Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV) Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'