Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

AustraliaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Australia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. You may send personal information anywhere, and no destination is banned. The catch is that you stay legally responsible for whatever your overseas supplier does with it. Small businesses under A$3 million turnover are exempt from the main privacy law. Specific industries are far stricter, and one of them carries a prison sentence.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch six areas. National electronic health records may not leave Australia at all, and taking them offshore is a crime punishable by five years in prison. Banks and insurers must tell the banking regulator before any offshore arrangement. Open banking data, critical infrastructure data, Australian Government hosting and Queensland state government data each have their own rules. Check your sector before you believe the headline.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you even with no office in Australia. The national privacy law applies to any organisation that carries on business in Australia, whether or not the data is collected or stored here. But Australia has something most countries do not: a real size threshold you can fall below. A business with annual turnover of A$3 million (about US$2 million) or less is generally exempt. That exemption has big holes: it does not apply if you provide a health service, if you buy or sell personal information, or if you supply services under a federal government contract. No local representative and no registration are required.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Australia has no national law saying personal data must be kept in the country, and no country is blacklisted. You can pick any cloud region you like. What you cannot do is hand off the risk: if your overseas supplier does something with the data that would break Australian rules, the law treats that as your own breach. The hard walls are industry by industry, and the health one is absolute.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Before data leaves, you must take reasonable steps to make sure the overseas recipient will handle it the Australian way. In practice that means a contract with the right promises in it. There is no government form to file, no approval to wait for, and no list of approved countries to check. A power to approve countries was switched on in December 2024, but as of today the government has not named a single one. The alternative routes are narrow: you can rely on the recipient already being covered by a substantially similar law, or on the person's informed consent after you warn them you will no longer be responsible.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. It is staffed, it has a sitting Privacy Commissioner, and it is issuing decisions. In October 2025 the Federal Court ordered a pathology company to pay A$5.8 million (about US$3.8 million), the first court penalty in the law's history. The regulator sued Optus in August 2025, settled with Meta for A$50 million in December 2024, and in June 2026 alone published formal findings against Optus, American Express and two health providers. Banking, cyber security, online safety and open banking each have their own separate regulator, and all of them are working.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and a ceiling and they pull in opposite directions. The clearest floor is telecoms: phone and internet providers must keep call and connection records for two years, and must encrypt them. The general ceiling has no number attached — you must destroy or de-identify personal information once you genuinely no longer need it. Two ceilings are sharp. A social media platform must destroy age-check information as soon as it has finished using it. A digital identity provider must destroy a face or fingerprint scan immediately after the identity check is complete.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, because they run at different speeds. If you pay a ransom and your Australian turnover is above A$3 million (about US$2 million), you have 72 hours to report the payment to the government. If you run critical infrastructure, you have 12 hours for an attack that seriously hits availability, and 72 hours for a lesser one. If you are a bank, insurer or superannuation fund, you have 72 hours for a security incident and only 24 hours if a critical service goes down beyond tolerance. For an ordinary personal data breach you get up to 30 days to assess whether it is serious, then you must tell the regulator and the affected people as soon as you practically can. There is no fixed hour count for that last one, which is the part people get wrong.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that will cost you a weekend. First, moving national electronic health record data offshore is a crime, not a fine: up to five years in prison. Second, you never stop owning your supplier's mistakes — a major bank had to get a special ruling from the Privacy Commissioner just to keep processing international money transfers. Third, since December 2025 social media platforms must keep under-16s off the service and then destroy the age-check data they collected. Fourth, Queensland's rule for state government data is stricter than the national one and is hidden in section 33 of the Act, not in the numbered principles — the principle numbered 8 says there is no equivalent. Fifth, the value of a penalty unit rose to A$364 (about US$240) on 1 July 2026, so every fine figure you looked up before then is now understated.High confidence
What's about to change?: One date dominates: 10 December 2026. On that day privacy policies must start explaining computer-made decisions that significantly affect people, and the new Children's Online Privacy Code must be finalised and registered. The draft of that code was out for public comment from 31 March to 5 June 2026. Further out, the tougher critical infrastructure duties made in June 2026 start biting from mid-2027 and mid-2028 as their grace periods run out. Watch three switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — My Health Records Act 2012, section 77

ThailandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch: The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?: Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	AustraliaChecked 18 August 2026	ThailandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Australia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. You may send personal information anywhere, and no destination is banned. The catch is that you stay legally responsible for whatever your overseas supplier does with it. Small businesses under A$3 million turnover are exempt from the main privacy law. Specific industries are far stricter, and one of them carries a prison sentence.	Thailand does not make you keep personal data inside the country, but data cannot leave until you have picked and documented a legal route. The regulator never published a list of approved destination countries, so consent and written safeguards do all the work. A foreign company selling into Thailand needs a named representative living there. Getting it wrong can mean fines, double damages, and in the worst cases jail.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch six areas. National electronic health records may not leave Australia at all, and taking them offshore is a crime punishable by five years in prison. Banks and insurers must tell the banking regulator before any offshore arrangement. Open banking data, critical infrastructure data, Australian Government hosting and Queensland state government data each have their own rules. Check your sector before you believe the headline.	The permissive headline is about residency only. The burden is high and the pain is elsewhere: a person in Thailand who answers for you personally, parental consent for anyone under twenty in many cases, 90-day traffic logs that catch any business offering guest wi-fi, compensation owed even when you were not careless, and a technology-crime regime that forces banks and telecoms companies to hand customer data into a government-run exchange. Payments, government workloads and digital platforms each add their own regulator gate on top.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it reaches you even with no office in Australia. The national privacy law applies to any organisation that carries on business in Australia, whether or not the data is collected or stored here. But Australia has something most countries do not: a real size threshold you can fall below. A business with annual turnover of A$3 million (about US$2 million) or less is generally exempt. That exemption has big holes: it does not apply if you provide a health service, if you buy or sell personal information, or if you supply services under a federal government contract. No local representative and no registration are required.High confidence	Yes. The privacy law reaches a company with no office in Thailand if it offers goods or services to people who are in Thailand, or if it tracks what those people do. Payment is irrelevant — a free service counts. There is no revenue or headcount floor to fall below. A foreign company caught this way must appoint, in writing, a representative who is physically in Thailand and who can be held answerable with no cap on liability.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes. Australia has no national law saying personal data must be kept in the country, and no country is blacklisted. You can pick any cloud region you like. What you cannot do is hand off the risk: if your overseas supplier does something with the data that would break Australian rules, the law treats that as your own breach. The hard walls are industry by industry, and the health one is absolute.High confidence	Yes, in most cases. Thailand does not make companies keep a copy of personal data inside the country. But data cannot simply leave: you must first have a legal route, and the regulator has never published a list of approved destination countries, so the 'this country is safe enough' route is unusable in practice. Everyone falls back on informed consent, contract necessity, approved group-wide rules, or their own written safeguards. Several industries add a second gate on top, described below.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Before data leaves, you must take reasonable steps to make sure the overseas recipient will handle it the Australian way. In practice that means a contract with the right promises in it. There is no government form to file, no approval to wait for, and no list of approved countries to check. A power to approve countries was switched on in December 2024, but as of today the government has not named a single one. The alternative routes are narrow: you can rely on the recipient already being covered by a substantially similar law, or on the person's informed consent after you warn them you will no longer be responsible.High confidence	There is no permission slip to apply for and no banned-country list. You pick a route and document it before the data moves. The routes are: the destination is judged to have good enough protection; one of six statutory exceptions such as informed consent; group-wide rules certified by the regulator; or your own written safeguards that a person in Thailand could actually enforce. The 'good enough country' route is dead on arrival because the regulator has published no approved list, so in practice the safeguards route and consent do all the work.Medium confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. It is staffed, it has a sitting Privacy Commissioner, and it is issuing decisions. In October 2025 the Federal Court ordered a pathology company to pay A$5.8 million (about US$3.8 million), the first court penalty in the law's history. The regulator sued Optus in August 2025, settled with Meta for A$50 million in December 2024, and in June 2026 alone published formal findings against Optus, American Express and two health providers. Banking, cyber security, online safety and open banking each have their own separate regulator, and all of them are working.High confidence	The Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee, usually shortened to PDPC, sits under the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. It is real and staffed: it has a serving Secretary-General, it runs walk-in complaint centres in five provinces and opened another in Ubon Ratchathani on 17 August 2026, and it is executing Cabinet-level instructions on data breaches. Complaints are decided by an Expert Committee that can order you to stop, order you to fix things, and impose fines itself. Other regulators run their own lanes: the cyber-security agency for critical infrastructure, the central bank for payments, and the electronic transactions agency for digital platforms.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a floor and a ceiling and they pull in opposite directions. The clearest floor is telecoms: phone and internet providers must keep call and connection records for two years, and must encrypt them. The general ceiling has no number attached — you must destroy or de-identify personal information once you genuinely no longer need it. Two ceilings are sharp. A social media platform must destroy age-check information as soon as it has finished using it. A digital identity provider must destroy a face or fingerprint scan immediately after the identity check is complete.High confidence	Thailand pushes in both directions at once. The floor: anyone who provides a computer or internet service to other people must keep traffic logs for at least 90 days, and an official can order that stretched to as much as two years. The ceiling: the privacy law makes you build a system that actually deletes personal data once your stated retention period runs out or the data is no longer needed. When the two collide, the keep-it duty wins, because the delete duty has a written carve-out for complying with law and for defending legal claims.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count four clocks, because they run at different speeds. If you pay a ransom and your Australian turnover is above A$3 million (about US$2 million), you have 72 hours to report the payment to the government. If you run critical infrastructure, you have 12 hours for an attack that seriously hits availability, and 72 hours for a lesser one. If you are a bank, insurer or superannuation fund, you have 72 hours for a security incident and only 24 hours if a critical service goes down beyond tolerance. For an ordinary personal data breach you get up to 30 days to assess whether it is serious, then you must tell the regulator and the affected people as soon as you practically can. There is no fixed hour count for that last one, which is the part people get wrong.High confidence	Count three clocks, not one. First: tell the privacy regulator about a personal data breach without delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless the breach carries no risk to people; if the risk to people is high you must also tell the affected individuals, with advice on what to do, without delay. Second: if you run critical information infrastructure, a significant cyber threat must be reported to the national cyber-security agency and to your own sector regulator, and silence without good reason is itself an offence. Third: if you are a bank or a telecoms operator and you suspect technology crime, you must push customer account and transaction data into a shared government-run system immediately.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that will cost you a weekend. First, moving national electronic health record data offshore is a crime, not a fine: up to five years in prison. Second, you never stop owning your supplier's mistakes — a major bank had to get a special ruling from the Privacy Commissioner just to keep processing international money transfers. Third, since December 2025 social media platforms must keep under-16s off the service and then destroy the age-check data they collected. Fourth, Queensland's rule for state government data is stricter than the national one and is hidden in section 33 of the Act, not in the numbered principles — the principle numbered 8 says there is no equivalent. Fifth, the value of a penalty unit rose to A$364 (about US$240) on 1 July 2026, so every fine figure you looked up before then is now understated.High confidence	Five things that are not in the brochure. Children: Thailand needs a parent's consent for a child aged ten or under, and for older teenagers too unless the act is one the law lets a minor do alone — and a person is a minor in Thailand until twenty. Jail is on the table for misusing sensitive data. You owe compensation even if you were not careless, and a court can add up to double on top. A foreign company must put a named human in Thailand with unlimited authority. And the 90-day log rule catches ordinary businesses that just offer guest wi-fi.High confidence
What's about to change?	One date dominates: 10 December 2026. On that day privacy policies must start explaining computer-made decisions that significantly affect people, and the new Children's Online Privacy Code must be finalised and registered. The draft of that code was out for public comment from 31 March to 5 June 2026. Further out, the tougher critical infrastructure duties made in June 2026 start biting from mid-2027 and mid-2028 as their grace periods run out. Watch three switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation.High confidence	Nothing in the next twelve months looks like a new statute. What is moving is enforcement reach. The privacy regulator is opening walk-in centres in eight provinces during 2026 to cover all five regions, which means more complaints will actually get filed. The Cabinet decided on 11 August 2026 to require multi-factor login protection across government to stop leaked passwords turning into data breaches, and the ministry is pushing the same expectation across all twenty ministries. The bigger risk is not new law but switches the government already holds and can flip without warning.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Health and social care — My Health Records Act 2012, section 77	None found.