Compare countries
Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.
SwitzerlandChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active
- In one paragraph
- Switzerland is easy to send data out of, as long as the destination is one the government trusts. An official list names about 44 approved places, including every European Union country and United States firms in one certification scheme. Anywhere else, you sign an approved contract first. The sting is elsewhere: getting it wrong is a crime, and the case lands on a person, not the company.
- The catch
- The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch three areas. Electronic patient record data must physically sit in Switzerland. Banking client data is protected by a criminal secrecy law with a three-year prison ceiling. Doctors, lawyers, notaries, pharmacists, psychologists and nurses are under a near-identical criminal secrecy rule, and a normal supplier contract does not cure it. Financial market infrastructures also need the regulator's permission before outsourcing anything important.
- Does this apply to me?
- Yes. Swiss privacy law reaches any organisation whose activities have an effect in Switzerland, even one with no office, staff or company here. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to duck under, and there is no register to sign up to. You only need a named representative inside Switzerland if four things are true at once: you are selling to people here or watching what they do, you are doing it on a large scale, you are doing it regularly, and the processing is high risk for the people involved. Very few foreign companies meet all four.High confidence
- Can the data leave the country?
- In general, yes. Switzerland publishes an official list of countries and territories it considers safe, and data can move to any of them with no extra paperwork. The list has about 44 entries. It covers all 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Uruguay and New Zealand. It covers the United States only for companies signed up to one specific certification scheme. Japan is not on it, even though the European Union treats Japan as safe. For anywhere not on the list, you sign an approved contract first. But three industries override this completely, and one of them is an outright ban.High confidence
- What do I have to do to send it abroad?
- The model is an approved-destinations list, and it is well populated: about 44 countries, territories and one sector-specific entry are on it right now. Send data to a listed place and you need nothing at all. Send it anywhere else and you need one of a short menu of safeguards, the most common being a standard contract. Switzerland has formally accepted the European Union's standard contract template, so most companies can reuse the paperwork they already have.High confidence
- Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
- The main regulator is the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner. It is real, fully staffed and busy: in the year to 31 March 2026 it ran 156 low-level interventions, 22 preliminary enquiries and 9 formal investigations, and it had 2 cases running in the Federal Administrative Court. It has issued binding orders against a bank, a debt collection firm and a fashion group, and in October 2025 the court confirmed its new way of working. The catch is that this regulator cannot fine anyone. Fines under the privacy law are criminal, they are handed out by cantonal prosecutors, and they land on individual people.High confidence
- How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
- Both directions apply and they pull against each other. The floor: business books, accounting records and audit reports must be kept for ten years. Financial market infrastructures keep their records ten years, trade repositories keep trade data ten years after the contract matures, electronic patient record access logs are kept ten years, and telecoms companies keep connection records for six months. The ceiling: the privacy law says personal data must be destroyed or made anonymous as soon as it is no longer needed. There is no fixed number. Where the two clash, the specific legal duty to keep wins.High confidence
- What happens when something goes wrong?
- Count four clocks, not one. The privacy regulator must be told 'as quickly as possible' when a breach is likely to put people at serious risk, with no number of hours attached. If you run critical infrastructure, you have a hard 24 hours to tell the national cyber security office. If you are supervised by the financial regulator, you have 24 hours to notify your supervisor and 72 hours to file the full report. Electronic patient record communities have to report security incidents to the health office. Most failures come from teams who set a single deadline and miss the others.High confidence
- What's the trap?
- Five things that are not in the summary. One: the penalty is a criminal fine on a named human being, not an administrative fine on the company, so your compliance lead is personally exposed. Two: sending data abroad without a valid safeguard is itself a crime. Three: banking secrecy and medical or legal secrecy are criminal laws with prison ceilings, and a standard supplier contract does not fix them. Four: cantonal authorities and cantonal hospitals are outside the federal law entirely. Five: the 24-hour cyber report has no penalty for being late, which misleads people into thinking it is optional.High confidence
- What's about to change?
- Nothing in the next twelve months changes where Swiss data may be stored. The electronic identity law has passed but is not switched on yet, and the financial regulator is holding a rule change until it is. A company transparency law hits banks on 1 October 2026. A rewrite of the telecoms surveillance rules has been announced for years and still has not landed. The bigger risk is not new legislation at all: the government can rewrite the approved-destinations list by itself, overnight, with no vote and no consultation.Medium confidence
- Hardest industry wall
- Health and social care — Verordnung ueber das elektronische Patientendossier (EPDV)
- Finance — FINMA-Rundschreiben 2018/3 'Outsourcing - Banken, Versicherungsunternehmen und ausgewaehlte Finanzinstitute nach FINIG'
IndiaChecked 18 August 2026
Depends on your industryWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up
- In one paragraph
- India's general privacy law is unusually relaxed about sending data abroad — it bans transfers only to countries on a government blacklist, and that blacklist is currently empty. But specific industries have hard walls: payments data, insurance records and telecom network data must stay inside India. The main law is passed but most of it only becomes enforceable in May 2027, and the regulator has no members yet.
- The catch
- The permissive headline is true only until you touch payments, insurance, telecom infrastructure, government cloud, public-health records or detailed mapping data. In those six areas India is one of the strictest jurisdictions in the world.
- Does this apply to me?
- Yes, it reaches you even with no office in India. The law applies to any organisation anywhere in the world that processes Indians' data in connection with offering goods or services to people in India. There is no size or revenue threshold to fall below.High confidence
- Can the data leave the country?
- In general, yes — freely. India's approach is a blacklist: the government may name countries you cannot send data to, and as of today it has named none. Six industries are the exception and are covered below.High confidence
- What do I have to do to send it abroad?
- Nothing to sign, no government approval, no standard contract. Unlike Europe, India requires no paperwork to send personal data abroad under the general law — the only question is whether the destination is on the blacklist, and nothing is. Sector rules override this completely.High confidence
- Who enforces this — and are they actually working?
- On paper, the Data Protection Board of India. In practice, nobody yet — the Board legally exists but as of August 2026 has no chairperson and no members. The government advertised the five posts in May 2026 and re-advertised in June, and they were still vacant in August. Sector regulators, by contrast, are fully active: the central bank, the insurance and securities regulators, the telecom department and the national cyber agency all enforce today.High confidence
- How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?
- There is both a floor and a ceiling. From May 2027 every organisation must keep processing logs for at least one year. Tax records run six years, company books eight, and security logs 180 days. In the other direction, large consumer platforms must delete a user's data three years after they last engaged — with 48 hours' warning to the user first.High confidence
- What happens when something goes wrong?
- Two clocks, and this trips up almost everyone. You have SIX HOURS to report a cyber incident to India's national cyber agency — one of the shortest deadlines in the world. Separately, from May 2027, you must tell the privacy regulator and affected individuals without delay, then file a detailed report within 72 hours.High confidence
- What's the trap?
- Four things that catch people out. (1) A child is anyone under 18 — there is no lower age of digital consent as there is in Europe, and targeted advertising to under-18s is banned outright. (2) A consent manager must be an Indian company with about $2.3m of net worth, so a foreign entity cannot be one. (3) If designated a 'significant' organisation you must have a data protection officer physically based in India who answers to the board. (4) The general law expressly preserves stricter sector rules, so its liberal transfer regime gives you nothing if you touch payments, insurance or telecom.High confidence
- What's about to change?
- Three dates matter. 13 November 2026: consent managers must register. 13 May 2027: the whole law becomes enforceable, and the government has publicly refused to extend it or exempt startups. At some point before then, the Board should get its members — at which point enforcement switches on.High confidence
- Hardest industry wall
- Payments — Storage of Payment System Data
- Telecoms — Telecommunications (Authorisation) Rules, 2026
- Insurance — IRDAI (Maintenance of Information by Regulated Entities and Sharing of Information by the Authority) Regulations, 2025
- Securities — Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework, control PR.DS.S2
- All industries — Directions under section 70B(6) of the Information Technology Act, 2000