Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

GeorgiaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Georgia copied the European model in 2023: data can leave the country, but only to a destination the supervisor has approved, or with a permit, or under a narrow exception. There is no general rule forcing data to stay. The big change is who is in charge — on 2 March 2026 the independent privacy watchdog was replaced by the State Audit Office, and we could not verify that it has issued a single decision since.
The catch: Two things break the calm headline. Telephone and internet connection records are copied into a state-held database inside Georgia, so telecoms cannot treat that data as ordinary business data. And the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The law catches a company with no office in Georgia if it uses technical means located in Georgia to handle people's data. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under. Worse, a foreign company in that position must appoint a representative in Georgia and register that person with the supervisor BEFORE it starts processing — the only escape is being based in the European Union or in a country the European Union has already approved.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Data may go abroad if the destination country has been judged to give good enough protection, or if the supervisor grants a permit for the contract you have signed, or under a short list of narrow exceptions such as the person's written consent after being told the risks. Nothing in the general law forces data to stay in Georgia. The one place data really does stay is telecoms: a copy of who called whom, and when, sits in a state-run database inside the country.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, with a permit as the back-up. The supervisor decides which countries offer good enough protection and publishes that decision as a formal act; if your destination is not on it, you need a permit for your contract, or you fall back on a narrow exception such as written consent. We could not find the current published list, so we cannot tell you today which countries are on it — treat that as the single biggest open question in this record.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: This is where Georgia surprises people. Until 1 March 2026 the job belonged to the Personal Data Protection Service, an independent watchdog. From 2 March 2026 the law hands the same job to the State Audit Office — the body that audits government spending — and its head, the Auditor General, now signs the privacy rules. We can prove the handover happened, because the Auditor General reissued two of the privacy rulebooks at the end of March 2026. We could not find a single enforcement decision published since the handover.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The ceiling is clear: keep personal data only as long as you need it for the purpose you collected it for, then erase, destroy or strip out the identifying parts, unless another law tells you to keep it. The floors are scattered across tax, accounting and sector laws that we could not open on an official site today. In telecoms the direction is reversed — the content of a call or message must be destroyed at once, while the record of who contacted whom can be copied into a state database and kept for a period set by a separate law.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Two clocks. If personal data is lost, leaked or wrongly handled, you have 72 hours from spotting it to tell the supervisor, and you must keep your own record of the incident and what you did about it. If you run a system the government has listed as critical to the country, you must tell the national computer emergency response team immediately — no fixed number of hours, which in practice means the same day. If both apply to you, both run at once.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. First, the regulator changed identity on 2 March 2026, so a privacy notice or contract naming the Personal Data Protection Service now points at a body the law no longer mentions. Second, a foreign company must register a representative in Georgia before it starts, not after. Third, a child is anyone under 16, so a European sign-up flow tuned to 13 will be wrong here. Fourth, direct marketing always needs consent, even if you bought the list lawfully. Fifth, the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations, which must publish detailed information about themselves.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing new is scheduled to start in the privacy law itself — we checked the current text on 18 August 2026 and found no provisions waiting on a future date. The live story is the handover: the Auditor General is reissuing the four rulebooks inherited from the old watchdog, and two of the four were reissued in March 2026. The rest of the risk sits in switches the government can already flip without a new law.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Telecoms — საქართველოს კანონი ელექტრონული კომუნიკაციების შესახებ

ThailandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch: The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	GeorgiaChecked 18 August 2026	ThailandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Waking up	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Georgia copied the European model in 2023: data can leave the country, but only to a destination the supervisor has approved, or with a permit, or under a narrow exception. There is no general rule forcing data to stay. The big change is who is in charge — on 2 March 2026 the independent privacy watchdog was replaced by the State Audit Office, and we could not verify that it has issued a single decision since.	Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch	Two things break the calm headline. Telephone and internet connection records are copied into a state-held database inside Georgia, so telecoms cannot treat that data as ordinary business data. And the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations.	The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. The law catches a company with no office in Georgia if it uses technical means located in Georgia to handle people's data. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under. Worse, a foreign company in that position must appoint a representative in Georgia and register that person with the supervisor BEFORE it starts processing — the only escape is being based in the European Union or in a country the European Union has already approved.High confidence	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with paperwork. Data may go abroad if the destination country has been judged to give good enough protection, or if the supervisor grants a permit for the contract you have signed, or under a short list of narrow exceptions such as the person's written consent after being told the risks. Nothing in the general law forces data to stay in Georgia. The one place data really does stay is telecoms: a copy of who called whom, and when, sits in a state-run database inside the country.High confidence	Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is an approved-destinations list, with a permit as the back-up. The supervisor decides which countries offer good enough protection and publishes that decision as a formal act; if your destination is not on it, you need a permit for your contract, or you fall back on a narrow exception such as written consent. We could not find the current published list, so we cannot tell you today which countries are on it — treat that as the single biggest open question in this record.Medium confidence	There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	This is where Georgia surprises people. Until 1 March 2026 the job belonged to the Personal Data Protection Service, an independent watchdog. From 2 March 2026 the law hands the same job to the State Audit Office — the body that audits government spending — and its head, the Auditor General, now signs the privacy rules. We can prove the handover happened, because the Auditor General reissued two of the privacy rulebooks at the end of March 2026. We could not find a single enforcement decision published since the handover.Medium confidence	The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	The ceiling is clear: keep personal data only as long as you need it for the purpose you collected it for, then erase, destroy or strip out the identifying parts, unless another law tells you to keep it. The floors are scattered across tax, accounting and sector laws that we could not open on an official site today. In telecoms the direction is reversed — the content of a call or message must be destroyed at once, while the record of who contacted whom can be copied into a state database and kept for a period set by a separate law.Medium confidence	Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Two clocks. If personal data is lost, leaked or wrongly handled, you have 72 hours from spotting it to tell the supervisor, and you must keep your own record of the incident and what you did about it. If you run a system the government has listed as critical to the country, you must tell the national computer emergency response team immediately — no fixed number of hours, which in practice means the same day. If both apply to you, both run at once.High confidence	Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five. First, the regulator changed identity on 2 March 2026, so a privacy notice or contract naming the Personal Data Protection Service now points at a body the law no longer mentions. Second, a foreign company must register a representative in Georgia before it starts, not after. Third, a child is anyone under 16, so a European sign-up flow tuned to 13 will be wrong here. Fourth, direct marketing always needs consent, even if you bought the list lawfully. Fifth, the same State Audit Office that now polices privacy also runs the public register of foreign-funded organisations, which must publish detailed information about themselves.Medium confidence	Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing new is scheduled to start in the privacy law itself — we checked the current text on 18 August 2026 and found no provisions waiting on a future date. The live story is the handover: the Auditor General is reissuing the four rulebooks inherited from the old watchdog, and two of the four were reissued in March 2026. The rest of the risk sits in switches the government can already flip without a new law.Medium confidence	Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Telecoms — საქართველოს კანონი ელექტრონული კომუნიკაციების შესახებ	None found.