Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

UkraineChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Ukraine still runs its 2010 privacy law, not a European-style one. Personal data may leave the country only to a country the law treats as safe — that means Europe and the 50-odd countries that signed a Council of Europe data treaty. The United States is not on that list. Fines are tiny, but the human rights Commissioner really does inspect, and misusing data can be a crime.
The catch: The general picture changes completely once government is involved. If a Ukrainian state body is the organisation deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may process that data for it — a private or foreign supplier cannot. State systems, defence data and critical infrastructure also carry hard location rules, and several of the current permissions exist only because the country is under martial law.
Does this apply to me?: Probably not, if you have nothing in Ukraine. The 2010 law simply says it covers the processing of personal data by automated means or in structured paper files. It contains no clause reaching foreign companies that only sell into Ukraine from abroad, and it does not make you appoint a local representative. There is no size or revenue threshold either — a corner shop and a bank are treated the same.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, but only to countries Ukraine already treats as safe. Those are the European Economic Area countries plus every country that has signed the Council of Europe's data protection treaty — roughly 55 states. The United States has signed neither, so routine transfers to American servers do not fit the safe-country route and need one of the narrow exceptions instead. Whole sectors then override this: government, defence and critical infrastructure are far tighter, and securities firms are unusually looser.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no form to file and no government permission to obtain. You either send the data to a country the law already treats as safe, or you rely on one of five narrow exceptions. Those are: the person's clear consent, necessity for a contract made for that person's benefit, protecting someone's life, an important public interest or a legal claim, and the sender giving guarantees that private and family life will not be interfered with. That last one is a catch-all that a lot of Ukrainian practice leans on.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights — the national ombudsman — is the data protection regulator, and it is genuinely working. It publishes a fresh inspection programme every three months; the one for July to September 2026 went up on 2 July 2026. It also publishes what it found, including a run of checks on the national electronic health system. The catch is the money: the regulator cannot fine anyone itself, it writes up a case and sends it to a court, and the maximum penalty is about $800.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor comes from tax law. Companies must keep primary accounting documents and financial statements for 1,825 days — five years. Papers needed for transfer pricing checks run to 2,555 days, which is seven years. Everything else the tax authority may ask for runs 1,095 days, three years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law: you must delete personal data when the agreed storage period runs out, or when your relationship with the person ends, unless another law tells you to keep it.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: This is the biggest surprise in Ukrainian law: if you lose personal data, there is no duty to tell the regulator and no duty to tell the people affected. The 2010 privacy law simply has no breach reporting clause. The only mandatory clocks sit in the cyber security regime, and they only bite if you run a state system or a piece of critical information infrastructure. Even there the law does not set the hours — it leaves the deadline to an order of the cyber agency.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) If a Ukrainian government body is the one deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may handle that data for it — a private or foreign supplier is not allowed at all. (2) Misusing personal data is a crime, not just a fine, and repeat offences carry up to five years in prison. (3) The fines are aimed at named individuals and sole traders, not at companies. (4) Posting anything that shows where Ukrainian troops are carries five to eight years in prison. (5) Martial law lets the government limit the constitutional right to privacy that the whole system rests on.High confidence
What's about to change?: The date to watch is not a new law — it is the end of the war. Martial law was extended again on 13 July 2026 and now runs from 2 August 2026 for 90 days, so to about 31 October 2026. Several of today's permissions exist only while it lasts, and they die six months after it ends. A European-style replacement privacy law has been discussed for years and has still not been passed, so nothing about the current regime should be planned around its arrival.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — Закон України "Про захист персональних даних", частина третя статті 4
Government — Закон України "Про захист інформації в інформаційно-комунікаційних системах"
Defence — Закон України "Про хмарні послуги"
Mapping and location — Кримінальний кодекс України, стаття 114-2

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	UkraineChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	Ukraine still runs its 2010 privacy law, not a European-style one. Personal data may leave the country only to a country the law treats as safe — that means Europe and the 50-odd countries that signed a Council of Europe data treaty. The United States is not on that list. Fines are tiny, but the human rights Commissioner really does inspect, and misusing data can be a crime.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	The general picture changes completely once government is involved. If a Ukrainian state body is the organisation deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may process that data for it — a private or foreign supplier cannot. State systems, defence data and critical infrastructure also carry hard location rules, and several of the current permissions exist only because the country is under martial law.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Probably not, if you have nothing in Ukraine. The 2010 law simply says it covers the processing of personal data by automated means or in structured paper files. It contains no clause reaching foreign companies that only sell into Ukraine from abroad, and it does not make you appoint a local representative. There is no size or revenue threshold either — a corner shop and a bank are treated the same.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	Yes, but only to countries Ukraine already treats as safe. Those are the European Economic Area countries plus every country that has signed the Council of Europe's data protection treaty — roughly 55 states. The United States has signed neither, so routine transfers to American servers do not fit the safe-country route and need one of the narrow exceptions instead. Whole sectors then override this: government, defence and critical infrastructure are far tighter, and securities firms are unusually looser.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	There is no form to file and no government permission to obtain. You either send the data to a country the law already treats as safe, or you rely on one of five narrow exceptions. Those are: the person's clear consent, necessity for a contract made for that person's benefit, protecting someone's life, an important public interest or a legal claim, and the sender giving guarantees that private and family life will not be interfered with. That last one is a catch-all that a lot of Ukrainian practice leans on.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	The Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights — the national ombudsman — is the data protection regulator, and it is genuinely working. It publishes a fresh inspection programme every three months; the one for July to September 2026 went up on 2 July 2026. It also publishes what it found, including a run of checks on the national electronic health system. The catch is the money: the regulator cannot fine anyone itself, it writes up a case and sends it to a court, and the maximum penalty is about $800.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	The floor comes from tax law. Companies must keep primary accounting documents and financial statements for 1,825 days — five years. Papers needed for transfer pricing checks run to 2,555 days, which is seven years. Everything else the tax authority may ask for runs 1,095 days, three years. The ceiling comes from the privacy law: you must delete personal data when the agreed storage period runs out, or when your relationship with the person ends, unless another law tells you to keep it.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	This is the biggest surprise in Ukrainian law: if you lose personal data, there is no duty to tell the regulator and no duty to tell the people affected. The 2010 privacy law simply has no breach reporting clause. The only mandatory clocks sit in the cyber security regime, and they only bite if you run a state system or a piece of critical information infrastructure. Even there the law does not set the hours — it leaves the deadline to an order of the cyber agency.Medium confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Five. (1) If a Ukrainian government body is the one deciding how personal data is used, only a Ukrainian state-owned or municipal company may handle that data for it — a private or foreign supplier is not allowed at all. (2) Misusing personal data is a crime, not just a fine, and repeat offences carry up to five years in prison. (3) The fines are aimed at named individuals and sole traders, not at companies. (4) Posting anything that shows where Ukrainian troops are carries five to eight years in prison. (5) Martial law lets the government limit the constitutional right to privacy that the whole system rests on.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	The date to watch is not a new law — it is the end of the war. Martial law was extended again on 13 July 2026 and now runs from 2 August 2026 for 90 days, so to about 31 October 2026. Several of today's permissions exist only while it lasts, and they die six months after it ends. A European-style replacement privacy law has been discussed for years and has still not been passed, so nothing about the current regime should be planned around its arrival.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Government — Закон України "Про захист персональних даних", частина третя статті 4 Government — Закон України "Про захист інформації в інформаційно-комунікаційних системах" Defence — Закон України "Про хмарні послуги" Mapping and location — Кримінальний кодекс України, стаття 114-2