Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

SloveniaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Slovenia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. It runs on the European rulebook: send data abroad once you have the right paperwork. Three things break that. The company running the new national health record system may not store data outside Slovenia. Government bodies may cloud only their least sensitive data. And working-time records must sit at the Slovenian workplace.
The catch: The easy answer stops being true in four places. First, health: the state-owned company running the central health information system is forbidden by law from transferring or storing personal data outside Slovenian territory, and every healthcare provider in the country must plug into that system. Second, government: a state administration body may only use a public cloud for the lowest security tiers of information, and only after the ministry approves in writing. Third, employment: the record of working time and the documents behind it must be kept at the employer's registered office or at the place where the worker actually works. Fourth, gambling: only a joint-stock company registered in Slovenia can hold a concession, and its system must be wired into the tax authority's own system. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, telecoms and mapping have no storage-location rule that we could find.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Slovenia's privacy rules reach a company with no office there. If you offer goods or services to people in Slovenia, or watch what they do online, the European rules apply to you and Slovenia's own privacy act applies alongside them. There is no size or revenue threshold that lets you out. A company with no office anywhere in Europe must appoint a written representative inside Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general yes, with paperwork — Slovenia adds no national storage-location rule of its own on top of the European regime. But four industries break that answer, and one of them is a hard wall. Health is the big one: the state company that runs Slovenia's central health record system is banned outright from storing or sending personal data outside Slovenia, and every healthcare provider must connect to that system. Government cloud, employment records and gambling each carry their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Slovenia uses the European model, and it works like an approved-destinations list with escape hatches. Data may go to a country the European Commission has approved. If the destination is not approved, you can still send data by signing the Commission's standard contract, using approved group-wide rules, or relying on one of a few narrow exceptions. Slovenia adds nothing of its own. The old Slovenian system, where the Information Commissioner had to authorise each export, was scrapped when the current privacy act arrived in January 2023.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Information Commissioner, and it is genuinely working. In 2025 it opened 464 inspection cases from complaints plus 102 more from inspection reports, issued 134 enforcement decisions, fined in 89 of them, gave warnings in 45, and handed down what it calls its largest fine since the European rules began. It handled 153 breach reports. It is small: one commissioner and 53 staff at the end of 2025, and it says openly that it does not have enough people. Cybersecurity is enforced separately by a government office set up for the job.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions, and the floors are long. A patient's medical file must be kept for ten years after the patient dies, and other basic medical records for fifteen years. Records of who touched personal data in a computer system must be kept for two years after the end of the year, and up to five if the risk is high. Working-time records must be kept at the Slovenian workplace. In the other direction the European rule applies: delete personal data once the purpose is spent.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. A personal data breach goes to the Information Commissioner within 72 hours. A serious cyber incident, if you are an essential or important organisation, goes to the government security office immediately and in any case within 24 hours as an early warning, then a full report within 72 hours, then a final report within one month. Telecoms operators have their own duties on top. Missing the 24-hour warning is the most common failure, because it lands while you are still working out what happened.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. A child can consent at 15 in Slovenia, not 16 — one year younger than the European default. Fingerprints and face scans are banned in the private sector unless a law allows them and the Commissioner approves. Every access to a covered database must be logged and the log kept two years. Leaking personal data you got through your job is a crime, not just a fine. And working-time records must physically be at the Slovenian workplace, which no cloud contract fixes.High confidence
What's about to change?: Two dates in the next twelve months matter most. On 19 December 2026 the cybersecurity duties bite for organisations newly captured by Slovenia's 2025 Information Security Act — registration, security measures and the incident clocks. On 12 January 2027 the European Data Act bans all cloud switching and data export fees. Behind both sits the roll-out of the national health record system, whose ban on storing data outside Slovenia is already law but whose timetable we could not pin down.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — Zakon o digitalizaciji zdravstva (ZDigZ)
All industries — Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o evidencah na področju dela in socialne varnosti (ZEPDSV-A)

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	SloveniaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	Slovenia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. It runs on the European rulebook: send data abroad once you have the right paperwork. Three things break that. The company running the new national health record system may not store data outside Slovenia. Government bodies may cloud only their least sensitive data. And working-time records must sit at the Slovenian workplace.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	The easy answer stops being true in four places. First, health: the state-owned company running the central health information system is forbidden by law from transferring or storing personal data outside Slovenian territory, and every healthcare provider in the country must plug into that system. Second, government: a state administration body may only use a public cloud for the lowest security tiers of information, and only after the ministry approves in writing. Third, employment: the record of working time and the documents behind it must be kept at the employer's registered office or at the place where the worker actually works. Fourth, gambling: only a joint-stock company registered in Slovenia can hold a concession, and its system must be wired into the tax authority's own system. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, telecoms and mapping have no storage-location rule that we could find.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Yes. Slovenia's privacy rules reach a company with no office there. If you offer goods or services to people in Slovenia, or watch what they do online, the European rules apply to you and Slovenia's own privacy act applies alongside them. There is no size or revenue threshold that lets you out. A company with no office anywhere in Europe must appoint a written representative inside Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	In general yes, with paperwork — Slovenia adds no national storage-location rule of its own on top of the European regime. But four industries break that answer, and one of them is a hard wall. Health is the big one: the state company that runs Slovenia's central health record system is banned outright from storing or sending personal data outside Slovenia, and every healthcare provider must connect to that system. Government cloud, employment records and gambling each carry their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	Slovenia uses the European model, and it works like an approved-destinations list with escape hatches. Data may go to a country the European Commission has approved. If the destination is not approved, you can still send data by signing the Commission's standard contract, using approved group-wide rules, or relying on one of a few narrow exceptions. Slovenia adds nothing of its own. The old Slovenian system, where the Information Commissioner had to authorise each export, was scrapped when the current privacy act arrived in January 2023.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	The Information Commissioner, and it is genuinely working. In 2025 it opened 464 inspection cases from complaints plus 102 more from inspection reports, issued 134 enforcement decisions, fined in 89 of them, gave warnings in 45, and handed down what it calls its largest fine since the European rules began. It handled 153 breach reports. It is small: one commissioner and 53 staff at the end of 2025, and it says openly that it does not have enough people. Cybersecurity is enforced separately by a government office set up for the job.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	Both directions, and the floors are long. A patient's medical file must be kept for ten years after the patient dies, and other basic medical records for fifteen years. Records of who touched personal data in a computer system must be kept for two years after the end of the year, and up to five if the risk is high. Working-time records must be kept at the Slovenian workplace. In the other direction the European rule applies: delete personal data once the purpose is spent.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	Count three clocks, not one. A personal data breach goes to the Information Commissioner within 72 hours. A serious cyber incident, if you are an essential or important organisation, goes to the government security office immediately and in any case within 24 hours as an early warning, then a full report within 72 hours, then a final report within one month. Telecoms operators have their own duties on top. Missing the 24-hour warning is the most common failure, because it lands while you are still working out what happened.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Five things that catch people out. A child can consent at 15 in Slovenia, not 16 — one year younger than the European default. Fingerprints and face scans are banned in the private sector unless a law allows them and the Commissioner approves. Every access to a covered database must be logged and the log kept two years. Leaking personal data you got through your job is a crime, not just a fine. And working-time records must physically be at the Slovenian workplace, which no cloud contract fixes.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	Two dates in the next twelve months matter most. On 19 December 2026 the cybersecurity duties bite for organisations newly captured by Slovenia's 2025 Information Security Act — registration, security measures and the incident clocks. On 12 January 2027 the European Data Act bans all cloud switching and data export fees. Behind both sits the roll-out of the national health record system, whose ban on storing data outside Slovenia is already law but whose timetable we could not pin down.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Health and social care — Zakon o digitalizaciji zdravstva (ZDigZ) All industries — Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o evidencah na področju dela in socialne varnosti (ZEPDSV-A)