Skip to the content
Global Data RulesData governance rules, country by country

Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries
CroatiaChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active
In one paragraph
Croatia looks like an ordinary European Union country for privacy: data may leave once you have the right paperwork. But its accounting law is stricter than most people expect. A Croatian company's books and receipts may only be kept in Croatia or another European Union country. Public bodies must keep personal-data registers in Croatian data centres. The privacy regulator fines hard.
The catch
The relaxed European headline stops being true in four places. First, accounting: the books and supporting documents of any Croatian company may be kept outside Croatia only in another European Union member state, so a United States or United Kingdom cloud archive of your ledger is not lawful, and no contract or consent fixes it. Second, the public sector: since May 2025 state registers containing personal data must sit in data centres on Croatian soil, and state bodies must use the government's own Shared Services Centre. Third, health: health data must be processed inside Croatia's national health information infrastructure and exchanged through the central health system. Fourth, aerial imagery: you need one permission to photograph Croatia from the air and a second permission to use the pictures, and the Ministry of Defence screens them first.
Does this apply to me?
Yes. Croatia's rules reach a company with no office in the country. The European Union privacy rulebook applies to anyone who offers goods or services to people in Europe, or who watches what they do online. There is no revenue or headcount threshold. Croatia does not demand its own local representative on top of the Europe-wide one, which you may place in any European country.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?
Mostly yes, but with one nasty exception that catches everybody. Ordinary personal data can go abroad using the standard European transfer tools. Your accounting records cannot: Croatian law allows them to be kept outside Croatia only in another European Union country. Health data, public-sector registers and aerial photographs each have their own separate walls.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?
For personal data, Croatia uses the European model. Some countries are pre-approved, and everywhere else you need a standard contract or a similar tool plus a risk check. The approved list is real and populated, and includes the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland. For accounting records the model is different and much blunter: only European Union countries are allowed, and no paperwork buys you more.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
The main regulator is the Personal Data Protection Agency, known as AZOP. It is fully staffed, it hires more people, and it is one of the busiest fining bodies in central Europe for its size. It issued 13 fines totalling about 6.7 million euros (roughly 7.3 million dollars) in 2025, and 38 fines the year before. The cyber regulator, the National Cyber Security Centre, is also up and running.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
Croatia has strong minimum keeping periods and a few hard maximums. Ledgers and the documents behind them must be kept at least eleven years; payroll lists six years; the detailed wage and contribution records forever. Medical records run to ten years after the patient dies. Going the other way, camera footage must normally be deleted after six months.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?
There are at least two clocks and they run at different speeds. A personal data breach goes to the privacy regulator within 72 hours. A significant cyber incident goes to the cyber authority within 24 hours as an early warning, with a fuller report at 72 hours and a final report within 30 days. One incident can easily trigger both, and the 24-hour clock is the one that catches people out.High confidence
What's the trap?
Five things that are not in the summary. Your ledger cannot live on an American cloud. Children count as adults for online consent at 16, not 13. Using someone's personal data unlawfully is a crime, not just a fine. Genetic test results may never be used to price life insurance. And camera footage in an apartment building needs two thirds of the owners to agree.High confidence
What's about to change?
Two Croatian dates matter. Fines under the state information infrastructure law switch on 1 January 2027. Mandatory eInvoicing widens to smaller traders on the same day. Across Europe, cloud switching fees must fall to zero by 12 January 2027. The thing to watch is the challenge to the Europe-United States data deal, which is still valid but under real pressure.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall
  • All industries Zakon o računovodstvu
  • Government Zakon o državnoj informacijskoj infrastrukturi
  • Health and social care Zakon o podacima i informacijama u zdravstvu
SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active
In one paragraph
Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch
The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?
Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?
In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?
The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?
Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?
Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?
Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall
  • Health and social care Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
  • Finance FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'