Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

ArmeniaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Dormant

In one paragraph: Armenia lets personal data leave, but only to a country on an official approved list of 53 states, or with case-by-case permission from the privacy regulator. That regulator has had no boss since February 2026 and the largest fine it can impose is about 1,300 US dollars. The real constraints are elsewhere: government data sent to a foreign cloud must keep a backup copy inside Armenia, and banking and medical secrecy sit outside the privacy law entirely.
The catch: The approved-country list is worthless in three places. Government bodies must keep an in-country backup of anything they put in a cloud abroad. Bank, notarial, lawyer and insurance secrets are carved out of the privacy law and are governed by their own secrecy statutes, which list exhaustively who may see the data and do not mention foreign cloud providers. And leaking medical secrets is a crime that can put a named individual in prison, not just a fine on the company.
Does this apply to me?: Probably not, if you have nothing in Armenia. The privacy law describes who it covers by naming Armenian public bodies, companies and individuals who process personal data. It contains no clause saying it follows Armenians' data abroad, and no rule requiring a foreign company to appoint someone inside Armenia. There is no size or revenue threshold either, so a one-person Armenian business is caught exactly like a bank.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Armenia runs an approved-country list: if the destination is on it, you can send data with no permission from anyone. The list is real and populated — 53 countries, including all of the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Georgia and Russia. Sending data anywhere else needs written permission from the privacy regulator first, and that regulator currently has nobody in the chair. Three sectors override this entirely: government, banking-type secrets, and health.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved list, and the list is full. Fifty-three countries were approved on 8 July 2024 and that decision has never been changed. If your destination is on it you need nothing — no standard contract, no filing, no fee. If it is not on it, you must write to the regulator before you send anything, attach the contract you plan to sign, and wait up to 30 days for a yes or a no.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: On paper, the Personal Data Protection Agency inside the Ministry of Justice. In practice, nobody right now: its head resigned with effect from 24 February 2026 and no replacement appointment has been published. In more than eleven years the agency has published exactly one general decision — the approved-country list. Two other regulators are genuinely working: the Central Bank supervises banks, payment firms, insurers and securities, and a brand-new Information Systems Regulatory Commission was appointed in March and April 2026 to police cybersecurity and state computer systems.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor is five years for anything that proves your tax position. The ceiling is not a number — it is a principle: you must destroy or block personal data as soon as you no longer need it for the purpose you collected it for. Two hard clocks sit inside that principle. If someone withdraws consent you have ten working days to destroy their data, then three more working days to tell them you did. If you spot unlawful processing you have three working days to fix it or destroy the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. Under the privacy law, if data leaks out of your electronic systems you must immediately publish a public announcement about it and at the same time tell the Armenian police and the privacy regulator — there is no grace period and no threshold. If you run a system in a sector the state calls vital, you have 24 hours to tell the cybersecurity regulator, 72 hours to send an update, two days to warn the people affected, and one month to file a final report. Both sets of duties can bite at once.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that will ruin your week. One: a data leak must be announced publicly and reported to the police, not just to the regulator. Two: encryption is legally compulsory, not a best practice, and failing to use it is its own separate fine. Three: before you process biometric or sensitive data you must notify the regulator in advance and wait to be entered in its register. Four: to process a dead person's data you need the consent of all of their legal heirs. Five: a child is anyone under 16 here, not 13 and not 18.High confidence
What's about to change?: Armenia rewired its digital rulebook in December 2025 and the deadlines land through 2026, 2027 and 2028. Rules for cyber incidents and for state computer systems are already live. Detailed technical rules are due by January 2027, internal cybersecurity policies and risk assessments by July 2027, and security certificates for critical systems by January 2028. The change most likely to catch someone out is not a new law at all: the approved-country list can be rewritten by one official's signature.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — «Ամպայինն առաջինը» քաղաքականության մշակման և ներդրման մասին ՀՀ կառավարության որոշում

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026	ArmeniaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Dormant
In one paragraph	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.	Armenia lets personal data leave, but only to a country on an official approved list of 53 states, or with case-by-case permission from the privacy regulator. That regulator has had no boss since February 2026 and the largest fine it can impose is about 1,300 US dollars. The real constraints are elsewhere: government data sent to a foreign cloud must keep a backup copy inside Armenia, and banking and medical secrecy sit outside the privacy law entirely.
The catch	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.	The approved-country list is worthless in three places. Government bodies must keep an in-country backup of anything they put in a cloud abroad. Bank, notarial, lawyer and insurance secrets are carved out of the privacy law and are governed by their own secrecy statutes, which list exhaustively who may see the data and do not mention foreign cloud providers. And leaking medical secrets is a crime that can put a named individual in prison, not just a fine on the company.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence	Probably not, if you have nothing in Armenia. The privacy law describes who it covers by naming Armenian public bodies, companies and individuals who process personal data. It contains no clause saying it follows Armenians' data abroad, and no rule requiring a foreign company to appoint someone inside Armenia. There is no size or revenue threshold either, so a one-person Armenian business is caught exactly like a bank.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Armenia runs an approved-country list: if the destination is on it, you can send data with no permission from anyone. The list is real and populated — 53 countries, including all of the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Georgia and Russia. Sending data anywhere else needs written permission from the privacy regulator first, and that regulator currently has nobody in the chair. Three sectors override this entirely: government, banking-type secrets, and health.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence	The model is an approved list, and the list is full. Fifty-three countries were approved on 8 July 2024 and that decision has never been changed. If your destination is on it you need nothing — no standard contract, no filing, no fee. If it is not on it, you must write to the regulator before you send anything, attach the contract you plan to sign, and wait up to 30 days for a yes or a no.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence	On paper, the Personal Data Protection Agency inside the Ministry of Justice. In practice, nobody right now: its head resigned with effect from 24 February 2026 and no replacement appointment has been published. In more than eleven years the agency has published exactly one general decision — the approved-country list. Two other regulators are genuinely working: the Central Bank supervises banks, payment firms, insurers and securities, and a brand-new Information Systems Regulatory Commission was appointed in March and April 2026 to police cybersecurity and state computer systems.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence	The floor is five years for anything that proves your tax position. The ceiling is not a number — it is a principle: you must destroy or block personal data as soon as you no longer need it for the purpose you collected it for. Two hard clocks sit inside that principle. If someone withdraws consent you have ten working days to destroy their data, then three more working days to tell them you did. If you spot unlawful processing you have three working days to fix it or destroy the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence	Count three clocks. Under the privacy law, if data leaks out of your electronic systems you must immediately publish a public announcement about it and at the same time tell the Armenian police and the privacy regulator — there is no grace period and no threshold. If you run a system in a sector the state calls vital, you have 24 hours to tell the cybersecurity regulator, 72 hours to send an update, two days to warn the people affected, and one month to file a final report. Both sets of duties can bite at once.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence	Five things that will ruin your week. One: a data leak must be announced publicly and reported to the police, not just to the regulator. Two: encryption is legally compulsory, not a best practice, and failing to use it is its own separate fine. Three: before you process biometric or sensitive data you must notify the regulator in advance and wait to be entered in its register. Four: to process a dead person's data you need the consent of all of their legal heirs. Five: a child is anyone under 16 here, not 13 and not 18.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence	Armenia rewired its digital rulebook in December 2025 and the deadlines land through 2026, 2027 and 2028. Rules for cyber incidents and for state computer systems are already live. Detailed technical rules are due by January 2027, internal cybersecurity policies and risk assessments by July 2027, and security certificates for critical systems by January 2028. The change most likely to catch someone out is not a new law at all: the approved-country list can be rewritten by one official's signature.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	None found.	Government — «Ամպայինն առաջինը» քաղաքականության մշակման և ներդրման մասին ՀՀ կառավարության որոշում