Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'

UzbekistanChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Uzbekistan used to say that data about its citizens had to sit on machines inside the country. In March 2026 it dropped that blanket rule. Most personal data may now be stored abroad if the destination country is on a new government approved list, or you use an approved contract, or you meet international standards. Three kinds of data still cannot leave at all.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops at three walls. Face and fingerprint data, genetic data, and data about customers of telephone and internet companies must be kept inside Uzbekistan. Banks face a separate rule that bans handing the running of their systems to an outside supplier, which blocks most managed cloud arrangements. Detailed maps are handled under state-secrecy rules.
Does this apply to me?: The law is written to cover the handling of personal data whatever tools are used, and it was aimed at foreign online platforms when the storage rules were first tightened in 2021. It does not set a size or revenue threshold, so a small foreign company is treated the same as a large one. We found no clear wording that forces a foreign company to appoint a representative living in Uzbekistan, and no explicit sentence saying the law follows the data outside the country.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Mostly yes, but only if you can point to one of three permissions. Face and fingerprint data, genetic data, and data about customers of telephone and internet companies must stay in Uzbekistan. Everything else may be stored and processed abroad if the destination country is on the government's approved list, or you sign an approved standard contract or use approved group rules, or you follow recognised international data standards.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved list. Before ordinary personal data leaves the country you need one of three things: the destination is on the Cabinet of Ministers' list of countries with adequate protection, or you use the standard contract terms or group rules approved by the data authority, or you meet recognised international data standards. The country list was signed on 29 July 2026 and started on 3 August 2026, so it is brand new. We could not read which countries are on it, and no approved standard contract template appears to have been published yet.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The data regulator is the State Centre for Personalization, which sits under the Cabinet of Ministers. It keeps the national register of personal data databases and can issue orders that companies and individuals must obey. It is a working government body and the registration service has run since 2020, but we found no published fines or decisions, so treat enforcement as waking up rather than active. Cyber incidents are handled by a different body, the State Security Service, and banks answer separately to the Central Bank.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The ceiling is clear: personal data must be destroyed once the purpose is achieved, once consent is withdrawn, once the agreed period ends, or when a court orders it. The floor is thinner. Organisations covered by the cybersecurity law must keep backup copies covering at least the last three months. We did not verify the general tax and accounting minimum keeping periods during this run, so plan on the usual company record rules as well.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are two clocks and they are not the same. The privacy law itself contains no duty to report a data breach to the regulator or to the people affected — we checked the text on 18 August 2026 and found none. The cybersecurity law is where reporting lives: organisations covered by it must tell the State Security Service about cyber incidents. Banks also report to the Central Bank under its security rules. We could not confirm a firm deadline in hours for any of these.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: First, every database of personal data has to be entered in a national register — it is a notification, it is free and it takes five working days, but skipping it is still a breach. Second, breaking the personal data rules can be a crime, not just a fine, so a named person can be prosecuted. Third, the face and fingerprint wall catches ordinary products like fingerprint logins and identity checks, not just spy technology. Fourth, banks are banned from handing the running of their technology and security systems to an outside supplier, which rules out most managed cloud and outsourced security operations. Fifth, the standard contract route for sending data abroad exists on paper but no approved template appears to have been published.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: The big change already happened in March 2026 and the follow-up is still landing. The approved country list started on 3 August 2026 and can be widened or cut by the Cabinet of Ministers at any time. The approved standard contract for sending data abroad is still missing, so watch for it. A new Tashkent International Financial Centre opened its legal regime on 25 July 2026 and its law also touched the privacy law, which may create a separate rulebook inside the centre. A national cybersecurity strategy was signed in March 2026.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: All industries — Закон «О персональных данных», статья 27-1, часть 2
Telecoms — Закон «О персональных данных», статья 27-1, часть 2 (данные пользователей услуг операторов телекоммуникаций)
Finance — Кредит бюроларининг ахборот хавфсизлиги ва киберхавфсизлигига доир минимал талаблар тўғрисидаги низом
Mapping and location — Положение о порядке установления ограничительных грифов картографических и геодезических материалов (данных)
Government — О мерах по организации деятельности Центра обработки данных системы «Электронное правительство»

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026	UzbekistanChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Waking up
In one paragraph	Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.	Uzbekistan used to say that data about its citizens had to sit on machines inside the country. In March 2026 it dropped that blanket rule. Most personal data may now be stored abroad if the destination country is on a new government approved list, or you use an approved contract, or you meet international standards. Three kinds of data still cannot leave at all.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.	The relaxed headline stops at three walls. Face and fingerprint data, genetic data, and data about customers of telephone and internet companies must be kept inside Uzbekistan. Banks face a separate rule that bans handing the running of their systems to an outside supplier, which blocks most managed cloud arrangements. Detailed maps are handled under state-secrecy rules.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence	The law is written to cover the handling of personal data whatever tools are used, and it was aimed at foreign online platforms when the storage rules were first tightened in 2021. It does not set a size or revenue threshold, so a small foreign company is treated the same as a large one. We found no clear wording that forces a foreign company to appoint a representative living in Uzbekistan, and no explicit sentence saying the law follows the data outside the country.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence	Mostly yes, but only if you can point to one of three permissions. Face and fingerprint data, genetic data, and data about customers of telephone and internet companies must stay in Uzbekistan. Everything else may be stored and processed abroad if the destination country is on the government's approved list, or you sign an approved standard contract or use approved group rules, or you follow recognised international data standards.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence	The model is an approved list. Before ordinary personal data leaves the country you need one of three things: the destination is on the Cabinet of Ministers' list of countries with adequate protection, or you use the standard contract terms or group rules approved by the data authority, or you meet recognised international data standards. The country list was signed on 29 July 2026 and started on 3 August 2026, so it is brand new. We could not read which countries are on it, and no approved standard contract template appears to have been published yet.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence	The data regulator is the State Centre for Personalization, which sits under the Cabinet of Ministers. It keeps the national register of personal data databases and can issue orders that companies and individuals must obey. It is a working government body and the registration service has run since 2020, but we found no published fines or decisions, so treat enforcement as waking up rather than active. Cyber incidents are handled by a different body, the State Security Service, and banks answer separately to the Central Bank.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence	The ceiling is clear: personal data must be destroyed once the purpose is achieved, once consent is withdrawn, once the agreed period ends, or when a court orders it. The floor is thinner. Organisations covered by the cybersecurity law must keep backup copies covering at least the last three months. We did not verify the general tax and accounting minimum keeping periods during this run, so plan on the usual company record rules as well.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence	There are two clocks and they are not the same. The privacy law itself contains no duty to report a data breach to the regulator or to the people affected — we checked the text on 18 August 2026 and found none. The cybersecurity law is where reporting lives: organisations covered by it must tell the State Security Service about cyber incidents. Banks also report to the Central Bank under its security rules. We could not confirm a firm deadline in hours for any of these.Medium confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence	First, every database of personal data has to be entered in a national register — it is a notification, it is free and it takes five working days, but skipping it is still a breach. Second, breaking the personal data rules can be a crime, not just a fine, so a named person can be prosecuted. Third, the face and fingerprint wall catches ordinary products like fingerprint logins and identity checks, not just spy technology. Fourth, banks are banned from handing the running of their technology and security systems to an outside supplier, which rules out most managed cloud and outsourced security operations. Fifth, the standard contract route for sending data abroad exists on paper but no approved template appears to have been published.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence	The big change already happened in March 2026 and the follow-up is still landing. The approved country list started on 3 August 2026 and can be widened or cut by the Cabinet of Ministers at any time. The approved standard contract for sending data abroad is still missing, so watch for it. A new Tashkent International Financial Centre opened its legal regime on 25 July 2026 and its law also touched the privacy law, which may create a separate rulebook inside the centre. A national cybersecurity strategy was signed in March 2026.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV) Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'	All industries — Закон «О персональных данных», статья 27-1, часть 2 Telecoms — Закон «О персональных данных», статья 27-1, часть 2 (данные пользователей услуг операторов телекоммуникаций) Finance — Кредит бюроларининг ахборот хавфсизлиги ва киберхавфсизлигига доир минимал талаблар тўғрисидаги низом Mapping and location — Положение о порядке установления ограничительных грифов картографических и геодезических материалов (данных) Government — О мерах по организации деятельности Центра обработки данных системы «Электронное правительство»