Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

TurkeyChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Turkey lets personal data leave, but only after you build the paperwork yourself. The regulator has never declared a single country safe, so the approved-destination list is empty. Most companies use a government-published standard contract and must file it within five working days. The regulator is busy: it fined 876 organisations in 2025.
The catch: The general rule is 'paperwork, then you may send it'. That stops being true the moment you touch payments, banking, telecoms networks, public-sector systems or critical infrastructure. Payment and electronic money firms must keep their systems, their backups and their data inside Turkey, and may only use cloud providers the central bank has approved by name.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. A company with no office in Turkey is still caught, and it is caught harder than a local one. Any organisation based outside Turkey that decides why and how Turkish people's data is used must appoint a representative inside Turkey and sign up to the public register of data controllers before it starts processing. That representative has to be a company set up in Turkey or a Turkish citizen. Turkish small businesses can escape the register if they have fewer than 50 staff and a balance sheet under 100 million lira, but there is no such let-off for foreign companies.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: It depends entirely on your industry, which is why Turkey is rated 'sectoral'. Under the general privacy law data may leave, but only after you put an approved safeguard in place, because the regulator has not yet declared any country safe. In payments and banking the answer flips to no: systems, backups and data have to sit inside Turkey. Public bodies, critical infrastructure, telecoms networks and health records all carry their own extra restrictions on top.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destination list, and the list is empty. Nobody can rely on their country being blessed, so almost everyone uses one of the safeguards instead. The usual route is signing one of four standard contracts the regulator publishes, then telling the regulator within five working days of signing. Group companies can instead get binding corporate rules approved, and there is a permission route for bespoke undertakings, but that route almost always fails.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Authority, and it is fully up and running. In 2025 its board met 42 times, took 2,528 decisions, handled 12,512 complaints and fined 876 organisations a combined 352.5 million lira, which is roughly 8 million US dollars. It publishes named breach announcements most weeks. Financial, telecoms and insurance regulators enforce their own rules alongside it, and a new Cybersecurity Directorate has taken over the national cyber incident centre.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply, and the ceiling is unusual. Turkey does not give you a fixed number of months to delete by. Instead, once your reason for holding data runs out, you must erase it at your next scheduled clear-out, and any organisation on the public register has to publish a written retention and destruction policy setting those dates. The floor comes from ordinary commercial and tax law, which forces you to keep books and invoices for years.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are at least three clocks. The privacy one is 72 hours: from the moment you learn that data has been taken unlawfully, you have three days to tell the Personal Data Protection Board, and you must tell the affected people as soon as you reasonably can. If you miss the 72 hours you must still report and explain why you were late. Companies based abroad have to report too, if people in Turkey are affected.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things bite people. One: most fines are for paperwork, not privacy. Two thirds of the organisations fined in 2025 were punished for the public register, not for mishandling anyone's data. Two: the bespoke permission route for sending data abroad is close to a dead end, with 76 of 89 applications refused in 2025. Three: filing your standard contract invites inspection rather than closing the file. Four: your representative in Turkey must be Turkish. Five: no country is on the safe list, so there is no shortcut.High confidence
What's about to change?: Two dated items and one direction of travel. Retailers running loyalty cards have until 28 February 2027 to build a way of checking that the person at the till really owns the card, after the regulator extended the original deadline in July 2026. Public bodies are working to a July 2026 ruling on what they may publish online. And the government is pushing openly on data sovereignty, with the President chairing a cyber security meeting in May 2026 that treated data as a strategic asset.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Payments — Odeme ve Elektronik Para Kuruluslarinin Bilgi Sistemleri ile Odeme Hizmeti Saglayicilarinin Odeme Hizmetleri Alanindaki Veri Paylasim Servislerine Iliskin Teblig
Banking — Bankalarin Bilgi Sistemleri ve Elektronik Bankacilik Hizmetleri Hakkinda Yonetmelik
Government — 2019/12 sayili Bilgi ve Iletisim Guvenligi Tedbirleri Genelgesi ve Bilgi ve Iletisim Guvenligi Rehberi

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	TurkeyChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	Turkey lets personal data leave, but only after you build the paperwork yourself. The regulator has never declared a single country safe, so the approved-destination list is empty. Most companies use a government-published standard contract and must file it within five working days. The regulator is busy: it fined 876 organisations in 2025.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	The general rule is 'paperwork, then you may send it'. That stops being true the moment you touch payments, banking, telecoms networks, public-sector systems or critical infrastructure. Payment and electronic money firms must keep their systems, their backups and their data inside Turkey, and may only use cloud providers the central bank has approved by name.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Yes. A company with no office in Turkey is still caught, and it is caught harder than a local one. Any organisation based outside Turkey that decides why and how Turkish people's data is used must appoint a representative inside Turkey and sign up to the public register of data controllers before it starts processing. That representative has to be a company set up in Turkey or a Turkish citizen. Turkish small businesses can escape the register if they have fewer than 50 staff and a balance sheet under 100 million lira, but there is no such let-off for foreign companies.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	It depends entirely on your industry, which is why Turkey is rated 'sectoral'. Under the general privacy law data may leave, but only after you put an approved safeguard in place, because the regulator has not yet declared any country safe. In payments and banking the answer flips to no: systems, backups and data have to sit inside Turkey. Public bodies, critical infrastructure, telecoms networks and health records all carry their own extra restrictions on top.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	The model is an approved-destination list, and the list is empty. Nobody can rely on their country being blessed, so almost everyone uses one of the safeguards instead. The usual route is signing one of four standard contracts the regulator publishes, then telling the regulator within five working days of signing. Group companies can instead get binding corporate rules approved, and there is a permission route for bespoke undertakings, but that route almost always fails.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	The Personal Data Protection Authority, and it is fully up and running. In 2025 its board met 42 times, took 2,528 decisions, handled 12,512 complaints and fined 876 organisations a combined 352.5 million lira, which is roughly 8 million US dollars. It publishes named breach announcements most weeks. Financial, telecoms and insurance regulators enforce their own rules alongside it, and a new Cybersecurity Directorate has taken over the national cyber incident centre.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	Both directions apply, and the ceiling is unusual. Turkey does not give you a fixed number of months to delete by. Instead, once your reason for holding data runs out, you must erase it at your next scheduled clear-out, and any organisation on the public register has to publish a written retention and destruction policy setting those dates. The floor comes from ordinary commercial and tax law, which forces you to keep books and invoices for years.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	There are at least three clocks. The privacy one is 72 hours: from the moment you learn that data has been taken unlawfully, you have three days to tell the Personal Data Protection Board, and you must tell the affected people as soon as you reasonably can. If you miss the 72 hours you must still report and explain why you were late. Companies based abroad have to report too, if people in Turkey are affected.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Five things bite people. One: most fines are for paperwork, not privacy. Two thirds of the organisations fined in 2025 were punished for the public register, not for mishandling anyone's data. Two: the bespoke permission route for sending data abroad is close to a dead end, with 76 of 89 applications refused in 2025. Three: filing your standard contract invites inspection rather than closing the file. Four: your representative in Turkey must be Turkish. Five: no country is on the safe list, so there is no shortcut.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	Two dated items and one direction of travel. Retailers running loyalty cards have until 28 February 2027 to build a way of checking that the person at the till really owns the card, after the regulator extended the original deadline in July 2026. Public bodies are working to a July 2026 ruling on what they may publish online. And the government is pushing openly on data sovereignty, with the President chairing a cyber security meeting in May 2026 that treated data as a strategic asset.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Payments — Odeme ve Elektronik Para Kuruluslarinin Bilgi Sistemleri ile Odeme Hizmeti Saglayicilarinin Odeme Hizmetleri Alanindaki Veri Paylasim Servislerine Iliskin Teblig Banking — Bankalarin Bilgi Sistemleri ve Elektronik Bankacilik Hizmetleri Hakkinda Yonetmelik Government — 2019/12 sayili Bilgi ve Iletisim Guvenligi Tedbirleri Genelgesi ve Bilgi ve Iletisim Guvenligi Rehberi