Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'

SlovakiaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Slovakia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. It runs on the European rulebook: send data abroad once you have the right paperwork. Three areas break that rule. Online gambling servers must sit on Slovak soil. The most sensitive government data must stay in a Slovak data centre. And anyone who takes aerial survey pictures of Slovakia must hand a copy to a defence ministry archive.
The catch: The easy answer stops being true in three places. First, online gambling: the operator's server must be physically in Slovakia, with no European Economic Area alternative. Second, government cloud: a public body handling the top security category of data may only use a service that stores and processes it inside Slovakia, in a data centre within reach of the Slovak state. Third, mapping: primary aerial survey imagery and published maps must be deposited with Slovak state archives, including one run by the Ministry of Defence. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, health and telecoms have no storage-location rule that we could find.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. A company with no office in Slovakia is still caught if it offers goods or services to people in Slovakia, or watches what they do online. There is no minimum size, headcount or revenue below which you are safe. If you have no office anywhere in the European Union, you must name a written representative inside the Union, and you can put that person in any member state where your customers are — it does not have to be Slovakia.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes — with the standard European paperwork. Nothing in Slovak law says personal data must be kept in Slovakia, and the law says so almost in as many words: it applies to a Slovak company whether it processes data inside or outside the country. But three specific activities do force data to stay. Online gambling operators must put their server in Slovakia. The top security tier of government data must stay in a Slovak data centre. And aerial survey imagery of Slovakia must be handed to a state archive.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Slovakia uses the European model, and it is an allowlist. Data may go to a country the European Commission has approved, or to anywhere else if you sign the Commission's standard contract, use approved group-wide rules, or fit one of a few narrow exceptions. The approved list is real and populated — it includes the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, Canada for commercial bodies, and the United States only for companies signed up to the transatlantic framework. Slovakia adds nothing of its own on top.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office for Personal Data Protection of the Slovak Republic. It is real, staffed and busy. In 2025 it issued 542 final fines totalling about 468,000 euros (roughly $510,000) and actually collected about 411,000 euros of that — a very high number of fines but a very small average, about 860 euros each. It has around 60 staff and got 20 extra posts in 2025. Cybersecurity incidents go to a separate body, the National Security Authority.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is no single retention rule. The general privacy rule is to delete when you no longer need the data. Against that sit long minimum-keeping duties: ten years for accounts and financial statements, and up to one hundred years after death for entries in the national health registers. Telecom companies keep far less than most people assume — Slovakia scrapped blanket call-record retention after its Constitutional Court struck it down, so operators only retain what a court order covers.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There are two clocks and they are different. A personal data breach goes to the privacy authority within 72 hours of you becoming aware of it, and to the affected people without undue delay if the risk to them is high. A cybersecurity incident at a regulated organisation goes to the National Security Authority twice: a first warning within 24 hours, then a fuller report within 72 hours. If you are both, you file both, to two different bodies.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. Public bodies can be fined the full amount, with no discount. Mishandling personal data you got through your job is a crime, not just a fine. The age of consent for online services is 16, not 13. The rule on dead people's data changed today. And the gambling server rule has no European workaround.High confidence
What's about to change?: The whole national privacy law is being replaced by two new laws — one general, one for police and courts — but they are still bills and have no legal effect. Act 18/2018 was amended today, 18 August 2026, mostly to remove dead people from its scope. Public bodies face a bigger data-registration duty from 1 January 2027, and all cloud switching and data export fees across Europe must drop to zero by 12 January 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Online gaming — Zákon č. 30/2019 Z. z. o hazardných hrách a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov, § 14 ods. 21 a 22
Government — Metodické usmernenie č. 020775/2025/oSBATA z 11. 4. 2025 pre proces zaradenia cloudovej služby do katalógu vládnych cloudových služieb, vydané podľa § 24a zákona č. 95/2019 Z. z.
Mapping and location — Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 215/1995 Z. z. o geodézii a kartografii

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026	SlovakiaChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.	Slovakia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. It runs on the European rulebook: send data abroad once you have the right paperwork. Three areas break that rule. Online gambling servers must sit on Slovak soil. The most sensitive government data must stay in a Slovak data centre. And anyone who takes aerial survey pictures of Slovakia must hand a copy to a defence ministry archive.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.	The easy answer stops being true in three places. First, online gambling: the operator's server must be physically in Slovakia, with no European Economic Area alternative. Second, government cloud: a public body handling the top security category of data may only use a service that stores and processes it inside Slovakia, in a data centre within reach of the Slovak state. Third, mapping: primary aerial survey imagery and published maps must be deposited with Slovak state archives, including one run by the Ministry of Defence. Banking, payments, insurance, securities, health and telecoms have no storage-location rule that we could find.
Does this apply to me?	Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence	Yes. A company with no office in Slovakia is still caught if it offers goods or services to people in Slovakia, or watches what they do online. There is no minimum size, headcount or revenue below which you are safe. If you have no office anywhere in the European Union, you must name a written representative inside the Union, and you can put that person in any member state where your customers are — it does not have to be Slovakia.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence	In general, yes — with the standard European paperwork. Nothing in Slovak law says personal data must be kept in Slovakia, and the law says so almost in as many words: it applies to a Slovak company whether it processes data inside or outside the country. But three specific activities do force data to stay. Online gambling operators must put their server in Slovakia. The top security tier of government data must stay in a Slovak data centre. And aerial survey imagery of Slovakia must be handed to a state archive.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence	Slovakia uses the European model, and it is an allowlist. Data may go to a country the European Commission has approved, or to anywhere else if you sign the Commission's standard contract, use approved group-wide rules, or fit one of a few narrow exceptions. The approved list is real and populated — it includes the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, Canada for commercial bodies, and the United States only for companies signed up to the transatlantic framework. Slovakia adds nothing of its own on top.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence	The Office for Personal Data Protection of the Slovak Republic. It is real, staffed and busy. In 2025 it issued 542 final fines totalling about 468,000 euros (roughly $510,000) and actually collected about 411,000 euros of that — a very high number of fines but a very small average, about 860 euros each. It has around 60 staff and got 20 extra posts in 2025. Cybersecurity incidents go to a separate body, the National Security Authority.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence	There is no single retention rule. The general privacy rule is to delete when you no longer need the data. Against that sit long minimum-keeping duties: ten years for accounts and financial statements, and up to one hundred years after death for entries in the national health registers. Telecom companies keep far less than most people assume — Slovakia scrapped blanket call-record retention after its Constitutional Court struck it down, so operators only retain what a court order covers.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence	There are two clocks and they are different. A personal data breach goes to the privacy authority within 72 hours of you becoming aware of it, and to the affected people without undue delay if the risk to them is high. A cybersecurity incident at a regulated organisation goes to the National Security Authority twice: a first warning within 24 hours, then a fuller report within 72 hours. If you are both, you file both, to two different bodies.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. Public bodies can be fined the full amount, with no discount. Mishandling personal data you got through your job is a crime, not just a fine. The age of consent for online services is 16, not 13. The rule on dead people's data changed today. And the gambling server rule has no European workaround.High confidence
What's about to change?	Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence	The whole national privacy law is being replaced by two new laws — one general, one for police and courts — but they are still bills and have no legal effect. Act 18/2018 was amended today, 18 August 2026, mostly to remove dead people from its scope. Public bodies face a bigger data-registration duty from 1 January 2027, and all cloud switching and data export fees across Europe must drop to zero by 12 January 2027.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV) Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'	Online gaming — Zákon č. 30/2019 Z. z. o hazardných hrách a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov, § 14 ods. 21 a 22 Government — Metodické usmernenie č. 020775/2025/oSBATA z 11. 4. 2025 pre proces zaradenia cloudovej služby do katalógu vládnych cloudových služieb, vydané podľa § 24a zákona č. 95/2019 Z. z. Mapping and location — Zákon Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky č. 215/1995 Z. z. o geodézii a kartografii