Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

IndiaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: India's general privacy law is unusually relaxed about sending data abroad — it bans transfers only to countries on a government blacklist, and that blacklist is currently empty. But specific industries have hard walls: payments data, insurance records and telecom network data must stay inside India. The main law is passed but most of it only becomes enforceable in May 2027, and the regulator has no members yet.
The catch: The permissive headline is true only until you touch payments, insurance, telecom infrastructure, government cloud, public-health records or detailed mapping data. In those six areas India is one of the strictest jurisdictions in the world.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you even with no office in India. The law applies to any organisation anywhere in the world that processes Indians' data in connection with offering goods or services to people in India. There is no size or revenue threshold to fall below.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes — freely. India's approach is a blacklist: the government may name countries you cannot send data to, and as of today it has named none. Six industries are the exception and are covered below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing to sign, no government approval, no standard contract. Unlike Europe, India requires no paperwork to send personal data abroad under the general law — the only question is whether the destination is on the blacklist, and nothing is. Sector rules override this completely.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: On paper, the Data Protection Board of India. In practice, nobody yet — the Board legally exists but as of August 2026 has no chairperson and no members. The government advertised the five posts in May 2026 and re-advertised in June, and they were still vacant in August. Sector regulators, by contrast, are fully active: the central bank, the insurance and securities regulators, the telecom department and the national cyber agency all enforce today.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is both a floor and a ceiling. From May 2027 every organisation must keep processing logs for at least one year. Tax records run six years, company books eight, and security logs 180 days. In the other direction, large consumer platforms must delete a user's data three years after they last engaged — with 48 hours' warning to the user first.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Two clocks, and this trips up almost everyone. You have SIX HOURS to report a cyber incident to India's national cyber agency — one of the shortest deadlines in the world. Separately, from May 2027, you must tell the privacy regulator and affected individuals without delay, then file a detailed report within 72 hours.High confidence
What's the trap?: Four things that catch people out. (1) A child is anyone under 18 — there is no lower age of digital consent as there is in Europe, and targeted advertising to under-18s is banned outright. (2) A consent manager must be an Indian company with about $2.3m of net worth, so a foreign entity cannot be one. (3) If designated a 'significant' organisation you must have a data protection officer physically based in India who answers to the board. (4) The general law expressly preserves stricter sector rules, so its liberal transfer regime gives you nothing if you touch payments, insurance or telecom.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three dates matter. 13 November 2026: consent managers must register. 13 May 2027: the whole law becomes enforceable, and the government has publicly refused to extend it or exempt startups. At some point before then, the Board should get its members — at which point enforcement switches on.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Payments — Storage of Payment System Data
Telecoms — Telecommunications (Authorisation) Rules, 2026
Insurance — IRDAI (Maintenance of Information by Regulated Entities and Sharing of Information by the Authority) Regulations, 2025
Securities — Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework, control PR.DS.S2
All industries — Directions under section 70B(6) of the Information Technology Act, 2000

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	IndiaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Waking up
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	India's general privacy law is unusually relaxed about sending data abroad — it bans transfers only to countries on a government blacklist, and that blacklist is currently empty. But specific industries have hard walls: payments data, insurance records and telecom network data must stay inside India. The main law is passed but most of it only becomes enforceable in May 2027, and the regulator has no members yet.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	The permissive headline is true only until you touch payments, insurance, telecom infrastructure, government cloud, public-health records or detailed mapping data. In those six areas India is one of the strictest jurisdictions in the world.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Yes, it reaches you even with no office in India. The law applies to any organisation anywhere in the world that processes Indians' data in connection with offering goods or services to people in India. There is no size or revenue threshold to fall below.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	In general, yes — freely. India's approach is a blacklist: the government may name countries you cannot send data to, and as of today it has named none. Six industries are the exception and are covered below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	Nothing to sign, no government approval, no standard contract. Unlike Europe, India requires no paperwork to send personal data abroad under the general law — the only question is whether the destination is on the blacklist, and nothing is. Sector rules override this completely.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	On paper, the Data Protection Board of India. In practice, nobody yet — the Board legally exists but as of August 2026 has no chairperson and no members. The government advertised the five posts in May 2026 and re-advertised in June, and they were still vacant in August. Sector regulators, by contrast, are fully active: the central bank, the insurance and securities regulators, the telecom department and the national cyber agency all enforce today.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	There is both a floor and a ceiling. From May 2027 every organisation must keep processing logs for at least one year. Tax records run six years, company books eight, and security logs 180 days. In the other direction, large consumer platforms must delete a user's data three years after they last engaged — with 48 hours' warning to the user first.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	Two clocks, and this trips up almost everyone. You have SIX HOURS to report a cyber incident to India's national cyber agency — one of the shortest deadlines in the world. Separately, from May 2027, you must tell the privacy regulator and affected individuals without delay, then file a detailed report within 72 hours.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Four things that catch people out. (1) A child is anyone under 18 — there is no lower age of digital consent as there is in Europe, and targeted advertising to under-18s is banned outright. (2) A consent manager must be an Indian company with about $2.3m of net worth, so a foreign entity cannot be one. (3) If designated a 'significant' organisation you must have a data protection officer physically based in India who answers to the board. (4) The general law expressly preserves stricter sector rules, so its liberal transfer regime gives you nothing if you touch payments, insurance or telecom.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	Three dates matter. 13 November 2026: consent managers must register. 13 May 2027: the whole law becomes enforceable, and the government has publicly refused to extend it or exempt startups. At some point before then, the Board should get its members — at which point enforcement switches on.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Payments — Storage of Payment System Data Telecoms — Telecommunications (Authorisation) Rules, 2026 Insurance — IRDAI (Maintenance of Information by Regulated Entities and Sharing of Information by the Authority) Regulations, 2025 Securities — Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework, control PR.DS.S2 All industries — Directions under section 70B(6) of the Information Technology Act, 2000