Compare countries
Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.
EstoniaChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active
- In one paragraph
- Estonia has no general rule forcing data to stay in the country, and it adds very little on top of the European privacy rules. Two industries are the exception. Phone and internet companies must keep connection records inside the European Union, with some records physically in Estonia. Online gambling firms may only run their game server from a short list of approved countries. The regulator works, but its fines are small.
- The catch
- The relaxed headline stops being true the moment you are a telecoms operator, an online gambling operator, a health care provider or a public body. Telecoms connection records may not leave the European Union at all and certain police-request records must sit on Estonian soil. Gambling servers are limited to an approved list of countries. Health records carry a 30-year minimum keep-time. Public bodies must run the Estonian national security standard and exchange data through the state's own data layer.
- Does this apply to me?
- Yes, it reaches you even with no office in Estonia. Estonia does not write its own reach test — it uses the European Union's. If you offer goods or services to people in Estonia, or track what they do online, the European privacy rules apply and Estonia's regulator can act against you. There is no size or revenue threshold to fall below. A company with no branch anywhere in Europe normally has to name a written representative inside Europe.High confidence
- Can the data leave the country?
- In general, yes. Estonia has no law telling companies to keep personal data in Estonia, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing one on non-personal data. Two industries break that headline. Phone and internet companies must keep their call and connection records inside the European Union, and certain police-request records must stay physically in Estonia. Online gambling companies may only place their game server in Estonia, in a country that has signed the cybercrime treaty, or in a country whose regulator has a cooperation deal with the Estonian Tax and Customs Board.High confidence
- What do I have to do to send it abroad?
- For the normal routes you file nothing with the Estonian regulator. If the destination country has been officially approved by the European Commission, you simply send the data. If it has not, you sign the European Commission's standard contract with the recipient and run a risk check on the destination first. Only two routes need Estonia's regulator to sign off: group-wide internal rules where the parent company is in Estonia, and a one-off contract you wrote yourself.High confidence
- Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
- The Data Protection Inspectorate, and it is genuinely working. It has 34 posts, a director general in her second term since May 2024, and it publishes its orders. In 2025 it took in 1,568 complaints, issued 13 orders and imposed 5 penalties. But note the shape of the risk: Estonian data protection penalties are handled like minor criminal charges, so they are slow and small, and no Estonian fine has ever approached the European ceilings. Cyber rules are enforced separately by the Information System Authority, which also publishes orders — the most recent on 5 June 2026.High confidence
- How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
- Estonia has some of the longest minimum keep-times in Europe. Health records must be kept for 30 years. Anti-money-laundering paperwork for 5 years after the customer leaves. Phone and internet connection records for 1 year, and the police request logs behind them for 5 years. Gambling records for 5 years. Going the other way, a dead person's data stays protected for 10 years after death, or 20 years if they died as a child, and a missed payment may only be reported to credit agencies between 30 days and 5 years after it happened.High confidence
- What happens when something goes wrong?
- Count three clocks, not one. If personal data leaks, you have 72 hours to tell the Data Protection Inspectorate, and you must tell the affected people without delay if the risk to them is high. If you run an important or essential service, you have only 24 HOURS to send a first cyber-incident warning to the Information System Authority, then 72 hours for a fuller report, then one month for a final report. Trust service providers such as e-signature and certificate companies must send the fuller report inside 24 hours too. Missing the cyber deadline is punished separately from missing the privacy one.High confidence
- What's the trap?
- Six things that are not in the summary. (1) A child in Estonia is anyone under 13 for online services, not 16 as in much of Europe, so a consent flow tuned to Germany will over-block Estonian teenagers. (2) A dead person's data stays protected for 10 years after death, 20 if they died as a child, and the heirs control it. (3) Research on Estonians must be stripped of names BEFORE the data are handed over, an ethics committee must sign off sensitive projects, and you must name the individual who holds the key. (4) Data protection fines are handled like minor criminal charges, which makes them small but also drags a named human being into the process. (5) Since 1 January 2025 the regulator itself can sue you in court on behalf of a whole group of affected people. (6) Under the cyber law a named board member is personally responsible for security and must attend training.High confidence
- What's about to change?
- One near-term date stands out. Estonia's official gazette marks its own current texts of the privacy, public information, cybersecurity, telecoms, emergency, health services, health insurance and social welfare acts as valid only until 30 September 2026, so a further change starts on 1 October 2026. We could not identify the amending law, so treat that date as a hard diary entry. Beyond it, the cyber rules phase in: registration was due by 1 April 2026 and full compliance is due by 1 January 2029. From 12 January 2027 European rules make cloud switching and data export charges free.Medium confidence
- Hardest industry wall
- Telecoms — Elektroonilise side seadus (ESS), § 111-1
Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active
- In one paragraph
- Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
- The catch
- The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
- Does this apply to me?
- Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
- Can the data leave the country?
- Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
- What do I have to do to send it abroad?
- Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
- Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
- The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
- How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
- There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
- What happens when something goes wrong?
- For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
- What's the trap?
- Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
- What's about to change?
- Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
- Hardest industry wall
- None found.