Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

GermanyChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Contrary to widespread belief, neither Europe nor Germany requires personal data to be stored in Europe. What the law requires is a valid legal instrument before data leaves — an official decision that the destination is safe enough, or a standard contract, plus a documented risk assessment. Germany then adds its own layer on top, and one genuine hard wall: health and social data may only be processed in the cloud within Europe, by a provider holding a specific German security certificate.
The catch: 'Germany doesn't require local storage' is true right up until you sell to a hospital, a health insurer, a doctor, a lawyer or a tax adviser. In health and social care it is simply false, and for the professional-secrecy trades a standard data processing agreement is not enough and getting it wrong is a criminal matter.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Germany. Europe's privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Europe or monitors their behaviour. If you have no European establishment you must also appoint a representative inside Europe.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes — with paperwork. This is the single most misunderstood point in the field. European law does not say where data must sit; it says what you must have in place before it leaves Europe. Storage location is a risk factor in that assessment, never a prohibition. For non-personal data, Europe goes further and actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: One of three routes. Best case, the destination is on Europe's official 'adequate' list and you need nothing extra — currently 17 entries including the UK, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, Canada for commercial bodies, Brazil since January 2026, and the United States but only for companies self-certified under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. Otherwise you sign Europe's standard contract clauses, or get group-wide internal rules approved. In either of those two cases you must also document an assessment of whether the destination country's surveillance laws undermine the protection.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: Eighteen separate authorities, and for a private company it is almost never the federal one. Each of the 16 states has its own regulator, and you answer to the one where your German office is. The federal regulator handles government bodies plus telecoms and postal operators. Bavaria splits it further, with different bodies for private and public sector. If you operate across Europe, a separate rule lets you deal mainly with the regulator where your main European establishment sits.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Business records have a floor: accounting vouchers must be kept 8 years (cut from 10 with effect from 2025, and from 2026 for banks and insurers), the annual accounts and trading books still 10 years, and business correspondence 6 years. Privacy law pushes the other way — don't keep personal data longer than you need it. Where the two collide, German law has an elegant answer: you restrict processing of the data instead of deleting it.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: 72 hours to tell your state regulator about a personal data breach, and without undue delay to tell affected people where the risk to them is high. Separately, since December 2025 Germany's cybersecurity law adds its own clocks for around 29,500 in-scope companies: a first warning within 24 hours, an update at 72 hours, and a full report within a month. Financial firms follow a separate European regime instead.High confidence
What's the trap?: Four. (1) Health and social data really does have to stay in Europe, with a specific German security certificate — the general 'no localisation' answer is wrong here. (2) For doctors, lawyers, tax advisers and notaries, a standard data processing agreement is NOT enough: you need explicit secrecy undertakings flowed down to every subcontractor, and breach is a criminal offence, not a fine. (3) Germany still requires a data protection officer at just 20 employees involved in data processing — far stricter than European law, and still in force despite a government promise to scrap it by the end of 2026. (4) The German rule people cite for employee data was effectively struck down by Europe's top court in 2023 but never removed from the statute book, so citing it as your legal basis is a mistake.High confidence
What's about to change?: Two hard dates and one live risk. From 12 January 2027 every cloud provider must drop switching and data egress fees to zero — renegotiate contracts now. By 31 December 2026 Germany's banking IT rulebook is fully withdrawn in favour of the European financial regime. The live risk is the US arrangement: Europe's data protection board formally asked the Commission on 31 July 2026 to review whether it is still valid, and a separate court appeal is pending. If it falls, thousands of transfers move to standard contracts overnight.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — § 393 SGB V — Cloud-Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen
Telecoms — §§ 175–181 TKG — Vorratsdatenspeicherung

ChinaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: Very highEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Data can leave China, but only through one of three official gates: a government security review, a government-written contract you file with the regulator, or a certificate from an approved body. Which gate you need depends on how many people's data you move, not on where you send it. Small exporters are exempt. Several industries are walled off entirely.
The catch: The 'paperwork, then it can go' answer is only true for ordinary companies. Payment firms, credit bureaus, hospitals, genetic labs, online map services, telecom and industrial operators, and anything the government labels critical national infrastructure must keep the data in China. In those areas a copy staying behind is not optional.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. China's privacy law reaches a company with no office and no staff in China if it offers goods or services to people in China, or analyses their behaviour. There is no revenue or headcount threshold that lets you out. If you are caught this way, you must set up a dedicated office in China or name a representative there, and give the regulator their details.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general yes, once you clear the right gate — but the gate is set by volume, not by destination. China has no list of banned or approved countries. Below 100,000 people a year you can usually send data abroad with no filing at all. Above that you need a contract filed with the regulator or a certificate; above a million people, or if you hold data the state calls 'important', you need a full government security review. Then come the industry walls, which override all of this.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Three routes, and you do not get to pick freely — your volume picks for you. Route one is a government security review, run by the national internet regulator through your provincial office; an approval lasts three years and only covers the exact purpose, scope and method you declared. Route two is China's own standard contract, which you sign with the overseas recipient and file with the provincial regulator along with a risk assessment. Route three is a certificate from an accredited body, which since 1 March 2026 has a national standard behind it. You also need each person's separate, specific consent before their data goes abroad.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Cyberspace Administration of China leads, and it is fully staffed and busy. It runs a nationwide enforcement campaign every year, tests apps itself and publishes the names of the ones that fail, and puts out batches of worked enforcement cases. Police, the industry ministry and the market regulator enforce alongside it, and finance, health, mapping and securities regulators run their own rules. Fines are usually modest and paired with an order to fix things; the eye-watering penalties in the statute are rarely used.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply, and they pull against each other. The floor: network logs must be kept for at least six months, and accounting records have their own long minimum periods set by a national schedule. The ceiling: personal data may only be kept for the shortest time needed for the purpose you collected it for, and must be deleted once that purpose is met, the service ends, or consent is withdrawn. Where a law sets a minimum, that minimum wins over the delete duty — you keep the record and stop using it for anything else.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Three clocks, and they overlap. If you run critical national infrastructure you have ONE HOUR to report a serious incident to your supervising department and the police. Everyone else has four hours to tell the provincial internet office. On top of that, a network data incident that could harm national security or the public interest must be reported within 24 hours. You must also tell affected people immediately, by phone, text, message, email or public notice.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that ruin weekends. (1) Sending data abroad needs each person's separate, specific consent — a line buried in a global privacy notice will not do. (2) A child is anyone under 14, and their data is treated as sensitive, so you need a parent's consent and a separate set of processing rules. (3) You may not hand data stored in China to a foreign court, police force or regulator without Chinese government approval — this catches routine legal discovery and overseas audit requests. (4) You have to work out for yourself whether you hold 'important data' and report it, because the official catalogues are incomplete. (5) The widely repeated claim that all personal financial data must be stored in China does not appear where people think it does.High confidence
What's about to change?: The next twelve months are about size-based rules. A draft published on 7 August 2026 would create a heavy new tier for any company holding data on ten million people or more: store it in China, appoint a chief privacy officer, set up an outside supervision committee, publish an annual report and honour data portability requests within 30 working days. Comments closed on 7 September 2026 and it is not law yet. A companion draft going the other way would simplify life for small processors. Watch the dormant switches — several can flip with no consultation at all.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — 中华人民共和国网络安全法（2025年修正）
Payments — 非银行支付机构监督管理条例
Finance — 征信业务管理办法
Banking — 中国人民银行业务领域数据安全管理办法
Securities — 关于加强境内企业境外发行证券和上市相关保密和档案管理工作的规定
Health and social care — 国家健康医疗大数据标准、安全和服务管理办法（试行）
Mapping and location — 地图管理条例
Telecoms — 工业和信息化领域数据安全管理办法（试行）

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	GermanyChecked 18 August 2026	ChinaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: Very high Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Contrary to widespread belief, neither Europe nor Germany requires personal data to be stored in Europe. What the law requires is a valid legal instrument before data leaves — an official decision that the destination is safe enough, or a standard contract, plus a documented risk assessment. Germany then adds its own layer on top, and one genuine hard wall: health and social data may only be processed in the cloud within Europe, by a provider holding a specific German security certificate.	Data can leave China, but only through one of three official gates: a government security review, a government-written contract you file with the regulator, or a certificate from an approved body. Which gate you need depends on how many people's data you move, not on where you send it. Small exporters are exempt. Several industries are walled off entirely.
The catch	'Germany doesn't require local storage' is true right up until you sell to a hospital, a health insurer, a doctor, a lawyer or a tax adviser. In health and social care it is simply false, and for the professional-secrecy trades a standard data processing agreement is not enough and getting it wrong is a criminal matter.	The 'paperwork, then it can go' answer is only true for ordinary companies. Payment firms, credit bureaus, hospitals, genetic labs, online map services, telecom and industrial operators, and anything the government labels critical national infrastructure must keep the data in China. In those areas a copy staying behind is not optional.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Germany. Europe's privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Europe or monitors their behaviour. If you have no European establishment you must also appoint a representative inside Europe.High confidence	Yes. China's privacy law reaches a company with no office and no staff in China if it offers goods or services to people in China, or analyses their behaviour. There is no revenue or headcount threshold that lets you out. If you are caught this way, you must set up a dedicated office in China or name a representative there, and give the regulator their details.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes — with paperwork. This is the single most misunderstood point in the field. European law does not say where data must sit; it says what you must have in place before it leaves Europe. Storage location is a risk factor in that assessment, never a prohibition. For non-personal data, Europe goes further and actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules.High confidence	In general yes, once you clear the right gate — but the gate is set by volume, not by destination. China has no list of banned or approved countries. Below 100,000 people a year you can usually send data abroad with no filing at all. Above that you need a contract filed with the regulator or a certificate; above a million people, or if you hold data the state calls 'important', you need a full government security review. Then come the industry walls, which override all of this.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	One of three routes. Best case, the destination is on Europe's official 'adequate' list and you need nothing extra — currently 17 entries including the UK, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, Canada for commercial bodies, Brazil since January 2026, and the United States but only for companies self-certified under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. Otherwise you sign Europe's standard contract clauses, or get group-wide internal rules approved. In either of those two cases you must also document an assessment of whether the destination country's surveillance laws undermine the protection.High confidence	Three routes, and you do not get to pick freely — your volume picks for you. Route one is a government security review, run by the national internet regulator through your provincial office; an approval lasts three years and only covers the exact purpose, scope and method you declared. Route two is China's own standard contract, which you sign with the overseas recipient and file with the provincial regulator along with a risk assessment. Route three is a certificate from an accredited body, which since 1 March 2026 has a national standard behind it. You also need each person's separate, specific consent before their data goes abroad.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	Eighteen separate authorities, and for a private company it is almost never the federal one. Each of the 16 states has its own regulator, and you answer to the one where your German office is. The federal regulator handles government bodies plus telecoms and postal operators. Bavaria splits it further, with different bodies for private and public sector. If you operate across Europe, a separate rule lets you deal mainly with the regulator where your main European establishment sits.High confidence	The Cyberspace Administration of China leads, and it is fully staffed and busy. It runs a nationwide enforcement campaign every year, tests apps itself and publishes the names of the ones that fail, and puts out batches of worked enforcement cases. Police, the industry ministry and the market regulator enforce alongside it, and finance, health, mapping and securities regulators run their own rules. Fines are usually modest and paired with an order to fix things; the eye-watering penalties in the statute are rarely used.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Business records have a floor: accounting vouchers must be kept 8 years (cut from 10 with effect from 2025, and from 2026 for banks and insurers), the annual accounts and trading books still 10 years, and business correspondence 6 years. Privacy law pushes the other way — don't keep personal data longer than you need it. Where the two collide, German law has an elegant answer: you restrict processing of the data instead of deleting it.High confidence	Both directions apply, and they pull against each other. The floor: network logs must be kept for at least six months, and accounting records have their own long minimum periods set by a national schedule. The ceiling: personal data may only be kept for the shortest time needed for the purpose you collected it for, and must be deleted once that purpose is met, the service ends, or consent is withdrawn. Where a law sets a minimum, that minimum wins over the delete duty — you keep the record and stop using it for anything else.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	72 hours to tell your state regulator about a personal data breach, and without undue delay to tell affected people where the risk to them is high. Separately, since December 2025 Germany's cybersecurity law adds its own clocks for around 29,500 in-scope companies: a first warning within 24 hours, an update at 72 hours, and a full report within a month. Financial firms follow a separate European regime instead.High confidence	Three clocks, and they overlap. If you run critical national infrastructure you have ONE HOUR to report a serious incident to your supervising department and the police. Everyone else has four hours to tell the provincial internet office. On top of that, a network data incident that could harm national security or the public interest must be reported within 24 hours. You must also tell affected people immediately, by phone, text, message, email or public notice.High confidence
What's the trap?	Four. (1) Health and social data really does have to stay in Europe, with a specific German security certificate — the general 'no localisation' answer is wrong here. (2) For doctors, lawyers, tax advisers and notaries, a standard data processing agreement is NOT enough: you need explicit secrecy undertakings flowed down to every subcontractor, and breach is a criminal offence, not a fine. (3) Germany still requires a data protection officer at just 20 employees involved in data processing — far stricter than European law, and still in force despite a government promise to scrap it by the end of 2026. (4) The German rule people cite for employee data was effectively struck down by Europe's top court in 2023 but never removed from the statute book, so citing it as your legal basis is a mistake.High confidence	Five things that ruin weekends. (1) Sending data abroad needs each person's separate, specific consent — a line buried in a global privacy notice will not do. (2) A child is anyone under 14, and their data is treated as sensitive, so you need a parent's consent and a separate set of processing rules. (3) You may not hand data stored in China to a foreign court, police force or regulator without Chinese government approval — this catches routine legal discovery and overseas audit requests. (4) You have to work out for yourself whether you hold 'important data' and report it, because the official catalogues are incomplete. (5) The widely repeated claim that all personal financial data must be stored in China does not appear where people think it does.High confidence
What's about to change?	Two hard dates and one live risk. From 12 January 2027 every cloud provider must drop switching and data egress fees to zero — renegotiate contracts now. By 31 December 2026 Germany's banking IT rulebook is fully withdrawn in favour of the European financial regime. The live risk is the US arrangement: Europe's data protection board formally asked the Commission on 31 July 2026 to review whether it is still valid, and a separate court appeal is pending. If it falls, thousands of transfers move to standard contracts overnight.High confidence	The next twelve months are about size-based rules. A draft published on 7 August 2026 would create a heavy new tier for any company holding data on ten million people or more: store it in China, appoint a chief privacy officer, set up an outside supervision committee, publish an annual report and honour data portability requests within 30 working days. Comments closed on 7 September 2026 and it is not law yet. A companion draft going the other way would simplify life for small processors. Watch the dormant switches — several can flip with no consultation at all.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Health and social care — § 393 SGB V — Cloud-Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen Telecoms — §§ 175–181 TKG — Vorratsdatenspeicherung	All industries — 中华人民共和国网络安全法（2025年修正） Payments — 非银行支付机构监督管理条例 Finance — 征信业务管理办法 Banking — 中国人民银行业务领域数据安全管理办法 Securities — 关于加强境内企业境外发行证券和上市相关保密和档案管理工作的规定 Health and social care — 国家健康医疗大数据标准、安全和服务管理办法（试行） Mapping and location — 地图管理条例 Telecoms — 工业和信息化领域数据安全管理办法（试行）