Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

GeorgiaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Georgia copied the European model in 2023: data can leave the country, but only to a destination the supervisor has approved, or with a permit, or under a narrow exception. There is no general rule forcing data to stay. The big change is who is in charge — on 2 March 2026 the independent privacy watchdog was replaced by the State Audit Office, and we could not verify that it has issued a single decision since.
The catch: Two things break the calm headline. Telephone and internet connection records are copied into a state-held database inside Georgia, so telecoms cannot treat that data as ordinary business data. And the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law catches a company with no office in Georgia if it uses technical means located in Georgia to handle people's data. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under. Worse, a foreign company in that position must appoint a representative in Georgia and register that person with the supervisor BEFORE it starts processing — the only escape is being based in the European Union or in a country the European Union has already approved.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Data may go abroad if the destination country has been judged to give good enough protection, or if the supervisor grants a permit for the contract you have signed, or under a short list of narrow exceptions such as the person's written consent after being told the risks. Nothing in the general law forces data to stay in Georgia. The one place data really does stay is telecoms: a copy of who called whom, and when, sits in a state-run database inside the country.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, with a permit as the back-up. The supervisor decides which countries offer good enough protection and publishes that decision as a formal act; if your destination is not on it, you need a permit for your contract, or you fall back on a narrow exception such as written consent. We could not find the current published list, so we cannot tell you today which countries are on it — treat that as the single biggest open question in this record.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: This is where Georgia surprises people. Until 1 March 2026 the job belonged to the Personal Data Protection Service, an independent watchdog. From 2 March 2026 the law hands the same job to the State Audit Office — the body that audits government spending — and its head, the Auditor General, now signs the privacy rules. We can prove the handover happened, because the Auditor General reissued two of the privacy rulebooks at the end of March 2026. We could not find a single enforcement decision published since the handover.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The ceiling is clear: keep personal data only as long as you need it for the purpose you collected it for, then erase, destroy or strip out the identifying parts, unless another law tells you to keep it. The floors are scattered across tax, accounting and sector laws that we could not open on an official site today. In telecoms the direction is reversed — the content of a call or message must be destroyed at once, while the record of who contacted whom can be copied into a state database and kept for a period set by a separate law.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Two clocks. If personal data is lost, leaked or wrongly handled, you have 72 hours from spotting it to tell the supervisor, and you must keep your own record of the incident and what you did about it. If you run a system the government has listed as critical to the country, you must tell the national computer emergency response team immediately — no fixed number of hours, which in practice means the same day. If both apply to you, both run at once.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. First, the regulator changed identity on 2 March 2026, so a privacy notice or contract naming the Personal Data Protection Service now points at a body the law no longer mentions. Second, a foreign company must register a representative in Georgia before it starts, not after. Third, a child is anyone under 16, so a European sign-up flow tuned to 13 will be wrong here. Fourth, direct marketing always needs consent, even if you bought the list lawfully. Fifth, the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations, which must publish detailed information about themselves.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing new is scheduled to start in the privacy law itself — we checked the current text on 18 August 2026 and found no provisions waiting on a future date. The live story is the handover: the Auditor General is reissuing the four rulebooks inherited from the old watchdog, and two of the four were reissued in March 2026. The rest of the risk sits in switches the government can already flip without a new law.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Telecoms — საქართველოს კანონი ელექტრონული კომუნიკაციების შესახებ

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	GeorgiaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Waking up
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	Georgia copied the European model in 2023: data can leave the country, but only to a destination the supervisor has approved, or with a permit, or under a narrow exception. There is no general rule forcing data to stay. The big change is who is in charge — on 2 March 2026 the independent privacy watchdog was replaced by the State Audit Office, and we could not verify that it has issued a single decision since.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	Two things break the calm headline. Telephone and internet connection records are copied into a state-held database inside Georgia, so telecoms cannot treat that data as ordinary business data. And the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Yes. The law catches a company with no office in Georgia if it uses technical means located in Georgia to handle people's data. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under. Worse, a foreign company in that position must appoint a representative in Georgia and register that person with the supervisor BEFORE it starts processing — the only escape is being based in the European Union or in a country the European Union has already approved.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Data may go abroad if the destination country has been judged to give good enough protection, or if the supervisor grants a permit for the contract you have signed, or under a short list of narrow exceptions such as the person's written consent after being told the risks. Nothing in the general law forces data to stay in Georgia. The one place data really does stay is telecoms: a copy of who called whom, and when, sits in a state-run database inside the country.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	The model is an approved-destinations list, with a permit as the back-up. The supervisor decides which countries offer good enough protection and publishes that decision as a formal act; if your destination is not on it, you need a permit for your contract, or you fall back on a narrow exception such as written consent. We could not find the current published list, so we cannot tell you today which countries are on it — treat that as the single biggest open question in this record.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	This is where Georgia surprises people. Until 1 March 2026 the job belonged to the Personal Data Protection Service, an independent watchdog. From 2 March 2026 the law hands the same job to the State Audit Office — the body that audits government spending — and its head, the Auditor General, now signs the privacy rules. We can prove the handover happened, because the Auditor General reissued two of the privacy rulebooks at the end of March 2026. We could not find a single enforcement decision published since the handover.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	The ceiling is clear: keep personal data only as long as you need it for the purpose you collected it for, then erase, destroy or strip out the identifying parts, unless another law tells you to keep it. The floors are scattered across tax, accounting and sector laws that we could not open on an official site today. In telecoms the direction is reversed — the content of a call or message must be destroyed at once, while the record of who contacted whom can be copied into a state database and kept for a period set by a separate law.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	Two clocks. If personal data is lost, leaked or wrongly handled, you have 72 hours from spotting it to tell the supervisor, and you must keep your own record of the incident and what you did about it. If you run a system the government has listed as critical to the country, you must tell the national computer emergency response team immediately — no fixed number of hours, which in practice means the same day. If both apply to you, both run at once.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Five. First, the regulator changed identity on 2 March 2026, so a privacy notice or contract naming the Personal Data Protection Service now points at a body the law no longer mentions. Second, a foreign company must register a representative in Georgia before it starts, not after. Third, a child is anyone under 16, so a European sign-up flow tuned to 13 will be wrong here. Fourth, direct marketing always needs consent, even if you bought the list lawfully. Fifth, the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations, which must publish detailed information about themselves.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	Nothing new is scheduled to start in the privacy law itself — we checked the current text on 18 August 2026 and found no provisions waiting on a future date. The live story is the handover: the Auditor General is reissuing the four rulebooks inherited from the old watchdog, and two of the four were reissued in March 2026. The rest of the risk sits in switches the government can already flip without a new law.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Telecoms — საქართველოს კანონი ელექტრონული კომუნიკაციების შესახებ