Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

BrazilChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Brazil does not force data to stay inside the country. Personal data can leave, but since August 2025 you normally need a contract written by the regulator, word for word, signed with whoever receives it. Sending data to the European Union needs nothing extra. The regulator is awake and has started switching features off large platforms.
The catch: Brazil is often listed as a data-localisation country. It is not one. The old rule that pushed federal government email and data onto Brazilian systems was scrapped in 2018, and today's federal cloud rules do not require Brazilian soil. The real constraints are different in shape: banks must keep the central bank able to reach their data wherever it sits, and since July 2026 digital platforms must have an actual office and a legal representative inside Brazil.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Brazil's privacy law reaches a company with no office in Brazil, as long as it collects data in Brazil or offers goods or services to people here. There is no size or revenue threshold that lets you out. The privacy law itself does not make you appoint anyone local — but two newer rules do, and if you run a digital platform you now need a registered office and a legal representative in Brazil.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Brazil has no rule making anyone keep a copy of anything inside the country — not for banks, not for hospitals, not even for the federal government's own cloud. What it has instead is a permission slip: before personal data leaves, you need one of a short list of approved legal grounds. Industry rules add conditions on top, but none of them is a wall.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Pick one of five routes. The easy one is the European Union: since January 2026 Brazil treats it as safe, so nothing extra is needed. For everywhere else, the normal route is a set of standard contractual clauses that the regulator itself wrote — you copy them into your contract exactly, and you may not edit them. A deadline to retrofit older contracts already passed, on 23 August 2025.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The National Data Protection Authority, and it is genuinely working. A law passed in February 2026 gave it real independence, 200 new specialist jobs and its own budget. In August 2026 it ordered Discord to switch off live video streaming in Brazil within three working days, to protect children. Banking, telecoms, insurance and securities regulators enforce their own rules in parallel and have done so for years.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions, and they pull against each other. The floor: internet access providers must keep connection records for one year, websites and apps must keep access records for six months, and tax records need five years. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be deleted once you have finished doing what you collected it for. Where the two clash, the legal duty to keep wins — the law lists that as an express reason to hold on.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. Privacy: three working days to tell the regulator AND the affected people, once you have confirmed a breach that could really hurt them. Platform content: two hours to take down intimate images shared without consent, once notified. On top of that, banks report incidents to the central bank and telecoms operators report to the telecoms regulator under their own separate timetables.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. (1) Your European standard contract is not automatically good enough — Brazil wrote its own clauses and you must copy them exactly, unedited, and the deadline to fix old contracts passed on 23 August 2025. (2) A child in Brazil is under 12 and an adolescent is 12 to 17, but the social media rule bites at 16 — accounts for anyone up to 16 must be tied to a parent's account, and asking users to state their own age is banned. (3) Since 20 July 2026 a digital platform needs an actual registered office in Brazil, not just a lawyer on retainer. (4) The biggest fine is not in the privacy law: the internet law allows up to 10 percent of your group's Brazilian revenue. (5) The regulator can order your database blocked or your processing suspended, which usually hurts more than any cheque.High confidence
What's about to change?: One firm date: January 2027, when the regulator moves from monitoring platforms to full enforcement of the children's digital rules. Brazil's artificial intelligence bill is still only a bill — it was sitting in a committee waiting for a report as recently as June 2026, so do not plan around it. The bigger risk is not new law: it is that the regulator can add or withdraw approved destinations for data transfers by publishing a single resolution, with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	BrazilChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	Brazil does not force data to stay inside the country. Personal data can leave, but since August 2025 you normally need a contract written by the regulator, word for word, signed with whoever receives it. Sending data to the European Union needs nothing extra. The regulator is awake and has started switching features off large platforms.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	Brazil is often listed as a data-localisation country. It is not one. The old rule that pushed federal government email and data onto Brazilian systems was scrapped in 2018, and today's federal cloud rules do not require Brazilian soil. The real constraints are different in shape: banks must keep the central bank able to reach their data wherever it sits, and since July 2026 digital platforms must have an actual office and a legal representative inside Brazil.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Yes. Brazil's privacy law reaches a company with no office in Brazil, as long as it collects data in Brazil or offers goods or services to people here. There is no size or revenue threshold that lets you out. The privacy law itself does not make you appoint anyone local — but two newer rules do, and if you run a digital platform you now need a registered office and a legal representative in Brazil.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Brazil has no rule making anyone keep a copy of anything inside the country — not for banks, not for hospitals, not even for the federal government's own cloud. What it has instead is a permission slip: before personal data leaves, you need one of a short list of approved legal grounds. Industry rules add conditions on top, but none of them is a wall.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	Pick one of five routes. The easy one is the European Union: since January 2026 Brazil treats it as safe, so nothing extra is needed. For everywhere else, the normal route is a set of standard contractual clauses that the regulator itself wrote — you copy them into your contract exactly, and you may not edit them. A deadline to retrofit older contracts already passed, on 23 August 2025.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	The National Data Protection Authority, and it is genuinely working. A law passed in February 2026 gave it real independence, 200 new specialist jobs and its own budget. In August 2026 it ordered Discord to switch off live video streaming in Brazil within three working days, to protect children. Banking, telecoms, insurance and securities regulators enforce their own rules in parallel and have done so for years.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	Both directions, and they pull against each other. The floor: internet access providers must keep connection records for one year, websites and apps must keep access records for six months, and tax records need five years. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be deleted once you have finished doing what you collected it for. Where the two clash, the legal duty to keep wins — the law lists that as an express reason to hold on.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	Count three clocks, not one. Privacy: three working days to tell the regulator AND the affected people, once you have confirmed a breach that could really hurt them. Platform content: two hours to take down intimate images shared without consent, once notified. On top of that, banks report incidents to the central bank and telecoms operators report to the telecoms regulator under their own separate timetables.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Five. (1) Your European standard contract is not automatically good enough — Brazil wrote its own clauses and you must copy them exactly, unedited, and the deadline to fix old contracts passed on 23 August 2025. (2) A child in Brazil is under 12 and an adolescent is 12 to 17, but the social media rule bites at 16 — accounts for anyone up to 16 must be tied to a parent's account, and asking users to state their own age is banned. (3) Since 20 July 2026 a digital platform needs an actual registered office in Brazil, not just a lawyer on retainer. (4) The biggest fine is not in the privacy law: the internet law allows up to 10 percent of your group's Brazilian revenue. (5) The regulator can order your database blocked or your processing suspended, which usually hurts more than any cheque.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	One firm date: January 2027, when the regulator moves from monitoring platforms to full enforcement of the children's digital rules. Brazil's artificial intelligence bill is still only a bill — it was sitting in a committee waiting for a report as recently as June 2026, so do not plan around it. The bigger risk is not new law: it is that the regulator can add or withdraw approved destinations for data transfers by publishing a single resolution, with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	None found.