Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

AzerbaijanChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Waking up

In one paragraph: Azerbaijan has had a personal data law since 2010. Data may leave the country, but only if you decide the destination protects it as well as Azerbaijan does, and you must declare those exports up front. The real cost is not the export rule. It is that you must register your database with the state before you collect a single record.
The catch: The easy-sounding export rule hides where the work actually is. Nothing may be collected until the system holding it sits on a state register, and the government's security rules are unusually specific, down to the encryption key length and where the archive building may stand. Banking and payments have no separate storage wall, but a new cybersecurity regime started in August 2026 and a social media law bites in 2027.
Does this apply to me?: The law is silent about foreign companies, and that silence is the answer. Unlike Europe's rules, Azerbaijan's personal data law has no clause reaching organisations abroad that sell to Azerbaijanis. What it does have is a duty on the 'owner' of a database to register it with the state before collecting anything, and that duty is enforced through the register in Baku. A foreign company with no Azerbaijani entity has no realistic way to register, and no regulator has said whether it must. From 2027 one narrow group of foreign firms is caught by name: social network providers offering services to users in Azerbaijan must set up a local branch or representative office.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with conditions, and the condition is a judgement call you make yourself. Azerbaijan bans sending personal data abroad in only two situations: where it would threaten national security, or where the destination country's law does not protect the data to the standard Azerbaijani law sets. Nobody publishes a list of good or bad countries, so you decide, and you carry the risk. If the person has consented, or if the transfer is needed to protect their life or health, the destination's standard stops mattering at all. We looked hard for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, telecoms and health and found none that force data to stay in the country.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no form to file and no approval to get. You need three things instead: a lawful basis for the processing in the first place, your own written assessment that the destination country protects the data well enough, and a declaration of the transfer in your entry on the state register. That last point is the one people miss. The registration form asks you to list the categories of personal data you send to other countries and to international organisations, so an undeclared export is also a registration failure.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: This changed three months ago. On 3 June 2026 the President abolished the Electronic Security Service and created the National Cybersecurity Agency in its place, under the Ministry of Digital Development and Transport, with express powers over personal data as well as cyber security. The agency is real and working: it runs the state register, takes complaints about data misuse through its website, publishes advisories most weeks, and signed a cooperation agreement with Latvia's data protection inspectorate in July 2026. It is not independent of government, and we found no published fines. The register itself is the strongest evidence it functions: 444 systems are listed and the most recent approval is dated 7 August 2026.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The ceiling is strict and the floor is thin. Once you have achieved the purpose you collected the data for, and there is no longer a need to keep it, you must destroy it without delay. If your registration is cancelled, everything in that system must be blocked immediately and destroyed. Sensitive data must go as soon as the reason for holding it disappears, unless the person agrees to it staying or being archived. In the other direction, the personal data law itself sets no minimum keeping period. The clearest floor we could verify is new: from 2026, records of a digital forensic investigation into a cyber incident must be kept for at least three years.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: There is no personal data breach notification duty at all. The 2010 law never created one, and nothing since has added one, so losing customer records triggers no report to any regulator and no letter to the people affected. What does exist is a cyber incident duty, and it is fast: since August 2026, organisations that run information infrastructure must pass information about cyber threats, attacks and incidents to the National CERT immediately. Once the National CERT asks you something, you have 24 hours to answer a threat research request and 5 working days to answer a digital investigation request. Financial firms have a second clock through the Central Bank's FinCERT portal.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five. One: you cannot start. Collecting or processing personal data in an unregistered system is an offence, and registration takes up to a month. Two: the security rules are engineering specifications, not principles, and include a minimum 256-bit encryption key, a data centre archive system housed in a separate building, and state expert review of your system design documents. Three: every operator must set things up so that police and intelligence bodies can carry out surveillance, and must keep the methods secret. Four: the fine for breaking the data law is 300 to 500 manat, roughly 175 to 290 US dollars, which tells you the real risk is being ordered to stop, not being fined. Five: the law says data system work needs a special licence, and no licensing regime matching it appears to be running.High confidence
What's about to change?: One big date and one big gap. The big date is roughly August 2027, twelve months after publication, when Azerbaijan's minimum age of 16 for social network accounts starts. Providers must verify age using a bank card, an email address and a mobile number, must delete what they collected for that check immediately, and must open a local branch. The penalty ladder ends with a court ordering the platform's traffic in Azerbaijan cut by 90 per cent. The big gap is that the July 2026 cybersecurity law leaves the important lists and technical requirements to be written by ministries, and they are not out yet.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — “Hökumət buludu”nun (G-cloud) yaradılması və “bulud” xidmətlərinin göstərilməsi sahəsində tədbirlər haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin Fərmanı

PolandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch: True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	AzerbaijanChecked 18 August 2026	PolandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Waking up	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Azerbaijan has had a personal data law since 2010. Data may leave the country, but only if you decide the destination protects it as well as Azerbaijan does, and you must declare those exports up front. The real cost is not the export rule. It is that you must register your database with the state before you collect a single record.	Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch	The easy-sounding export rule hides where the work actually is. Nothing may be collected until the system holding it sits on a state register, and the government's security rules are unusually specific, down to the encryption key length and where the archive building may stand. Banking and payments have no separate storage wall, but a new cybersecurity regime started in August 2026 and a social media law bites in 2027.	True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?	The law is silent about foreign companies, and that silence is the answer. Unlike Europe's rules, Azerbaijan's personal data law has no clause reaching organisations abroad that sell to Azerbaijanis. What it does have is a duty on the 'owner' of a database to register it with the state before collecting anything, and that duty is enforced through the register in Baku. A foreign company with no Azerbaijani entity has no realistic way to register, and no regulator has said whether it must. From 2027 one narrow group of foreign firms is caught by name: social network providers offering services to users in Azerbaijan must set up a local branch or representative office.Medium confidence	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with conditions, and the condition is a judgement call you make yourself. Azerbaijan bans sending personal data abroad in only two situations: where it would threaten national security, or where the destination country's law does not protect the data to the standard Azerbaijani law sets. Nobody publishes a list of good or bad countries, so you decide, and you carry the risk. If the person has consented, or if the transfer is needed to protect their life or health, the destination's standard stops mattering at all. We looked hard for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, telecoms and health and found none that force data to stay in the country.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	There is no form to file and no approval to get. You need three things instead: a lawful basis for the processing in the first place, your own written assessment that the destination country protects the data well enough, and a declaration of the transfer in your entry on the state register. That last point is the one people miss. The registration form asks you to list the categories of personal data you send to other countries and to international organisations, so an undeclared export is also a registration failure.High confidence	Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	This changed three months ago. On 3 June 2026 the President abolished the Electronic Security Service and created the National Cybersecurity Agency in its place, under the Ministry of Digital Development and Transport, with express powers over personal data as well as cyber security. The agency is real and working: it runs the state register, takes complaints about data misuse through its website, publishes advisories most weeks, and signed a cooperation agreement with Latvia's data protection inspectorate in July 2026. It is not independent of government, and we found no published fines. The register itself is the strongest evidence it functions: 444 systems are listed and the most recent approval is dated 7 August 2026.High confidence	The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	The ceiling is strict and the floor is thin. Once you have achieved the purpose you collected the data for, and there is no longer a need to keep it, you must destroy it without delay. If your registration is cancelled, everything in that system must be blocked immediately and destroyed. Sensitive data must go as soon as the reason for holding it disappears, unless the person agrees to it staying or being archived. In the other direction, the personal data law itself sets no minimum keeping period. The clearest floor we could verify is new: from 2026, records of a digital forensic investigation into a cyber incident must be kept for at least three years.Medium confidence	There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	There is no personal data breach notification duty at all. The 2010 law never created one, and nothing since has added one, so losing customer records triggers no report to any regulator and no letter to the people affected. What does exist is a cyber incident duty, and it is fast: since August 2026, organisations that run information infrastructure must pass information about cyber threats, attacks and incidents to the National CERT immediately. Once the National CERT asks you something, you have 24 hours to answer a threat research request and 5 working days to answer a digital investigation request. Financial firms have a second clock through the Central Bank's FinCERT portal.High confidence	Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?	Five. One: you cannot start. Collecting or processing personal data in an unregistered system is an offence, and registration takes up to a month. Two: the security rules are engineering specifications, not principles, and include a minimum 256-bit encryption key, a data centre archive system housed in a separate building, and state expert review of your system design documents. Three: every operator must set things up so that police and intelligence bodies can carry out surveillance, and must keep the methods secret. Four: the fine for breaking the data law is 300 to 500 manat, roughly 175 to 290 US dollars, which tells you the real risk is being ordered to stop, not being fined. Five: the law says data system work needs a special licence, and no licensing regime matching it appears to be running.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?	One big date and one big gap. The big date is roughly August 2027, twelve months after publication, when Azerbaijan's minimum age of 16 for social network accounts starts. Providers must verify age using a bank card, an email address and a mobile number, must delete what they collected for that check immediately, and must open a local branch. The penalty ladder ends with a court ordering the platform's traffic in Azerbaijan cut by 90 per cent. The big gap is that the July 2026 cybersecurity law leaves the important lists and technical requirements to be written by ministries, and they are not out yet.High confidence	Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Government — “Hökumət buludu”nun (G-cloud) yaradılması və “bulud” xidmətlərinin göstərilməsi sahəsində tədbirlər haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin Fərmanı	None found.