Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

AustraliaChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Australia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. You may send personal information anywhere, and no destination is banned. The catch is that you stay legally responsible for whatever your overseas supplier does with it. Small businesses under A$3 million turnover are exempt from the main privacy law. Specific industries are far stricter, and one of them carries a prison sentence.
The catch: The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch six areas. National electronic health records may not leave Australia at all, and taking them offshore is a crime punishable by five years in prison. Banks and insurers must tell the banking regulator before any offshore arrangement. Open banking data, critical infrastructure data, Australian Government hosting and Queensland state government data each have their own rules. Check your sector before you believe the headline.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you even with no office in Australia. The national privacy law applies to any organisation that carries on business in Australia, whether or not the data is collected or stored here. But Australia has something most countries do not: a real size threshold you can fall below. A business with annual turnover of A$3 million (about US$2 million) or less is generally exempt. That exemption has big holes: it does not apply if you provide a health service, if you buy or sell personal information, or if you supply services under a federal government contract. No local representative and no registration are required.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: In general, yes. Australia has no national law saying personal data must be kept in the country, and no country is blacklisted. You can pick any cloud region you like. What you cannot do is hand off the risk: if your overseas supplier does something with the data that would break Australian rules, the law treats that as your own breach. The hard walls are industry by industry, and the health one is absolute.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Before data leaves, you must take reasonable steps to make sure the overseas recipient will handle it the Australian way. In practice that means a contract with the right promises in it. There is no government form to file, no approval to wait for, and no list of approved countries to check. A power to approve countries was switched on in December 2024, but as of today the government has not named a single one. The alternative routes are narrow: you can rely on the recipient already being covered by a substantially similar law, or on the person's informed consent after you warn them you will no longer be responsible.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. It is staffed, it has a sitting Privacy Commissioner, and it is issuing decisions. In October 2025 the Federal Court ordered a pathology company to pay A$5.8 million (about US$3.8 million), the first court penalty in the law's history. The regulator sued Optus in August 2025, settled with Meta for A$50 million in December 2024, and in June 2026 alone published formal findings against Optus, American Express and two health providers. Banking, cyber security, online safety and open banking each have their own separate regulator, and all of them are working.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a floor and a ceiling and they pull in opposite directions. The clearest floor is telecoms: phone and internet providers must keep call and connection records for two years, and must encrypt them. The general ceiling has no number attached — you must destroy or de-identify personal information once you genuinely no longer need it. Two ceilings are sharp. A social media platform must destroy age-check information as soon as it has finished using it. A digital identity provider must destroy a face or fingerprint scan immediately after the identity check is complete.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count four clocks, because they run at different speeds. If you pay a ransom and your Australian turnover is above A$3 million (about US$2 million), you have 72 hours to report the payment to the government. If you run critical infrastructure, you have 12 hours for an attack that seriously hits availability, and 72 hours for a lesser one. If you are a bank, insurer or superannuation fund, you have 72 hours for a security incident and only 24 hours if a critical service goes down beyond tolerance. For an ordinary personal data breach you get up to 30 days to assess whether it is serious, then you must tell the regulator and the affected people as soon as you practically can. There is no fixed hour count for that last one, which is the part people get wrong.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that will cost you a weekend. First, moving national electronic health record data offshore is a crime, not a fine: up to five years in prison. Second, you never stop owning your supplier's mistakes — a major bank had to get a special ruling from the Privacy Commissioner just to keep processing international money transfers. Third, since December 2025 social media platforms must keep under-16s off the service and then destroy the age-check data they collected. Fourth, Queensland's rule for state government data is stricter than the national one and is hidden in section 33 of the Act, not in the numbered principles — the principle numbered 8 says there is no equivalent. Fifth, the value of a penalty unit rose to A$364 (about US$240) on 1 July 2026, so every fine figure you looked up before then is now understated.High confidence
What's about to change?: One date dominates: 10 December 2026. On that day privacy policies must start explaining computer-made decisions that significantly affect people, and the new Children's Online Privacy Code must be finalised and registered. The draft of that code was out for public comment from 31 March to 5 June 2026. Further out, the tougher critical infrastructure duties made in June 2026 start biting from mid-2027 and mid-2028 as their grace periods run out. Watch three switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Health and social care — My Health Records Act 2012, section 77

Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026

Depends on your industryWork: MediumEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch: The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?: Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	AustraliaChecked 18 August 2026	Hong Kong SARChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active	Depends on your industry Work: Medium Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Australia has no general rule that data must stay in the country. You may send personal information anywhere, and no destination is banned. The catch is that you stay legally responsible for whatever your overseas supplier does with it. Small businesses under A$3 million turnover are exempt from the main privacy law. Specific industries are far stricter, and one of them carries a prison sentence.	Hong Kong's privacy law contains a cross-border transfer ban that has never been switched on. It was written in 1995 and, thirty years later, still has no start date. So under the general law you can send personal data anywhere with no paperwork at all. The privacy regulator is busy and prosecutes people, but it cannot fine you directly.
The catch	The relaxed headline stops the moment you touch six areas. National electronic health records may not leave Australia at all, and taking them offshore is a crime punishable by five years in prison. Banks and insurers must tell the banking regulator before any offshore arrangement. Open banking data, critical infrastructure data, Australian Government hosting and Queensland state government data each have their own rules. Check your sector before you believe the headline.	The free-for-all stops at three doors. Licensed securities and futures firms need written permission from the markets regulator before their records live only on servers outside Hong Kong. Government departments are told not to put sensitive or personal information on public cloud at all. And data coming the other way, from mainland China into Hong Kong, is tightly controlled by mainland law, not by Hong Kong law - that is the wall most companies actually hit.
Does this apply to me?	Yes, it reaches you even with no office in Australia. The national privacy law applies to any organisation that carries on business in Australia, whether or not the data is collected or stored here. But Australia has something most countries do not: a real size threshold you can fall below. A business with annual turnover of A$3 million (about US$2 million) or less is generally exempt. That exemption has big holes: it does not apply if you provide a health service, if you buy or sell personal information, or if you supply services under a federal government contract. No local representative and no registration are required.High confidence	Yes, it can reach you with no office in Hong Kong. The privacy law bites on whoever controls the collection, holding, use or processing of personal data in or from Hong Kong, so a foreign company running a Hong Kong-facing service is caught. There is no revenue or headcount threshold to fall below, no register to join, and no requirement to appoint a local representative. The anti-doxxing powers go further still: the regulator can order an overseas platform to take material down.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	In general, yes. Australia has no national law saying personal data must be kept in the country, and no country is blacklisted. You can pick any cloud region you like. What you cannot do is hand off the risk: if your overseas supplier does something with the data that would break Australian rules, the law treats that as your own breach. The hard walls are industry by industry, and the health one is absolute.High confidence	Under the general privacy law, yes - freely, with nothing to sign. The one section that would have restricted transfers abroad was written into the law in 1995 and has never been brought into operation, so today there is no legal control on personal data leaving Hong Kong. Industry rules are where the real limits sit, and there are fewer of them than people expect: the securities regulator is the main one, and government departments have their own restriction.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	Before data leaves, you must take reasonable steps to make sure the overseas recipient will handle it the Australian way. In practice that means a contract with the right promises in it. There is no government form to file, no approval to wait for, and no list of approved countries to check. A power to approve countries was switched on in December 2024, but as of today the government has not named a single one. The alternative routes are narrow: you can rely on the recipient already being covered by a substantially similar law, or on the person's informed consent after you warn them you will no longer be responsible.High confidence	Nothing. There is no approval to seek, no standard contract to sign and no government list to check before personal data leaves Hong Kong. The model on paper is an allowlist - the regulator would publish a list of approved destinations - but because the section was never switched on, that list has never been issued and is empty. The regulator does publish a voluntary guide and encourages firms to build the safeguards now, but that is advice, not law.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. It is staffed, it has a sitting Privacy Commissioner, and it is issuing decisions. In October 2025 the Federal Court ordered a pathology company to pay A$5.8 million (about US$3.8 million), the first court penalty in the law's history. The regulator sued Optus in August 2025, settled with Meta for A$50 million in December 2024, and in June 2026 alone published formal findings against Optus, American Express and two health providers. Banking, cyber security, online safety and open banking each have their own separate regulator, and all of them are working.High confidence	The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, and it is genuinely busy. By the end of December 2025 it had issued 2,104 orders to 57 online platforms to take down 33,743 doxxing messages, opened 519 criminal investigations and arrested 81 people. But there is a catch that changes the risk picture completely: the Commissioner cannot impose a fine for breaking the privacy principles. It serves a notice telling you to fix the problem, and only ignoring that notice is a crime.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	There is a floor and a ceiling and they pull in opposite directions. The clearest floor is telecoms: phone and internet providers must keep call and connection records for two years, and must encrypt them. The general ceiling has no number attached — you must destroy or de-identify personal information once you genuinely no longer need it. Two ceilings are sharp. A social media platform must destroy age-check information as soon as it has finished using it. A digital identity provider must destroy a face or fingerprint scan immediately after the identity check is complete.High confidence	There is a hard ceiling and almost no floor in the privacy law itself. You must erase personal data once it is no longer needed for the purpose you collected it for, and failing to do so is a criminal offence carrying a fine of up to HK$10,000 (about $1,300). The privacy law sets no minimum keeping periods; those come from tax, company and anti-money-laundering law instead. Where the two pull against each other, the specific keeping duty in the other law wins, and you delete once it expires.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count four clocks, because they run at different speeds. If you pay a ransom and your Australian turnover is above A$3 million (about US$2 million), you have 72 hours to report the payment to the government. If you run critical infrastructure, you have 12 hours for an attack that seriously hits availability, and 72 hours for a lesser one. If you are a bank, insurer or superannuation fund, you have 72 hours for a security incident and only 24 hours if a critical service goes down beyond tolerance. For an ordinary personal data breach you get up to 30 days to assess whether it is serious, then you must tell the regulator and the affected people as soon as you practically can. There is no fixed hour count for that last one, which is the part people get wrong.High confidence	For a normal data breach there is no deadline, because there is no duty. Telling the Privacy Commissioner about a breach is voluntary in Hong Kong - the regulator asks you to do it as good practice and gives you a form, but no law compels it. That is unusual and it is changing: since 1 January 2026 operators of designated critical infrastructure must report computer-system security incidents, so those firms now have a real clock while everyone else has none.High confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that will cost you a weekend. First, moving national electronic health record data offshore is a crime, not a fine: up to five years in prison. Second, you never stop owning your supplier's mistakes — a major bank had to get a special ruling from the Privacy Commissioner just to keep processing international money transfers. Third, since December 2025 social media platforms must keep under-16s off the service and then destroy the age-check data they collected. Fourth, Queensland's rule for state government data is stricter than the national one and is hidden in section 33 of the Act, not in the numbered principles — the principle numbered 8 says there is no equivalent. Fifth, the value of a penalty unit rose to A$364 (about US$240) on 1 July 2026, so every fine figure you looked up before then is now understated.High confidence	Five things that catch people out. First, marketing mistakes are crimes here, not fines - using someone's data for direct marketing without the right consent can mean five years in prison. Second, the regulator cannot fine you, so people assume the risk is low and miss the criminal exposure entirely. Third, Hong Kong sets no age at which a child can consent, so there is no simple number to code into a sign-up flow. Fourth, licensed securities firms need written permission before their records live only on overseas servers, and two named people who live in Hong Kong must be able to unlock them. Fifth, the dormant transfer section, if ever switched on, would also catch data moving between two foreign countries when a Hong Kong company controls it.Medium confidence
What's about to change?	One date dominates: 10 December 2026. On that day privacy policies must start explaining computer-made decisions that significantly affect people, and the new Children's Online Privacy Code must be finalised and registered. The draft of that code was out for public comment from 31 March to 5 June 2026. Further out, the tougher critical infrastructure duties made in June 2026 start biting from mid-2027 and mid-2028 as their grace periods run out. Watch three switches the government already holds and can flip with no consultation.High confidence	Nothing is scheduled to land in the next twelve months that we could confirm. The critical infrastructure security law already started on 1 January 2026, and the government's guideline for generative artificial intelligence was revised in December 2025. The thing to watch is not a new bill. It is a switch the government has held for thirty years: the cross-border transfer section can be brought into force by a simple commencement notice, with no consultation and no new vote.Medium confidence
Hardest industry wall	Health and social care — My Health Records Act 2012, section 77	None found.