Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

IsraelChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Israeli data can go abroad, but never by default. Either the destination country protects data as well as Israel does, or you fit one of eight listed exceptions — usually a contract in which the receiver promises to follow Israeli rules. A big reform started on 14 August 2025 and the regulator now issues real fines. No industry bans exports outright, but several add heavy conditions.
The catch: The general answer is 'yes, with paperwork'. It stops being true in four places. Banks may not put sensitive customer data on a cloud outside Israel unless they have checked the provider meets European-level protection. Insurers and pension bodies must report every offshore outsourcing arrangement to their regulator each year. Identifiable patient data used for research must generally stay inside the hospital or health fund that holds it, not merely inside Israel. And central government has moved its own cloud into Israeli data-centre regions on purpose, so selling cloud to the state effectively requires an Israeli region.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach a foreign company with no office in Israel — but the law never says so in words. Israeli privacy law simply applies to anyone who collects, uses or processes personal data, with no size or revenue threshold to fall under. There is no general requirement to appoint a local representative. Some organisations must appoint a privacy officer, and that person is allowed to be an outside contractor rather than a staff member.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork — and you must be able to name the route you are using. The default rule is that data may only go to a country whose law protects it at least as well as Israeli law does. If the destination fails that test, you have to fit one of eight listed exceptions, and whichever route you take you also need a written promise from the receiver. No Israeli industry has a flat 'the data stays here' rule, but four sectors bolt extra conditions on top.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is closest to an allowlist: you may not send data out unless the destination qualifies, and the qualifying list is already populated. It counts if the country signed the Council of Europe data protection convention, or if it receives data from European Union countries on the same terms — so Europe's approved-country list does much of the work. If your destination does not qualify, the usual fallback is a contract in which the receiver promises to meet Israeli standards. Either way you also need a separate written promise from the receiver that it will protect the data and pass it to nobody else.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Protection Authority, part of the Ministry of Justice, and it is fully operational. It has a serving commissioner, an administrative enforcement department, and it publishes its decisions with names and amounts. In 2026 it fined a national health fund about 256,000 shekels (roughly $72,000) for taking two months to report a security incident, and a small leisure company about 12,000 shekels (roughly $3,400) for a defective privacy notice. Industry regulators — the Bank of Israel, the insurance regulator and the Ministry of Health — enforce their own rules separately.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a clear floor and a clear ceiling, and they sit close together. The floor: security and access-monitoring records must be kept for at least 24 months, and organisations with medium or high security databases must keep a restorable backup of them. The ceiling: if a database contains anything that came from Europe, you must run a mechanism that finds data you no longer need and delete it, and you must delete data on request. Where another law says you must keep something, that wins over the duty to delete.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is one main clock and it has no hours attached to it: a severe security incident must be reported to the Privacy Protection Authority immediately, along with what you did about it. 'Immediately' is taken literally — a health fund was fined for a two-month delay. Telling the affected people is not automatic; the Authority decides, after consulting the national cyber agency, and can order you to notify them. Israel has no general law forcing every company to report cyber incidents to the state, so your second clock, if you have one, comes from your industry regulator.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: a single record that arrived from Europe drags the whole database into the stricter European rules — since 1 January 2025 those rules apply to any other data sitting in the same database. Two: 'immediately' really means immediately, and there is no safe 72-hour habit to fall back on. Three: fines are calculated per person, not as a flat cap, so a large database turns a small breach into a very large bill. Four: privacy breaches are criminal offences, not just regulatory ones, with prison terms attached. Five: 'data security officer' and 'data protection officer' are two different Israeli roles with different triggers, and having one does not satisfy the other.High confidence
What's about to change?: The big change already happened on 14 August 2025. What is landing now is the detail underneath it. In April 2026 the regulator finalised its binding rules on the contract you must sign before sending data abroad, and separate regulations came into force giving a short grace period — a warning instead of a fine — for brand-new obligations. A guideline applying privacy law to artificial intelligence, including a requirement of consent before scraping the web to train models, is also in play. Watch three switches the government can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — חוזרי מנכ"ל משרד הבריאות 1/2018 ו-2/2018 - שימושים משניים במידע בריאות
Government — פרויקט נימבוס - מדיניות הענן הממשלתית

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	IsraelChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	Israeli data can go abroad, but never by default. Either the destination country protects data as well as Israel does, or you fit one of eight listed exceptions — usually a contract in which the receiver promises to follow Israeli rules. A big reform started on 14 August 2025 and the regulator now issues real fines. No industry bans exports outright, but several add heavy conditions.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	The general answer is 'yes, with paperwork'. It stops being true in four places. Banks may not put sensitive customer data on a cloud outside Israel unless they have checked the provider meets European-level protection. Insurers and pension bodies must report every offshore outsourcing arrangement to their regulator each year. Identifiable patient data used for research must generally stay inside the hospital or health fund that holds it, not merely inside Israel. And central government has moved its own cloud into Israeli data-centre regions on purpose, so selling cloud to the state effectively requires an Israeli region.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Yes, it can reach a foreign company with no office in Israel — but the law never says so in words. Israeli privacy law simply applies to anyone who collects, uses or processes personal data, with no size or revenue threshold to fall under. There is no general requirement to appoint a local representative. Some organisations must appoint a privacy officer, and that person is allowed to be an outside contractor rather than a staff member.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork — and you must be able to name the route you are using. The default rule is that data may only go to a country whose law protects it at least as well as Israeli law does. If the destination fails that test, you have to fit one of eight listed exceptions, and whichever route you take you also need a written promise from the receiver. No Israeli industry has a flat 'the data stays here' rule, but four sectors bolt extra conditions on top.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	The model is closest to an allowlist: you may not send data out unless the destination qualifies, and the qualifying list is already populated. It counts if the country signed the Council of Europe data protection convention, or if it receives data from European Union countries on the same terms — so Europe's approved-country list does much of the work. If your destination does not qualify, the usual fallback is a contract in which the receiver promises to meet Israeli standards. Either way you also need a separate written promise from the receiver that it will protect the data and pass it to nobody else.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	The Privacy Protection Authority, part of the Ministry of Justice, and it is fully operational. It has a serving commissioner, an administrative enforcement department, and it publishes its decisions with names and amounts. In 2026 it fined a national health fund about 256,000 shekels (roughly $72,000) for taking two months to report a security incident, and a small leisure company about 12,000 shekels (roughly $3,400) for a defective privacy notice. Industry regulators — the Bank of Israel, the insurance regulator and the Ministry of Health — enforce their own rules separately.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	There is a clear floor and a clear ceiling, and they sit close together. The floor: security and access-monitoring records must be kept for at least 24 months, and organisations with medium or high security databases must keep a restorable backup of them. The ceiling: if a database contains anything that came from Europe, you must run a mechanism that finds data you no longer need and delete it, and you must delete data on request. Where another law says you must keep something, that wins over the duty to delete.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	There is one main clock and it has no hours attached to it: a severe security incident must be reported to the Privacy Protection Authority immediately, along with what you did about it. 'Immediately' is taken literally — a health fund was fined for a two-month delay. Telling the affected people is not automatic; the Authority decides, after consulting the national cyber agency, and can order you to notify them. Israel has no general law forcing every company to report cyber incidents to the state, so your second clock, if you have one, comes from your industry regulator.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. One: a single record that arrived from Europe drags the whole database into the stricter European rules — since 1 January 2025 those rules apply to any other data sitting in the same database. Two: 'immediately' really means immediately, and there is no safe 72-hour habit to fall back on. Three: fines are calculated per person, not as a flat cap, so a large database turns a small breach into a very large bill. Four: privacy breaches are criminal offences, not just regulatory ones, with prison terms attached. Five: 'data security officer' and 'data protection officer' are two different Israeli roles with different triggers, and having one does not satisfy the other.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	The big change already happened on 14 August 2025. What is landing now is the detail underneath it. In April 2026 the regulator finalised its binding rules on the contract you must sign before sending data abroad, and separate regulations came into force giving a short grace period — a warning instead of a fine — for brand-new obligations. A guideline applying privacy law to artificial intelligence, including a requirement of consent before scraping the web to train models, is also in play. Watch three switches the government can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Health and social care — חוזרי מנכ"ל משרד הבריאות 1/2018 ו-2/2018 - שימושים משניים במידע בריאות Government — פרויקט נימבוס - מדיניות הענן הממשלתית