Compare countries
Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.
EstoniaChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active
- In one paragraph
- Estonia has no general rule forcing data to stay in the country, and it adds very little on top of the European privacy rules. Two industries are the exception. Phone and internet companies must keep connection records inside the European Union, with some records physically in Estonia. Online gambling firms may only run their game server from a short list of approved countries. The regulator works, but its fines are small.
- The catch
- The relaxed headline stops being true the moment you are a telecoms operator, an online gambling operator, a health care provider or a public body. Telecoms connection records may not leave the European Union at all and certain police-request records must sit on Estonian soil. Gambling servers are limited to an approved list of countries. Health records carry a 30-year minimum keep-time. Public bodies must run the Estonian national security standard and exchange data through the state's own data layer.
- Does this apply to me?
- Yes, it reaches you even with no office in Estonia. Estonia does not write its own reach test — it uses the European Union's. If you offer goods or services to people in Estonia, or track what they do online, the European privacy rules apply and Estonia's regulator can act against you. There is no size or revenue threshold to fall below. A company with no branch anywhere in Europe normally has to name a written representative inside Europe.High confidence
- Can the data leave the country?
- In general, yes. Estonia has no law telling companies to keep personal data in Estonia, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing one on non-personal data. Two industries break that headline. Phone and internet companies must keep their call and connection records inside the European Union, and certain police-request records must stay physically in Estonia. Online gambling companies may only place their game server in Estonia, in a country that has signed the cybercrime treaty, or in a country whose regulator has a cooperation deal with the Estonian Tax and Customs Board.High confidence
- What do I have to do to send it abroad?
- For the normal routes you file nothing with the Estonian regulator. If the destination country has been officially approved by the European Commission, you simply send the data. If it has not, you sign the European Commission's standard contract with the recipient and run a risk check on the destination first. Only two routes need Estonia's regulator to sign off: group-wide internal rules where the parent company is in Estonia, and a one-off contract you wrote yourself.High confidence
- Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
- The Data Protection Inspectorate, and it is genuinely working. It has 34 posts, a director general in her second term since May 2024, and it publishes its orders. In 2025 it took in 1,568 complaints, issued 13 orders and imposed 5 penalties. But note the shape of the risk: Estonian data protection penalties are handled like minor criminal charges, so they are slow and small, and no Estonian fine has ever approached the European ceilings. Cyber rules are enforced separately by the Information System Authority, which also publishes orders — the most recent on 5 June 2026.High confidence
- How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
- Estonia has some of the longest minimum keep-times in Europe. Health records must be kept for 30 years. Anti-money-laundering paperwork for 5 years after the customer leaves. Phone and internet connection records for 1 year, and the police request logs behind them for 5 years. Gambling records for 5 years. Going the other way, a dead person's data stays protected for 10 years after death, or 20 years if they died as a child, and a missed payment may only be reported to credit agencies between 30 days and 5 years after it happened.High confidence
- What happens when something goes wrong?
- Count three clocks, not one. If personal data leaks, you have 72 hours to tell the Data Protection Inspectorate, and you must tell the affected people without delay if the risk to them is high. If you run an important or essential service, you have only 24 HOURS to send a first cyber-incident warning to the Information System Authority, then 72 hours for a fuller report, then one month for a final report. Trust service providers such as e-signature and certificate companies must send the fuller report inside 24 hours too. Missing the cyber deadline is punished separately from missing the privacy one.High confidence
- What's the trap?
- Six things that are not in the summary. (1) A child in Estonia is anyone under 13 for online services, not 16 as in much of Europe, so a consent flow tuned to Germany will over-block Estonian teenagers. (2) A dead person's data stays protected for 10 years after death, 20 if they died as a child, and the heirs control it. (3) Research on Estonians must be stripped of names BEFORE the data are handed over, an ethics committee must sign off sensitive projects, and you must name the individual who holds the key. (4) Data protection fines are handled like minor criminal charges, which makes them small but also drags a named human being into the process. (5) Since 1 January 2025 the regulator itself can sue you in court on behalf of a whole group of affected people. (6) Under the cyber law a named board member is personally responsible for security and must attend training.High confidence
- What's about to change?
- One near-term date stands out. Estonia's official gazette marks its own current texts of the privacy, public information, cybersecurity, telecoms, emergency, health services, health insurance and social welfare acts as valid only until 30 September 2026, so a further change starts on 1 October 2026. We could not identify the amending law, so treat that date as a hard diary entry. Beyond it, the cyber rules phase in: registration was due by 1 April 2026 and full compliance is due by 1 January 2029. From 12 January 2027 European rules make cloud switching and data export charges free.Medium confidence
- Hardest industry wall
- Telecoms — Elektroonilise side seadus (ESS), § 111-1
United StatesChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active
- In one paragraph
- In general the United States lets data go anywhere. There is no national privacy law and no permit is needed to move data abroad. Two things bite hard. Six countries are effectively off limits for large amounts of sensitive data, with prison sentences attached. And anything connected to government work must physically stay on American soil.
- The catch
- The open headline stops the moment you touch one of six areas: government contracting, police records, federal tax records, defence technical data, telecom licences, and bulk sensitive data flowing to China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba or Venezuela. Also note that the rule that actually binds you is almost always a state law or an industry regulator's rule, not a national privacy act. There isn't one.
- Does this apply to me?
- Yes. American rules reach a foreign company with no office in the country. California's privacy law applies to any for-profit business that 'does business in California' and crosses one of three thresholds, and physical presence is not one of them. The children's rule covers foreign websites aimed at American children. No state and no federal law requires you to appoint a local representative — a real difference from Europe.High confidence
- Can the data leave the country?
- It depends entirely on your industry, so the single national answer is misleading. For ordinary consumer or employee data, yes — send it anywhere, no paperwork. But six sectors have hard walls. Government contracting, police data, federal tax data and defence work require the data to physically stay in the United States. Telecom licences restrict which foreign staff may even look at records. And for anyone, sending large volumes of sensitive data to six named countries is now a crime.High confidence
- What do I have to do to send it abroad?
- For ordinary data, nothing. No standard contract, no government approval, no destination approval list. The model is a blocklist and it is now populated: six countries are named. Before you move large volumes of sensitive data, your only real job is to work out whether a country of concern, or a company or person they control, could end up with access — including through a vendor, an investor or an employee.High confidence
- Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
- Nobody, and everybody. There is no national privacy regulator. Instead the consumer protection regulator, the health department, the securities regulator, the communications regulator, the Justice Department, all fifty state attorneys general and one dedicated state privacy agency each enforce a slice. Almost all of them are visibly working right now. The one exception is the new national data transfer programme: it is staffed and issuing guidance but has published no enforcement action yet.High confidence
- How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
- There is a strong floor and a weak but growing ceiling. Investment firms must keep some books for six years and most others for three, with the first two years easy to reach. Health providers keep their paperwork for six years. In the other direction, state privacy laws now force you to publish how long you keep each type of data and to stop keeping it longer than you said, and since April 2026 children's data may no longer be kept indefinitely. Where a keep-it rule and a delete-it rule collide, the keep-it rule wins: every state law carves out data you are required by law to retain.High confidence
- What happens when something goes wrong?
- Count the clocks — there are at least seven, and they disagree. New York financial firms: 72 hours to the state regulator, and only 24 hours to report paying a ransom. Telecom carriers: seven working days to the police agencies and the communications regulator, and you may not warn customers until seven working days after that. Investment and finance firms: 30 days to affected customers. Health organisations: 60 days. Texas and many other states: 30 days to the state attorney general. Listed companies: four working days to disclose a material incident. The overlap, not any single deadline, is what people fail.High confidence
- What's the trap?
- Five that cost people their weekend. One: the national data transfer programme carries prison — up to twenty years for a deliberate breach. Two: Illinois lets individuals sue over fingerprints and face scans with fixed damages per person, no proof of harm needed, and that is where the largest privacy payouts happen. Three: the children's rule uses under 13, but several state laws use under 18, so a single age gate will not do. Four: government work means American soil, and police data allows only the United States, its territories, tribal lands and Canada. Five: a rule can be printed in the law book and still be unenforceable, because a court has blocked it.High confidence
- What's about to change?
- Four things in the next twelve months. The national critical infrastructure reporting rule should be finalised in late 2026, which will switch on a 72-hour incident clock and a 24-hour ransom-payment clock for a very wide range of businesses. California's rules on automated decision-making bite on 1 January 2027. The open banking rule is being rewritten after a court blocked it. And a federal privacy bill is moving in Congress, but it is only a bill and binds nobody.High confidence
- Hardest industry wall
- Government — Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Security Policy
- Government — Publication 1075, Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies
- Defence — Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clause 252.239-7010, Cloud Computing Services
- Telecoms — National security agreement / letter of assurance conditioning a section 214 authorisation, reviewed by the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector