Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

AzerbaijanChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Azerbaijan has had a personal data law since 2010. Data may leave the country, but only if you decide the destination protects it as well as Azerbaijan does, and you must declare those exports up front. The real cost is not the export rule. It is that you must register your database with the state before you collect a single record.
The catch: The easy-sounding export rule hides where the work actually is. Nothing may be collected until the system holding it sits on a state register, and the government's security rules are unusually specific, down to the encryption key length and where the archive building may stand. Banking and payments have no separate storage wall, but a new cybersecurity regime started in August 2026 and a social media law bites in 2027.
Does this apply to me?: The law is silent about foreign companies, and that silence is the answer. Unlike Europe's rules, Azerbaijan's personal data law has no clause reaching organisations abroad that sell to Azerbaijanis. What it does have is a duty on the 'owner' of a database to register it with the state before collecting anything, and that duty is enforced through the register in Baku. A foreign company with no Azerbaijani entity has no realistic way to register, and no regulator has said whether it must. From 2027 one narrow group of foreign firms is caught by name: social network providers offering services to users in Azerbaijan must set up a local branch or representative office.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with conditions, and the condition is a judgement call you make yourself. Azerbaijan bans sending personal data abroad in only two situations: where it would threaten national security, or where the destination country's law does not protect the data to the standard Azerbaijani law sets. Nobody publishes a list of good or bad countries, so you decide, and you carry the risk. If the person has consented, or if the transfer is needed to protect their life or health, the destination's standard stops mattering at all. We looked hard for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, telecoms and health and found none that force data to stay in the country.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no form to file and no approval to get. You need three things instead: a lawful basis for the processing in the first place, your own written assessment that the destination country protects the data well enough, and a declaration of the transfer in your entry on the state register. That last point is the one people miss. The registration form asks you to list the categories of personal data you send to other countries and to international organisations, so an undeclared export is also a registration failure.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: This changed three months ago. On 3 June 2026 the President abolished the Electronic Security Service and created the National Cybersecurity Agency in its place, under the Ministry of Digital Development and Transport, with express powers over personal data as well as cyber security. The agency is real and working: it runs the state register, takes complaints about data misuse through its website, publishes advisories most weeks, and signed a cooperation agreement with Latvia's data protection inspectorate in July 2026. It is not independent of government, and we found no published fines. The register itself is the strongest evidence it functions: 444 systems are listed and the most recent approval is dated 7 August 2026.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The ceiling is strict and the floor is thin. Once you have achieved the purpose you collected the data for, and there is no longer a need to keep it, you must destroy it without delay. If your registration is cancelled, everything in that system must be blocked immediately and destroyed. Sensitive data must go as soon as the reason for holding it disappears, unless the person agrees to it staying or being archived. In the other direction, the personal data law itself sets no minimum keeping period. The clearest floor we could verify is new: from 2026, records of a digital forensic investigation into a cyber incident must be kept for at least three years.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is no personal data breach notification duty at all. The 2010 law never created one, and nothing since has added one, so losing customer records triggers no report to any regulator and no letter to the people affected. What does exist is a cyber incident duty, and it is fast: since August 2026, organisations that run information infrastructure must pass information about cyber threats, attacks and incidents to the National CERT immediately. Once the National CERT asks you something, you have 24 hours to answer a threat research request and 5 working days to answer a digital investigation request. Financial firms have a second clock through the Central Bank's FinCERT portal.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. One: you cannot start. Collecting or processing personal data in an unregistered system is an offence, and registration takes up to a month. Two: the security rules are engineering specifications, not principles, and include a minimum 256-bit encryption key, a data centre archive system housed in a separate building, and state expert review of your system design documents. Three: every operator must set things up so that police and intelligence bodies can carry out surveillance, and must keep the methods secret. Four: the fine for breaking the data law is 300 to 500 manat, roughly 175 to 290 US dollars, which tells you the real risk is being ordered to stop, not being fined. Five: the law says data system work needs a special licence, and no licensing regime matching it appears to be running.High confidence
What's about to change?: One big date and one big gap. The big date is roughly August 2027, twelve months after publication, when Azerbaijan's minimum age of 16 for social network accounts starts. Providers must verify age using a bank card, an email address and a mobile number, must delete what they collected for that check immediately, and must open a local branch. The penalty ladder ends with a court ordering the platform's traffic in Azerbaijan cut by 90 per cent. The big gap is that the July 2026 cybersecurity law leaves the important lists and technical requirements to be written by ministries, and they are not out yet.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — “Hökumət buludu”nun (G-cloud) yaradılması və “bulud” xidmətlərinin göstərilməsi sahəsində tədbirlər haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin Fərmanı

ThailandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch: The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	AzerbaijanChecked 18 August 2026	ThailandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Waking up	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Azerbaijan has had a personal data law since 2010. Data may leave the country, but only if you decide the destination protects it as well as Azerbaijan does, and you must declare those exports up front. The real cost is not the export rule. It is that you must register your database with the state before you collect a single record.	Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch	The easy-sounding export rule hides where the work actually is. Nothing may be collected until the system holding it sits on a state register, and the government's security rules are unusually specific, down to the encryption key length and where the archive building may stand. Banking and payments have no separate storage wall, but a new cybersecurity regime started in August 2026 and a social media law bites in 2027.	The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?	The law is silent about foreign companies, and that silence is the answer. Unlike Europe's rules, Azerbaijan's personal data law has no clause reaching organisations abroad that sell to Azerbaijanis. What it does have is a duty on the 'owner' of a database to register it with the state before collecting anything, and that duty is enforced through the register in Baku. A foreign company with no Azerbaijani entity has no realistic way to register, and no regulator has said whether it must. From 2027 one narrow group of foreign firms is caught by name: social network providers offering services to users in Azerbaijan must set up a local branch or representative office.Medium confidence	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with conditions, and the condition is a judgement call you make yourself. Azerbaijan bans sending personal data abroad in only two situations: where it would threaten national security, or where the destination country's law does not protect the data to the standard Azerbaijani law sets. Nobody publishes a list of good or bad countries, so you decide, and you carry the risk. If the person has consented, or if the transfer is needed to protect their life or health, the destination's standard stops mattering at all. We looked hard for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, telecoms and health and found none that force data to stay in the country.High confidence	Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no form to file and no approval to get. You need three things instead: a lawful basis for the processing in the first place, your own written assessment that the destination country protects the data well enough, and a declaration of the transfer in your entry on the state register. That last point is the one people miss. The registration form asks you to list the categories of personal data you send to other countries and to international organisations, so an undeclared export is also a registration failure.High confidence	There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	This changed three months ago. On 3 June 2026 the President abolished the Electronic Security Service and created the National Cybersecurity Agency in its place, under the Ministry of Digital Development and Transport, with express powers over personal data as well as cyber security. The agency is real and working: it runs the state register, takes complaints about data misuse through its website, publishes advisories most weeks, and signed a cooperation agreement with Latvia's data protection inspectorate in July 2026. It is not independent of government, and we found no published fines. The register itself is the strongest evidence it functions: 444 systems are listed and the most recent approval is dated 7 August 2026.High confidence	The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	The ceiling is strict and the floor is thin. Once you have achieved the purpose you collected the data for, and there is no longer a need to keep it, you must destroy it without delay. If your registration is cancelled, everything in that system must be blocked immediately and destroyed. Sensitive data must go as soon as the reason for holding it disappears, unless the person agrees to it staying or being archived. In the other direction, the personal data law itself sets no minimum keeping period. The clearest floor we could verify is new: from 2026, records of a digital forensic investigation into a cyber incident must be kept for at least three years.Medium confidence	Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is no personal data breach notification duty at all. The 2010 law never created one, and nothing since has added one, so losing customer records triggers no report to any regulator and no letter to the people affected. What does exist is a cyber incident duty, and it is fast: since August 2026, organisations that run information infrastructure must pass information about cyber threats, attacks and incidents to the National CERT immediately. Once the National CERT asks you something, you have 24 hours to answer a threat research request and 5 working days to answer a digital investigation request. Financial firms have a second clock through the Central Bank's FinCERT portal.High confidence	Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five. One: you cannot start. Collecting or processing personal data in an unregistered system is an offence, and registration takes up to a month. Two: the security rules are engineering specifications, not principles, and include a minimum 256-bit encryption key, a data centre archive system housed in a separate building, and state expert review of your system design documents. Three: every operator must set things up so that police and intelligence bodies can carry out surveillance, and must keep the methods secret. Four: the fine for breaking the data law is 300 to 500 manat, roughly 175 to 290 US dollars, which tells you the real risk is being ordered to stop, not being fined. Five: the law says data system work needs a special licence, and no licensing regime matching it appears to be running.High confidence	Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?	One big date and one big gap. The big date is roughly August 2027, twelve months after publication, when Azerbaijan's minimum age of 16 for social network accounts starts. Providers must verify age using a bank card, an email address and a mobile number, must delete what they collected for that check immediately, and must open a local branch. The penalty ladder ends with a court ordering the platform's traffic in Azerbaijan cut by 90 per cent. The big gap is that the July 2026 cybersecurity law leaves the important lists and technical requirements to be written by ministries, and they are not out yet.High confidence	Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Government — “Hökumət buludu”nun (G-cloud) yaradılması və “bulud” xidmətlərinin göstərilməsi sahəsində tədbirlər haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin Fərmanı	None found.