before scraping the web to train models, is also in play. Watch three switches the government can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — חוזרי מנכ"ל משרד הבריאות 1/2018 ו-2/2018 - שימושים משניים במידע בריאות
Government — פרויקט נימבוס - מדיניות הענן הממשלתית

BrazilChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Brazil does not force data to stay inside the country. Personal data can leave, but since August 2025 you normally need a contract written by the regulator, word for word, signed with whoever receives it. Sending data to the European Union needs nothing extra. The regulator is awake and has started switching features off large platforms.
The catch: Brazil is often listed as a data-localisation country. It is not one. The old rule that pushed federal government email and data onto Brazilian systems was scrapped in 2018, and today's federal cloud rules do not require Brazilian soil. The real constraints are different in shape: banks must keep the central bank able to reach their data wherever it sits, and since July 2026 digital platforms must have an actual office and a legal representative inside Brazil.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Brazil's privacy law reaches a company with no office in Brazil, as long as it collects data in Brazil or offers goods or services to people here. There is no size or revenue threshold that lets you out. The privacy law itself does not make you appoint anyone local — but two newer rules do, and if you run a digital platform you now need a registered office and a legal representative in Brazil.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Brazil has no rule making anyone keep a copy of anything inside the country — not for banks, not for hospitals, not even for the federal government's own cloud. What it has instead is a permission slip: before personal data leaves, you need one of a short list of approved legal grounds. Industry rules add conditions on top, but none of them is a wall.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Pick one of five routes. The easy one is the European Union: since January 2026 Brazil treats it as safe, so nothing extra is needed. For everywhere else, the normal route is a set of standard contractual clauses that the regulator itself wrote — you copy them into your contract exactly, and you may not edit them. A deadline to retrofit older contracts already passed, on 23 August 2025.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The National Data Protection Authority, and it is genuinely working. A law passed in February 2026 gave it real independence, 200 new specialist jobs and its own budget. In August 2026 it ordered Discord to switch off live video streaming in Brazil within three working days, to protect children. Banking, telecoms, insurance and securities regulators enforce their own rules in parallel and have done so for years.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions, and they pull against each other. The floor: internet access providers must keep connection records for one year, websites and apps must keep access records for six months, and tax records need five years. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be deleted once you have finished doing what you collected it for. Where the two clash, the legal duty to keep wins — the law lists that as an express reason to hold on.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. Privacy: three working days to tell the regulator AND the affected people, once you have confirmed a breach that could really hurt them. Platform content: two hours to take down intimate images shared without consent, once notified. On top of that, banks report incidents to the central bank and telecoms operators report to the telecoms regulator under their own separate timetables.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) Your European standard contract is not automatically good enough — Brazil wrote its own clauses and you must copy them exactly, unedited, and the deadline to fix old contracts passed on 23 August 2025. (2) A child in Brazil is under 12 and an adolescent is 12 to 17, but the social media rule bites at 16 — accounts for anyone up to 16 must be tied to a parent's account, and asking users to state their own age is banned. (3) Since 20 July 2026 a digital platform needs an actual registered office in Brazil, not just a lawyer on retainer. (4) The biggest fine is not in the privacy law: the internet law allows up to 10 percent of your group's Brazilian revenue. (5) The regulator can order your database blocked or your processing suspended, which usually hurts more than any cheque.High confidence
What's about to change?: One firm date: January 2027, when the regulator moves from monitoring platforms to full enforcement of the children's digital rules. Brazil's artificial intelligence bill is still only a bill — it was sitting in a committee waiting for a report as recently as June 2026, so do not plan around it. The bigger risk is not new law: it is that the regulator can add or withdraw approved destinations for data transfers by publishing a single resolution, with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	IsraelChecked 18 August 2026	BrazilChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Israeli data can go abroad, but never by default. Either the destination country protects data as well as Israel does, or you fit one of eight listed exceptions — usually a contract in which the receiver promises to follow Israeli rules. A big reform started on 14 August 2025 and the regulator now issues real fines. No industry bans exports outright, but several add heavy conditions.	Brazil does not force data to stay inside the country. Personal data can leave, but since August 2025 you normally need a contract written by the regulator, word for word, signed with whoever receives it. Sending data to the European Union needs nothing extra. The regulator is awake and has started switching features off large platforms.
The catch	The general answer is 'yes, with paperwork'. It stops being true in four places. Banks may not put sensitive customer data on a cloud outside Israel unless they have checked the provider meets European-level protection. Insurers and pension bodies must report every offshore outsourcing arrangement to their regulator each year. Identifiable patient data used for research must generally stay inside the hospital or health fund that holds it, not merely inside Israel. And central government has moved its own cloud into Israeli data-centre regions on purpose, so selling cloud to the state effectively requires an Israeli region.	Brazil is often listed as a data-localisation country. It is not one. The old rule that pushed federal government email and data onto Brazilian systems was scrapped in 2018, and today's federal cloud rules do not require Brazilian soil. The real constraints are different in shape: banks must keep the central bank able to reach their data wherever it sits, and since July 2026 digital platforms must have an actual office and a legal representative inside Brazil.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach a foreign company with no office in Israel — but the law never says so in words. Israeli privacy law simply applies to anyone who collects, uses or processes personal data, with no size or revenue threshold to fall under. There is no general requirement to appoint a local representative. Some organisations must appoint a privacy officer, and that person is allowed to be an outside contractor rather than a staff member.Medium confidence	Yes. Brazil's privacy law reaches a company with no office in Brazil, as long as it collects data in Brazil or offers goods or services to people here. There is no size or revenue threshold that lets you out. The privacy law itself does not make you appoint anyone local — but two newer rules do, and if you run a digital platform you now need a registered office and a legal representative in Brazil.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with paperwork — and you must be able to name the route you are using. The default rule is that data may only go to a country whose law protects it at least as well as Israeli law does. If the destination fails that test, you have to fit one of eight listed exceptions, and whichever route you take you also need a written promise from the receiver. No Israeli industry has a flat 'the data stays here' rule, but four sectors bolt extra conditions on top.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Brazil has no rule making anyone keep a copy of anything inside the country — not for banks, not for hospitals, not even for the federal government's own cloud. What it has instead is a permission slip: before personal data leaves, you need one of a short list of approved legal grounds. Industry rules add conditions on top, but none of them is a wall.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is closest to an allowlist: you may not send data out unless the destination qualifies, and the qualifying list is already populated. It counts if the country signed the Council of Europe data protection convention, or if it receives data from European Union countries on the same terms — so Europe's approved-country list does much of the work. If your destination does not qualify, the usual fallback is a contract in which the receiver promises to meet Israeli standards. Either way you also need a separate written promise from the receiver that it will protect the data and pass it to nobody else.High confidence	Pick one of five routes. The easy one is the European Union: since January 2026 Brazil treats it as safe, so nothing extra is needed. For everywhere else, the normal route is a set of standard contractual clauses that the regulator itself wrote — you copy them into your contract exactly, and you may not edit them. A deadline to retrofit older contracts already passed, on 23 August 2025.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Protection Authority, part of the Ministry of Justice, and it is fully operational. It has a serving commissioner, an administrative enforcement department, and it publishes its decisions with names and amounts. In 2026 it fined a national health fund about 256,000 shekels (roughly $72,000) for taking two months to report a security incident, and a small leisure company about 12,000 shekels (roughly $3,400) for a defective privacy notice. Industry regulators — the Bank of Israel, the insurance regulator and the Ministry of Health — enforce their own rules separately.High confidence	The National Data Protection Authority, and it is genuinely working. A law passed in February 2026 gave it real independence, 200 new specialist jobs and its own budget. In August 2026 it ordered Discord to switch off live video streaming in Brazil within three working days, to protect children. Banking, telecoms, insurance and securities regulators enforce their own rules in parallel and have done so for years.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a clear floor and a clear ceiling, and they sit close together. The floor: security and access-monitoring records must be kept for at least 24 months, and organisations with medium or high security databases must keep a restorable backup of them. The ceiling: if a database contains anything that came from Europe, you must run a mechanism that finds data you no longer need and delete it, and you must delete data on request. Where another law says you must keep something, that wins over the duty to delete.High confidence	Both directions, and they pull against each other. The floor: internet access providers must keep connection records for one year, websites and apps must keep access records for six months, and tax records need five years. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be deleted once you have finished doing what you collected it for. Where the two clash, the legal duty to keep wins — the law lists that as an express reason to hold on.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is one main clock and it has no hours attached to it: a severe security incident must be reported to the Privacy Protection Authority immediately, along with what you did about it. 'Immediately' is taken literally — a health fund was fined for a two-month delay. Telling the affected people is not automatic; the Authority decides, after consulting the national cyber agency, and can order you to notify them. Israel has no general law forcing every company to report cyber incidents to the state, so your second clock, if you have one, comes from your industry regulator.High confidence	Count three clocks, not one. Privacy: three working days to tell the regulator AND the affected people, once you have confirmed a breach that could really hurt them. Platform content: two hours to take down intimate images shared without consent, once notified. On top of that, banks report incidents to the central bank and telecoms operators report to the telecoms regulator under their own separate timetables.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: a single record that arrived from Europe drags the whole database into the stricter European rules — since 1 January 2025 those rules apply to any other data sitting in the same database. Two: 'immediately' really means immediately, and there is no safe 72-hour habit to fall back on. Three: fines are calculated per person, not as a flat cap, so a large database turns a small breach into a very large bill. Four: privacy breaches are criminal offences, not just regulatory ones, with prison terms attached. Five: 'data security officer' and 'data protection officer' are two different Israeli roles with different triggers, and having one does not satisfy the other.High confidence	Five. (1) Your European standard contract is not automatically good enough — Brazil wrote its own clauses and you must copy them exactly, unedited, and the deadline to fix old contracts passed on 23 August 2025. (2) A child in Brazil is under 12 and an adolescent is 12 to 17, but the social media rule bites at 16 — accounts for anyone up to 16 must be tied to a parent's account, and asking users to state their own age is banned. (3) Since 20 July 2026 a digital platform needs an actual registered office in Brazil, not just a lawyer on retainer. (4) The biggest fine is not in the privacy law: the internet law allows up to 10 percent of your group's Brazilian revenue. (5) The regulator can order your database blocked or your processing suspended, which usually hurts more than any cheque.High confidence
What's about to change?	The big change already happened on 14 August 2025. What is landing now is the detail underneath it. In April 2026 the regulator finalised its binding rules on the contract you must sign before sending data abroad, and separate regulations came into force giving a short grace period — a warning instead of a fine — for brand-new obligations. A guideline applying privacy law to artificial intelligence, including a requirement of consent before scraping the web to train models, is also in play. Watch three switches the government can flip without warning.Medium confidence	One firm date: January 2027, when the regulator moves from monitoring platforms to full enforcement of the children's digital rules. Brazil's artificial intelligence bill is still only a bill — it was sitting in a committee waiting for a report as recently as June 2026, so do not plan around it. The bigger risk is not new law: it is that the regulator can add or withdraw approved destinations for data transfers by publishing a single resolution, with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Health and social care — חוזרי מנכ"ל משרד הבריאות 1/2018 ו-2/2018 - שימושים משניים במידע בריאות Government — פרויקט נימבוס - מדיניות הענן הממשלתית	None found.